Notice2026-10526

Stationary and Portable Air Compressors From the People's Republic of China, Malaysia, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 27, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31425-31429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-10526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-233, C-557-837, C-552-857]


Stationary and Portable Air Compressors From the People's 
Republic of China, Malaysia, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 
Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Applicable May 20, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hall-Eastman and Maria Teresa 
Aymerich at (202) 482-6467 and (202) 482-0499, respectively, (the 
People's Republic of China (China)), Ted Pearson at (202) 482-2631 
(Malaysia), and Henry Wolfe at (202) 482-0574 (the Socialist Republic 
of Vietnam (Vietnam)), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Petitions

    On April 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
received countervailing duty (CVD) petitions concerning imports of 
stationary and portable air compressors (air compressors) from China, 
Malaysia, and Vietnam, filed in proper form on behalf of MAT 
Industries, LLC (the petitioner), a domestic producer of air 
compressors.\1\ The CVD Petitions were accompanied by antidumping duty 
(AD) petitions concerning imports of air compressors from China, 
Malaysia, and Vietnam.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated April 30, 2026 
(Petitions).
    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Between May 4 and 14, 2026, Commerce requested supplemental 
information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petitions in 
supplemental questionnaires.\3\ Between May 8 and 18, 2026, the 
petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for additional 
information.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated 
May 4, 2026 (Malaysia CVD Supplemental Questionnaire); 
``Supplemental Questions,'' dated May 5, 2026 (First Vietnam CVD 
Supplemental Questionnaire); ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated May 
6, 2026 (First General Issues Questionnaire); ``Supplemental 
Questions,'' dated May 8, 2026 (China CVD Supplemental 
Questionnaire); ``Second Supplemental Questions,'' dated May 13, 
2026 (Second Vietnam CVD Supplemental Questionnaire); see also 
Memorandum, ``Teleconference with Counsel to the Petitioner,'' dated 
May 14, 2026; and Memorandum, ``Teleconference with Counsel to the 
Petitioner,'' dated May 19, 2026 (Third General Issues 
Questionnaire).
    \4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Response to the Supplemental 
Questions Regarding Volume VII,'' dated May 8, 2026 (First Vietnam 
CVD Supplement); ``Response to the General Issues Supplemental 
Questions,'' dated May 11, 2026 (First General Issues Supplement); 
``Response to the Supplemental Questions Regarding Volume VI,'' 
dated May 11, 2026 (Malaysia CVD Supplement); ``Response to the 
Supplemental Questions Regarding Volume V,'' dated May 13, 2026 
(China CVD Supplement); ``Response to the Second Supplemental 
Questionnaire Regarding Volume VII,'' dated May 15, 2026 (Second 
Vietnam CVD Supplement); ``Response to the Second Supplemental 
Questionnaire Regarding Volume I,'' dated May 18, 2026 (Second 
General Issues Supplement); and ``Response to the Third Supplemental 
Questionnaire Regarding Volume I,'' dated May 20, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of China 
(GOC), the Government of Malaysia (GOM), and the Government of Vietnam 
(GOV) are providing countervailable subsidies, within the meaning of 
sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of air compressors in 
the respective countries and that such imports are materially injuring, 
or threatening material injury to, the domestic industry producing air

[[Page 31426]]

compressors in the United States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we 
are initiating CVD investigations, the Petitions were accompanied by 
information reasonably available to the petitioner supporting its 
allegations.
    Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petitions on behalf of 
the domestic industry, because the petitioner is an interested party, 
as defined in sections 771(9)(C) of the Act. Commerce also finds that 
the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to 
the initiation of the requested CVD investigations.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the 
Petitions,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Periods of Investigation (POI)

    Because the Petitions were filed on April 30, 2026, the POI for 
each of the CVD investigations is January 1, 2025, through December 31, 
2025.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The products covered by these investigations are air compressors 
from China, Malaysia, and Vietnam. For a full description of the scope 
of these investigations, see the appendix to this notice.

