Notice2026-08235

National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures for the Bureau of Land Management

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 28, 2026
Effective
April 28, 2026

Issuing agencies

Interior Department

Abstract

This notice announces a revision to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing procedures for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) at DOI Handbook of NEPA Implementing Procedures (DOI NEPA Handbook) that supplements Chapter 1 of Part 516 of the Department of the Interior's (Department or DOI) Departmental Manual (516 DM 1). The revision adds a new categorical exclusion (CE) for geothermal resource exploration operations to the DOI Handbook of NEPA Implementing Procedures, Appendix 2: Bureau Categorical Exclusions.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22848-22852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-08235]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary

[A2407-014-004-065516; #O2412-014-004-047181.1; LLHQ330000]


National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures for the 
Bureau of Land Management

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a revision to the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA) implementing procedures for the Bureau of Land 
Management (BLM) at DOI Handbook of NEPA Implementing Procedures (DOI 
NEPA Handbook) that supplements Chapter 1 of Part 516 of the Department 
of the Interior's (Department or DOI) Departmental Manual (516 DM 1). 
The revision adds a new categorical exclusion (CE) for geothermal 
resource exploration operations to the DOI Handbook of NEPA 
Implementing Procedures, Appendix 2: Bureau Categorical Exclusions.

DATES: The CE is effective April 28, 2026.

ADDRESSES: The new CE will be found at the web address for the DOI NEPA 
Handbook: <a href="http://www.doi.gov/elips/">http://www.doi.gov/elips/</a>. The ``Substantiation of Proposed 
National Environmental Policy Act Categorical Exclusion for Geothermal

[[Page 22849]]

