Notice2026-08195
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From Austria: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 28, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22790-22793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-08195]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-433-815]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From Austria: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable April 22, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Riggs, Office IX, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On April 2, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)
received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of
certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Austria, filed in proper
form on behalf of the U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association,\1\ United
States Steel Corporation, and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry,
Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC (USW) (collectively, the
petitioners).\2\ The CVD Petition was accompanied by antidumping duty
(AD) petitions concerning imports of OCTG from Austria, Taiwan, and the
United Arab Emirates.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The members of the U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association
joining the CVD petition are Axis Pipe and Tube LLC, Borusan Pipe
U.S., Inc., PTC Liberty Tubulars LLC, Tenaris USA, Vallourec STAR
L.P., and Welded Tube USA, Inc.
\2\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated April 2, 2026
(Petition).
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Between April 6 and 15, 2026, Commerce requested supplemental
information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petition in
supplemental questionnaires.\4\ On April 8 and 20, 2026, the
petitioners filed timely responses to these requests for additional
information.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated
April 9, 2026 (First General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire);
``Supplemental Questions,'' dated April 6, 2026 (Austria CVD
Supplemental Questionnaire); and ``Second Supplemental Questions,''
dated April 15, 2026 (Second General Issues Questionnaire).
\5\ See Petitioners' Letters, ``Petitioners' Response to General
Issues Supplemental Questions and Amendment to Volume I of the
Petitions,'' dated April 14, 2026 (First General Issues Supplement);
``Response to Supplemental Questions,'' dated April 8, 2026 (Austria
CVD Supplemental Response); and ``Petitioners' Response to Second
General Issues Supplemental Questions and Amendment to Volume I of
the Petitions,'' dated April 20, 2026 (Second General Issues
Supplement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the petitioners allege that the Government of
Austria (GOA) is providing countervailable subsidies, within the
meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of OCTG
from Austria, and that such imports are materially injuring, or
threatening material injury to, the domestic industry producing OCTG in
the United States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are initiating a
CVD investigation, the Petition was accompanied by information
reasonably available to the petitioners supporting their allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioners filed the Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry, because the petitioners are interested parties,
as defined in sections 771(9)(C), (D), and (E) of the Act.\6\ Commerce
also finds that the petitioners demonstrated sufficient industry
support with respect to the initiation of the requested CVD
investigation.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ United States Steel Corporation is an interested party under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act. The USW is a certified union
representing workers engaged in the production of OCTG in the United
States and therefore is an interested party under section 771(9)(D)
of the Act. The U.S. OCTG Manufacturers Association is a trade
association representing domestic producers of OCTG and therefore is
an interested party under section 771(9)(E) of the Act.
\7\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation (POI)
Because the Petition was filed on April 2, 2026, the POI is January
1, 2025 through December 31, 2025.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is OCTG from Austria. For
a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the appendix
to this notice.
Comments on the Scope of the Investigation
As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).\9\ Commerce will consider all scope
comments received from interested parties and, if necessary, will
consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the
preliminary
[[Page 22791]]
determination. If scope comments include factual information, all such
factual information should be limited to public information.\10\
Commerce requests that interested parties provide at the beginning of
their scope comments a public executive summary for each comment or
issue raised in their submission. Commerce further requests that
interested parties limit their public executive summary of each comment
or issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. Commerce
intends to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the
comment summaries included in the analysis of scope comments. To
facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce requests that
scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on May 12,
2026, which is 20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice.
Any rebuttal comments, which may include factual information, and
should also be limited to public information, must be filed by 5:00
p.m. ET on May 22, 2026, which is 10 calendar days from the initial
comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble); see also 19 CFR
351.312.
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce requests that any factual information that parties
consider relevant to the scope of this investigation be submitted
during that period. However, if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent
AD and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception
applies.\11\ An electronically filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx</a> and a handbook
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce
notified the GOA of the receipt of the Petition and provided an
opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petition.\12\
Commerce held consultations with the GOA on April 20, 2026.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultations to
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated April 2, 2026.