Comments on the Scope of the Investigations

    Between May 6 and 19, 2026, Commerce requested information and 
clarification from the petitioner regarding the proposed scope to 
ensure that the scope language in the Petitions is an accurate 
reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is seeking 
relief.\7\ Between May 11 and 20, 2026, the petitioner provided 
clarifications and revised the scope.\8\ The description of merchandise 
covered by these investigations, as described in the appendix to this 
notice, reflects these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See First General Issues Questionnaire; see also Second 
General Issues Questionnaire; and Third General Issues 
Questionnaire.
    \8\ See First General Issues Supplement at 2-8; see also Second 
General Issues Supplement at 1-4; and Third General Issues 
Supplement at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are 
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding 
product coverage (i.e., scope).\9\ Commerce will consider all scope 
comments received from interested parties and, if necessary, will 
consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the 
preliminary determinations. If scope comments include factual 
information, all such factual information should be limited to public 
information.\10\ Commerce requests that interested parties provide at 
the beginning of their scope comments a public executive summary for 
each comment or issue raised in their submission. Commerce further 
requests that interested parties limit their public executive summary 
of each comment or issue to no more than 450 words, not including 
citations. Commerce intends to use the public executive summaries as 
the basis of the comment summaries included in the analysis of scope 
comments. To facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce 
requests that scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 
(ET) on June 9, 2026, which is 20 calendar days from the signature date 
of this notice. Any rebuttal comments, which may include factual 
information, and should also be limited to public information, must be 
filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on June 22, 2026, which is the next business day 
after 10 calendar days from the initial comment deadline.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble); see also 19 CFR 
351.312.
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual 
information'').
    \11\ The deadline for scope rebuttal comments falls on June 19, 
2026, which is a federal holiday. Commerce's practice dictates that 
where a deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the 
appropriate deadline is the next business day (in this instance, 
June 22, 2026). See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1) (``For both electronically 
filed and manually filed documents, if the applicable due date falls 
on a non-business day, the Secretary will accept documents that are 
filed on the next business day.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce requests that any factual information that parties 
consider relevant to the scope of this investigation be submitted 
during that period. However, if a party subsequently finds that 
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the 
investigation may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and 
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope 
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent 
AD and CVD investigations.

Filing Requirements

    All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception 
applies.\12\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and 
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing 
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS 
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help">https://access.trade.gov/help</a> and a handbook can be 
found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/ACCESSHandbookonElectronicFilingProcedures_March2026.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/ACCESSHandbookonElectronicFilingProcedures_March2026.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations

    Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce 
notified the GOC, GOM, and GOV of the receipt of the Petitions and 
provided an opportunity for consultations with respect to the 
Petitions.\13\ Commerce held consultations with the GOM on May 18, 
2026.\14\ The GOC and GOV did not request consultations.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultations to 
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated April 9, 2026.
    \14\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of 
Malaysia,'' dated May 18, 2026; see also GOM's Letter, ``The 
Government of Malaysia's Statement for the Consultations on the 
Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated May 19, 2026.
    \15\ See GOC's Letter, ``Comments on CVD Petition,'' dated May 
15, 2026; see also GOC's Letter, ``Comments on CVD Petition: Alleged 
Transnational Subsidy Programs,'' dated May 15, 2026; and GOV's 
Letter, ``Comments on Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated May 18, 
2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions

    Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic 
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least 
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and 
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like 
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support 
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of 
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of 
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i) 
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if 
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or 
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling 
method to poll the ``industry.''
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine 
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute 
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the 
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), 
which is

[[Page 31427]]

responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has been 
injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like product 
in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the ITC apply 
the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like product,\16\ 
they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a separate and 
distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination is subject to 
limitations of time and information. Although this may result in 
different definitions of the like product, such differences do not 
render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
    \17\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F.Supp.2d 1, 8 (CIT 
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.Supp. 
639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United 
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
petition).
    With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not 
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope 
of the investigations.\18\ Based on our analysis of the information 
submitted on the record, we have determined that air compressors, as 
defined in the scope, constitute a single domestic like product, and we 
have analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like 
product.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as 
applied to these cases and information regarding industry support, 
see Checklists, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation 
Checklists: Stationary and Portable Air Compressors from the 
People's Republic of China, Malaysia, and the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice (Country-Specific CVD Initiation Checklists), at Attachment 
II, Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Stationary and Portable Air 
Compressors from the People's Republic of China, Malaysia, and the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Attachment II). These checklists are 
on file electronically via ACCESS.
    \19\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the Country-
Specific CVD Initiation Checklists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In determining whether the petitioner has standing under section 
732(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data 
contained in the Petitions with reference to the domestic like product 
as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in the appendix to 
this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioner provided its 
own shipments of air compressors in 2025 and compared this to the 
estimated total shipments of the domestic like product for the entire 
domestic industry.\20\ Because total production data for the domestic 
like product for 2025 are not reasonably available to the petitioner, 
and the petitioner has established that shipments are a reasonable 
proxy for production data,\21\ we relied on data provided by the 
petitioner for purposes of measuring industry support.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Id.
    \21\ Id.
    \22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our review of the data provided in the Petitions, the First General 
Issues Supplement, the Second General Issues Supplement, the Third 
General Issues Supplement, and other information readily available to 
Commerce indicates that the petitioner has established industry support 
for the Petitions.\23\ First, the Petitions established support from 
domestic producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product and, as such, 
Commerce is not required to take further action in order to evaluate 
industry support (e.g., polling).\24\ Second, the domestic producers 
(or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry support under 
section 702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the domestic producers (or 
workers) who support the Petitions account for at least 25 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product.\25\ Finally, the 
domestic producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for 
industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the 
domestic producers (or workers) who support the Petition account for 
more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product 
produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for, or 
opposition to, the Petitions.\26\ Accordingly, Commerce determines that 
the Petitions were filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the 
meaning of section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Id.
    \24\ Id.; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
    \25\ See Attachment II of Country-Specific CVD Initiation 
Checklists.
    \26\ Id.
    \27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Injury Test

