Notice2026-09864

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt FINRA Rule 4321 (Allocations of Fail To Deliver Positions) and Amend FINRA Rule 4560 (Short-Interest Reporting)

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 18, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 95 (Monday, May 18, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28699-28705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-09864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-105482; File No. SR-FINRA-2026-012]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt 
FINRA Rule 4321 (Allocations of Fail To Deliver Positions) and Amend 
FINRA Rule 4560 (Short-Interest Reporting)

May 13, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice 
is hereby given that on May 1, 2026, the Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as 
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared 
by FINRA. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing to (1) amend FINRA Rule 4560 (Short-Interest 
Reporting) to increase the frequency and granularity of the short 
interest information collected and disseminated by FINRA, and (2) adopt 
FINRA Rule 4321 (Allocations of Fail to Deliver Positions) to require 
members to report to FINRA on a monthly basis their daily allocations 
of fail to deliver positions to correspondent firms.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's 
website at <a href="http://www.finra.org">http://www.finra.org</a> and at the principal office of FINRA.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, 
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    FINRA is proposing amendments to improve the usefulness of the 
short interest information reported to and published by FINRA, and to 
improve FINRA's oversight of member compliance with SEC Regulation 
SHO.\3\ Specifically, the proposed amendments would increase the 
frequency and granularity of the short interest information reported to 
FINRA pursuant to Rule 4560 and adopt new FINRA Rule 4321 to require 
members to report to FINRA on a monthly basis their daily allocations 
of SEC Regulation SHO Rule 204 \4\ fail to deliver positions to 
correspondent firms, as further described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 17 CFR 242.200-204.
    \4\ 17 CFR 242.204. SEC Regulation SHO Rule 204 generally 
requires broker-dealers to either deliver securities to the clearing 
agency by settlement date (one business day after the trade date) or 
the broker-dealer must close out the fail to deliver position by the 
next settlement date (two business days after the trade date). If 
the short position is not closed out, the broker-dealer and any 
broker-dealer for which it clears transactions may not effect 
further short sales in that security without borrowing or entering 
into a bona fide agreement to borrow the security until the broker-
dealer purchases shares to close out the position (``pre-borrow 
requirement'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Short Interest Reporting
    Rule 4560(a) requires each FINRA member to maintain a record of 
total short positions in all customer and proprietary firm accounts in 
all equity securities (other than Restricted Equity Securities as 
defined in Rule 6420) \5\ at the member and to regularly report such 
information to FINRA in the manner prescribed by FINRA. The rule 
provides that short interest reports must be received by FINRA no later 
than the second business day after the reporting

[[Page 28700]]

