Notice2026-07821

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 21.19 and 21.21 To Permit Orders for the Accounts of Market-Makers With an Appointment in the Applicable Class To Be Solicited for the Initiating Order for a Simple AIM or Simple SAM Auction

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 22, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21550-21553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-07821]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-105273; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2026-021]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Rules 21.19 and 21.21 To Permit Orders for the Accounts of 
Market-Makers With an Appointment in the Applicable Class To Be 
Solicited for the Initiating Order for a Simple AIM or Simple SAM 
Auction

April 20, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on April 7, 2026, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') proposes to 
amend Rules 21.19 and 21.21 to permit orders for the accounts of 
Market-Makers with an appointment in the applicable class on the 
Exchange, in all classes, to be solicited for the Initiating Order 
submitted for execution against an Agency Order into a simple AIM or 
simple SAM Auction.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Commission's website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>), the 
Exchange's website (<a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/">https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/</a>), and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 21.19 (Automated Improvement 
Mechanism (``AIM'' or ``AIM Auction'')) and 21.21 (``Solicitation 
Auction Mechanism (``SAM'' or ``SAM Auction'')), to permit orders for 
the accounts of Market-Makers with an appointment in the applicable 
class on the Exchange, in all classes, to be solicited for the 
Initiating Order \3\ submitted for execution against an Agency Order 
into a simple AIM Auction pursuant to Rule 21.19 or a simple SAM 
Auction pursuant to Rule 21.21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The ``Initiating Order'' is the order comprised of principal 
interest or a solicited order(s) submitted to trade against the 
order the submitting Member (the ``Initiating Member'') represents 
as agent (the ``Agency Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By way of background, Rule 21.19 contains the requirements 
applicable to the execution of certain customer orders (``Agency 
Orders'') using AIM. An AIM Auction is an electronic auction intended 
to provide an Agency Order with the opportunity to receive price 
improvement (over the National Best Bid or Offer (``NBBO'')). Rule 
21.21 contains the requirements applicable to the execution of Agency 
Orders using SAM. Similarly, a SAM Auction is an electronic auction 
intended to provide a larger-sized Agency Order with the opportunity to 
receive price improvement over the NBBO. Upon submitting an Agency 
Order into an AIM or SAM Auction, the initiating Member (``Initiating 
Member'') must also submit a contra-side second order (``Initiating 
Order'') for the same size as the Agency Order. The Initiating Order 
guarantees that the Agency Order will receive an execution at no worse 
than the auction price. Upon commencement of an auction, market 
participants may submit responses to trade against the Agency Order.\4\ 
At the conclusion of an AIM Auction, depending on the contra-side 
interest (including auction responses) available, the Initiating Order 
may be allocated a certain percentage (or more) of the Agency Order.\5\ 
At the conclusion of a SAM Auction, depending on the contra-side 
interest (including auction responses) available, the Initiating Order 
may be allocated the entire Agency Order or none of the Agency 
Order.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Rules 21.19(c)(5) and 21.21(c)(5).
    \5\ See Rule 21.19(e).
    \6\ See Rule 21.21(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the introductory paragraphs of Rules 21.19 and 21.21 
prohibit orders for the account of any Market-Maker registered in the 
applicable series on the Exchange to be solicited to execute against 
the Agency Order in a simple AIM or simple SAM Auction, respectively.
    While market participants other than appointed Market-Makers may 
contribute liquidity to these crossing auctions as either contra orders 
or responses, appointed Market-Makers, who are the primary source of 
liquidity on the Exchange in their appointed classes, are limited in 
the manner in which they may provide liquidity to these auctions. Given 
that contra orders that comprise Initiating Orders may be allocated a 
percentage of the Agency Order at the conclusion of the auctions, the 
limited ability of appointed Market-Makers to participate in simple AIM 
and simple SAM Auctions may reduce the

[[Page 21551]]

