Notice2026-07311

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 15, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Review" section of this notice.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20105-20106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-07311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-938]


Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that 
revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on citric acid and 
certain citrate salts (citric acid) from the People's Republic of China 
(China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the ``Final 
Results of Sunset Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Applicable April 15, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David De Falco, Trade Agreements 
Policy and Negotiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2178.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 29, 2009, Commerce published the Order on citric acid from 
China.\1\ On December 1, 2025, Commerce published the notice of 
initiation of the third sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 
351.218(c).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from the People's 
Republic of China: Notice of Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 25705 
(May 29, 2009) (Order).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 90 FR 55084 
(December 1, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 16, 2025, Commerce received a notice of intent to 
participate in this review from Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, 
Cargill, Incorporated, and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC 
(collectively, the domestic interested parties), within the deadline 
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ The domestic interested 
parties claimed interested party status within the meaning of section 
771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v) as manufacturers, 
producers, or wholesalers in the United States of a domestic like 
product.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Third Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on 
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic of 
China: Domestic Industry's Notice of Intent To Participate,'' dated 
December 16, 2025.
    \4\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 22, 2025, Commerce received an adequate substantive 
response from the domestic interested parties, within the 30-day 
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ Commerce did not 
receive a substantive response from either the Government of China or a 
respondent interested party in this proceeding. On January 23, 2026, 
Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it 
did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent 
interested parties.\6\ As a result, Commerce conducted an expedited 
(120-day) sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Third Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review Of The Countervailing Duty Order On Citric Acid 
And Certain Citrate Salts from the People's Republic of China: 
Domestic Industry's Substantive Response,'' dated December 22, 2025.
    \6\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated December 
1, 2025,'' dated January 23, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by this Order is citric acid from China. For 
the full description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and 
Decisions Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 
from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 20106]]

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, 
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization 
and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Order 
were to be revoked, is contained in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\8\ A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), 
which is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In 
addition, complete versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Sunset Review

    Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce 
determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the 
following net countervailable subsidy rates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Net countervailable
              Producers/exporters                 subsidy rate (percent
                                                       ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TTCA Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. Shandong TTCA                               60.07
 Biochemistry Co., Ltd.).......................
Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd.; and Yixing                     52.22
 Union Cogeneration Co., Ltd...................
Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd................                   166.34
All Others.....................................                    55.53
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO 
materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance 
with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.221(c)(5)(ii).

    Dated: April 10, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable 
Subsidy
    2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely To Prevail
    3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2026-07311 Filed 4-14-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 15, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.