Notice2026-08624

FCC's Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Further Empowering Parents to Protect Their Children and Make Informed Choices About the TV Programs Their Children Watch

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 4, 2026

Issuing agencies

Federal Communications Commission

Abstract

In this document, the Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission seeks comments on whether and how the Bureau's suggestions to improve the transparency of the Television Oversight Monitoring Board (TVOMB) and the accuracy of TV ratings have been implemented, whether the composition of the TVOMB is sufficiently balanced, and whether content descriptions provide a sufficient basis for parents to make informed decisions concerning viewing decisions for their family, among other issues.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 85 (Monday, May 4, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23990-23992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-08624]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[MB Docket No. 19-41; DA 26-392; FR ID 343421]


FCC's Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Further Empowering Parents to 
Protect Their Children and Make Informed Choices About the TV Programs 
Their Children Watch

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Media Bureau of the Federal 
Communications Commission seeks comments on whether and how the 
Bureau's suggestions to improve the transparency of the Television 
Oversight Monitoring Board (TVOMB) and the accuracy of TV ratings have 
been implemented, whether the composition of the TVOMB is sufficiently 
balanced, and whether content descriptions provide a sufficient basis 
for parents to make informed decisions concerning viewing decisions for 
their family, among other issues.

DATES: Comment Date: May 22, 2026. Reply Comment Date: June 22, 2026.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, reply comments and ex parte 
communications, identified by MB Docket No. 19-41, electronically or on 
paper. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific information and 
addresses for electronic or paper filings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Murphy, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57193639342e791a2225273f2e1731343479303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a547b74796334576f686a72635a7c7979347d756c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, 
Media Bureau, (202) 418-1043.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Media Bureau's 
Public Notice entitled FCC's Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Further 
Empowering Parents to Protect their Children and Make Informed Choices 
about the TV Programs their Children Watch in MB Docket No. 19-41, DA 
26-392, that was released April 22, 2026. The full text of this 
document is available for public inspection online at <a href="https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-392A1.pdf">https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-392A1.pdf</a> and via the search 
function on the Commission's Electronic Document Management System 
(EDOCS) web page at <a href="https://www.fcc.gov/edocs">https://www.fcc.gov/edocs</a>. Alternative formats are 
available for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, 
electronic files, audio format, etc.) and reasonable accommodations 
(accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) 
may be requested by sending an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cfaffffa9aca8dcfaffffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e181d1d4b4e4a3e181d1d50191108">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> or call the 
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice).
    Ex Parte Rules--Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding shall be 
treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the 
Commission's ex parte rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must 
file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any 
oral presentation within two business days after the presentation 
(unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period 
applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that 
memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons 
attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex 
parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and 
arguments made during the presentation.
    If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the 
presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter's 
written comments, memoranda, or other filings in the proceeding, the 
presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her 
prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant 
page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be 
found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown 
or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be 
written ex parte presentations and must be filed

[[Page 23991]]

consistent with rule 1.1206(b). Written ex parte presentations and 
memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments 
thereto, must, when feasible, be filed through the electronic comment 
filing system in the docket established for this proceeding, and must 
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable 
.pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves 
with the Commission's ex parte rules.
    Filing Requirements--Comments and Replies. Interested parties may 
file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on 
the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using the 
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS).
    <bullet> Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically 
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: <a href="https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs">https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs</a>.
    <bullet> Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must 
file an original and one copy of each filing. Filings can be sent by 
hand or messenger delivery, by commercial courier, or by the U.S. 
Postal Service. All filings must be addressed to the Secretary, Federal 
Communications Commission.
    [cir] Hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the 
Commission's Secretary are accepted between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. by 
the FCC's mailing contractor at 9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis 
Junction, MD 20701. All hand deliveries must be held together with 
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be disposed of 
before entering the building.
    [cir] Commercial courier deliveries (any deliveries not by the U.S. 
Postal Service) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis 
Junction, MD 20701.
    [cir] Filings sent by U.S. Postal Service First-Class Mail, 
Priority Mail, and Priority Mail Express must be sent to 45 L Street 
NE, Washington, DC 20554.

