Rule2026-07889

Finding of Failure To Attain and Reclassification of Tribal Portions of the Greater Connecticut Ozone Nonattainment Area as Serious for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 23, 2026
Effective
May 26, 2026

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing its finding that the tribal portions of the Greater Connecticut area (the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Indian Tribe) did not attain the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) by the attainment date and a reclassification of those portions of the area to Serious nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Additionally, the EPA is taking final action on an exceptional events request submitted by CT DEEP on July 1, 2024, and the EPA's July 22, 2024 concurrence and nonconcurrence with CT DEEP's request. This final action fulfills the EPA's statutory obligation to determine whether the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Indian Tribe's portions of the Greater Connecticut area attained the NAAQS by the attainment date. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 78 (Thursday, April 23, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21729-21731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-07889]



[[Page 21729]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[EPA-R01-OAR-2024-0325; FRL-13014-02-R1]


Finding of Failure To Attain and Reclassification of Tribal 
Portions of the Greater Connecticut Ozone Nonattainment Area as Serious 
for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing its 
finding that the tribal portions of the Greater Connecticut area (the 
Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Indian Tribe) did not 
attain the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) by 
the attainment date and a reclassification of those portions of the 
area to Serious nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Additionally, 
the EPA is taking final action on an exceptional events request 
submitted by CT DEEP on July 1, 2024, and the EPA's July 22, 2024 
concurrence and nonconcurrence with CT DEEP's request. This final 
action fulfills the EPA's statutory obligation to determine whether the 
Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Indian Tribe's 
portions of the Greater Connecticut area attained the NAAQS by the 
attainment date. This action is being taken in accordance with the 
Clean Air Act.

DATES: This rule is effective on May 26, 2026.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket 
Identification No. EPA-R01-OAR-2024-0325. All documents in the docket 
are listed on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed 
in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain 
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the 
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. 
Publicly available docket materials are available at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 
Region 1 Regional Office, Air and Radiation Division, 5 Post Office 
Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible, 
you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section to schedule your inspection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Lillis, Air and Radiation 
Division (Mail Code 5-MI), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
1 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3912; 
telephone number: (617)-918-1067, or email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ce0e5e0e0e5ffa2fcedf8fee5efe7cce9fceda2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8a4a1a4a4a1bbe6b8a9bcbaa1aba388adb8a9e6afa7be">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is 
used, we mean EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On November 20, 2025 (90 FR 52297), EPA published a Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that proposed to find that the tribal 
portions of the Greater Connecticut area did not attain the standards 
by the attainment date. Consequently, in that NPRM, we proposed to 
reclassify the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Indian 
Tribe to Serious nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The statutory 
authority for these determinations is provided by the CAA, as amended 
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). The NPRM also solicited public comment on 
EPA's prior action on CT DEEP's July 1, 2024 request to exclude event-
influenced air quality monitoring data from regulatory decisions. 
Please see the NPRM for more information regarding EPA's July 22, 2024 
concurrence and nonconcurrence with CT DEEP's request. Relevant 
portions of the CAA include, but are not necessarily limited to, 
sections 181 and 182. Other specific requirements and EPA's rationale 
of this reclassification are explained in the NPRM and will not be 
restated here.