execution opportunities for these liquidity providers, which execution 
opportunities are available to other market participants who may be 
solicited or submit responses.
    The Exchange believes that eliminating the prohibition against 
appointed Market-Makers acting as contra in single-leg AIM and SAM 
orders would enhance price improvement opportunities, particularly, in 
the case of AIM Auctions, for retail and smaller Customer orders. 
Allowing local appointed Market-Makers to be solicited as contras may 
result in exposure of more small customer orders to potential price 
improvement via auction processes. The Exchange notes that appointed 
Market-Makers may be solicited as contras for complex AIM and SAM 
Auctions, which function in a substantially similar manner as AIM and 
SAM for simple orders.\7\ The Exchange further notes that Rule 18.4 
prohibits Members from misusing material, nonpublic information (for 
example, advanced knowledge of auctioned orders), so protections will 
remain in place under the proposed rule change to address any potential 
information leakage concerns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Rules 21.22 and 21.23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the restriction has become operationally outdated in 
current market structure. As noted above, it is common practice that 
AIM orders already involve the same Market-Maker firm acting as both 
contra (via an away Market-Maker) and auction respondent (via an 
appointed Market-Maker). Eliminating this restriction would reduce an 
arbitrary and unnecessary burden allow Market-Maker firms to structure 
more efficient auction processes, which may ultimately promote greater 
competition among Market-Makers and provide Customers with enhanced 
opportunities for price improvement.
    The Exchange is proposing to amend Rules 21.19 and 21.21 to permit 
orders for the accounts of Market-Makers with an appointment in the 
applicable class to be solicited for the Initiating Order submitted for 
execution against an Agency Order in all classes into a simple AIM 
Auction pursuant to Rule 21.19 or a simple SAM Auction pursuant to Rule 
21.21. The Exchange believes providing appointed Market-Makers with an 
additional way to participate in electronic auctions will expand 
available liquidity for these auctions, which may increase execution 
and price improvement opportunities for customers' orders.
    The Exchange notes the electronic crossing price improvement 
auction of another options exchange currently permits orders for the 
accounts of appointed market-makers to be solicited as the contra 
orders for that auction.\8\ The Exchange also notes that a similar 
proposal submitted by its affiliated exchange, Cboe Exchange, Inc. 
(``Cboe Exchange'') was recently approved by the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'').\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See NYSE American, Inc. (``American'') Rule 971.1NY and NYSE 
Pillar Options FIX Gateway Protocol Specification, Section 5.2, New 
Cross Order. See also <a href="https://www.nyse.com/markets/american-options/cube-customer-best-execution">https://www.nyse.com/markets/american-options/cube-customer-best-execution</a>.
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 105049 (March 19, 
2026), 91 FR 14057 (March 24, 2026) (SR-CBOE-2025-090) (``Cboe 
Exchange Approval'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\10\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, 
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \12\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will 
promote just and equitable principles of trade and remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system because it will provide the primary liquidity providers 
on the Exchange with an additional way to participate in electronic 
auctions. Additionally, by permitting brokers to solicit primary 
liquidity providers in a class for electronic auctions, the Exchange 
believes brokers will be able to more efficiently locate liquidity to 
fill their customer orders, particularly during times of volatility. As 
a result, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will likely 
expand available liquidity for these auctions, which may create 
additional execution and price improvement opportunities for customers 
at all times, which ultimately benefits investors.
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will promote 
competition in AIM and SAM Auctions, including competition to initiate 
AIM and SAM Auctions, which will remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors. The Exchange believes the 
availability of this liquidity to Agency Orders will positively affect 
the experience for Agency Orders and overall quality of the auctions. 
Furthermore, the Exchange believes increasing the number of market 
participants available to be solicited may increase competition to 
provide Initiating Orders, which may lead to an AIM or SAM Auction 
being initiated at a better price. More market participants competing 
to provide Initiating Orders may lead to solicited parties providing 
more aggressive initial prices. The Exchange believes the ability of 
all market participants, including appointed Market-Makers that did not 
submit an Initiating Order, to submit responses to an AIM or SAM 
Auction will continue to provide competition for executions against 
Agency Orders.
    The Exchange believes any risk that appointed Market-Makers may 
misuse the nonpublic information of an upcoming AIM or SAM Auction is 
de minimis. Currently, that risk is present for non-appointed Market-
Makers, but the Exchange has not observed any trends of solicited 
market participants separately submitting unrelated orders as a result 
of knowledge of impending AIM or SAM Auctions. The Exchange notes Rule 
21.19, Interpretation and Policy .02 prohibits a pattern or practice of 
submitting orders or quotes for the purpose of disrupting or 
manipulating AIM Auctions, and Rule 18.4 requires Members to establish, 
maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably 
designed to prevent the misuse of material, nonpublic information by 
Members and their associated persons. Finally, the Exchange believes 
the proposed rule change is not designed to permit unfair 
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers because 
it will be permit orders for accounts of appointed Market-Makers to be 
solicited in the same manner as orders for the

[[Page 21552]]

accounts of all other market participants. Currently, all market 
participants other than appointed Market-Makers may be solicited as the 
contra and submit responses in AIM or SAM Auctions for all classes. 
Given the additional costs and obligations associated with being an 
appointed Market-Maker, the Exchange does not believe these Market-
Makers should have fewer execution opportunities with respect to volume 
submitted for execution through AIM or SAM auctions and not for 
electronic execution against interest in the book. The Exchange 
believes the proposed rule change will provide all Market-Makers on the 
Exchange with the same ability to participate in AIM and SAM Auctions 
in all classes at all times, which may further increase execution and 
price improvement opportunities for customers.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not 
believe the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act because it provides the same execution 
opportunities in AIM and SAM Auctions to appointed Market-Makers that 
are currently available to all other market participants.
    The Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will impose 
any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because it 
relates to orders submitted into auction mechanisms on the Exchange. 
Additionally, the Exchange notes that the proposal is identical to a 
previously Commission-approved rule \13\ and that the rules of at least 
one other options exchange permits orders for the accounts of appointed 
market-makers to be solicited as contra orders for that exchange's 
electronic crossing price improvement auction.\14\ The Exchange 
believes the proposed rule change may improve price competition within 
AIM and SAM Auctions, because the primary liquidity providers will be 
able to increase participation in AIM and SAM Auctions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Cboe Exchange Approval.
    \14\ See NYSE American, Inc. (``American'') Rule 971.1NY and 
NYSE Pillar Options FIX Gateway Protocol Specification, Section 5.2, 
New Cross Order. See also <a href="https://www.nyse.com/markets/american-options/cube-customer-best-execution">https://www.nyse.com/markets/american-options/cube-customer-best-execution</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such 
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \15\ and subparagraph 
(f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along 
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \17\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\18\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed 
rule change may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange 
states that the proposed rule change is not novel and raises no unique 
issues not previously considered by the Commission, as it is nearly 
identical to a previously Commission-approved rule change.\19\ For that 
reason, the Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative 
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public 
interest. Accordingly, the Commission designates the proposed rule 
change to be operative upon filing.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \19\ See Cboe Exchange Approval.
    \20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \21\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80f2f5ece5ade3efedede5eef4f3c0f3e5e3aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f785829b92da94989a9a92998384b7849294d9909881">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-CboeEDGX-2026-021 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2026-021. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2026-021 and should be 
submitted on or before May 13, 2026.


[[Page 21553]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) and (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-07821 Filed 4-21-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 22, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.