Notice2026-07345
Self-Regulatory Organizations; CME Securities Clearing Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Modify the CME Securities Clearing Inc. Amended and Restated By-Laws, Board of Directors Charter, Risk Management Committee Charter, Nominating Committee Charter, and Audit Committee Charter
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 16, 2026
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20550-20554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-07345]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-105214; File No. SR-CMESC-2026-002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; CME Securities Clearing Inc.;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Modify the CME Securities
Clearing Inc. Amended and Restated By-Laws, Board of Directors Charter,
Risk Management Committee Charter, Nominating Committee Charter, and
Audit Committee Charter
April 13, 2026.
I. Introduction
On February 26, 2026, CME Securities Clearing Inc. (``CMESC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
proposed rule change CMESC-2026-002, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change would modify the Amended and
Restated By-Laws of CME Securities Clearing Inc. (``By-Laws''), the
Board of Directors Charter (``Board Charter''), the Risk Management
Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee Charter, the Audit
Committee Charter, and the
[[Page 20551]]
Regulatory Oversight Committee Charter (collectively, the ``Committee
Charters''). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on March 12, 2026.\3\ The Commission has received no
comments on the changes proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104955 (Mar. 9,
2026), 91 FR 12224 (Mar. 12, 2026) (File No. SR-CMESC-2026-002)
(``Notice of Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the
proposed rule change.
II. Background
On December 13, 2024, CMESC filed with the Commission its
application on Form CA-1 (``Application'') for registration as a
clearing agency to provide central counterparty services for
transactions involving U.S. Treasury securities. The Commission
published notice of the Application in the Federal Register on January
22, 2025.\4\ The Application contained certain proposed governance
documents, including CMESC's By-Laws,\5\ Board of Directors Charter,\6\
Risk Management Committee Charter,\7\ Nominating Committee Charter,\8\
Audit Committee Charter,\9\ and Regulatory Oversight Committee
Charter.\10\ Together, these governance documents constitute CMESC's
governance framework as a registered, operating clearing agency
(``Governance Framework''). On December 1, 2025, the Commission issued
an order granting CMESC's Application for registration as a clearing
agency, finding that the Application satisfied the requirements of the
Act and rules and regulations thereunder.\11\ In the order, the
Commission discussed CMESC's governance arrangements as reflected in
the foregoing governance documents and found that ``CMESC is so
organized and has the capacity to be able to facilitate the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and to
comply with the provisions of the Exchange Act and the rule[s and]
regulations thereunder.'' \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 102200 (Jan. 15, 2025),
90 FR 7713 (Jan. 22, 2025). Non-confidential aspects of the
Application, including any exhibits thereto cited in this order, are
available on the Commission's website at: <a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/other-commission-orders-notices-information/cme-form-ca-1">https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/other-commission-orders-notices-information/cme-form-ca-1</a>.
\5\ See Exhibit E-2A(2) to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2a-2-amended-restated-bylaws-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2a-2-amended-restated-bylaws-12-13-24.pdf</a>.
\6\ See Exhibit E-2B to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2b-board-directors-charter-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2b-board-directors-charter-12-13-24.pdf</a>.
\7\ See Exhibit E-2C to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2c-risk-management-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2c-risk-management-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf</a>.
\8\ See Exhibit E-2D to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2d-nominating-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2d-nominating-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf</a>.
\9\ See Exhibit E-2E to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2e-audit-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2e-audit-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf</a>.
\10\ See Exhibit E-2F to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2f-regulatory-oversight-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2f-regulatory-oversight-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf</a>.
\11\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104281 (Dec. 1, 2025),
90 FR 55926 (Dec. 4, 2025), available at <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/04/2025-21908/cme-securities-clearing-inc-order-granting-an-application-for-registration-as-a-clearing-agency">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/04/2025-21908/cme-securities-clearing-inc-order-granting-an-application-for-registration-as-a-clearing-agency</a> (``CMESC Registration Approval'').