II. Response to Comments

    EPA received one comment during the comment period, which is 
available in the docket of this rulemaking action. This commenter 
claimed that the EPA did not adhere to the following statutory 
requirements based on the four arguments below.
    Comment 1: The reclassification to Serious for the 2015 ozone NAAQS 
``lowers major NSR [New Source Review] applicability thresholds for 
VOC/NO<INF>X</INF> . . . increases offset ratios . . . [and] tightens 
applicability for federal minor NSR,'' thereby imposing ``significant 
costs'' on small entities. EPA must comply with the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA) either by providing a reasoned certification with 
a factual basis showing no significant economic impact or by preparing 
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
    Response: The RFA is inapplicable to this rulemaking because the 
EPA has certified that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The regulatory 
analysis provisions of the RFA are only triggered by a threshold 
determination by the Agency that this rule will have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Because the 
Agency has certified this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact, section 603 and 604 of the RFA do not apply to this rulemaking. 
5 U.S.C. 605(b). As noted in the NPRM, ``[t]he determination of failure 
to attain the 2015 ozone standards (and resulting reclassifications), 
do not in and of themselves create any new requirements beyond what is 
mandated by the CAA,'' 90 FR 52297 at 52302 (November 20, 2025), which 
the comment does not contest. Furthermore, the premise of the comment--
that reclassification will impose costs on small entities--is flawed. 
As the EPA stated in the NPRM, ``Areas such as the Mashantucket Pequot 
Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Indian Tribe that were already classified 
as Serious for a previous ozone NAAQS . . . are already subject to 
these lower thresholds and higher offset ratios, so a reclassification 
to Serious for the 2015 ozone NAAQS would have no effect on the NNSR 
permitting requirements for the tribal lands in those areas.'' 90 FR at 
52302 & n.17.
    Comment 2: EPA's reliance on the Administrative Procedure Act's 
(APA) ``good cause'' exceptions to bypass notice and comment and the 
30-day effective date is improper for discretionary elements of this 
action.
    Response: The EPA disagrees with the commenter. This claim is based 
on commenter's mistaken assertion that the EPA issued a final rule with 
the November 20, 2025, action. The EPA published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking on November 20, 2025. The EPA included a 30-day public 
comment period that closed on December 22, 2025, which the commenter 
availed itself of. In this action we are finalizing the November 20, 
2025, proposed action. Based on these facts, the proposed rule was not 
a final action for the commenter to petition the EPA for a stay or 
delay of a yet-to-be-established effective date. Finally, the EPA is 
not relying on APA 553(b) in this action.
    Comment 3: The action has clear tribal implications in that ``it 
changes permitting thresholds and offset ratios that affect economic 
development, and it may trigger federal planning measures

[[Page 21730]]

in the absence of a Tribal Implementation Plan.'' EPA must document 
meaningful consultation under Executive Order (E.O.) 13175 and 
reconcile its statements with E.O. 12866 analysis.
    Response: As noted in the proposal, the EPA complied with E.O. 
13175 by engaging in meaningful and timely input with Tribal officials 
regarding this reclassification to Serious nonattainment. Relevant 
communications are in the docket for this action. As also noted in the 
proposal, a Tribe that is part of an area that is reclassified from 
Moderate to Serious nonattainment is not required to submit a Tribal 
Implementation Plan (TIP) revision to address new Serious area 
requirements. And, as explained in an earlier response above and in the 
proposal, the NNSR major source threshold and offset requirements will 
not change for stationary sources seeking preconstruction permits in 
the tribal portions of this nonattainment area, because they are 
already subject to these higher offset ratios and lower thresholds. Nor 
does the reclassification impose substantial direct compliance costs on 
Indian tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Accordingly, a tribal 
summary impact statement under E.O. 13175 is not required. Lastly, the 
Agency complied with E.O. 12866 by determining that this rulemaking is 
not a significant regulatory action as defined in E.O. 12866.
    Comment 4: The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) analysis is 
incomplete as to private sector effects.
    Response: The EPA has complied with the UMRA by making its own 
determination that this rule will not result in expenditures of $100M+, 
and therefore the Agency does not need to complete a statement under 2 
U.S.C. 1532.

III. Final Action

    For the reasons described in our November 20, 2025, notice of 
proposed rulemaking,\1\ EPA is taking final action to reclassify the 
Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and the Mohegan Indian Tribe portions 
of the Greater Connecticut nonattainment to Serious nonattainment for 
the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Additionally, the EPA is taking final action on 
an exceptional events request submitted by CT DEEP on July 1, 2024, and 
the EPA's July 22, 2024 concurrence and nonconcurrence with CT DEEP's 
request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 90 FR 52297.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive 
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review

    This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the 
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is 
therefore not subject to review under Executive Order 14094 (88 FR 
21879, April 11, 2023).

