Proposed Rule2026-10376

Regulation A: Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 26, 2026

Issuing agencies

Federal Reserve System

Abstract

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) proposes to amend its Regulation A (Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks) to specify that a holder of a proposed special-purpose payment account (a Payment Account) would not be eligible for access to discount window credit made available by the Federal Reserve Banks (Reserve Banks). The proposal would change neither the existing programs under which the Reserve Banks generally provide discount window credit (primary credit, secondary credit, and seasonal credit) nor the process for establishing the primary credit, secondary credit, and seasonal credit rates.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30498-30503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-10376]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 201

[Docket No. R-1892]
RIN 7100-AH24


Regulation A: Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) 
proposes to amend its Regulation A (Extensions of Credit by Federal 
Reserve Banks) to specify that a holder of a proposed special-purpose 
payment account (a Payment Account) would not be eligible for access to 
discount window credit made available by the Federal Reserve Banks 
(Reserve Banks). The proposal would change neither the existing 
programs under which the Reserve Banks generally provide discount 
window credit (primary credit, secondary credit, and seasonal credit) 
nor the process for establishing the primary credit, secondary credit, 
and seasonal credit rates.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 27, 2026.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. R-1892 and 
RIN 7100-AH24, by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Agency Website: <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/">https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/</a>. Follow the instructions for submitting comments, including 
attachments. Preferred Method.
    <bullet> Mail: Benjamin W. McDonough, Secretary, Board of Governors 
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and

[[Page 30499]]

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mailing address.
    <bullet> Other Means: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4d4d1c6c8cdc7c7cbc9c9c1cad0d7e4c2d6c68ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f78782959b9e9494989a9a92998384b7918595d9909881">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. You must include the 
docket number in the subject line of the message.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available on the Board's website at 
<a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/">https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/</a> without change and will 
not be modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would be not appropriate for public disclosure. Public comments 
may also be viewed electronically or in person in Room M-4365A, 2001 C 
St. NW, Washington, DC 20551, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. during Federal 
business weekdays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin Snodgrass, Special Counsel 
(202-263-4877), Legal Division, or Lyle Kumasaka, Lead Financial 
Institution and Policy Analyst (202-452-2382), Division of Monetary 
Affairs. For users of TTY-TRS, please call 711 from any telephone, 
anywhere in the United States or (202) 263-4869.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Overview

    As described elsewhere in today's Federal Register, the Board is 
requesting comment on proposed updates to (1) the Federal Reserve's 
Policy on Payment System Risk (PSR Policy) and (2) the Board's 
guidelines for Reserve Banks to utilize in evaluating requests for 
access to Reserve Bank accounts and services (the Account Access 
Guidelines), to accommodate Payment Accounts. That request for comment 
(the Payment Account Notice) follows a request for information (RFI) 
previously published by the Board.\1\ The Payment Account would be a 
new, optional way for institutions to request access to accounts and 
services. As proposed in the Payment Account Notice, the Payment 
Account would have a standard set of risk-mitigating terms designed to 
create a lower residual risk profile than a master account.\2\ The 
Board explains in the Payment Account Notice that the terms of the 
proposed Payment Account would permit a more streamlined review of 
requests for such accounts.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 90 FR 60096 (Dec. 23, 2025).
    \2\ As used in this notice of proposed rulemaking, the phrase 
``Payment Account terms'' (and similar phrases) refers to the 
standard set of parameters of the Payment Account as proposed by the 
Board in proposed revisions to Regulation A, Regulation D, the 
Account Access Guidelines, and the PSR Policy and as would be 
implemented by the Reserve Banks through their Operating Circulars 
and other agreements.
    \3\ Proposed revisions to the PSR Policy would provide that an 
institution generally may only maintain one account with a Reserve 
Bank, either a Payment Account or a master account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR), the Board proposes to 
amend Regulation A to specify that a holder of a Payment Account would 
not be eligible for discount window credit. The proposed amendments 
complement the proposed risk-mitigating terms for Payment Accounts that 
are described more fully in the Payment Account Notice. This 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION comprises six parts. Section I provides a 
high-level overview of the proposal. Section II discusses the RFI and 
summarizes comments on the RFI germane to this NPR. Section III 
provides statutory and regulatory background. Section IV discusses the 
rationale for the proposal and describes the revisions the Board 
proposes to make to Regulation A. Section V solicits feedback on the 
proposal broadly and on questions regarding specific aspects of the 
proposal. Section VI addresses several administrative law matters.