    Because China, Malaysia, and Vietnam are ``Subsidies Agreement 
Countries'' within the meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 
701(a)(2) of the Act applies to these investigations. Accordingly, the 
ITC must determine whether imports of the subject merchandise from 
China, Malaysia, and Vietnam materially injure, or threaten material 
injury to, a U.S. industry.

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are 
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are 
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry 
producing the domestic like product.
    The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is 
illustrated by a significant increase in the volume of subject imports; 
reduced market share; underselling and price depression and 
suppression; lost sales and revenues; decline in U.S. shipments and a 
U.S. producer ceasing production; negative impact on financial 
performance; and negative impact on investment in automation and 
technology.\28\ We assessed the allegations and supporting evidence 
regarding material injury, threat of material injury, causation, as 
well as negligibility, and we have determined that these allegations 
are properly supported by adequate evidence, and meet the statutory 
requirements for initiation.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Id.
    \29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initiation of CVD Investigations

    Based upon the examination of the Petitions and supplemental 
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of 
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating CVD investigations to determine 
whether imports of air compressors from China, Malaysia, and Vietnam 
benefit from countervailable subsidies conferred by the GOC, GOM, and 
GOV. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our preliminary 
determinations no later than 65 days after the date of this initiation.

China

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 39 programs 
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the China CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

[[Page 31428]]

Malaysia

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 23 programs 
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the Malaysia CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

Vietnam

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 43 programs 
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the Vietnam CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

Respondent Selection

    In the Petitions, the petitioner identified over 300 companies in 
China, five companies in Malaysia and 12 companies in Vietnam as 
producers/exporters of air compressors.\30\ Commerce intends to follow 
its standard practice in CVD investigations and calculate company-
specific subsidy rates in these investigations. In the event that 
Commerce determines that the number of companies is large and it cannot 
individually examine each company based on Commerce's resources, 
Commerce intends to select mandatory respondents based on quantity and 
value (Q&V) questionnaires issued to the potential respondents. 
Commerce normally selects mandatory respondents in CVD investigations 
using U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry data for U.S. 
imports under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS) subheading(s) listed in the ``Scope of the 
Investigation'' in the appendix. However, for these investigations, one 
of the main HTSUS subheadings under which the subject merchandise would 
enter (HTSUS 8414.80.1685) is a basket category under which non-subject 
merchandise may also enter. Therefore, we cannot rely on CBP entry data 
in selecting respondents. Notwithstanding the decision to rely on Q&V 
questionnaires for respondent selection, due to the large number of 
Chinese producers and/or exporters identified in the Petition, Commerce 
has determined to limit the number of Q&V questionnaires that it will 
issue to Chinese producers and/or exporters based on CBP data for air 
compressors from China during the POI under the appropriate HTSUS 
subheadings listed in the ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in the 
appendix.\31\ Accordingly, for China, Commerce will issue Q&V 
questionnaires to the largest producers and/or exporters that are 
identified in the CBP entry data for which there is complete address 
information on the record. For Malaysia and Vietnam, we intend to issue 
Q&V questionnaires to each potential respondent for which there is 
complete address information on the record.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Petitions at Volume I (Exhibit 11); see also First 
General Issues Supplement at Exhibit GI-SUPP-1; and Second General 
Issues Supplement at Exhibit GI-SUPP2-1.
    \31\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection Entry Data,'' dated May 19, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce will post the Q&V questionnaires along with filing 
instructions on Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/ec-adcvd-case-announcements">https://www.trade.gov/ec-adcvd-case-announcements</a>. Producers/exporters of air compressors from China, 
Malaysia, and Vietnam that do not receive Q&V questionnaires may still 
submit a response to the Q&V questionnaire and can obtain a copy of the 
Q&V questionnaire from Commerce's website. Responses to the Q&V 
questionnaire must be submitted by the relevant producers/exporters no 
later than 5:00 p.m. ET on June 3, 2026, which is two weeks from the 
signature date of this notice. All Q&V questionnaire responses must be 
filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must 
be received successfully, in its entirety, by ACCESS no later than 5:00 
p.m. ET on the deadline noted above.
    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective order (APO) in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may be found on 
Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders">https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders</a>.

