Proposed Rule2026-09771

Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 15, 2026

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation Administration

Abstract

The FAA is revising a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would have applied to certain Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Model PC-12 airplanes. This action revises the NPRM by changing the applicability. The FAA is proposing this airworthiness directive (AD) to address the unsafe condition on these products. Since these actions would impose an additional burden over those in the NPRM for different airplanes, the FAA is requesting comments on this SNPRM.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 94 (Friday, May 15, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27878-27881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-09771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2026-0018; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01384-A]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is revising a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
that would have applied to certain Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) 
Model PC-12 airplanes. This action revises the NPRM by changing the 
applicability. The FAA is proposing this airworthiness directive (AD) 
to address the unsafe condition on these products. Since these actions 
would impose an additional burden over those in the NPRM for different 
airplanes, the FAA is requesting comments on this SNPRM.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this SNPRM by June 29, 2026.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>. Follow 
the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Fax: (202) 493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

[[Page 27879]]

    <bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under 
Docket No. FAA-2026-0018; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 
docket contains this SNPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The 
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
    <bullet> For European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) material 
identified in this proposed AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 
50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#befffacdfedbdfcddf90dbcbccd1cedf90dbcb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5213162112373321337c3727203d22337c3727">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>; website: easa.europa.eu. You may find this material 
on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also available at 
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under Docket No. FAA-2026-0018.
    <bullet> You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1100 Main, Kansas City, MO 
64105. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, 
call (817) 222-5110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety 
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 
phone: (816) 329-4059; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e4a415b49005c5b4a41425e466e484f4f00494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d7972687a336f687972716d755d7b7c7c337a726b">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments using a method listed 
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2026-0018; 
Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01384-A'' at the beginning of your 
comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the 
proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include 
supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the 
closing date and may again revise this proposal because of those 
comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in 
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to 
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>, including any personal information you provide. The 
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal 
contact received about this SNPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily 
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public 
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this SNPRM contain 
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as 
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or 
responsive to this SNPRM, it is important that you clearly designate 
the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission 
containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked 
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed 
in the public docket of this SNPRM. Submissions containing CBI should 
be sent to Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart 
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590. Any commentary that the FAA 
receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in 
the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that 
would have applied to certain Pilatus Model PC-12 airplanes. The NPRM 
was published in the Federal Register on January 21, 2026 (91 FR 2512). 
The NPRM was prompted by EASA AD 2025-0182, dated August 25, 2025 (EASA 
AD 2025-0182) (also referred to as the MCAI), issued by EASA, which is 
the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, to 
correct an unsafe condition on certain Pilatus Model PC-12/47E 
airplanes. The MCAI states that there was a report that the emergency 
exit door could not be opened from inside an airplane. Further 
investigation revealed that incorrect installation of the passenger 
service unit (PSU) trim panel, which is installed above the emergency 
exit door, could block the opening of the emergency exit if the PSU 
trim panel is positioned too far inboard. This condition, if not 
addressed, could prevent the opening of the emergency door, which could 
result in injury to occupants during an emergency evacuation.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require a visual inspection of the 
PSU trim panel for dual lock fastener tapes and modification if dual 
lock fastener tapes are not installed. The NPRM also proposed to 
prohibit the installation of affected parts.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under 
Docket No. FAA-2026-0018.

Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued

    Since the FAA issued the NPRM, the FAA has determined that the 
applicability of the NPRM referenced the incorrect airplane model. 
Therefore, this proposed AD revises the NPRM to correct the affected 
airplane from Model PC-12 to Model PC-12/47E. The FAA is proposing this 
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Comments

    The FAA received a comment from the Air Line Pilots Association, 
International. The commenter supported the NPRM without change.

Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2025-0182, which specifies procedures for 
modifying the PSU trim panel if dual lock fastener tapes are not 
installed. EASA AD 2025-0182 also prohibits the installation of an 
affected part. EASA AD 2025-0182 also refers to instructions to 
determine whether dual lock fastener tapes are installed on a PSU trim 
panel. This material is reasonably available because the interested 
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by 
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    These products have been approved by the civil aviation authority 
of another country and are approved for operation in the United States. 
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design 
Authority, that authority has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition 
described in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA is issuing this SNPRM 
after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is 
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
    Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a 
result, it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide 
additional opportunity for the public to comment on this SNPRM.