B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, 
February 6, 2025) because determinations of attainment by the 
attainment date under the CAA are exempt from review under Executive 
Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This rule does not impose an information collection burden under 
the provisions of the PRA of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This action 
does not contain any information collection activities and serves only 
to finalize determinations that the tribal portions of the Greater 
Connecticut nonattainment area failed to attain the 2015 ozone 
standards by the August 3, 2024, attainment date where such areas will 
be reclassified as Serious nonattainment for the 2015 ozone standards.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This action is certified as not having a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This action will not impose any requirements on 
small entities. The determination of failure to attain the 2015 ozone 
standards (and resulting reclassifications), do not in and of 
themselves create any new requirements beyond what is mandated by the 
CAA.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, 
local or tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. The 
division of responsibility between the Federal government and the 
states for purposes of implementing the NAAQS is established under the 
CAA.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA 
to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely 
input by Tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies 
that have Tribal implications.'' This action has Tribal implications. 
However, it will neither impose substantial direct compliance costs on 
federally recognized tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law. As 
noted in the proposed rule, a Tribe that is part of an area that is 
reclassified from Moderate to Serious nonattainment is not required to 
submit a TIP revision to address new Serious area requirements. 
However, the EPA is finalizing the determinations of failure to attain 
in this action. Ordinarily, the NNSR major source threshold and offset 
requirements will change for stationary sources seeking preconstruction 
permits in any nonattainment areas newly classified as Serious, 
including on tribal lands. Areas that are already classified as Serious 
for a previous ozone NAAQS, however, are already subject to these 
higher offset ratios and lower thresholds, so a reclassification to 
Serious for the 2015 ozone NAAQS would have no effect on the NNSR 
permitting requirements for the tribal lands in those areas.
    The EPA has communicated with the affected Tribes located within 
the boundaries of the nonattainment area addressed in this final rule.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) 
as applying to those regulatory actions that concern environmental 
health or safety risks that EPA has reason to believe may 
disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered 
regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This 
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not 
establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or 
safety risks.

[[Page 21731]]

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, 
May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. Therefore, 
EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of particular 
applicability. The rule makes factual determinations for identified 
entities (Mashantucket Pequot Indian Nation and Mohegan Indian Tribe), 
based on facts and circumstances specific to each entity. The 
determinations of attainment and failure to attain the 2015 ozone NAAQS 
do not in themselves create any new requirements beyond what is 
mandated by the CAA.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 22, 2026. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, 
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: April 15, 2026.
Mark Sanborn,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental 
Protection Agency amends part 81 of Chapter I, title 40 of the CFR to 
read as follows:

PART 81--DESIGNATION FOR AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES

0
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.


0
2. In Sec.  81.307 the table entitled ``Connecticut--2015 8-Hour Ozone 
NAAQS'' is amended to read as follows:


Sec.  81.307  Connecticut.

* * * * *

                                                          Connecticut--2015 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
                                                                 [Primary and secondary]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Designation                                             Classification
         Designated area \1\          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Date \2\                          Type                   Date \2\                    Type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greater Connecticut, CT..............  ...........................  Nonattainment....................       7/29/2024  Serious.
    Hartford County..................
    Litchfield County................
    New London County................
    Tolland County...................
    Windham County...................
    Mashantucket Pequot..............  ...........................  .................................       5/26/2026  Serious.
    Tribal Nation....................  ...........................  .................................       5/26/2026
    Mohegan Indian Tribe.............
New York-N New Jersey-Long Island, NY- ...........................  Nonattainment....................
 NJ-CT.
    Fairfield County.................  ...........................  .................................  ..............  Serious.
    Middlesex County.................  ...........................  .................................  ..............  Serious.
    New Haven County.................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian country
  in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation
  area is not a determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
\2\ This date is August 3, 2018, unless otherwise noted.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2026-07889 Filed 4-22-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 23, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.