settlement date designated by FINRA. The rule further specifies the 
type of positions reportable to FINRA as short interest. Specifically, 
Rule 4560(b) provides that members are required to record and report 
all gross short positions existing in each individual firm or customer 
account at the member, including the account of a broker-dealer, that 
resulted from (1) a ``short sale'' as that term is defined in Rule 
200(a) of Regulation SHO,\6\ or (2) where the transaction that caused 
the short position was marked ``long,'' consistent with Regulation SHO, 
due to the firm's or the customer's net long position at the time of 
the transaction.\7\ FINRA aggregates the short positions reported by 
members and publishes an industry-wide aggregate per security, free of 
charge, on <a href="http://finra.org">finra.org</a>.\8\ FINRA is proposing the following changes to 
its short interest reporting rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ``Restricted Equity Security'' is defined in Rule 6420(k) as 
``any equity security that meets the definition of `restricted 
security' as contained in Securities Act Rule 144(a)(3).''
    \6\ Rule 200 of SEC Regulation SHO provides that ``short sale'' 
means ``any sale of a security which the seller does not own or any 
sale which is consummated by the delivery of a security borrowed by, 
or for the account of, the seller.'' See Rule 200(a) of SEC 
Regulation SHO, 17 CFR 242.200. SEC Rule 200 further provides, among 
other things, that a person is deemed to own a security if: (a) the 
person or his agent has title to it; (b) the person has purchased, 
or has entered into an unconditional contract, binding on both 
parties thereto, to purchase it, but has not yet received it; (c) 
the person owns a security convertible into or exchangeable for it 
and has tendered such security for conversion or exchange; (d) the 
person has an option to purchase or acquire it and has exercised 
such option; (e) the person has rights or warrants to subscribe to 
it and has exercised such rights or warrants; or (f) the person 
holds a security futures contract to purchase it and has received 
notice that the position will be physically settled and is 
irrevocably bound to receive the underlying security. See Rule 
200(b) of SEC Regulation SHO.
    \7\ Rule 4560(b) also specifies that members must report only 
those short positions resulting from short sales that have settled 
or reached settlement date by the close of the reporting settlement 
date designated by FINRA.
    \8\ See <a href="https://www.finra.org/finra-data/browse-catalog/equity-short-interest/data">https://www.finra.org/finra-data/browse-catalog/equity-short-interest/data</a>. FINRA publishes the aggregate short interest 
data seven business days after the reporting settlement date. Such 
publication includes, for each security: the reporting settlement 
date, security name, security symbol, identity of the listing 
exchange or indicates the over-the-counter market, the current 
aggregate short interest position for the security, and information 
regarding the change in the size of the short interest position 
since the prior reporting settlement date. FINRA also provides 
additional FINRA-calculated metrics for the security (the average 
daily volume and a ``days to cover'' metric). ``Days to cover'' is a 
FINRA-calculated metric representing the number of days of average 
share volume required to buy all of the shares that were sold short 
during the reporting cycle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Positions Resulting From ``Arranged Financing''
    FINRA proposes to require reporting of additional position 
information that reflects the kind of economic short interest sought to 
be captured under Rule 4560--specifically, positions in each individual 
firm or customer account at the member that results from arranged 
financings, as further described below. As previously discussed, 
currently, members' short interest reporting is limited to short 
positions at the member that result from a ``short sale'' as defined in 
SEC Regulation SHO or where the transaction that caused the short 
position was marked ``long'' due to the member's or customer's net long 
position at the time of the transaction. FINRA is proposing also to 
require members to record and report to FINRA any position existing in 
a customer account that resulted from a securities loan obligation in 
connection with a customer's borrow of a security from a domestic or 
foreign affiliate of the member, even where such position itself 
neither resulted from a ``short sale,'' as described in Rule 4560(b)(1) 
nor where the transaction that caused the short position was marked 
``long,'' as described in Rule 4560(b)(2). In such instances, the 
original short position, which typically resulted from a ``short 
sale,'' has been replaced by the securities loan established through 
the arranged financing program; nonetheless, the borrower remains 
obligated to close the position in its account by purchasing shares to 
satisfy the loan obligation. Therefore, the position, economically, 
reflects the type of short interest that FINRA believes should be 
captured by the rule to better represent short sentiment in the stock.
B. Timing and Frequency of Short Interest Data Reporting and 
Dissemination
    As stated above, FINRA Rule 4560(a) requires members to regularly 
report short interest information to FINRA in such a manner as may be 
prescribed by FINRA, and further provides for a two-business day 
turnaround period such that the required reports must be received by 
FINRA no later than the second business day after the reporting 
settlement date designated by FINRA. Each calendar year, FINRA 
publishes on its website a list of the relevant dates for its short 
interest reporting program--specifically, all reporting settlement 
dates for a calendar year (i.e., the dates on which short interest 
positions must be captured), the short interest report due dates (i.e., 
the dates that are two business days after each short interest 
settlement date), and the publication dates (i.e., the dates on which 
the aggregate reports are made publicly available by FINRA on the FINRA 
website).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See <a href="https://www.finra.org/filing-reporting/regulatory-filing-systems/short-interest">https://www.finra.org/filing-reporting/regulatory-filing-systems/short-interest</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA is proposing to increase the frequency of both short interest 
reporting under the rule and the subsequent public dissemination of 
short interest data by (1) requiring members to submit short interest 
reports on a weekly rather than a bi-monthly basis, and (2) reducing 
the two business-day reporting turnaround period to one business day to 
allow for a more streamlined and timely publication process for short 
interest reports. If the proposed amendments are approved by the 
Commission, FINRA will specify on its website a list of weekly short 
interest reporting settlement dates, member reporting due dates (that 
are one business day after the short interest reporting settlement 
date), and the website publication date.
    FINRA believes that these modifications--which together would allow 
short interest data to be published weekly, five business days after 
the reporting settlement date--would provide FINRA, other regulators, 
investors, and other market participants with a more current view of 
short interest information, better inform investors' and other market 
participants' investment decisions, and provide more timely information 
to FINRA for regulatory use, without substantially impacting the 
quality of the data received and published by FINRA.
C. Short Interest Reporting for Securities With Deleted Symbols
    FINRA is also proposing to amend Rule 4560 to ensure that FINRA 
receives a final short interest report that includes short interest 
position data for a security as of the last settlement date prior to 
the deletion of its symbol by a self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') 
(i.e., FINRA or a national securities exchange).\10\ Currently, if a 
security no longer is assigned a security symbol as of a designated 
short interest reporting settlement date, members do not include that 
security in their reported short interest data (due to the absence of a 
valid symbol on the date that short interest is assessed). To address 
this data gap, FINRA is proposing to adopt Supplementary Material .01 
under Rule 4560 to require that, where a symbol no longer exists on the 
short interest reporting settlement date, members