Proposed AD Requirements in This SNPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified 
in the material already described, except for any differences 
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. 
See ``Differences Between this SNPRM and the MCAI'' for a

[[Page 27880]]

discussion of the general differences included in this proposed AD.

Differences Between This SNPRM and the MCAI

    Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2025-0182 does not specify an 
inspection to determine whether dual lock fastener tapes are installed 
on a PSU trim panel, for this proposed AD an inspection would be 
required in accordance with section B. Part 1 of the material 
referenced in EASA AD 2025-0182 to determine whether an airplane has 
the dual lock fastener tapes installed on a PSU trim panel and is 
either a Group 1 or Group 2 airplane as defined in EASA AD 2025-0182.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD 
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation 
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance 
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has since 
coordinated with other manufacturers and CAAs to use this process. As a 
result, the FAA proposes to incorporate by reference EASA AD 2025-0182 
in the FAA final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require 
compliance with EASA AD 2025-0182 in its entirety through that 
incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions in 
the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Using common terms that are 
the same as the heading of a particular section in EASA AD 2025-0182 
does not mean that operators need comply only with that section. For 
example, where the AD requirement refers to ``all required actions and 
compliance times,'' compliance with this AD requirement is not limited 
to the section titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in 
EASA AD 2025-0182. Material required by EASA AD 2025-0182 for 
compliance will be available at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under Docket No. FAA-
2026-0018 after the FAA final rule is published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would 
affect 276 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed 
AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect PSU trim panel................  1 work-hour x $85 per                 $0             $85         $23,460
                                         hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary 
modification that would be required based on the results of the 
proposed inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of 
airplanes that might need this modification:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modify PSU trim panel.........................  2 work-hours x $85 per hour =               $100            $270
                                                 $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. 
According to the manufacturer, however, some of the costs of this 
proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost 
impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive:


[[Page 27881]]


Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA-2026-0018; Project Identifier 
MCAI-2025-01384-A.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive 
(AD) by June 29, 2026.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-12/47E 
airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers 2001 through 2999, 
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 2500, Cabin 
Equipment/Furnishings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that the emergency exit door 
could not be opened from inside an airplane. The FAA is issuing this 
AD to prevent the passenger service unit (PSU) trim panel from 
blocking the opening of the emergency exit. The unsafe condition, if 
not addressed, could prevent the opening of the emergency door, 
which could result in injury to occupants during an emergency 
evacuation.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD: Comply 
with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in 
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 
2025-0182, dated August 25, 2025 (EASA AD 2025-0182).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2025-0182

    (1) Where EASA AD 2025-0182 refers to its effective date, this 
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2025-0182 does not specify an 
inspection to determine whether dual lock fastener tapes are 
installed on a PSU trim panel, for this AD an inspection is required 
in accordance with section B. Part 1 of the material referenced in 
EASA AD 2025-0182 to determine whether an airplane has the dual lock 
fastener tapes installed on a PSU trim panel and is either a Group 1 
or Group 2 airplane as defined in EASA AD 2025-0182.
    (3) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 
2025-0182.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the material referenced in EASA AD 2025-0182 specifies 
to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not 
include that requirement.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the 
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight 
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information 
directly to the International Validation Branch, send it to the 
attention of the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD and 
email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fcbdb1b3bfbc9a9d9dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="20616d6f63604641410e474f56">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the responsible Flight Standards Office/certificate holding 
district office.

(k) Additional Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Doug Rudolph, 
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 
Westbury, NY 11590; phone: (816) 329-4059; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5818a9082cb9790818a89958da5838484cb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0d4dfc5d79ec2c5d4dfdcc0d8f0d6d1d19ed7dfc6">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference of the material listed in this paragraph 
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions 
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2025-0182, 
dated August 25, 2025.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For EASA material identified in this AD, contact EASA, 
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 
000; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#47060334072226342669223235283726692232"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d7c794e7d585c4e5c1358484f524d5c135848">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>; website: easa.europa.eu. You may 
find this EASA AD on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1100 Main, Kansas City, 
MO 64105. For information on the availability of this material at 
the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
    (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability 
of this material at NARA, visit <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations">www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations</a> or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2244500c4b4c51524741564b4d4c624c4350430c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a1c08541314090a1f190e1315143a141b081b541d150c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

    Issued on May 12, 2026.
Paul R. Bernado,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2026-09771 Filed 5-14-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 15, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.