Synopsis

    Over the years, Congress and the FCC have acted to empower parents 
to determine the type of television programming that is appropriate for 
their children. Indeed, in 1996, Congress found that television 
programming has a ``uniquely pervasive presence in the lives of 
American children'' and ``influences children's perceptions of the 
values and behavior that are common and acceptable in society.'' 
Congress then determined that parents should be provided with timely 
information about the nature of upcoming video programming and have the 
ability to block violent, sexual, or other programming that parents 
believe is harmful to their children.
    In passing this legislation, Congress provided the relevant 
television and video programming industries with an option. They could 
establish their own voluntary system for rating video programming or 
the Commission could establish a ratings system itself. Industry 
representatives chose to set up their own voluntary system, and the 
Commission in 1998 found that industry's approach met the relevant 
statutory criteria. As a result, industry established the TV Oversight 
Management Board (TVOMB), and developed the TV Parental Guidelines age 
ratings system that prevails today. The voluntary TV Parental 
Guidelines overseen by the TVOMB, if properly implemented, can be 
useful to ensure parents are adequately informed about video 
programming on television that their children may be exposed to.
    The industry's system allows for the display of specific ratings 
for programs. Programs that are designed to be appropriate for all 
children, including very young ones, are rated TV-Y. Programs that are 
designed to be appropriate for children age 7 and above are rated TV-
Y7. Programs that are not specifically designed for children but are 
nonetheless suitable for all ages are rated TV-G. The industry's system 
also includes ratings for TV-PG, TV-14, and TV-MA. The TV Parental 
Guidelines also allow content descriptors to be included with the 
rating, including descriptors to let parents know that programs have 
sexually suggested dialog (D), fantasy violence (FV), coarse or crude 
language (L), sexual situations (S), and/or violence (V). The 1996 law 
also required TV manufacturers to develop technology that allows 
parents to block material rated as violent, sexual, or otherwise 
flagged by the ratings system.
    Today, both the traditional broadcast TV sector, multichannel video 
programming distribution services (MVPDs) (i.e., cable and satellite), 
and streaming platforms use the voluntary ratings system. In recent 
years, however, significant concerns have been raised about the ratings 
system. For instance, commenters have raised concerns with the FCC 
about the accuracy of the ratings, the appropriateness of the ratings, 
and a shift or ratings creep in which mature, adult, or inappropriate 
content is being rated as appropriate for young children. The FCC wants 
to ensure that the ratings system continues to serve the purpose that 
Congress had in mind, empowering parents to make informed decisions for 
their children.
    Recently, parents have raised concerns that controversial gender 
identity issues are being included or promoted in children's programs 
without providing any disclosure or transparency to parents. 
Specifically, the industry guidelines that parents rely on are rating 
shows with transgender and gender non-binary programming as appropriate 
for children and young children, and doing so without providing this 
information to parents, thereby undermining the ability of parents to 
make informed choices for their families. Consistent with Congress's 
vision for the ratings system, we seek comment on whether the 
industry's approach is continuing to provide the information that is 
relevant to parents today.
    By passing the relevant legislation in 1996, Congress acted to 
protect the right of parents to decide when and how to discuss mature 
topics with their children, and to know if and when their children are 
being exposed to these topics in their TV viewing. Accordingly, we seek 
comment here on any changes that can or should be made to the current 
ratings system to ensure that it is responsive to the issues that 
parents confront today. This includes any changes that may make sense 
for the TVOMB to ensure that it is representative of a range of family 
values. We also ask how ratings can be applied consistently across 
broadcast, MVPDs, and streaming platforms.
    Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2019, Congress asked 
the Commission to report on the accuracy of the voluntary rating system 
and on the ability of the TVOMB to oversee the ratings system and 
address public concerns. Following public notice and comment, the Media 
Bureau submitted a report (2019 Report) to the Committees on 
Appropriations of the House and Senate.
    Accessibility and Transparency of TVOMB. In the 2019 Report, the 
Bureau made the following suggestions for Board and industry 
consideration related to increasing accessibility and transparency to 
the public and increasing awareness of the Board's role:
    <bullet> TVOMB should increase efforts to promote public awareness 
of TVOMB and its role in overseeing the rating system. As part of this 
suggestion, the Bureau urged TVOMB and industry to increase outreach 
efforts concerning the existence of the rating system and to consider 
additional ways to publicize the ability of the public to file 
complaints with TVOMB and provide instructions on how to file 
complaints.
    <bullet> TVOMB should consider ways to inform the public of the 
number of complaints it receives, the nature of the complaints, the 
program and network or

[[Page 23992]]

producer involved, and any action taken by TVOMB or the industry in 
response to the complaints. The Bureau noted that the Board could 
consider issuing an annual report on the complaints it has received, 
how they were adjudicated, and whether they led to the rating of a 
program being changed for future airings.
    <bullet> TVOMB should hold at least one public meeting annually to 
seek direct public input.
    Accuracy of TV Ratings System. The Bureau also made the following 
suggestions with regard to the accuracy of the ratings being applied 
pursuant to the TV Parental Guidelines:
    <bullet> TVOMB should consider random audits or spot checks to 
analyze the accuracy and consistency of the ratings in addition to the 
survey data it already collects.
    <bullet> TVOMB should use this combined data to determine if any 
changes are needed to the ratings system to ensure they are as helpful 
as possible to viewers.
    The Media Bureau seeks comment on whether and how the Bureau's 
suggestions, both regarding increased transparency of the TVOMB and 
accuracy of TV ratings, have been implemented. How does the TVOMB 
engage with the public and are the steps taken sufficient? Is the 
composition of the board sufficiently balanced to represent a broad 
range of stakeholders outside of the entertainment industry? What more 
could the board do to include family-oriented perspectives, which are 
not well represented in the media industry, in its ratings process? 
Should additional faith-based organizations be represented on the 
TVOMB? Does the current complaint process provide for meaningful public 
participation?
    Is the general public aware of the ratings system and how to 
provide feedback to the TVOMB? Is the general public aware that the V-
chip can be used with the ratings system to block unwanted video 
programming from reaching children? Do descriptions of the content 
provide a sufficient basis for parents to make informed decisions 
concerning viewing decisions for their family, including when gender 
identity themes are discussed or displayed?
    Are parents aware that children watching programs rated TV-Y, TV-
Y7, and TV-G may contain the discussion or promotion of gender identity 
themes? Should such programming be rated differently or contain 
relevant descriptions so that parents can make informed decisions?
    Is there disparity in ratings among different viewing platforms; 
i.e., is the same program consistently rated when it airs on 
broadcasting, MVPDs, and streaming platforms? Are streaming platforms 
more broadly interpreting what is allowable in categories intended for 
audiences under TV-Y14? Is objectionable content rated consistently 
across various programmers? For example, do different networks rate 
explicit language, suggestive language, and violent programming 
similarly, or are some networks prone to provide a lesser rating than 
others?
    We seek comment on whether outreach efforts have been successful in 
providing parents with the information necessary to use the guidelines 
effectively and to provide feedback to the TVOMB. Commenters should 
identify the specific recommendation from the 2019 Report about which 
they are commenting. Comments should include any surveys or data used 
to support the comments.

Federal Communications Commission.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2026-08624 Filed 5-1-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 4, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.