\12\ Id. at 55932.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CMESC states that, as a newly registered clearing agency, it does
not have any operating history and is in the early stage of engaging
with prospective Members and Users that are to be represented on its
Board and, therefore, the adoption of the Governance Framework requires
CMESC to take certain steps in sequence.\13\ As the initial step to
adopt the Governance Framework, CMESC states that the current CMESC
Board or CMESC's stockholder will adopt the By-Laws in accordance with
CMESC's current By-Laws,\14\ and that, upon adoption of the By-Laws,
the Secretary will call a special stockholders meeting to elect
Directors, consistent with the requirements of Article III, Section 1
of the By-Laws.\15\ After the new Board is constituted, CMESC states
that it will undertake formal Board actions to adopt the Board Charter
and Committee Charters and appoint members to the Nominating Committee
and other Committees in accordance with the Committee Charters and,
once constituted, the Nominating Committee and other Committees will
assume their responsibilities under their respective Committee
Charters.\16\ CMESC further states that the Nominating Committee will
review the classification of each Director elected to the initial Board
to verify the Director's classification as an Independent Director or
non-Independent Director.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 3, at 12225.
\14\ See Exhibit E-2A(1) to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2a-1-initial-bylaws-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2a-1-initial-bylaws-12-13-24.pdf</a>. Article IX sets forth the provisions for adoption of
amendments to the By-Laws.
\15\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 3, at 12225.
\16\ Id.
\17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CMESC states that it is necessary for CMESC to make certain
modifications to the By-Laws, Board Charter, and Committee Charters to
provide the flexibility needed to facilitate composing and standing up
the new Board and to smooth the implementation of the Governance
Framework.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would modify the Board Charter to provide
flexibility in the initial number of Directors on the Board and to
reflect a transition from a staggered Board structure to a unitary
Board elected annually, as well as to clarify the Board's
responsibilities and standards for conducting its meetings. Conforming
clarifications would also be made to the Amended and Restated By-Laws
and the Nominating Committee Charter to align those documents with the
annual Board term structure and its flexible initial size and to update
cross-references. In addition, the Risk Management Committee Charter
would be revised to add oversight of CMESC's Enterprise Risk Management
Framework, and the Audit Committee Charter would be amended to correct
a technical cross-reference. Finally, non-substantive clarifying
changes would be made to each Committee Charter to clarify that a
majority of its Directors must be Independent Directors, along with
other non-substantive clarifying and conforming edits. The proposed
changes are described in more detail below.
A. Changes to the By-Laws
The proposed rule change would make several changes to the By-Laws.
First, Article III, Section 1 (``Number, Composition, and Election of
Directors'') would remove the current discussion regarding the initial
sizing of the Board of Directors (as initially being two and then
increased to nine upon adopting of the by-laws). CMESC states that it
is more appropriate to address the size of the initial Board in the
Board Charter, as described in part III.B below.\19\ CMESC states that
this flexibility to appoint fewer than nine Directors to the first
Board is consistent with the existing authority under Article III
Section 1 of the By-Laws to appoint between one and fifteen
directors.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Id. at 12226.
\20\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, Section 1 of Article III would clarify that the Nominating
Committee process for reviewing and recommending candidates to serve on
the Board will apply to the first Board to be elected after the
election of the initial Board following adoption of the By-Laws.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ CMESC states that, following its appointment, the
Nominating Committee will also have other responsibilities under the
Nominating Committee Charter, which would include nominating
candidates to fill any vacancy that may occur on the Board including
a vacancy on the initial Board, and its role in verifying the
classification of a Director as an Independent Director or a non-
Independent Director. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20552]]
Third, the proposed rule change would modify the manner of filling
an officer vacancy in Article IV (``Officers''), Section 2
(``Election''). Currently, Article IV, Section 2 of the By-Laws
provides that officer vacancies shall be filled by the Board, which,
according to CMESC, contradicts certain provisions in the other
governance documents.\22\ The proposed rule change would modify the
relevant language in Article IV, Section 2 to state that officer
vacancies shall be filled as specified in the By-Laws or any Board
committee charter. Similarly, the proposed rule change would remove the
language in the same paragraph regarding the salaries of all officers
being fixed by the Board to take into consideration that the
compensation of certain officers may not be fixed by the Board under
certain existing Board committee charters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Id. For example, the Regulatory Oversight Committee Charter
provides that if the Chief Compliance Officer position becomes
vacant, the Head of the Corporation shall appoint a successor,
subject to the approval of the Regulatory Oversight Committee. See
Exhibit E-2F to Form CA-1, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2f-regulatory-oversight-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/files/cmesc-ca-1-exhibit-e-2f-regulatory-oversight-committee-charter-12-13-24.pdf</a>. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the proposed rule change would create a defined term
``Annual Meeting'' in Article II, Section 2 to refer to the annual
meeting of Stockholders.