II. Payment Account RFI and Comments Received

    The RFI, published in the Federal Register on December 23, 2025, 
sought public input on a prototype Payment Account and potential 
updates to the Account Access Guidelines. The prototype Payment Account 
described in the RFI would be designed for the purpose of clearing and 
settling the Payment Account holder's payment activity. The Board 
explained that Payment Accounts would have a standard set of risk-
mitigating terms, including that an institution holding a Payment 
Account would not be permitted to access intraday or discount window 
credit from Reserve Banks. The Board noted in the RFI that limiting 
access to Reserve Bank credit would reduce the risk that a Payment 
Account holder could pose to a Reserve Bank.\4\ The Board invited 
comments on all aspects of the RFI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Id. at 60098.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board received 72 comments on the RFI. Commenters discussing 
the discount window included trade associations representing commercial 
banks and money transmitters, non-traditional institutions, a nonprofit 
organization, and others.
    A majority of these commenters supported the Board's proposal not 
to permit Payment Account holders to access discount window credit as 
part of the standard set of terms for Payment Accounts. These 
commenters cited several reasons. One commenter argued that not 
providing discount window access to Payment Account holders would 
mitigate moral hazard concerns. The commenter stated that access to the 
discount window might create expectations of government support and 
encourage excessive risk taking. Commenters also addressed the discount 
window as a tool of monetary policy and systemic liquidity support. 
They asserted that the discount window should be available only to 
full-service depository institutions subject to a full complement of 
prudential standards, capital and liquidity oversight, and supervisory 
expectations. Commenters also noted that not permitting discount window 
access to Payment Account holders would mitigate risk to Reserve Banks.
    Among commenters that discussed the discount window, a minority 
expressed support for discount window access. A number of commenters 
suggested that the Board consider some discount window access in 
unusual or exigent circumstances, including to mitigate the effects of 
operational incidents and significant stablecoin redemptions. Another 
commenter, while not necessarily advocating for discount window access, 
noted that a prefunding model coupled with prohibitions on daylight 
overdrafts and lack of access to discount window credit could constrain 
money creation and limit Payment Accounts to fully funded payments.

III. Statutory and Regulatory Background

    The discount window plays an important role in supporting the 
liquidity and stability of the banking system and the effective 
implementation of monetary policy. By providing ready access to 
funding, the discount window helps depository institutions manage their 
liquidity risks efficiently and avoid actions that have negative 
consequences for their customers, such as withdrawing credit during 
times of market stress. Thus, the discount window supports the smooth 
flow of credit to households and businesses. Providing liquidity in 
this way is one of the original purposes of the Federal Reserve System. 
The statutory framework for the discount window is set forth in the 
Federal Reserve Act

[[Page 30500]]