Resource Exploration Operations'' (Substantiation Report) for the CE is 
available at the BLM's ePlanning site: <a href="http://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/2034945/510">http://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/2034945/510</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amelia Savage, Senior Planning and 
Environmental Specialist Decision Support, Planning, and NEPA, at (303) 
239-3635, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e7f726d7f687f797b5e7c727330797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d1c110e1c0b1c1a183d1f1110531a120b">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Individuals in the United States who are 
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 
711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay 
services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay 
services offered within their country to make international calls to 
the point-of-contact in the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department published the proposed CE and Substantiation Report 
for geothermal resource exploration operations on January 17, 2025, for 
a 30-day public comment period. Refer to the Federal Register notice 
(90 FR 5981) proposing the CE for more information regarding the 
background and rationale for establishment of the CE. This notice 
notifies the public of the Department's establishment of the Geothermal 
Exploration Operations (GEO) CE and includes the BLM's responses to 
comments from the public on the proposed CE. The BLM has made editorial 
edits to the CE text as explained in this notice. These edits do not 
change the scope of the CE as proposed.
    Geothermal energy offers baseload energy as geothermal power plants 
use heat energy found in rock formations containing hot water or steam 
below the Earth's surface to turn a turbine and generate electrical 
power. Additionally, geothermal energy is a steady source of 
electricity, generating energy 24 hours a day, regardless of changing 
weather patterns, as opposed to intermittent sources of power. 
Geothermal power plants also have one of the smallest amounts of 
surface disturbance relative to electricity produced, with a 
generation-weighted average of 0.34 acre/Gigawatt hour (GWh). 
Currently, approximately seventy (~70) percent (%) of geothermal 
installed capacity in the United States includes federal resources. For 
these reasons, the BLM's Geothermal Energy Program is a critical 
component to the efforts of the administration and various western 
states to advance the nation's energy portfolio.
    Further, this CE advances President Trump's Executive Order 14154, 
Unleashing American Energy, and Executive Order 14156, Declaring a 
National Energy Emergency, and Secretary Burgum's ensuing Secretary's 
Order 3417, Addressing the National Energy Emergency, and Secretary's 
Order 3418, Unleashing American Energy.
    The Department proposed the CE for use by the BLM to support 
approval of a notice of intent to conduct geothermal resource 
exploration operations (NOI) to streamline project authorization at the 
exploration operations phase (see definition at 43 CFR 3200.1) to 
simplify and focus the NEPA process. This increased efficiency will 
serve to expedite authorization of geothermal exploration activities 
that could be vital to the expansion of geothermal development on BLM 
managed lands.
    NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., requires Federal agencies to consider 
the environmental effects of their proposed actions in their decision-
making processes and inform and engage the public in that process. To 
comply with NEPA, agencies determine the appropriate level of review of 
any major Federal action--an environmental impact statement (EIS), 
environmental assessment (EA), or a categorical exclusion (CE). See 
generally, 42 U.S.C. 4336 (b); 43 CFR part 46; DOI NEPA Handbook 
section 1.2 (2025). Where it is reasonably foreseeable that significant 
environmental effects are likely, the agency must prepare an EIS and 
document its decision. See generally, 42 U.S.C. 4336 (b)(1); DOI NEPA 
Handbook section 1.2(a)(5)(ii). Where appropriate, an agency may 
prepare an environmental assessment, and if it reaches a finding of no 
significant impact (FONSI), it need not prepare an EIS. See generally, 
42 U.S.C. 4336(b)(2); DOI NEPA Handbook section 1.6; section 1.2(a)(4).
    Under NEPA, the Department recently revised its 43 CFR part 46 
regulations and its procedural and interpretive guidance (see 90 FR 
29498, July 3, 2025) (explaining the Department's decision to move most 
of its NEPA procedures to the DOI NEPA Handbook). Before publishing 
these procedures, the Department and the BLM consulted with CEQ to 
ensure the procedures conform to NEPA and applicable regulations. 
Consistent with those revisions, the Department may establish CEs--
categories of actions that the agency has determined normally do not 
have a significant effect on the human environment--in its NEPA 
procedures. See 42 U.S.C. 4336(a)(2); 43 CFR 46.205. If the BLM 
determines that a CE covers a proposed action, it then evaluates the 
proposed action for extraordinary circumstances, which are factors or 
circumstances that indicate a normally categorically excluded action 
may have a significant effect. 43 CFR 46.205, 46.215. If the BLM cannot 
categorically exclude the proposed action following review for 
extraordinary circumstances, it will prepare an EA or EIS, as 
appropriate, before issuing any decision to authorize the action. 43 
CFR 46.205(c); 42 U.S.C. 4336(b). For establishing a CE, the BLM 
developed a written record containing information sufficient to 
substantiate its determination that the category of actions does not 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This substantiation 
and the establishment of the CE is made publicly available by 
publishing this notice in the Federal Register. See 43 CFR 46.205(h).
    In developing the GEO CE, the Department and BLM consulted with the 
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 
4332(2)(B) and its past guidance to agencies. The BLM also provided an 
opportunity for public review of the proposed CE and the Substantiation 
Report (See 90 FR 5981, January 17, 2025).

II. Categorical Exclusion as Proposed

    The text of the proposed CE, as provided in the January 17, 2025, 
Federal Register notice, was as follows:
    Approval of a notice of intent to conduct geothermal resource 
exploration operations that:
    <bullet> Does not include the direct testing of geothermal 
resources or resource utilization;
    <bullet> Does not exceed 10 acres of total (contiguous or 
noncontiguous) surface disturbance;
    <bullet> Requires reclamation of surface disturbances when their 
intended purpose has been fulfilled;
    <bullet> Requires reclamation of temporary routes when their 
intended purpose(s) has been fulfilled, unless through a separate 
review and decision-making process the BLM incorporates and 
appropriately designates the route as part of its transportation 
system.
    <bullet> Does not make a temporary route available for public use 
unless the temporary route is specifically intended to accommodate 
public use;
    <bullet> Requires temporary routes to be constructed or used so as 
to allow for the reclamation, by artificial or natural means, of 
vegetative cover on the temporary route and areas where the vegetative 
cover was disturbed by the construction or use of the route, and 
requires such treatment to be designed

[[Page 22850]]

to reestablish vegetative cover as soon as possible, but at most within 
10 years after approved reclamation commences; and,
    <bullet> Includes design elements to protect resources and resource 
uses consistent with the applicable resource management plan, laws, 
regulations, and any lease terms (as applicable).