B. Changes to the Board Charter
The proposed changes to the Board Charter relate to composing and
standing up the new CMESC Board. First, the proposed rule change would
modify the second bullet under Section II (``Board Composition'') to
reflect that the initial Board would include no more than nine
Directors. The proposed rule change would also provide that the number
of Directors on the Board shall continually be composed of a sufficient
number of Directors to meet the composition requirements described in
the Board Charter, which would be subject to the provisions of the By-
Laws (i.e., in Section I of Article III regarding the election of the
initial Board following adoption of the By-Laws.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the proposed rule change would change the staggered
(classified) Board structure to a non-classified Board structure with a
unitary annual term by eliminating Section IV (``Term of Office;
Classes'') entirely and revising the existing Section V (``Election of
Directors'') to provide that the Directors will be elected by the
Stockholder at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholder and that each
Director so elected will serve until the end of the annual term or
until the Director's earlier death, resignation, or removal. CMESC
states that, on further consideration, a staggered or classified Board
structure, which is often utilized by Delaware corporations as an anti-
takeover defense mechanism, is not an appropriate structure for
CMESC.\24\ CMESC states that, as a registered clearing agency, it does
not need a staggered Board structure as a defense mechanism, and a
staggered Board structure would unnecessarily complicate the process of
composing the Board and administering the terms of the Directors.\25\
As a result of removing Section IV, Section V (``Election of
Directors'') would be renumbered as Section IV and ``Term of Office''
would be added to the heading of the new Section IV. In addition, the
proposed rule change would capitalize the term ``annual meeting''
throughout the new Section IV to clarify that it is a defined term.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 3, at 12226.
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, the proposed rule change would add language to Section I
(``Purpose'') to specify the standards and obligations of the Board of
Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities. Specifically, the
proposed rule change would add new language as a third bullet under
Section I to require the Board, in fulfilling its responsibilities, to
consider the legitimate interests of Members and Users, and prioritize
the overall risk management, safety, and efficiency of CMESC, including
its obligations to facilitate and promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and to assure
safeguarding securities and funds, and generally support the stability
of the broader financial system in accordance with best practices in
the industry. CMESC states that this language is designed to provide
greater transparency to Directors of the Board and the public regarding
the Board's responsibilities.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See id. and Amended and Restated By-Laws, Art. III, Sec.
3(c), Art. X, Sec. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change would also add language to existing
Section VIII (``Meetings'')--to be re-numbered as Section VII after the
proposed removal of existing Section IV--to state considerations the
Board should take into account when evaluating a proposal.
Specifically, when evaluating a proposal in front of the Board, the
Board of Directors would be required to take into account all factors
that the Board of Directors deems relevant, including, to the extent
deemed relevant: (i) the potential impact of the proposal on the
integrity, continuity, and stability of the Corporation, on the ability
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, and on
investors and the public, and (ii) whether such proposal would promote
the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions, assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for
which it is responsible, foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions, and remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
national system for the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions, in light of the nature of CMESC and its
operations as a registered clearing agency and its status as a self-
regulatory organization. CMESC states that this language is consistent
with the statutory requirements and the clearing agency standards
promulgated by the Commission under the statute and provides greater
transparency to Board Directors and the public regarding the Board's
responsibilities.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 3, at 12227.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the proposed rule change would modify the Board Charter to
improve clarity, maintain consistency among various governance
documents, and correct certain errors, including:
<bullet> Clarifying that it is the Nominating Committee's
responsibility, with support from the Secretary, to broadly consider
all relevant facts and circumstances to evaluate, determine, and
document, as necessary, whether reported new relationships or changes
to existing relationships may likely impair the categorization of a
Director as an Independent Director and preclude a Director from being
an Independent Director in the fifth bullet under Section II.
