Rule2026-08931

Conforming Change for Approving a Making Application

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 6, 2026
Effective
May 6, 2026

Issuing agencies

Justice DepartmentAlcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau

Abstract

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives ("ATF") is amending Department of Justice ("Department") regulations to require that a National Instant Criminal Background Check System background check be performed as part of the approval process to make a National Firearms Act ("NFA") firearm. ATF already conducts such background checks as part of its processing and this amendment to the regulation simply ensures that the regulations addressing NFA processes are consistent with the statutory requirements.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24362-24364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-08931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives

27 CFR Part 479

[ATF No. 2025R-21F]
RIN 1140-AA79


Conforming Change for Approving a Making Application

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 
Department of Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives 
(``ATF'') is amending Department of Justice (``Department'') 
regulations to require that a National Instant Criminal Background 
Check System background check be performed as part of the approval 
process to make a National Firearms Act (``NFA'') firearm. ATF already 
conducts such background checks as part of its processing and this 
amendment to the regulation simply ensures that the regulations 
addressing NFA processes are consistent with the statutory 
requirements.

DATES: This rule is effective May 6, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Regulatory Affairs, by email 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#501f0211103124367e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d120f1c1d3c293b733a322b">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, by mail at Office of Regulatory Affairs; Enforcement 
Programs and Services; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 
Explosives; 99 New York Ave NE; Washington DC 20226, or by telephone at 
202-648-7070 (this is not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Attorney General is responsible for enforcing the National 
Firearms Act (``NFA''), as amended, 26 U.S.C. chapter 53.\1\ Congress 
and the Attorney General have delegated the responsibility for 
administering and enforcing the NFA to the Director of ATF 
(``Director''), subject to the direction of the Attorney General and 
the Deputy Attorney General. See 28 U.S.C. 599A(b)(1), (c)(1); 28 CFR 
0.130(a)(1)-(2); Treas. Order No. 221(2)(a), (d), 37 FR 11696-97 (June 
10, 1972).\2\ Accordingly, the Department and ATF have promulgated 
regulations to implement the NFA in 27 CFR part 479.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Some NFA provisions still refer to the ``Secretary of the 
Treasury.'' However, the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 
107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, transferred the functions of ATF from the 
Department of the Treasury to the Department of Justice, under the 
general authority of the Attorney General. 26 U.S.C. 7801(a)(2); 28 
U.S.C. 599A(c)(1). Thus, for ease of reference, this final rule 
refers to the Attorney General where relevant.
    \2\ In Attorney General Order Number 6353-2025, the Attorney 
General delegated authority to the Director to issue regulations 
pertaining to matters within ATF's jurisdiction, including under the 
NFA, Gun Control Act, and Title XI of the Organized Crime Control 
Act. ATF's jurisdiction also includes those portions of sec. 38 of 
the Arms Export Control Act pertaining to permanently importing 
defense articles and services and the Contraband Cigarette 
Trafficking Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The regulations in 27 CFR part 479 contain procedural and 
substantive requirements for importing, making, exporting, 
transferring, taxing, identifying, registering, and dealing in machine 
guns, destructive devices, and certain other firearms. The NFA applies 
to machine guns, shotguns having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 
inches in length, rifles having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 
inches in length, weapons made from a rifle with an overall length of 
less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in 
length, weapons made from a shotgun with an overall length of less than 
26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length, 
silencers, destructive devices, and any other weapon as defined by the 
NFA (``NFA firearm''). 26 U.S.C. 5845(a).
    Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 5822(e), no person can make an NFA firearm 
unless they have obtained the Attorney General's approval to make and 
register the firearm and the application form shows such approval. 
Applications must be denied if making or possessing the firearm would 
place the person making the firearm in violation of law.
    The regulations that implement 26 U.S.C. 5822(e) are found at 27 
CFR 479.64 (``Procedure for approval of application'') and 479.65 
(``Denial of application''). Section 479.64 sets forth the process for 
ATF's approval of the application and makes clear that the maker cannot 
make the firearm until the application has been approved and returned 
to the applicant with the approved stamp. The regulation at 27 CFR 
479.65 includes the requirement that an application must be denied if 
making or possessing the firearm would place the maker in violation of 
law. However, these provisions contain no explicit guidance on how 
applications to make an NFA firearm (i.e., ATF Form 5320.1, Application 
to Make and Register a Firearm (``Form 1'')) are to be evaluated to 
ensure that, pursuant to the statute, making or possessing the firearm 
would not place the person making the firearm in violation of law.
    Another NFA regulation in 27 CFR part 479 that implements 
application processing procedures contains explicit guidance that is 
absent from 27 CFR 479.64. The statute at 26 U.S.C. 5812, which 
pertains to transferring an NFA firearm, states that an application to 
transfer an NFA firearm ``shall be denied if the transfer, receipt, or 
possession of the firearm would place the transferee in violation of 
law.'' The implementing regulation for 26 U.S.C. 5812 states, ``[i]n 
addition to any other records checks that may be conducted to determine 
whether the transfer, receipt, or possession of a firearm would place 
the transferee in violation of law, the Director shall contact the 
National Instant Criminal Background Check System.'' 27 CFR 479.86.
    While both statutory provisions (26 U.S.C. 5812 and 5822) require 
that the respective applications to either make or transfer an NFA 
firearm be denied if making or transferring the firearm would place the 
individual in violation of law, currently it is only 27 CFR 479.86 that 
explicitly states that a National Instant Criminal Background Check 
System (``NICS'') background check must be performed as part of the 
application process, whereas 27 CFR 479.64 contains no such explicit 
requirement. Nevertheless, for both making and transfer applications, 
ATF currently contacts NICS to ensure individuals are not prohibited 
under the law from possessing a firearm.