III. Comments on the Proposed CE

    The BLM received 10 comment letters during the 30-day public 
comment period on the proposed CE. Comments were submitted by State 
agencies, interest groups, non-profit organizations, and private 
citizens. The BLM received comments both in support of and in 
opposition to the proposed CE. Some comments were beyond the scope of 
the proposed CE, such as a recommendation for the BLM to update the 
2008 ``Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Geothermal 
Leasing in the Western United States.''
    The BLM considered all comments to date and responds in this notice 
to all four substantive issues raised in the public comments. The BLM 
appreciates the interest and participation of all respondents. The BLM, 
where appropriate, grouped together similar or related comments, and 
responds to the comments as follows:
    Comment 1--Support for the GEO CE: At least nine commenters 
expressed support for establishing the CE, stating that it would 
substantially reduce permitting timelines for geothermal energy 
authorizations and advance the responsible development of clean and 
reliable energy on public lands while keeping in place strong 
commitments to environmental stewardship. In addition, commenters noted 
that the availability of the CE for the BLM's use could help the BLM to 
expedite approval of new geothermal projects and promote the 
realization of their associated economic benefits while allowing the 
BLM's staff to focus on other proposals that may have a significant 
environmental effect.
    Response 1: The BLM will continue to conduct the appropriate level 
of NEPA review for proposed Federal actions, including, where 
appropriate, reliance on available CEs, and public engagement, as 
necessary, and consider potential adverse effects of proposed 
activities through the NEPA process.
    Comment 2--Suggested revisions to the scope of covered activities: 
At least one commenter expressed concern that the scope of covered 
exploration activities under the proposed CE is too broad and suggested 
that the BLM restrict use of the proposed CE to existing types of 
geothermal resource exploration activities and not allow reliance on 
the CE for novel or experimental geothermal resource exploration 
methods yet to be developed.
    Response 2: Within the Substantiation Report, the BLM reviewed 
different types of exploration project requirements, including well 
pads, well diameter, and access road requirements for geothermal 
resource exploration projects. For example, as described within the 
Substantiation Report, the 10 acres of disturbance provides flexibility 
to address the various types of exploration project requirements 
considered within the 28 projects analyzed in the EAs reviewed, such 
as, construction of temporary roads for site access, construction of 
well pads, and drilling of temperature gradient wells or core holes. 
The commenter did not identify any specific kind of ``novel or 
experimental'' geothermal resource exploration activity that the BLM 
did not adequately consider in developing this CE.
    Moreover, before relying on the CE to approve any proposed action, 
the BLM must consider extraordinary circumstances (43 CFR 46.215) 
including whether a project would have highly uncertain and potentially 
significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown 
environmental risks. This review would be documented and included in 
the information posted on the BLM's NEPA register. If the responsible 
official cannot rely on the CE because of extraordinary circumstances, 
the responsible official will prepare an EA or EIS, consistent with 43 
CFR 46.205(c).
    Comment 3--Potential effects to wildlife resources: At least one 
commenter expressed concern that geothermal resource exploration can 
affect wildlife and recommended that the BLM incorporate protections 
for species into the CE text.
    Response 3: The BLM's NOI review process includes several layers of 
protection, which ensure that exploration projects will not 
significantly impact wildlife, regardless of the level of NEPA review. 
Actions that are proposed to take place on BLM-managed lands must be 
reviewed for conformance with the applicable BLM resource management 
plan (RMP) as part of the BLM's compliance with the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act, as amended, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., and its 
implementing regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-3). The BLM ensures that design 
elements are included in NOI approvals for conformance with the 
applicable RMP, lease terms (as applicable), and other relevant 
requirements. BLM professionals review each proposed action for 
potential resource conflicts and incorporate appropriate design 
elements into any approval.
    BLM's Substantiation Report and project EA summaries illustrate 
these considerations. Geothermal resource exploration projects may 
impact wildlife resources (e.g., migratory birds, bald and golden 
eagles, raptors, wild horses and burros, mule deer, small mammals and 
reptiles). Due to the non-contiguous nature of disturbed acreage, one 
common environmental impact consideration is the potential for species 
displacement due to habitat fragmentation, including edge effects 
associated with dispersed surface disturbance. Other common effects are 
loss of habitat from vegetation removal, and mortality of small, less 
mobile mammals and reptiles due to increased vehicle traffic (Levine et 
al. 2018; Substantiation Report, appendix A). However, in the 28 EAs/
FONSIs analyzed, BLM made findings that population-level effects to 
species were not expected to occur; effects of habitat fragmentation 
due to removal of vegetation and construction of drill sites and new 
roads in areas used by wildlife were short-term and negligible because 
the project size was small in comparison to the amount of surrounding 
lands with suitable habitat. Moreover, common design elements ensured 
restoration of disturbed habitat.
    The BLM reviewed published reports from the National Renewable 
Energy Laboratory and other reliable sources analyzing potential 
environmental effects and associated project design elements 
implemented for protection of wildlife and resources in geothermal 
resource exploration projects as a comparison to the effects analyzed 
within the EAs selected for analysis.
    Further, before relying on the CE to approve any proposed action, 
the BLM must consider extraordinary circumstances (43 CFR 46.215), 
which include consideration of effects on, among others: natural 
resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands; wilderness areas; wild or 
scenic rivers; wetlands; floodplains; national monuments; migratory 
birds; other ecologically significant or critical areas; listed or 
proposed species or critical habitat; and contribution to the 
introduction, continued existence, or spread of invasive plants or non-
native invasive species. This review would be documented and included 
in the information posted on the BLM's NEPA register.