(FRA), and general policies that govern discount window lending are set 
forth in Regulation A. The twelve Reserve Banks administer the discount 
window within this framework.
    Several sections of the FRA authorize Reserve Banks to extend 
credit to member banks, depository institutions, and branches and 
agencies of foreign banks. Reserve Banks generally extend credit 
pursuant to sections 10B, 13(14), and 19(b)(7) of the FRA. Section 10B 
of the FRA provides that any Reserve Bank, under rules and regulations 
prescribed by the Board, may make advances to any member bank on its 
time or demand notes, subject to certain maturity limitations, and 
which are secured to the satisfaction of the Reserve Bank.\5\ Section 
13(14) of the FRA provides that, subject to such restrictions, 
limitations, and regulations as may be imposed by the Board, each 
Reserve Bank may discount paper endorsed by and make advances to any 
branch or agency of a foreign bank in the same manner and to the same 
extent that the Reserve Bank may exercise such powers with respect to a 
member bank, if the branch or agency is maintaining reserves with the 
Reserve Bank pursuant to section 7 of the International Banking Act of 
1978 (codified at 12 U.S.C. 3105).\6\ Section 19(b)(7) of the FRA 
provides that any ``depository institution'' in which transaction 
accounts or nonpersonal time deposits are held shall be entitled to the 
same discount and borrowing privileges as member banks.\7\ Certain 
other provisions of the FRA authorize Reserve Banks to extend credit 
through discounts and advances to depository institutions, such as 
sections 13(2) and 13(8) of the FRA.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 12 U.S.C. 347b(a). In addition, FRA section 4(8) provides 
that a Reserve Bank may, subject to the provisions of law and the 
orders of the Board, extend to each member bank such discounts, 
advancements, and accommodations as may be safely and reasonably 
made with due regard for the claims and demands of other member 
banks, the maintenance of sound credit conditions, and the 
accommodation of commerce, industry, and agriculture. The Board of 
Governors may prescribe regulations further defining within the 
limitations of the FRA the conditions under which discounts, 
advancements, and the accommodations may be extended to member 
banks. 12 U.S.C. 301.
    \6\ 12 U.S.C. 347d.
    \7\ 12 U.S.C. 461(b)(7). The term ``depository institution'' is 
defined in FRA Sec.  19(b)(2). 12 U.S.C. 461(b)(2).
    \8\ See, e.g., 12 U.S.C. 343 and 347.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board's Regulation A (12 CFR part 201) provides that the 
Federal Reserve System extends credit with due regard to the basic 
objectives of monetary policy and the maintenance of a sound and 
orderly financial system.\9\ It establishes rules under which a Reserve 
Bank may extend credit to depository institutions and, as provided in 
Sec.  201.1(b), U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks that are 
subject to reserve requirements under the Board's Regulation D (12 CFR 
part 204). Section 201.2 of Regulation A defines certain terms, 
including the term ``depository institution.'' To qualify as a 
depository institution for purposes of Regulation A, an institution 
must maintain reservable transaction accounts or nonpersonal time 
deposits.\10\ The term ``depository institution'' excludes bankers' 
banks and corporate credit unions that are not required to maintain 
reserves under Sec.  204.1(c)(4) of Regulation D.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 12 CFR 201.1(b).
    \10\ In addition, an institution must be (i) an insured bank as 
defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) 
(12 U.S.C. 1813(h)) or a bank that is eligible to make application 
to become an insured bank under section 5 of such act (12 U.S.C. 
1815); (ii) a mutual savings bank as defined in section 3 of the FDI 
Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(f)) or a bank that is eligible to make 
application to become an insured bank under section 5 of such act 
(12 U.S.C. 1815); (iii) a savings bank as defined in section 3 of 
the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(g)) or a bank that is eligible to make 
application to become an insured bank under section 5 of such act 
(12 U.S.C. 1815); (iv) an insured credit union as defined in section 
101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752(7)) or a credit 
union that is eligible to make application to become an insured 
credit union pursuant to section 201 of such act (12 U.S.C. 1781); 
(v) a member as defined in section 2 of the Federal Home Loan Bank 
Act (12 U.S.C. 1422(4)); or (vi) a savings association as defined in 
section 3 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(b)) that is an insured 
depository institution as defined in section 3 of the act (12 U.S.C. 
1813(c)(2)) or is eligible to apply to become an insured depository 
institution under section 5 of the act (12 U.S.C. 15(a)).
    \11\ See 12 CFR 201.2(c)(2). Hereafter, unless the context 
otherwise requires, references to ``depository institution'' should 
be read to include branches and agencies of foreign banks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 201.3 of Regulation A sets forth general provisions for 
extensions of credit by Reserve Banks. As provided in Sec.  
201.3(a)(1), a Reserve Bank may lend to a depository institution either 
by making an advance secured by acceptable collateral under Sec.  201.4 
or by discounting certain types of paper, but a Reserve Bank generally 
extends credit by making an advance. Section 201.3(a)(2) provides that 
an advance made to a depository institution must be secured to the 
satisfaction of the Reserve Bank making the advance and sets forth a 
non-exclusive list of asset types that are satisfactory collateral. 
Section 201.3(a)(3) addresses use of discounts in lieu of advances. 
Section 201.3(b) states that no person or entity is entitled to obtain 
any credit or any increase, renewal, or extension of maturity of any 
credit from a Reserve Bank. Section 201.3(c) prescribes certain 
information requirements related to discount window credit. Finally, 
Sec.  201.3(d) pertains to indirect credit obtained by one depository 
institution as an agent or medium for another depository institution. 
Section 201.4(a) through (c) of Regulation A sets forth the three 
discount window programs under which the Reserve Banks extend credit.