<bullet> Making non-substantive revisions to the existing fourth,
fifth, and sixth sub-bullets under the fifth bullet of Section II to
combine them into a new sub-bullet to create a new defined term
``Interested Party'' to refer to the types of third-party organization,
entity, or outside auditor described in the existing sub-bullets under
the existing fifth bullet of Section II. CMESC states that this new
sub-bullet continues to be closely aligned with Rules 17ad-25(f)(4),
(5) and (6) of the Act.\28\ It also states that the revisions are
designed to improve drafting efficiency by incorporating the new
defined term ``Interested Party'' and
[[Page 20553]]
allow the subsequent sub-bullets (i.e., existing seventh and eighth
sub-bullets) to conveniently use the term ``Interested Party'' to refer
to the type of third-party organization, entity or outside auditor
described in Rule 17ad-25(f)(4)-(6) with respect to disclosure and
monitoring of a Director's relationships and relationships of the
Director's family members with CMESC, its affiliates, or Interested
Parties that could affect the Director's categorization as an
Independent Director.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 3, at 12227 and 17 CFR
240.17ad-25(f)(4)-(6).
\29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Clarifying that the Chairman of the Board shall be
selected by the Board ``on an annual basis'' in Section III (``Chairman
of the Board''), which is consistent with the new annual term of the
Board under the proposed declassified (non-staggered) Board structure.
<bullet> Removing reference to ``the President'' from existing
Section VII (``Removal and Resignation'')--which will become Section VI
after the proposed removal of Section IV--to clarify that ``President''
is not an officer position in CMESC.
C. Changes to the Risk Management Committee Charter
The proposed rule change would clarify the text prescribing the
composition requirements for the Risk Management Committee (``CSRMC'')
in the Risk Management Committee Charter. Specifically, the proposed
rule change would revise the first bullet in Section II (``Membership &
Organization'') to clarify that a majority of the Directors serving on
the CSRMC must be Independent Directors, the same as required for the
Board, rather than the existing language ``in at least the same
majority percentage as required for the Board,'' which CMESC states
does not accurately reflect the original intent.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 3, at 12227.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change would also clarify the responsibilities of
the CSRMC. Specifically, the proposed rule change would add two bullets
to Section IV (``CSRMC Meetings, Tasks and Authority'') under
``Responsibilities.'' The first proposed bullet would require the CSRMC
to provide oversight of CMESC's Enterprise Risk Management Framework
(``ERMF''), including annual review of the ERMF and review and approval
of substantive changes to the ERMF, as well as a requirement to
annually submit a recommendation to the Board to approve the ERMF. The
second proposed bullet would require the CSRMC to review the quarterly
Enterprise Risk Profile report on CMESC's enterprise risks. CMESC
states that the proposed additions clarify the CSRMC's
responsibilities, which is critical to CMESC's overall risk
management.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Changes to the Nominating Committee Charter
The proposed rule change would also clarify the text in the
Nominating Committee Charter that prescribes the composition of the
Nominating Committee. Specifically, the proposed rule change would
revise the first bullet in Section II (``Membership & Organization'')
to clarify that a majority of the Directors serving on the Nominating
Committee (as with the Board) shall be Independent Directors, rather
than the existing language ``in at least the same majority percentage
as required for the Board,'' which CMESC states does not accurately
reflect the original intent.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change would also make certain conforming changes
to the Nominating Committee Charter, as follows:
<bullet> Changing the existing language regarding Board nominations
to reflect the proposed change from a staggered Board structure to a
declassified (non-staggered) Board structure with a unitary annual
term.
<bullet> Changing a cross-reference located in Section IV
(``Nominating Committee Meetings, Tasks and Authority'') under
``Responsibilities'' to Section V, reflecting the proposed removal of
Section IV from the Board of Directors Charter.
E. Changes to the Audit Committee Charter
The proposed rule change would clarify the text prescribing the
composition of the Audit Committee. Specifically, the proposed rule
change would revise the first bullet in Section II (``Membership &
Organization'') to clarify that a majority of the Directors serving on
the Audit Committee (as with the Board) shall be Independent Directors,
rather than the existing language ``in at least the same majority
percentage as required for the Board,'' which CMESC states does not
accurately reflect the original intent.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ Id. at 12228.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CMESC is also proposing to correct a cross-reference located in
Section VII (``Confidentiality'') of the Audit Committee Charter by
correcting a reference to Rule 1203 of the Rulebook to reference Rule
1202 instead.