[[Page 28701]]

must report their gross short positions in the security as of the last 
settlement date for which a symbol was in effect. FINRA believes that 
this proposed rule change would support the availability of more 
complete information to regulators and market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ A security may cease to be identified by a symbol for a 
variety of reasons, including where the shares have been cancelled 
by the issuer, the symbol has not been used for quoting or trading 
for an extended period of time, or where the security no longer has 
a valid CUSIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Scope of Securities Subject to Short Interest Reporting Requirements
    FINRA is proposing to clarify the scope of the securities that are 
the subject of short interest reporting requirements. Currently, Rule 
4560(a) applies to ``all equity securities (other than Restricted 
Equity Securities as defined in FINRA Rule 6420).'' FINRA is proposing 
to clarify that the rule applies to ``OTC Equity Securities,'' as 
defined in Rule 6420,\11\ and securities listed on a national 
securities exchange. These proposed amendments align with FINRA's short 
interest reporting systems and existing reporting conventions (FINRA's 
systems allow members to report short interest positions only in 
securities that meet the definition of ``OTC Equity Security'' and 
securities listed on a national securities exchange). Thus, the 
proposal would not require members to make changes to their short 
interest reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ ``OTC Equity Security'' is defined in Rule 6420(f) as ``any 
equity security that is not an `NMS stock' as that term is defined 
in Rule 600(b)(47) of SEC Regulation NMS; provided, however, that 
the term `OTC Equity Security' shall not include any Restricted 
Equity Security.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Allocations of Fail To Deliver Positions--New Rule 4321
    Rule 204 of SEC Regulation SHO \12\ generally requires that broker-
dealers either deliver securities to the clearing agency by the short 
sale settlement date or close out the fail to deliver position on the 
next settlement day. Under SEC guidance, a clearing firm is permitted 
to reasonably allocate a portion of its fail to deliver position to a 
correspondent firm based on that firm's activity (e.g., a clearing firm 
with a 1,000 share fail to deliver position at a clearing agency in a 
stock is permitted to allocate the 1,000 share fail (or relevant 
portion thereof) to a correspondent firm whose activity is responsible 
for the development of the fail position).\13\ If the clearing firm has 
reasonably allocated the fail to deliver position to a correspondent 
firm, the correspondent firm--rather than the clearing firm--must 
comply with the requirements of Rule 204, including the pre-borrow 
requirement, with respect to that position.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 242.204.
    \13\ SEC staff guidance states that: ``Rule 204(d) permits the 
participant to reasonably allocate a portion of a fail-to-deliver 
position to another registered broker or dealer for which it clears 
trades or for which it is responsible for settlement, based on such 
broker's or dealer's short position. If the participant has 
reasonably allocated the fail-to-deliver position, the provisions of 
Rule 204 relating to such fail-to-deliver position, including the 
pre-borrow requirement, apply to such registered broker or dealer 
that was allocated the fail-to-deliver position, and not to the 
participant.'' See Division of Market Regulation: Responses to 
Frequently asked Questions Concerning Regulation SHO, # 5.4 (October 
15, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA reviews member compliance with Regulation SHO's Rule 204 
close out obligations. However, because broker-dealers are not required 
to report to FINRA when they have allocated a close out obligation to a 
correspondent firm, FINRA is often unaware of which member bears 
responsibility for a particular close out obligation under Rule 204. 
Instead, when there has been a fail to deliver, FINRA requests 
information on whether the fail to deliver has been allocated to a 
correspondent firm and, if so, the identity of the correspondent firm. 
Obtaining information from clearing firms on daily fail to deliver 
allocations would allow FINRA to directly identify the member that is 
responsible for a close out obligation without having to first request 
this information from the clearing firm, thereby reducing 
inefficiencies and potential delays in FINRA's surveillance and 
reviews.
    Therefore, FINRA is proposing to adopt new Rule 4321 to require 
member clearing firms to submit to FINRA on a monthly basis a report of 
their daily allocations of fail to deliver positions to correspondent 
firms pursuant to Rule 204 of SEC Regulation SHO.\14\ Under new Rule 
4321, members that have allocated fail to deliver positions would be 
required to report, in the form and manner prescribed by FINRA, the 
following information for each allocation:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Allocation reports would be due 10 business days after the 
end of each month. The information provided in the allocation report 
would be used only for regulatory purposes and would not be publicly 
disseminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Security name and symbol;
    <bullet> Identity of the correspondent firm to which the fail was 
allocated;
    <bullet> Number of shares of the fail that are allocated to the 
correspondent firm;
    <bullet> Settlement date on which the allocated fail developed;
    <bullet> Allocation date; and
    <bullet> Other information specified by FINRA.
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change would provide FINRA 
with important information in support of its SEC Regulation SHO 
compliance program.
    If the Commission approves the proposed rule change, FINRA will 
announce the effective date of the proposed rule change in a Regulatory 
Notice.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\15\ which requires, among 
other things, that FINRA rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA believes that the proposal to require members to report as 
short interest outstanding stock borrows by customers in their arranged 
financing programs would improve transparency about short interest 
positions and better reflect short sentiment in a stock. FINRA believes 
that the proposal to increase the frequency of reporting under Rule 
4560, and subsequent public dissemination, of short interest 
information would provide a more current view of short interest 
information, better inform investors' and other market participants' 
investment decisions, and provide more timely information to FINRA for 
regulatory use. FINRA also believes that the proposal to require 
members to report to FINRA the final short interest position in any 
security whose symbol has been deleted by an SRO would provide 
additional valuable information to regulators and investors. FINRA 
further believes that the proposal to limit the scope of Rule 4560 to 
OTC Equity Securities and securities listed on a national securities 
exchange is appropriate and consistent with the Act in that it provides 
for greater clarity with respect to members' existing obligations.
    Finally, FINRA believes that the proposal to adopt new Rule 4321 to 
require member clearing firms to submit to FINRA on a monthly basis a 
report of their daily allocations of fail to deliver positions to 
correspondent firms would improve regulatory efficiency and support 
FINRA's oversight for member compliance with SEC Regulation SHO, 
consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in 
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