IV. Proposed Revisions

    The Board proposes to amend Sec.  201.2 and Sec.  201.3 of 
Regulation A to define the term ``payment account'' and to specify that 
a Payment Account holder is not eligible for access to discount window 
credit from the Reserve Banks.

A. Rationale for Proposed Revisions

    As explained in the Payment Account Notice, the Board has continued 
to monitor developments in the payments ecosystem since the Board 
issued the Account Access Guidelines, including the development of new 
financial products and technologies. Since then, the types of 
institutions seeking accounts and services have continued to evolve. 
Several institutions focused on payments innovation have explained that 
they are interested in direct access to accounts and services, as 
opposed to having to rely on third-party intermediaries to access 
services, to reduce costs to their customers and reduce risks while 
increasing payment processing speed. The Board is proposing to create a 
Payment Account as a new, optional way for institutions to request 
access to accounts and services to support private-sector payments 
innovation while prudently managing the risks identified in the Account 
Access Guidelines. As part of the standard set of risk-mitigating terms 
applicable to Payment Accounts, the Board proposes not to permit 
discount window access for Payment Account holders.
    The Board believes that not permitting discount window access for 
Payment Account holders would mitigate risk to the Reserve Banks (and 
by extension to the American public) in a consistent and transparent 
manner across different types of Payment Account holders with novel and 
diverse business models and risk profiles.\12\ The Board anticipates 
that Payment Account holders generally would not be federally insured 
(that is, they would be Tier 2 or Tier 3 institutions under the Account 
Access Guidelines), and, as noted in the Payment Account Notice, Tier 2 
and

[[Page 30501]]

Tier 3 institutions may present greater risk than federally insured 
institutions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The FRA requires the Reserve Banks to remit excess earnings 
to the U.S. Treasury after providing for operating costs, payments 
of dividends, and an amount necessary to maintain surplus. 12 U.S.C. 
289(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, different Payment Account holders will be subject to 
varying insolvency regimes. Resolution of federally insured 
institutions follows clear, consistent, and well-established rules for 
paying Reserve Banks and other creditors of a failed institution. 
Insolvency regimes applicable to uninsured Payment Account holders may 
be new or may involve the application of rarely applied state and 
federal laws. Moreover, uninsured Payment Account holders would likely 
not be subject to a framework of prudential supervision and regulation 
that is as robust as that applied to federally insured depository 
institutions. Finally, data available to Reserve Banks may vary across 
Payment Account holders. Current credit risk monitoring at Reserve 
Banks relies mostly on supervisory information received from within the 
Federal Reserve System or from other federal regulators, and similar 
information on the full range of potential Payment Account holders may 
not be readily available.
    In addition to mitigating risk to the Reserve Banks, not permitting 
discount window access to Payment Account holders would mitigate risks 
posed by Payment Accounts to the financial sector and economy. Payment 
Account holders may engage in novel and diverse business models that 
involve greater and less-predictable risk-taking than business models 
of insured depository institutions, and liquidity provision to such 
firms could incentivize risk-taking behavior. Although such incentives 
exist across all institutions, Payment Account holders will also be 
subject to different supervisory frameworks in a rapidly evolving 
regulatory environment. The Board believes that not permitting discount 
window access for Payment Account holders would mitigate risk to the 
financial sector and the economy in a consistent and transparent manner 
across different types of Payment Account holders that present varying 
levels of risk.
    The Board could, alternatively, leave unchanged the current 
discount window eligibility requirements in Regulation A.\13\ It is 
possible that permitting discount window access for Payment Account 
holders that otherwise meet the current eligibility criteria under 
Regulation A may support broader financial stability and the Federal 
Reserve's monetary policy implementation goals. Discount window access 
would help such Payment Account holders obtain liquidity during periods 
of stress and could potentially support control of the federal funds 
rate under certain circumstances. On balance, however, and having 
considered the comments received, the Board believes it is appropriate 
not to permit Payment Account holders to access the discount window. 
Not permitting discount window access for Payment Account holders would 
mitigate risk to the Reserve Banks, the financial system, and the 
economy in a consistent and transparent manner across different types 
of Payment Account holders that may present varying levels of risk. It 
would also be consistent with the other terms proposed for Payment 
Accounts discussed in the Payment Account Notice, which are designed as 
a standard set of risk mitigants for Payment Accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ As discussed above Regulation A establishes rules under 
which a Reserve Bank may extend credit to depository institutions 
that maintain reservable transaction accounts or non-personal time 
deposits and to U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks that are 
subject to reserve requirements under the Board's Regulation D (12 
CFR part 204).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Proposed Revisions to Sec.  201.2 (Definitions) and Sec.  201.3 
(Extensions of Credit Generally)

