Certain Semiconductor Devices, Computing Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety; Termination of the Investigation in Its Entirety
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's ("ALJ") initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 11), granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation in its entirety based on a settlement agreement and withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation is terminated in its entirety.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23306-23307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-08384]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1465]
Certain Semiconductor Devices, Computing Products Containing the
Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not
To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate
the Investigation in Its Entirety; Termination of the Investigation in
Its Entirety
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 11),
granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation
in its entirety based on a settlement agreement and withdrawal of the
complaint. The investigation is terminated in its entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6520212c36562d0009152510160c11064b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5e0e1ecf696edc0c9d5e5d0d6ccd1c68bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on December 19, 2025, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Adeia,
Inc., Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc., and Adeia
Holdings Inc., all of San Jose, CA (collectively, ``Adeia''). 90 FR
59,579-580 (Dec. 19, 2025). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain semiconductor devices, computing products containing the same,
and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims
of U.S.
[[Page 23307]]
Patent No. 11,978,681; U.S. Patent No. 12,199,069; U.S. Patent No.
12,322,650; and U.S. Patent No. 12,381,173. The complaint, as
supplemented, further alleged that an industry in the United States
exists or is in the process of being established as required by the
applicable Federal Statute. The Commission's notice of investigation
named Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (``AMD'') of Santa Clara, CA; Lenovo
(United States) Inc. of Morrisville, NC; Lenovo Group Limited of Hong
Kong; Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen,
China, and Super Micro Computer, Inc. of San Jose, CA, as respondents.
Id. at 59,580. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'')
was also named as a party in this investigation.
On March 11, 2026, Complainant Adeia and Respondent AMD moved to
terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement between
Adeia and AMD. See Order No. 11 at 1 (Mar. 31, 2026). Additionally,
Adeia moved to withdraw the complaint as to the other respondents in
the investigation and limit service of the agreement. Id. On March 19,
2026, the ALJ issued Order No. 10, finding the motion did not comply
with Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) because the ``public version of the
settlement agreement was over-redacted.'' Order No. 10 at 1-2 (Mar. 19,
2026); see 19 CFR 210.21(b)(1). The ALJ directed Adeia and AMD to file
an amended public version of the agreement. Id. at 2. OUII filed a
statement in support of the motion to the extent Adeia and AMD comply
with Order No. 10. On March 27, 2026, an amended public version of the
agreement was filed.
On March 31, 2026, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 11),
granting the joint motion to terminate the above-captioned
investigation as to AMD based on a settlement agreement and as to the
remaining respondents based on withdrawal of the complaint. The ID
found the motion with the amended public version of the settlement
agreement complies with the Commission Rules. Order No. 11 at 2. The ID
also found that there are no extraordinary circumstances that warrant
denying the motion and there is no evidence indicating that terminating
this investigation based on the agreement would be contrary to the
public interest. Id. at 2-3. No petitions for review were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The
investigation is terminated in its entirety.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on April 27,
2026.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
part 210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 27, 2026.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026-08384 Filed 4-29-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.