F. Changes to the Regulatory Oversight Committee Charter
Finally, CMESC is proposing to make the same clarifying change to
the text prescribing the composition of the Regulatory Oversight
Committee in the Regulatory Oversight Committee Charter as the other
Committee Charters. CMESC proposes to revise the first bullet in
Section II (``Membership & Organization'') to clarify CMESC's intention
that a majority of the Directors serving on the Regulatory Oversight
Committee (as with the Board) shall be Independent Directors, rather
than the existing language ``in at least the same majority percentage
as required for the Board,'' which CMESC states does not accurately
reflect the original intent.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \35\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it
finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and rules and regulations thereunder applicable
to such organization. After careful review of the proposed rule change,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to CMESC. More specifically, for the reasons given below,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Sections 17A(b)(3)(A) and (C) of the Act \36\ and Rules 17ad-
22(e)(2)(i) and 17ad-25 thereunder.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\36\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(A) and (C).
\37\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(2)(i) and 17ad-25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(A)
Section 17A(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires, among other things, that
CMESC be so organized and have the capacity to be able to comply with
the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.\38\
Based on review of the record, and for the reasons discussed below,\39\
CMESC's proposed rule changes described in Section III above are
consistent with CMESC being so organized and having the capacity to
comply with the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder. Accordingly, the proposed
[[Page 20554]]
rule changes are consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(A).
\39\ See infra Sections IV. C. (Consistency with Rule 17ad-
22(e)(2)(i)) and IV.D (Consistency with Rule 17ad-25).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(C)
Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires, among other things, that
CMESC's rules assure a fair representation of its shareholders (or
members) and participants in the selection of its directors and
administration of its affairs.\40\ As described above in Sections
III.A. and B., the proposed rule change modifies the Board Charter
(and, correspondingly, the By-Laws) by changing the amount of Directors
required to be on the initial Board following adoption of the By-Laws
from exactly nine to no more than nine Directors, which would provide
CMESC the flexibility for composing the Board shortly before the launch
of CMESC's clearing services. By capping the initial Board at up to
nine Directors while preserving one seat for a representative of a
Member and one seat for a representative of a User, the proposed rule
change should preserve meaningful participant representation within
CMESC's governance structure.\41\ Moreover, the proposed requirement
that the Board, in fulfilling its responsibilities, ``consider the
legitimate interests of Members and Users'' should enhance participant
representation by embedding consideration of participant perspectives
into the Board's decision-making framework. Therefore, these changes
should help to assure fair representation in the selection of its
directors and administration of its affairs, consistent with Section
17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).
\41\ See CMESC Registration Approval, supra note 11, at 55935
(``As such CMESC's approach, in reserving positions on the Board of
Directors for a representative of a Member and a representative of a
User, is consistent with fair representation, helping to provide a
voice in CMESC's governance to a range of views from among the
customers of the clearing agency'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Consistency With Rule 17ad-22(e)(2)(i)
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) requires, among other things, that covered
clearing agencies establish, implement, maintain and enforce written
policies and procedures reasonably designed to provide for governance
arrangements that are clear and transparent.\42\ As described above in
Sections III.A. through F., the proposed rule change introduces
clarifying and conforming amendments to CMESC's Amended and Restated
By-Laws, Board Charter, and Committee Charters. By removing
contradictory language regarding officer appointments, clarifying
Committee responsibilities, specifying the considerations the Board
should take into account when evaluating a proposal, and updating
cross-references, definitions, and terminology to improve clarity and
internal consistency, these changes should enhance the clarity and
transparency of CMESC's governance arrangements, consistent with Rule
17ad-22(e)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Consistency With Rule 17ad-25
Rule 17Ad-25 requires, among other things, that the majority of the
members of the board of directors of a registered clearing agency, and
any committee with authority to act on behalf of the board of
directors, be independent directors.\43\ As described above in Sections
III.C. through E., the proposed rule changes to the charters of the
Risk Management Committee, Nominating Committee, Audit Committee, and
Regulatory Oversight Committee clarify that the majority of directors
serving on the CSRMC, Nominating Committee, Audit Committee, and
Regulatory Oversight Committee will be Independent Directors,
consistent with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-25.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-25.
\44\ Similarly, the removal of CMESC's current staggered Board
structure is also consistent with Rule 17ad-25, which does not
require such a structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of
the Exchange Act \45\ and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act \46\ that
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
proposed rule change SR-CMESC-2026-002 be, and hereby is,
approved.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposals' impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-07345 Filed 4-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 16, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.