[[Page 28702]]

Economic Impact Assessment
    FINRA has undertaken an economic impact assessment, as set forth 
below, to analyze the potential economic impacts, including anticipated 
costs, benefits, and distributional and competitive effects, relative 
to the current baseline, and the alternatives FINRA considered in 
assessing how to best meet its regulatory objectives. The economic 
impact assessment is organized into three separate sections covering 
the frequency and timing of short interest reporting, changes to the 
data collected, and reporting of allocations of fail to deliver 
positions.
    The proposed short sale-related reporting enhancements would 
provide greater transparency regarding short sale activity.\16\ 
Generally, providing additional data furnishes market participants a 
more complete view into the level of short interest in a particular 
security and in aggregate across reporting firms. This may allow market 
participants to better evaluate investment opportunities, encourage 
greater market participation, and accelerate the incorporation of 
potentially relevant information into price formation processes. These 
enhancements and the proposed fail to deliver allocation reporting also 
would allow FINRA to monitor more efficiently for compliance with 
Regulation SHO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ On October 13, 2023, the SEC adopted Exchange Act Rule 10c-
1a to increase the transparency and efficiency of the securities 
lending market by, among other things, requiring covered persons to 
report information about securities loans to a registered national 
securities association (``RNSA''). See Securities Act Release No. 
98737 (October 13, 2023), 88 FR 75644 (November 3, 2023) (File No. 
S7-18-21) (Reporting of Securities Loans). On December 3, 2025, the 
SEC issued a temporary exemption, pursuant to Section 36(a)(1) of 
the Exchange Act, from compliance with SEA Rule 10c-1a to allow time 
for the staff to consider potential changes to the proposal. See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104303 (December 3, 2025), 90 FR 
56813 (December 8, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the same time, increasing transparency could create concerns 
regarding potential disincentives for short selling. As short selling 
is an important mechanism for incorporating negative information into 
prices, such an outcome could reduce price efficiency. To the extent 
that short selling provides liquidity to the market, changes in short 
selling behavior could impact liquidity. The balance of these 
incentives determines the primary market impact of the proposal.
Content of Short Interest Data
Loan Obligations Resulting From Arranged Financing
    Loan obligations resulting from arranged financing are economically 
equivalent to short interest positions but are currently not reported 
as short interest and therefore are not available in the short interest 
data to market participants nor to FINRA. Expanding the short interest 
reporting requirement to capture loan obligations resulting from 
borrowing shares through an arranged financing program would more fully 
reflect short sentiment, thus allowing FINRA, market participants and 
investors to more comprehensively understand market activity.
    FINRA members would incur upfront costs associated with making 
systems changes required to identify these loan obligations (including 
sourcing information from affiliates as needed) for purposes of 
including this information in reported short interest. Following the 
upfront process and systems costs to facilitate reporting this 
information, FINRA anticipates that the ongoing cost of including loan 
obligations resulting from arranged financing in reported short 
interest is expected to be minimal as firms currently incur costs for 
existing short interest reporting.
    FINRA understands the primary motivation for customers to use 
arranged financing is to obtain increased leverage rather than to avoid 
short interest reporting. To the extent this is true, this would limit 
incentives to shift lending to non-FINRA members, including banks. 
FINRA also understands that, although it is possible for customers to 
obtain short exposure to a security through other means, it would be 
impractical for entities other than affiliates of FINRA members to 
offer a service substantially similar to arranged financing as 
discussed in the proposed rule change.
Short Interest Reporting for Deleted Symbols
    Given the current timeframe for reporting short interest to FINRA, 
FINRA may not receive a short interest report that includes data for a 
security that recently was no longer identified by an SRO-issued 
symbol. Receiving a final short interest report in such a security 
would allow FINRA to more efficiently monitor for compliance with 
Regulation SHO.
    FINRA estimates that 2,426 equity securities ceased to be 
identified by an SRO-issued symbol in 2025, of which 722 were exchange-
listed equity securities and 1,704 were OTC equity securities. Of these 
2,426 equity securities, 1,122 (46 percent) had outstanding short 
interest positions as of their last short interest reporting date. For 
these securities, the average time between the last short interest 
reporting date and the last settlement date for which a symbol existed 
was eight days.
    FINRA does not expect that firms would incur substantial costs 
associated with reporting this information because it would be a 
continuation of the same data that they are required to report for 
securities, although they may need to make an upfront system or process 
change in order to report their gross short positions in the security 
as of the last settlement date for which a symbol was in effect.
Frequency and Timing of Short Interest Position Reporting and Data 
Dissemination
    Based on current reporting requirements as noted above, twice a 
month FINRA disseminates aggregate short interest information seven 
business days after the reporting settlement date. However, changes in 
short interest for OTC and exchange-listed equity securities between 
reporting settlement dates (and thus dissemination) can be fairly large 
relative to the average daily trading volume \17\ and, currently, there 
are no other sources of the short interest information that FINRA 
produces available on a more frequent basis, free of charge to 
investors generally and retail investors in particular.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ For each short interest reporting date between January 2025 
and December 2025, FINRA analyzed the change in each security's 
short interest from the previous reporting date. On an average 
reporting date, 11,323 exchange-listed equity securities experienced 
changes in short interest. The median change in short interest for 
these securities amounts to 25 percent of the average daily trading 
volume but rises to 56 percent by the 75th percentile and 183 
percent by the 95th percentile. During the same time period, an 
average of 7,118 OTC equity securities experienced changes in short 
interest each reporting date. The median change in short interest 
for these securities amounted to 60 percent of the average daily 
trading volume but rises to 1,170 percent by the 75th percentile and 
157,032 percent by the 95th percentile.
    \18\ A 2025 study finds that vendor-derived short interest 
estimates explain only up to 67 percent of the variation in actual 
short interest changes. See Yong Chen, Minjae Kim, John McInnis, and 
Wuyang Zhao, Interest in the Short Interest: The Rise of Private 
Sector Data, 42(4) Contemporary Accounting Research 2424-2457 
(2025). In addition, the cost of this data is substantial and likely 
unaffordable for most retail investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Increasing the reporting frequency to weekly would provide FINRA 
and market participants with more current short interest information. 
More frequent information could accelerate the incorporation of 
potentially relevant