II. Final Rule

    To reflect current practice and track relevant language in Sec.  
479.86, this rule amends Sec.  479.64 to require that a NICS background 
check be conducted by ATF as part of processing Form 1 applications to 
make an NFA firearm. This change is necessary to ensure that the Form 1 
approval process meets the statutory requirement at 26 U.S.C. 5822 and 
is consistent across ATF regulations.
    Section 479.86 currently provides: ``An application, Form 4 
(Firearms), to transfer a firearm shall be denied if the transfer, 
receipt, or possession of a firearm would place the transferee in 
violation of law. In addition to any other records checks that may be 
conducted to

[[Page 24363]]

determine whether the transfer, receipt, or possession of a firearm 
would place the transferee in violation of law, the Director shall 
contact the [NICS].'' Accordingly, ATF is simply adding to 27 CFR 
479.64 language that parallels the language in Sec.  479.86 used for 
transfer applications. The added language makes clear that an 
application to make a firearm, Form 1, must be denied if making or 
possessing the firearm would place the maker in violation of law, and 
that to make this determination ATF must contact NICS.
    This final rule also makes a technical edit to correct the 
authority citation line for 27 CFR part 479 to read as: 26 U.S.C. 5801-
5812; 26 U.S.C. 7801; 26 U.S.C. 7805, and makes minor technical edits 
to Sec.  479.64 for plain writing purposes--primarily, breaking the 
long paragraph into smaller ones, updating form references, and 
removing passive voice.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Review

A. Administrative Procedure Act

    This final rule relates to a matter of agency management or 
personnel and is a rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice. 
This rule does not alter any obligations on the public and simply adds 
to ATF's regulations ATF's longstanding practice of running a NICS 
background check to determine whether an applicant's making or 
possession of an NFA firearm would place the maker in violation of the 
law. Accordingly, this rule is exempt from the usual requirements of 
prior notice-and-comment and a 30-day delay in effective date. See 5 
U.S.C. 553(a)(2), (b)(A), (d).

B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) directs 
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory 
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory 
approaches that maximize net benefits.
    Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) 
emphasizes the importance of agencies quantifying both costs and 
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting public 
flexibility.
    This final rule is amending 27 CFR 479.64 to require that ATF 
conduct a NICS background check as part of processing Form 1, the 
application to make an NFA firearm, to simply make the agency's 
regulations consistent with the current process. The Office of 
Management and Budget (``OMB'') has determined that this rule is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Therefore, it did not review this rule. There are no changes in ATF 
standards or compliance requirements; therefore, ATF anticipates no 
costs or benefits accruing from this rule.

