Notice2026-10342

Unwrought Palladium from the Russian Federation: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duy Determination

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 22, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of unwrought palladium (palladium) from the Russian Federation (Russia). The period of investigation is January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 99 (Friday, May 22, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30283-30284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-10342]



[[Page 30283]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-821-841]


Unwrought Palladium from the Russian Federation: Final 
Affirmative Countervailing Duy Determination

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters 
of unwrought palladium (palladium) from the Russian Federation 
(Russia). The period of investigation is January 1, 2024, through 
December 31, 2024.

DATES: Applicable May 22, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelsie Hohenberger, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2517.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 11, 2026, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination 
in the Federal Register and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ 
On April 10, 2026, and April 15, 2026, we received a case brief and a 
rebuttal brief, respectively, from the Government of Russia (GOR) and 
the petitioners.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Unwrought Palladium from the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 91 FR 
11949 (March 11, 2026) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See GOR's Letter, ``Case Brief of the Ministry of Economic 
Development of the Russian Federation,'' dated April 10, 2026; see 
also Petitioners' Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated April 15, 2026. 
The petitioners are Stillwater Mining Company d/b/a Sibanye-
Stillwater and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, 
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers 
International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A summary of the events that occurred since the Preliminary 
Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by 
interested parties for this final determination, may be found in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
<a href="http://access.trade.gov">http://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/frnotices">https://access.trade.gov/frnotices</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Affirmative Determination in the Countervailing Duty 
Investigation of Unwrought Palladium from the Russian Federation,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is palladium from Russia. 
For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see 
Appendix I.

Scope Comments

    No interested party commented on the scope of the investigation as 
it appeared in the Preliminary Determination. Therefore, no changes 
were made to the scope of the investigation.

Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received

    The subsidy programs under investigation, and the issues raised in 
the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by interested parties in this 
investigation, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. For 
a list of the issues raised by parties, which we addressed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum, see Appendix II to this notice.

Methodology

    Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section 
701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the 
subsidy programs found to be countervailable, Commerce determines that 
there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' 
that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 
specific.\4\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
final determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In making this final determination, Commerce relied, in part, on 
facts otherwise available, including with an adverse inference, 
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For a full discussion 
of our application of adverse facts available, see the Preliminary 
Determination \5\ and the Issues and Decision Memorandum at the section 
entitled ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse 
Inferences.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at 3-13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

    Because the mandatory company respondents in this investigation did 
not provide information requested by Commerce, and Commerce determined 
that these respondents were uncooperative, no verification was 
conducted.

All-Others Rate

    Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that Commerce shall 
determine an estimated all-others rate for companies not individually 
examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of 
the estimated subsidy rates established for those companies 
individually examined, excluding any zero and de minimis rates and any 
rates based entirely under section 776 of the Act.
    Pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act, if the individual 
estimated countervailable subsidy rates established for all exporters 
and producers individually examined are zero, de minimis, or determined 
based entirely on facts otherwise available, Commerce may use ``any 
reasonable method'' to establish the estimated subsidy rate for all 
other producers and/or exporters. In this investigation, the estimated 
subsidy rate for the individually examined respondents is based 
entirely on facts available, pursuant to section 776 of the Act. The 
rate based on total facts available, therefore, is the only rate 
available in this proceeding for deriving the all-others rate. 
Consequently, the subsidy rate assigned to the mandatory respondents is 
also assigned as the subsidy rate for all other producers and/or 
exporters.

Final Determination

    Commerce determines that the following estimated countervailable 
subsidy rates exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Subsidy
                                                                 rate
                          Company                            (percent ad
                                                               valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSC Urals Innovative Technologies..........................     * 109.10
Prioksky Plant of Non Ferrous Metals.......................     * 109.10
All Others.................................................       109.10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rate based on facts available with adverse inferences.

Disclosure

    Because we made no changes to the calculations of the rates 
assigned in the Preliminary Determination, there are no new 
calculations to disclose in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b) for this 
final determination.

[[Page 30284]]

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    As a result of our Preliminary Determination, and pursuant to 
sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, Commerce instructed U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits and 
suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 11, 2026, 
the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal 
Register.
    If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final 
affirmative injury determination, we will issue a countervailing duty 
order and require a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties for 
such entries of subject merchandise in the amounts indicated above, in 
accordance with section 706(a) of the Act. If the ITC determines that 
material injury, or threat of material injury, does not exist, this 
proceeding will be terminated, and all estimated duties deposited or 
securities posted as a result of the suspension of liquidation will be 
refunded or cancelled.

ITC Notification

    In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the 
ITC of our final affirmative determination that countervailable 
subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of palladium 
from Russia. Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in 
accordance with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC will determine, 
within 45 days, whether the domestic industry in the United States is 
materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of 
imports of palladium from Russia. In addition, we are making available 
to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information in our 
files, provided that the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such 
information, either publicly or under administrative protective order 
(APO), without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Administrative Protective Order

    In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury 
determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties 
subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or 
destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of 
the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to 
sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 
705(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).

    Dated: May 19, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties, of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

    The scope of this investigation is unwrought palladium. 
Unwrought palladium includes palladium, whether or not refined, in 
the form of ingots, blocks, lumps, billets, cakes, slabs, pigs, 
cathodes, anodes, briquettes, cubes, sticks, grains, sponge, 
pellets, shot, powder, and similar primary forms.
    Unwrought palladium is covered by the scope regardless of 
production method. The scope includes unwrought palladium produced 
through ore extraction, unwrought palladium produced by recycling 
palladium-containing scrap, unwrought palladium produced by any 
other method, and blends of unwrought palladium produced by 
different methods.
    The scope includes unwrought palladium that is commingled with 
unwrought palladium from sources not subject to this investigation 
or commingled with other metals. Only the subject unwrought 
palladium component of such commingled products is covered by the 
scope of this investigation.
    Subject merchandise includes merchandise matching the above 
description that has been finished, packaged, or otherwise processed 
in a third country, including by refining, grinding, commingling, 
adding or removing additives (such as other metals), or performing 
any other finishing, packaging, or processing that would not 
otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation 
if performed in the subject country.
    The covered merchandise is currently classified in the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at 
subheading 7110.21.0000. Unwrought palladium meeting the scope 
description may also enter under HTSUS subheading 7110.29.0000. 
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and for 
customs purposes, the written description of the subject merchandise 
is dispositive.

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse 
Inferences
IV. Analysis of Programs
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available 
(AFA) to the GOR
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Countervail via AFA Certain 
Income Tax Programs
    Comment 3: Whether the AFA Rate Selected for the Certain Less 
Than Adequate Remuneration Programs is Appropriate
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Modify its Treatment of the 
Chinese Loans to Secure Natural Resources Program
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2026-10342 Filed 5-21-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 22, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.