    Currently, Regulation A addresses eligibility for the discount 
window by reference to whether an institution is a ``depository 
institution'' as defined in Sec.  201.2(c) or, as provided for in Sec.  
201.1(b), a branch or agency of a foreign bank subject to reserve 
requirements under Regulation D (12 CFR part 204). The Board proposes 
to define the term ``payment account'' in a new Sec.  201.2(d) as the 
record maintained by a Reserve Bank of the debtor-creditor relationship 
between the Reserve Bank and a single depository institution with 
respect to deposit balances of the depository institution that are 
maintained with the Reserve Bank and which is governed by an agreement 
that states the account is a payment account.\14\ This definition is 
structured similarly to the definition of ``master account'' in 
Regulation D and the proposed definition of ``payment account'' set 
forth in the Board's proposal, published elsewhere in today's Federal 
Register, to amend Regulation D.\15\ However, the proposed definitions 
for Regulation A and Regulation D differ somewhat based on the 
terminology used in each regulation.\16\ Current Sec.  201.2(d) through 
(f) would be renumbered accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Board intends the definition of ``payment account'' to 
also include payment accounts of U.S. branches and agencies of 
foreign banks. See 12 CFR 201.1(b) (noting that, except otherwise 
provided, Regulation A applies to U.S. branches and agencies of 
foreign banks that are subject to reserve requirements under 
Regulation D in the same manner and to the same extent as Regulation 
A applies to depository institutions).
    \15\ In the Payment Account Notice, published elsewhere in 
today's Federal Register, the Board describes a Payment Account as a 
special purpose account designed for the purpose of clearing and 
settling payments activity of an institution, its depositors, and 
its other customers. For purposes of Regulation A, the Board does 
not believe it is necessary to describe the functions of a Payment 
Account and that an agreement-based definition will be easy to 
administer by the Reserve Banks.
    \16\ The definition of payment account in Regulation D would 
refer to ``eligible institutions,'' a term that is used only in 
Regulation D and defines the types of institutions that may earn 
interest on reserve balances under Regulation D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board proposes to revise Sec.  201.3(a)(1) to specify that a 
Reserve Bank may lend to a depository institution, except as described 
in proposed new Sec.  201.3(a)(4), either by making an advance secured 
by acceptable collateral under Sec.  201.4 or by discounting certain 
types of paper. Proposed Sec.  201.3(a)(4) would specify that a Reserve 
Bank may not lend under Sec.  201.4(a), (b), or (c) to a depository 
institution that holds a payment account.\17\ Section 201.3(a)(1) would 
continue to specify that a Reserve Bank generally extends credit by 
making an advance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Regulation A Sec.  201.4(a), (b), and (c) set forth the 
primary credit, secondary credit, and seasonal credit programs, 
respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed revisions to Regulation A would prohibit access to the 
discount window only for depository institutions that hold Payment 
Accounts and would have no effect on discount window eligibility for 
other depository institutions, whether those institutions access the 
discount window through their own master accounts or through the master 
account of a correspondent.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Reserve Banks have no obligation to extend discount window 
credit to any depository institution. See 12 U.S.C. 347b(b)(4) (``A 
Federal Reserve bank shall have no obligation to make, increase, 
renew, or extend any advance or discount under [the FRA] to any 
depository institution.''); 12 CFR 201.3(b) (``This section does not 
entitle any person or entity to obtain any credit or any increase, 
renewal or extension of maturity of any credit from a Federal 
Reserve Bank.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Request for Comment

    The Board invites comment on all aspects of the proposed revisions. 
In addition, the Board invites feedback on the following specific 
questions related to the proposal:
    1. Has the Board appropriately identified and considered the 
potential risks and benefits of permitting or not permitting Payment 
Account holders to access discount window credit? Are

[[Page 30502]]

there other potential risks and benefits the Board should consider?
    2. Should the Board instead retain the existing eligibility 
requirements for the discount window set forth in Regulation A? If so, 
why?
    3. Should the Board instead consider a narrow restriction on 
eligibility for discount window credit (e.g., a restriction applicable 
to only certain types of Payment Account holders) or permit access to 
discount window credit for Payment Account holders in limited 
circumstances (e.g., periods of significant market stress)? If so, why? 
How should the Board define these restrictions or limitations?