[[Page 28703]]

information into price formation processes.
    The costs associated with accommodating more frequent reporting 
with a faster turn-around time depends primarily on firms' reliance 
upon manual processes in collecting, validating and reporting short 
interest.\19\ Many firms like[sic] rely on manual processes to 
determine whether a short position is reportable, as well as to 
validate and verify their short positions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ A total of 86 firms reported short interest for at least 
one security in 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is possible that more frequent public disclosure of short 
interest positions could discourage short selling, which is an 
important mechanism for price efficiency and for liquidity 
provision.\20\ However, the five-business-day turnaround time between 
the reporting settlement date and the dissemination of short interest 
information, combined with aggregation across all accounts, should 
mitigate concerns about information leakage and the impact on liquidity 
and make any such outcome less likely.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Two studies that looked at short interest reporting in the 
European Union and Japan found that daily short interest reporting 
of large individual positions reduced short selling. The study 
looking at the European Union found that this reduction slowed down 
the incorporation of new information into prices as measured by the 
Hou and Moskowitz (2005) measure. It also found short reporting 
increased the Amihud illiquidity measure, which is calculated as the 
ratio of absolute value of daily stock returns to daily dollar 
trading volume and intended as a rough measure of price impact, 
although quoted spreads narrowed. The study looking at Japan did not 
directly examine price efficiency or liquidity but finds that after 
adopting the reporting regime, the remaining short selling became 
less informed and short-term price volatility increased. However, 
both studies examine reporting requirements with higher frequency 
and less aggregation than the instant proposal. See Charles M. 
Jones, Adam V. Reed & William Waller, Revealing Shorts: An 
Examination of Large Short Position Disclosures, 29(12) The Review 
of Financial Studies 3278-3320 (2016) and Truong X. Duong, Zsuzsa R. 
Huszar & Takeshi Yamada, The Costs and Benefits of Short Sale 
Disclosure, 53 Journal of Banking and Finance 124-130 (2015).
    FINRA received comments expressing concern that increasing the 
frequency of short interest reporting could have negative impacts on 
liquidity because short sellers, a source of market liquidity, may 
limit their activity if they believe reporting reveals their trading 
strategies or allows others to trade in a way that is detrimental to 
their interests.
    \21\ Studies have suggested that, while increasing dissemination 
speed beyond a certain point may discourage short selling, more 
moderate increases in dissemination speed can offset negative 
impacts. Kahraman (2020) finds that, at the same level of 
aggregation as the instant proposal, increasing the short interest 
reporting frequency from monthly to bimonthly more than offset any 
negative impact on short selling activity by accelerating the 
incorporation of the information into prices. See Bige Kahraman, 
Publicizing Arbitrage: Impact of Mandatory Disclosures, Journal of 
Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56, 789-820 (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information on Allocations of Fail To Deliver Positions
    FINRA is proposing to require member clearing firms to submit to 
FINRA on a monthly basis a report of their daily allocations of fail to 
deliver positions to correspondent firms pursuant to Rule 204 of 
Regulation SHO. Currently, when there has been a fail to deliver, FINRA 
must contact the clearing firm to learn whether the firm has allocated 
the fail to deliver to a correspondent firm and if so, to which 
firm.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Across settlement dates in 2025, the median number of 
equity securities with any outstanding fail to deliver positions was 
5,261. A total of 158 firms reported at least one fail to deliver 
position in 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Requiring clearing firms to submit on a monthly basis a report of 
their daily allocations would allow FINRA to conduct more efficient 
investigations as FINRA would be able to identify which member has the 
close-out obligation directly from the reported information. Member 
clearing firms may also benefit from freeing up resources used to 
respond to inquiries about allocations to correspondent firms.
    FINRA members that are participants of a registered clearing agency 
would incur costs associated with establishing a process to report to 
FINRA daily allocations to correspondent firms. These member firms may 
seek to amend their contracts with correspondent firms to shift these 
costs.
Alternatives Considered
    FINRA considered requiring short interest to be reported on a daily 
rather than weekly basis. While more frequent availability of 
information could be useful to market participants and to FINRA for 
regulatory purposes because it would provide information about short 
positions at members with less delay, reporting data daily also would 
place a larger burden on reporting firms and may raise concerns 
addressed above regarding potential impacts on price efficiency and 
liquidity.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    In June 2021, FINRA published Regulatory Notice 21-19 (``Notice'') 
seeking comment on potential enhancements to its short sale reporting 
program. These potential enhancements included (1) modifications to the 
short interest reporting requirements in Rule 4560, (2) adoption of a 
new rule to require participants of a registered clearing agency to 
report to FINRA information on allocations to correspondent firms of 
fail to deliver positions, and (3) other potential enhancements related 
to short sale activity.\23\ FINRA received 2,227 comment letters in 
response to the Notice. A copy of the Notice is available on FINRA's 
website at <a href="http://www.finra.org">http://www.finra.org</a>. A list of the comment letters and 
copies of the comment letters received in response to the Notice are 
available on FINRA's website.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ In the Notice, FINRA did not solicit comment on the 
proposed rule changes discussed in Item 3 of this rule filing 
regarding the reporting of final short interest positions for 
securities with deleted symbols or the clarification of the scope of 
the securities subject to the reporting requirements of Rule 4560.
    \24\ See <a href="https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/21-19#comments">https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/21-19#comments</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In general, the commenters supported some aspects of the potential 
enhancements and raised concerns with others. A summary of the comments 
FINRA received that are related to the instant proposed rule change and 
FINRA's responses are discussed below.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Some comments raised concerns regarding broader issues, 
such as (1) more stringent regulation of naked short selling and 
fails to deliver, (2) allowing shares to be borrowed only once and 
limiting the total amount of shares held short to no more than the 
security's float, (3) increasing enforcement penalties and fines, 
(4) the potential conflict of interest when a market maker also runs 
a hedge fund, (5) lack of transparency and manipulation in the 
context of dark pools, (6) requiring settlement on trade date, (7) 
preventing payment for order flow, and (8) requiring disclosure of 
synthetic long positions. These comments are outside the scope of 
the instant proposed rule change and therefore are not addressed 
herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Positions Resulting From ``Arranged Financing''
    FINRA received comments regarding expanding short interest 
reporting to require members to report as short interest outstanding 
stock borrows by customers in their arranged financing programs through 
which a customer borrows shares from the firm's domestic or foreign 
affiliate and uses those shares to close out a short position in the 
customer's account.
    Several commenters supported reflecting loan obligations resulting 
from arranged financing in reported short interest.\26\ Angel, Better 
Markets,

[[Page 28704]]