\13\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of
Austria,'' dated April 20, 2026; see also GOA's Letter,
``Consultation with the US Department of Commerce,'' dated April 22,
2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i)
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC),
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry''
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the
ITC apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like
product,\14\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\15\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation.\16\ Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that OCTG, as defined in
the scope, constitutes a single domestic like product, and we have
analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to this case and information regarding industry support, see
Checklist, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist:
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Austria,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Austria CVD
Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, ``Analysis of Industry
Support for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Austria, Taiwan, and
the United Arab Emirates'' (Attachment II). This checklist is on
file electronically via ACCESS.
\17\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the Austria
CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining whether the petitioners have standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data
contained in the Petition with reference to the domestic like product
as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in the appendix to
this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioners provided
the 2025 shipments of the domestic like product for the U.S. producers
that support the Petitions, and compared this to the estimated total
2025 shipments of the domestic like product for the entire domestic
industry.\18\ Because total production data for the domestic like
product for 2025 are not reasonably available to the petitioners, and
the petitioners have established that shipments are a reasonable proxy
for production data,\19\ we relied on data provided by the
[[Page 22792]]
petitioners for purposes of measuring industry support.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Id.
\19\ Id.
\20\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the Austria
CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review of the data provided in the Petition, the First General
Issues Supplement, the Second General Issues Supplement, and other
information readily available to Commerce indicates that the
petitioners have established industry support for the Petition.\21\
First, the Petition established support from domestic producers (or
workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of
the domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not required to
take further action in order to evaluate industry support (e.g.,
polling).\22\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have met the
statutory criteria for industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i)
of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers) who support the
Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total production of the
domestic like product.\23\ Finally, the domestic producers (or workers)
have met the statutory criteria for industry support under section
702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers)
who support the Petition account for more than 50 percent of the
production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the
industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petition.\24\
Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petition was filed on behalf
of the domestic industry within the meaning of section 702(b)(1) of the
Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Id.
\22\ Id.; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
\23\ See Attachment II of the Austria CVD Initiation Checklist.
\24\ Id.
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because Austria is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject merchandise from Austria materially
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioners allege that imports of the subject merchandise are
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product.
The petitioners contend that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by a significant increase in the volume of subject imports;
reduced market share; underselling and price depression and/or
suppression; and negative impact on financial performance.\26\ We
assessed the allegations and supporting evidence regarding material
injury, threat of material injury, causation, as well as negligibility,
and we have determined that these allegations are properly supported by
adequate evidence, and meet the statutory requirements for
initiation.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Id.
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon the examination of the Petition and supplemental
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to determine
whether imports of OCTG from Austria benefit from countervailable
subsidies conferred by the GOA. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our
preliminary determination no later than 65 days after the date of this
initiation.
Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 11 programs
alleged by the petitioners. For a full discussion of the basis for our
decision to initiate on each program, see the Austria CVD Initiation
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this
investigation is available on ACCESS.
Respondent Selection
In the Petition, the petitioners identified three companies in
Austria.\28\ Commerce intends to follow its standard practice in CVD
investigations and calculate company-specific subsidy rates in the
investigation. Following standard practice in CVD investigations, in
the event Commerce determines that the number of companies is large,
and it cannot individually examine each company based upon Commerce's
resources, where appropriate, Commerce intends to select mandatory
respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for
imports under the appropriate Harmonized tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) subheadings listed in the ``Scope of the
Investigation,'' in the appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Petition at Volume I (page 18 and Exhibit I-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 21, 2026, Commerce released CBP data on imports of OCTG
from Austria under administrative protective order (APO) to all parties
with access to information protected by APO and indicated that
interested parties wishing to comment on CBP data and/or respondent
selection must do so within three days of the publication date of the
notice of initiation of this investigation.\29\ Comments must be filed
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. ET on the
specified deadline. Commerce will not accept rebuttal comments
regarding the CBP data or respondent selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See Memorandum, ``Petition for the Imposition of
Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Oil Country Tubular
Goods from Austria: Release of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Entry Data,'' dated April 21, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such
applications may be found on Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders">https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders</a>.