VI. Administrative Law Matters

A. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. (RFA), 
requires an agency to consider the impact of its rules on small 
entities.\19\ In connection with a proposed rule, the RFA generally 
requires an agency to prepare an Initial Regulatory Flexibility 
Analysis (IRFA) describing the impact of the rule on small entities, 
unless the head of the agency certifies that the proposal will not have 
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
and publishes such certification along with a statement providing the 
factual basis for such certification in the Federal Register. An IRFA 
must contain (i) a description of the reasons why action by the agency 
is being considered; (ii) a succinct statement of the objectives of, 
and legal basis for, the proposal; (iii) a description of, and, where 
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities to which the 
proposal will apply; (iv) a description of the projected reporting, 
recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the proposal, 
including an estimate of the classes of small entities that will be 
subject to the requirement and the type of professional skills 
necessary for preparation of the report or record; (v) an 
identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant Federal 
rules that may duplicate, overlap with, or conflict with the proposal; 
and (vi) a description of any significant alternatives to the proposal 
that accomplish its stated objectives and minimize any significant 
economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Under regulations issued by the U.S. Small Business 
Administration (SBA), a small entity includes a depository 
institution, bank holding company, or savings and loan holding 
company with total assets of $850 million or less. See 13 CFR 
121.201. Consistent with the SBA's General Principles of 
Affiliation, the Board includes the assets of all domestic and 
foreign affiliates toward the applicable size threshold when 
determining whether to classify a particular entity as a small 
entity. See 13 CFR 121.103.
    \20\ 5 U.S.C. 603(b)-(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board is providing an IRFA with respect to the proposal. The 
Board believes that the proposal will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Payment accounts 
would be a new, optional way for institutions to request access to 
Reserve Bank accounts and services. Institutions would retain the 
option of requesting a master account or not requesting any account, 
and eligibility for access to the discount window would remain 
unchanged for master account holders and non-account holders. The 
proposal, therefore, would not impose mandatory requirements on any 
small entities. The Board invites comment on all aspects of this IRFA.
1. Reasons Action is Being Considered
    As discussed in this Supplementary Information, the Board is 
proposing to amend Sec.  201.2 and Sec.  201.3 of Regulation A in 
connection with the Board's proposal to update the PSR Policy and 
Account Access Guidelines.
2. Objectives of and Legal Basis for the Proposal
    As discussed in this Supplementary Information, the proposal 
relates to proposed amendments to the PSR Policy and Account Access 
Guidelines regarding Payment Accounts and would implement a proposed 
standard term applicable to Payment Accounts. The Reserve Banks 
generally extend credit pursuant to sections 10B, 13(14), and 19(b)(7) 
of the FRA. Each of those sections of the FRA authorizes the Board to 
prescribe regulations regarding the Reserve Banks' extensions of 
credit.
3. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities
    Under Regulation A, Reserve Banks may extend discount window credit 
to ``depository institutions'' and, in the same manner as Regulation A 
applies to depository institutions, to branches and agencies of foreign 
banks. The SBA has adopted size standards for determining whether a 
particular entity is a ``small entity'' for purposes of the RFA. The 
Board believes that the most appropriate SBA size standard to apply in 
determining whether a depository institution or branch or agency of a 
foreign bank is a small entity is the SBA size standard for 
``commercial banking.'' Under this standard, an entity engaged in 
commercial banking is considered a small entity if it has total assets 
of $850 million or less.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See 13 CFR 121.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the proposed amendments to Regulation A, a Reserve Bank would 
not be permitted to extend discount window credit to Payment Account 
holders, a population that could potentially include all institutions 
that are (1) legally eligible for access to the discount window; and 
(2) do not have a master account or settle transactions in a 
correspondent's master account.\22\ The Board estimates that, as of the 
end of 2025, there are approximately 7,000 small entities, of which 
6,800 already have a master account or access to financial services. 
Accordingly, the Board estimates that there are approximately 200 small 
entities that the proposed amendments to Regulation A might affect, 
were these small entities to decide to request Payment Accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ The Board has estimated the number of small entities that 
are legally eligible for the discount window on the basis of 
institution type. Small entities that currently have master accounts 
or settle transactions in a correspondent's master account are 
already subject to the Account Access Guidelines. The Board assumes 
that these small entities would not request a Payment Account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Description of Compliance Requirements
    The proposed amendments would not impose reporting, recordkeeping, 
or other compliance requirements.
5. Duplicative, Overlapping, and Conflicting Rules
    The Board is not aware of any federal rules that may duplicate, 
overlap with, or conflict with the proposal.
6. Significant Alternatives Considered
    As discussed in Section IV.A above, the Board considered not 
proposing revisions to Regulation A. The Board does not believe that 
this alternative would have affected the economic impact on small 
entities because, as noted above, the Payment Account would be a new, 
optional way for institutions to request access to accounts and 
services, and the proposed amendments would not impose mandatory 
requirements on any small entities.
    Therefore, the Board believes that the proposed revisions will not 
have a significant economic impact on substantial number of small 
entities supervised by the Board.
    The Board welcomes comment on all aspects of its analysis. In 
particular, the Board requests that commenters describe the nature of 
any impact on small entities and provide empirical data to illustrate 
and support the extent of the impact.