and CFA Institute stated that the proposal would provide greater 
transparency regarding short interest. In addition, individual 
investors generally supported increased granularity of short interest 
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See letter from James J. Angel, Ph.D., CFP, CFA, Associate 
Professor of Finance, Georgetown University, McDonough School of 
Business, to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of the Corporate 
Secretary, FINRA, dated September 30, 2021 (``Angel''); letter from 
Joseph R. Cisewski, Senior Derivatives Consultant and Special 
Counsel, Better Markets, Inc., to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office 
of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 30, 2021 
(``Better Markets''); letter from Kurt N. Schacht, CFA, CFA 
Institute Head of Advocacy, and Stephen Deane, CFA, CFA Institute 
Senior Director--Advocacy, to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of 
the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 24, 2021 (``CFA 
Institute''); letter from Jennifer W. Han, Chief Counsel & Head of 
Regulatory Affairs, Managed Funds Association, to Jennifer Piorko 
Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 
30, 2021 (``MFA''); letter from Melanie Senter Lubin, NASAA 
President, Maryland Securities Commissioner, North American 
Securities Administrators Association, Inc., to Jennifer Piorko 
Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 
30, 2021 (``NASAA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Three commenters opposed reflecting loan obligations resulting from 
arranged financing in reported short interest.\27\ Credit Suisse stated 
that this change could result in ``false positives'' and potential 
duplication in the data reported. Fidelity stated that the change would 
shift borrowing activity away from FINRA member arranged financing 
programs to swaps dealers, custody banks, or off-shore entities that 
are not subject to similar reporting requirements. FIF stated that 
there would be a significant undertaking involved in reporting this 
information and that the information is available from other sources 
such as The Depository Trust Company. One commenter neither supported 
nor opposed this aspect of the proposal but asked that FINRA consider 
the challenges firms would face obtaining the information from their 
affiliates in addition to the significant implementation challenges 
before proceeding to require that firms provide arranged financing 
information in short interest.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See letter from Michael E. Moran, Managing Director, Head 
of US Public Policy, Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc., to Jennifer 
Piorko Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, received 
September 30, 2021 (``Credit Suisse''); letter from Michael Lyons, 
Chief Financial Officer, National Financial Services LLC (submitted 
by Fidelity Investments), to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of the 
Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 30, 2021 (``Fidelity''); 
letter from Howard Meyerson, Managing Director, Financial 
Information Forum, to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of the 
Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 29, 2021 (``FIF'').
    \28\ See letter from Robert Toomey, Managing Director, Associate 
General Counsel, and Joseph Corcoran, Managing Director, Associate 
General Counsel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets 
Association, to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of the Corporate 
Secretary, FINRA, dated September 30, 2021 (``SIFMA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After considering the comments received, FINRA has determined to 
propose amendments to Rule 4560(b) to require members to report as 
short interest outstanding stock borrows by customers in their arranged 
financing programs. FINRA believes that including in FINRA's short 
interest data these positions, as specifically defined in the proposed 
rule change, would not be duplicative and would better reflect the 
actual short sentiment in an equity security. Because the reporting 
member has made available the arranged financing program to its 
customers and the position is reflected on the member's books, FINRA 
believes it is reasonable to require the member to identify these 
positions and include them in reported short interest, as contemplated 
in the proposal. FINRA also believes that the primary motivation for 
customers to use arranged financing is to obtain increased leverage 
rather than to avoid short interest reporting, which, to the extent 
this is true, would limit incentives to shift lending to non-FINRA 
members, including banks. FINRA further understands that, although it 
is possible for customers to obtain short exposure to a security 