Distribution of a Copy of the Petition
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petition has been
provided to the GOA via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by
section 702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date
on which the Petition was filed, whether there is a reasonable
indication that imports of OCTG from Austria are materially injuring,
or threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry.\30\ A negative ITC
determination will result in the investigation being terminated.\31\
Otherwise, this CVD investigation will proceed according to statutory
and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of
[[Page 22793]]
allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors of
production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of
remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the
record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other than factual information
described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of Commerce's regulations
requires any party, when submitting factual information, to specify
under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is
being submitted \32\ and, if the information is submitted to rebut,
clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to
provide an explanation identifying the information already on the
record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or
correct.\33\ Time limits for the submission of factual information are
addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific time limits based
on the type of factual information being submitted. Interested parties
should review the regulations prior to submitting factual information
in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by
Commerce.\34\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to
submitting factual information in this investigation.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
\35\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits;
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final
Rule), available at <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\36\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\37\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\37\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
<a href="https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf">https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate
in this investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of
19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of appearance).
Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining
to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: April 22, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by the investigation is certain oil
country tubular goods (OCTG), which are hollow steel products of
circular cross-section, including oil well casing and tubing, of
iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both carbon and alloy),
whether seamless or welded, regardless of end finish (e.g., whether
or not plain end, threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether or not
conforming to American Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API
specifications, whether finished (including limited service OCTG
products) or unfinished (including green tubes and limited service
OCTG products), whether or not thread protectors are attached. The
scope of the investigation also covers OCTG coupling stock.
Subject merchandise includes material matching the above
description that has been finished, packaged, or otherwise processed
in a third country, including by performing any heat treatment,
cutting, upsetting, threading, coupling, or any other finishing,
packaging, or processing that would not otherwise remove the
merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the
country of manufacture of the OCTG.
Excluded from the scope of the investigation are: casing,
tubing, or coupling stock containing 10.5 percent or more by weight
of chromium; drill pipe; unattached couplings; and unattached thread
protectors.
The merchandise subject to the investigation is currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7304.29.1010, 7304.29.1020,
7304.29.1030, 7304.29.1040, 7304.29.1050, 7304.29.1060,
7304.29.1080, 7304.29.2010, 7304.29.2020, 7304.29.2030,
7304.29.2040, 7304.29.2050, 7304.29.2060, 7304.29.2080,
7304.29.3110, 7304.29.3120, 7304.29.3130, 7304.29.3140,
7304.29.3150, 7304.29.3160, 7304.29.3180, 7304.29.4110,
7304.29.4120, 7304.29.4130, 7304.29.4140, 7304.29.4150,
7304.29.4160, 7304.29.4180, 7304.29.5015, 7304.29.5030,
7304.29.5045, 7304.29.5060, 7304.29.5075, 7304.29.6115,
7304.29.6130, 7304.29.6145, 7304.29.6160, 7304.29.6175,
7305.20.2000, 7305.20.4000, 7305.20.6000, 7305.20.8000,
7306.29.1030, 7306.29.1090, 7306.29.2000, 7306.29.3100,
7306.29.4100, 7306.29.6010, 7306.29.6050, 7306.29.8110, and
7306.29.8150.
The merchandise subject to the investigation may also enter
under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7304.39.0024, 7304.39.0028,
7304.39.0032, 7304.39.0036, 7304.39.0040, 7304.39.0044,
7304.39.0048, 7304.39.0052, 7304.39.0056, 7304.39.0062,
7304.39.0068, 7304.39.0072, 7304.39.0076, 7304.39.0080,
7304.59.6000, 7304.59.8015, 7304.59.8020, 7304.59.8025,
7304.59.8030, 7304.59.8035, 7304.59.8040, 7304.59.8045,
7304.59.8050, 7304.59.8055, 7304.59.8060, 7304.59.8065,
7304.59.8070, 7304.59.8080, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6090,
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5090, 7306.50.5050, and 7306.50.5070.
The HTSUS subheadings and specifications above are provided for
convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of
the scope of the investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2026-08195 Filed 4-27-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 28, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.