Distribution of a Copy of the Petitions

    In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petitions have been 
provided to the GOC, GOM, and GOV via ACCESS. To the extent 
practicable, we will attempt to provide a copy of the public version of 
the Petitions to each exporter named in the Petitions, as provided 
under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).

ITC Notification

    Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by 
section 702(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determination by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date 
on which the Petitions were filed, whether there is a reasonable 
indication that imports of air compressors from China, Malaysia, and/or 
Vietnam are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, a 
U.S. industry.\32\ A negative ITC determination for any country will 
result in the investigation being terminated with respect to that 
country.\33\ Otherwise, these CVD investigations will proceed according 
to statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
    \33\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submission of Factual Information

    Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) 
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence 
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available 
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or 
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); 
(iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other 
than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of 
Commerce's regulations requires any party, when submitting factual 
information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) 
the information is being submitted \34\ and, if the information is 
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on 
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information 
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, 
clarify, or correct.\35\ Time limits for the submission of factual 
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific 
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. 
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting 
factual information in these investigations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
    \35\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extensions of Time Limits

    Parties may request an extension of time limits before the 
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as 
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will 
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time

[[Page 31429]]

limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by 
Commerce.\36\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties 
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it 
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain 
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by 
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions 
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we 
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline 
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed 
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a 
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will 
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where 
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances 
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the 
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to 
submitting factual information in these investigations.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
    \37\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits; 
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final 
Rule), available at <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certification Requirements

    Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding 
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\38\ 
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 
351.303(g).\39\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the 
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
    \39\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import 
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also 
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 
<a href="https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf">https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate 
in these investigations should ensure that they meet the requirements 
of 19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of 
appearance). Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements 
pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other 
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and 
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).

    Dated: May 20, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigations

    The merchandise covered by these investigations consists of 
certain stationary and portable air compressors, whether electric, 
gas, or battery powered, including electric motor and gasoline 
engine powered air compressors with either oil free or oil 
lubricated reciprocating pumps, and with an integrated pressure 
vessel that ranges in size from 1 to 80 gallons. The compressors may 
be either direct drive or belt driven.
    Direct drive air compressors included in the scope have a motor 
connected directly to the compressor element. Belt driven air 
compressors included in the scope have a motor connected to the 
compressor crankshaft with a belt. Direct drive air compressors are 
more often portable but can be stationary, while belt driven air 
compressors are either portable or stationary.
    Covered air compressors have a power level designation between 
373 watts (0.5 HP) and 22.37 kilowatts (30 HP). Specifically, 
portable air compressors often range in power from 0.5HP (373 watts) 
to 15HP (11.19KW). Reciprocating stationary air compressors range in 
power from 0.5HP (373 watts) to 25HP (18.64KW). However, a portable 
or stationary air compressor with a different power level, within 
the range of 373 watts to 22.37 KW, and otherwise meeting the 
language of the scope, is covered by the scope. The scope includes 
only certain reciprocating (piston) compressors, which use a piston 
moving back and forth in a cylinder to compress the air. The scope 
also includes unfinished compressors exported from the subject 
countries. Subject merchandise also includes finished and unfinished 
compressors that are further processed in a third country or in the 
United States, including, but not limited to, assembly or any other 
processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the 
scope of these investigations if performed in the country of 
manufacture of the in-scope air compressors. The additional parts 
used to complete ``unfinished compressors'' in a third country are 
subject to the scope of these investigations.
    For the purposes of this scope, ``unfinished compressors'' are 
compressors which require additional fabrication such as labeling, 
and packaging, and kitting operations adding accessories.
    Specifically included in the scope are compressors which are 
imported as part of a package with accessories or other products, or 
kit. Such accessories include but are not limited to hoses, 
fittings, tool kits, oils, nail guns, pneumatic paint sprayers, air 
ratchet wrenches, air grease guns, air drills, air hammers, air 
sanders, air inflators, and air impact drivers. If such accessories 
or other products are imported separately from the air compressor, 
such products are not subject to the scope of these investigations.
    Specifically excluded from the scope are AC, DC, and battery 
powered inflators without an integrated air tank or air reservoir 
that have an output of 1 CFM or less.
    The scope excludes rotary compressors. Types of rotary 
compressors excluded from the scope are rotary screw, rotary vane, 
and scroll compressors. The scope also excludes dynamic compressors. 
Types of dynamic compressors excluded from the scope are centrifugal 
compressors and axial compressors, where rotating impellers or 
blades compress air.
    The in-scope stationary air compressors are classified under 
subheadings 8414.80.1615, 8414.80.1625, and 8414.80.1635 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The in-
scope portable air compressors are classified under subheading 
8414.80.1685 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 
description of the covered merchandise is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2026-10526 Filed 5-26-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 27, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.