through other means, it would be impractical for entities other than 
affiliates of FINRA members to offer a service substantially similar to 
arranged financing. FINRA continues to believe that requiring members 
to include these positions will improve the completeness of reported 
short interest information, and notes that this information is not 
reasonably ascertainable elsewhere; therefore, requiring members to 
report this information is reasonable and appropriate.
2. Frequency and Timing of Short Interest Position Reporting and 
Dissemination
    In the Notice, FINRA requested comment on potentially increasing 
the frequency of short interest reporting and dissemination. 
Specifically, FINRA stated that it was considering increasing the 
frequency of short interest reporting and dissemination from bi-monthly 
to weekly or daily. In addition, FINRA noted that it was considering 
shortening the timeframe for members to submit short interest reports 
and reducing the amount of time FINRA takes to process the collected 
information so that FINRA could disseminate short interest data more 
quickly.
    Eight commenters supported increasing the short interest reporting 
frequency to weekly, noting that it would be more feasible than daily 
reporting while still increasing transparency, providing investors with 
timely information, and preserving the confidentiality of individual 
firm investment and trading strategies.\29\ FIF, however, raised 
concerns, including regarding the feasibility of shortening the 
timeframe for members to submit short interest position reports to 
FINRA after the designated settlement date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See letter from Stephen John Berger, Managing Director, 
Global Head of Government & Regulatory Policy, Citadel Securities, 
to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, 
FINRA, dated September 30, 2021 (``Citadel''); letter from Sarah A. 
Bessin, Associate General Counsel, and Nhan Nguyen, Assistant 
General Counsel, Investment Company Institute, to Jennifer Piorko 
Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated August 31, 
2021 (``ICI''); letter from Paul Wilson, Managing Director, Global 
Head of Securities Finance, Equities Data & Analytics, IHS Markit, 
to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, 
FINRA, dated September 30, 2021 (``IHS Markit''); letter from 
Matthew R. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer, Provable Markets LLC, to 
Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, 
dated September 30, 2021 (``PML''); letter from Thomas M. Merritt, 
Deputy General Counsel, Virtu Financial, Inc., to Jennifer Piorko 
Mitchell, Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 
30, 2021 (``Virtu''); letters from CFA Institute, FIF and MFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Angel, Better Markets, NASAA, and several individual investors 
supported daily reporting and dissemination of short interest data. 
Better Markets and NASAA suggested that, if necessary, there should be 
a suitable delay in daily dissemination to allow firms to compile short 
interest data. NASAA further stated that daily short interest data 
currently can be purchased and therefore this data can be compiled 
without undue burden. CFA Institute also asked that FINRA consider 
daily reporting if daily short interest data already is available 
through other means.
    Five commenters opposed increasing the frequency of short interest 
reporting.\30\ Credit Suisse, Fidelity, and SIFMA stated that such a 
change would be operationally challenging and a significant cost burden 
on firms. Nasdaq asked that FINRA undertake a rigorous analysis on the 
frequency of reporting, and publish the results of that analysis, 
before increasing the frequency of short sale reporting. T. Rowe Price 
stated that more frequent short interest reporting would negatively 
impact liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See letter from Jeffrey Davis, Senior Vice President, North 
American Regulation, Nasdaq, Inc., to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, 
Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated October 13, 2021 
(``Nasdaq''); letter from Mehmet Kinak, Global Head of Systematic 
Trading & Market Structure, Philip Nestico, Head of U.S. Equity 
Trading, and Jonathan Siegel, Senior Legal Counsel--Legislative & 
Regulatory Affairs, T. Rowe Price, to Jennifer Piorko Mitchell, 
Office of the Corporate Secretary, FINRA, dated September 20, 2021 
(``T. Rowe Price''); letters from Credit Suisse, Fidelity and SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After considering the comments received, FINRA is proposing to 
increase the frequency of short interest reporting and dissemination 
from bi-monthly to weekly and to reduce the turnaround time for the 
submission of the reports from two business days to