[[Page 22851]]

    BLM contacted the field offices and relevant staff that had 
prepared each of the 48 EAs and requested information as to (1) whether 
the projects had been completed or at least substantially implemented, 
(2) whether project activities had resulted in any unanticipated 
effects (e.g., effects not contemplated, discussed), and (3) if 
unanticipated effects had occurred, what they were. For each of the 48 
EAs included for analysis, BLM staff positively confirmed that no 
unanticipated effects occurred for any of the studied projects.
    If the responsible official cannot rely on the CE to support a 
decision on a particular proposed action due to extraordinary 
circumstances, the responsible official will prepare an EA or EIS, 
consistent with 43 CFR 46.205(c) and 42 U.S.C. 4336(b). Finally, 
reliance on a CE constitutes compliance only with NEPA; the BLM must 
separately comply with requirements under any other applicable law, 
such as the Endangered Species Act.
    Comment 4--Suggested revisions to allowable disturbed acreage: At 
least one commenter suggested that the BLM expand the acreage amount of 
allowable surface disturbance.
    Response 4: To support the development of the CE, in its 
Substantiation Report, the BLM examined the range of surface 
disturbance types and extent in 28 geothermal projects analyzed in EAs 
that all supported FONSIs, and that were completed between 2003 and 
2019, to identify potential effects resulting from the kinds of 
activities normally included in NOIs, as outlined in the Department's 
regulations at 43 CFR part 3200, subpart 3250. As discussed in the 
Substantiation Report, the BLM reviewed these EAs and associated FONSIs 
to determine the scope of environmental effects anticipated to result 
from the exploration operations and compared the various disturbed 
acreage statistics. The size and scale of geothermal resource 
exploration projects evaluated in those documents were the basis of the 
surface disturbance limitations chosen for the CE. This analysis 
together with BLM's consultations with CEQ and the Department's Office 
of Environmental Policy and Compliance support the 10-acre surface 
disturbance limitation. Therefore, the BLM declines to modify the 
allowable disturbed acreage.

IV. Additional Clarifying Changes

    While considering the comments and recommendations the BLM received 
during the public comment period on the proposed CE revisions, the BLM 
incorporated three changes to the CE text proposed in January 2025. 
These changes include updating the format from a bulletized list to an 
alphabetized list; to add ``or resource production'' to better track 
the definition of geothermal exploration operations (43 CFR 3200.1); 
and to add ``, pursuant to 43 CFR part 3200 subpart 3250,'' before 
``that'' in the main CE text to qualify the regulations and define the 
scope of activities to which the CE pertains.