C. Executive Order 14192

    Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation) 
requires an agency, unless prohibited by law, to identify at least ten 
existing regulations to be repealed or revised when the agency publicly 
proposes for notice-and-comment or otherwise promulgates a new 
regulation that qualifies as an Executive Order 14192 regulatory action 
(defined in OMB Memorandum M-25-20 as a final significant regulatory 
action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 that imposes costs 
greater than zero). In furtherance of this requirement, section 3(c) of 
Executive Order 14192 requires that any new incremental costs 
associated with such new regulations must, to the extent permitted by 
law, also be offset by eliminating existing costs associated with at 
least ten prior regulations. However, this rule is not an Executive 
Order 14192 regulatory action because it is not a significant 
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 and it does not 
impose total costs greater than zero.

D. Executive Order 14294

    Executive Order 14294 (Fighting Overcriminalization in Federal 
Regulations) requires agencies promulgating regulations with criminal 
regulatory offenses potentially subject to criminal enforcement to 
explicitly describe the conduct subject to criminal enforcement, the 
authorizing statutes, and the mens rea standard applicable to each 
element of those offenses. This final rule does not create a criminal 
regulatory offense and is thus exempt from Executive Order 14294 
requirements.

E. Executive Order 13132

    This final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the 
states, the relationship between the federal government and the states, 
or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of 
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism), the Director has determined that 
this final rule does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on 
state and local governments, preempt state law, or meaningfully 
implicate federalism. It thus does not warrant preparing a federalism 
summary impact statement.

F. Executive Order 12988

    This final rule meets the applicable standards set forth in 
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice 
Reform).

G. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA''), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, 
agencies are required to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of 
any rule subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements unless 
the agency head certifies, including a statement of the factual basis, 
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include certain 
small businesses, small not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    A regulatory flexibility analysis is not necessary because this 
rule is not required to undergo notice-and-comment rulemaking as 
described in section III.A of this preamble. Nevertheless, the Director 
certifies, after consideration, that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
because it is only including in the regulations the existing practice 
of running a NICS background check on applicants who submit a Form 1 to 
make an NFA firearm.

H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This final rule does not include a federal mandate that might 
result in the expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 
one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments. Therefore, ATF has determined that no actions are 
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995.

I. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA''), 44 U.S.C. 
3501-3521, agencies are required to submit to OMB, for review and 
approval, any information collection requirements a rule creates or any 
impacts it has on existing information collections. An information 
collection includes any reporting, record-keeping, monitoring, posting, 
labeling, or other similar actions an agency requires of the public. 
See 5 CFR 1320.3(c). This final rule involves one existing information 
collection under the PRA, which is

[[Page 24364]]

OMB control number 1140-0011: Application to Make and Register NFA 
Firearm, which includes ATF Form 5320.1 (``Form 1''). However, because 
this rule changes only a requirement for the agency, it will not have 
an impact on this existing information collection.

J. Congressional Review Act

    This rule is not a major rule as defined by the Congressional 
Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804.

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 479

    Administrative practice and procedure, Arms and munitions, Exports, 
Imports, Military personnel, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Seizures and forfeitures, Taxes, Transportation

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, ATF amends 27 CFR part 
479 as follows:

PART 479--MACHINE GUNS, DESTRUCTIVE DEVICES, AND CERTAIN OTHER 
FIREARMS

0
1. Revise the authority citation for 27 CFR part 479 to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  26 U.S.C. 5801-5812; 26 U.S.C. 7801; 26 U.S.C. 
7805.Inserting required closing tag for E.


0
2. Revise Sec.  479.64 to read as follows:


Sec.  479.64  Action on making application.

    (a) A person who intends to make a firearm must submit the 
application to make a firearm, Form 1, directly, in duplicate, to the 
Director in accordance with the instructions on the form. The Director 
will consider the application for approval or disapproval. If the 
application is approved, the Director will return the original to the 
applicant and retain the duplicate.
    (b) In addition to any other records checks the Director may 
conduct to determine whether the applicant would be violating the law 
by making or possessing a firearm, the Director must contact the 
National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
    (c) Upon receiving the approved application, the maker may make the 
described firearm. The maker must not, under any circumstances, make 
the firearm until the Director has approved and returned the 
application with the National Firearms Act stamp affixed.
    (d) If the Director disapproves the application, the Director will 
return to the applicant the original Form 1 and the remittance 
submitted by the applicant and will include on the form the reason for 
disapproving the application.

Robert Cekada,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2026-08931 Filed 5-5-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FY-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 6, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.