[[Page 30503]]

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the proposed 
rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB). The proposed rule contains no requirements 
subject to the PRA.

C. Plain Language

    Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. 106-102, 113 
Stat. 1338, 1471, 12 U.S.C. 4809) requires the federal banking agencies 
to use plain language in all proposed and final rules published after 
January 1, 2000. The Board has sought to present the proposal in a 
simple and straightforward manner and invites comment on the use of 
plain language and whether any part of the proposal could be more 
clearly stated.

D. Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023

    The Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023 (5 
U.S.C. 553(b)(4)) requires that an NPR include the internet address of 
a summary of not more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, in 
plain language, that shall be posted on the internet website under 
section 206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note).
    In summary, the Board proposes to amend its Regulation A 
(Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks) to specify that a 
holder of a proposed special-purpose payment account would not be 
eligible for access to discount window credit made available by the 
Federal Reserve Banks (Reserve Banks). The proposal would change 
neither the existing programs under which the Reserve Banks generally 
provide discount window credit (primary credit, secondary credit, and 
seasonal credit) nor the process for establishing the primary credit, 
secondary credit, and seasonal credit rates.
    The proposal and such a summary can be found at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/supervisionreg/reglisting.htm">https://www.federalreserve.gov/supervisionreg/reglisting.htm</a>.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 201

    Banks, Banking, Federal Reserve System, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

Authority and Issuance

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board proposes to 
amend Regulation A, 12 CFR part 201, as follows:

PART 201--EXTENSIONS OF CREDIT BY FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS (REGULATION 
A)

0
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 248(i)-(j), 343 et seq., 347a, 347b, 347c, 
348 et seq., 357, 374, 374a, and 461.

0
2. In Sec.  201.2, redesignate paragraphs (d) through (f) as paragraphs 
(e) through (g) and add new paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  201.2   Definitions.

* * * * *
    (d) Payment account means the record maintained by a Federal 
Reserve Bank of the debtor-creditor relationship between the Federal 
Reserve Bank and a single depository institution with respect to 
deposit balances of the depository institution that are maintained with 
the Federal Reserve Bank and which is governed by an agreement that 
states the account is a payment account.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec.  201.3 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and adding paragraph 
(a)(4) as follows:


Sec.  201.3   Extensions of credit generally.

    (a) Advances to and discounts for a depository institution.
    (1) A Federal Reserve Bank may lend to a depository institution, 
except as described in paragraph (a)(4), either by making an advance 
secured by acceptable collateral under Sec.  201.4 of this part or by 
discounting certain types of paper. A Federal Reserve Bank generally 
extends credit by making an advance.
    (2) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (4) A Federal Reserve Bank may not lend under Sec.  201.4(a), (b), 
or (c) to a depository institution that holds a payment account.

    By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.
Benjamin W. McDonough,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2026-10376 Filed 5-22-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 26, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.