Categorical Exclusion Justification

    The BLM finds that the category of actions described in the CE 
(below) does not normally have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This finding is based on the analysis of the proposal to 
establish the CE in the BLM's Substantiation Report and supporting 
record documents. The Substantiation Report explains that the 
restrictions on the proposed CE limit surface disturbance and access 
road construction and the required design elements incorporated into 
the NOI approvals and enforced by conditions of approval, as needed, 
are effective to address environmental effects. Consequently, the BLM 
concludes that the category of actions included in this CE does not 
normally result in significant environmental effects.
    The Substantiation Report summarizes the review of 28 geothermal 
EAs that supported FONSIs, 20 similar oil and gas drilling project EAs 
that also supported FONSIs, as well as benchmarking similar CEs 
supporting geophysical investigations that are in use by other agencies 
by analyzing 6 U.S. Forest Service and 1 Department of the Navy project 
to demonstrate the finding that actions under the revised CE would not 
normally result in significant effects to the human environment. The 
Substantiation Report includes evaluation of the BLM NEPA analyses and 
available scientific research on the effects of actions similar to 
those included in the new CE over time and over different geographic 
areas and following consideration of comments from the public.
    The Department and the BLM consulted with CEQ on the proposed and 
final CE. CEQ found the CE to comply with NEPA and agreed that the CE 
is appropriate to establish. Therefore, the Department adds this CE to 
the DOI NEPA Handbook, Appendix 2.
    When applying this CE, responsible officials within the BLM will 
evaluate proposed actions covered by the CE to determine whether any 
extraordinary circumstances are present in accordance with the 
requirements in the Department's NEPA implementing procedures at 43 CFR 
46.205 and 46.215. This review would be documented and included in the 
information posted on the BLM's NEPA register. If the responsible 
official cannot rely on this CE to support a decision to authorize 
geothermal resource exploration operation activities due to 
extraordinary circumstances, the responsible official will prepare an 
EA or EIS before doing so, consistent with 43 CFR 46.205(c) and 42 
U.S.C. 4336(b). When applying this CE, the BLM will document its 
reliance on the CE and publish the documentation on the BLM NEPA 
website.

V. Text Added to the U.S. Department of the Interior Handbook of NEPA 
Implementing Procedures, Appendix 2: Bureau Categorical Exclusions

    The DOI Handbook of NEPA Implementing Procedures, Appendix 2: 
Bureau Categorical Exclusions includes the following language:

* * * * *

Bureau of Land Management

11.9 Actions Eligible for a Categorical Exclusion (CE)

* * * * *

B. Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Energy

* * * * *
    (8) Approval of a notice of intent to conduct geothermal 
resource exploration operations, pursuant to 43 CFR part 3200 
subpart 3250, that:
    (a) Does not include the direct testing of geothermal resources 
or resource production or utilization;
    (b) Does not exceed 10 acres of total (contiguous or 
noncontiguous) surface disturbance;
    (c) Requires reclamation of surface disturbances when their 
intended purpose has been fulfilled;
    (d) Requires reclamation of temporary routes when their intended 
purpose(s) has been fulfilled, unless through a separate review and 
decision-making process the BLM incorporates and appropriately 
designates the route as part of its transportation system.
    (e) Does not make a temporary route available for public use 
unless the temporary route is specifically intended to accommodate 
public use;
    (f) Requires temporary routes to be constructed or used so as to 
allow for the reclamation, by artificial or natural means, of 
vegetative cover on the temporary route and areas where the 
vegetative cover was disturbed by the construction or use of the 
route, and requires such treatment to be designed to reestablish 
vegetative cover as soon as possible, but at most within 10 years 
after approved reclamation commences; and,
    (g) Includes design elements to protect resources and resource 
uses consistent with the applicable resource management plan,

[[Page 22852]]

laws, regulations, and any lease terms (as applicable).
* * * * *
(Authority: NEPA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.))

Stephen G. Tryon,
Director, Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2026-08235 Filed 4-27-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-29-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 28, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.