[[Page 28705]]

one business day following the designated settlement date. FINRA 
believes that these changes best balance the goals of improving 
transparency and the usefulness of short interest data for regulators 
and market participants with the burden on firms to provide such 
information on a more frequent basis and concerns regarding potential 
impacts on liquidity. FINRA believes that firms' current reporting 
processes are well-established and that, following the initial process 
and systems adjustments, members will be able to report data on a 
weekly basis using current systems. In addition, FINRA believes that 
the aggregate nature of the published short interest data and the five-
business-day turnaround time between the date of the short interest 
data and its dissemination would largely mitigate concerns regarding 
potential information leakage and impacts on liquidity.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ Some comment letters also discussed FINRA's oversight 
program with regard to the accuracy and completeness of firms' short 
interest reporting. These commenters state that FINRA's inquiries, 
which require manual efforts, would further complicate weekly 
reporting. FINRA notes that the referenced process appears to be 
part of the ongoing oversight process to ensure that members are 
reporting their short interest data in compliance with FINRA rules 
and guidance. FINRA believes that these oversight efforts have been, 
and will remain, important elements of FINRA's regulatory program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Allocations of Fails To Deliver Positions
    FINRA also received comments with respect to the proposal to adopt 
a new rule to require members to submit to FINRA a report of daily 
allocations of fail to deliver positions to correspondent firms 
pursuant to Rule 204(d) of SEC Regulation SHO. Angel, Better Markets, 
CFA Institute, FIF, and NASAA supported the adoption of such a rule. 
FIF stated that, subject to the manner and timing of implementation, on 
balance, the benefits of the proposed rule could outweigh the costs. 
NASAA indicated that the proposed rule would benefit investors by 
adding efficiencies to FINRA's market oversight with minimal impacts on 
firms, as well as possibly increase the likelihood that firms would 
comply with their settlement requirements in a timely fashion.
    Fidelity and SIFMA opposed FINRA adopting such a rule, stating that 
the costs would outweigh the benefits and increase the potential for 
reporting errors. Fidelity further stated that FINRA should eliminate 
the proposed data field requiring the time period for the applicable 
close out obligation as the introducing firm rather than the clearing 
firm is responsible for this information.
    Having considered comments received, FINRA continues to believe it 
is appropriate to propose new Rule 4321 to require members to report to 
FINRA on a monthly basis their daily allocations of fail to deliver 
positions to correspondent firms. FINRA believes that allocations of 
these positions by clearing firms is a common occurrence and that a 
report of daily allocations of fail to deliver positions to 
correspondent firms would provide valuable information in support of 
FINRA's surveillance program for compliance with SEC Regulation SHO. 
FINRA believes that routinely obtaining this information would allow 
FINRA to conduct more efficient investigations and that the anticipated 
costs of the proposal are appropriate in light of the expected 
regulatory benefits. However, FINRA has, in response to comments, 
revised the proposal to omit the data fields pertaining to the close 
out date and the applicable close out obligation, since clearing firms 
will not necessarily know this information.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef9d9a838ac28c8082828a819b9caf9c8a8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96e4e3faf3bbf5f9fbfbf3f8e2e5d6e5f3f5b8f1f9e0">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
File Number SR-FINRA-2026-012 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2026-012. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). 
Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and copying at 
the principal office of FINRA. Do not include personal identifiable 
information in submissions; you should submit only information that you 
wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold 
entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject 
to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to File Number 
SR-FINRA-2026-012 and should be submitted on or before June 8, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-09864 Filed 5-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 18, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.