Notice2026-07172

1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-Hexamethylcyclopenta [g]-2-Benzopyran (HHCB); Phthalic Anhydride; o-Dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) and p-Dichlorobenzene (p-DCB); Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) Peer Review; Draft Risk Evaluations; Notice of SACC Meeting; Availability of Draft Documents and Request for Comment

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 14, 2026

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is announcing that there will be two virtual public meetings of the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC). On May 26, 2026, a preparatory meeting will be held for the SACC to consider the scope and clarity of the draft charge questions for the peer review of the draft risk evaluations for 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8- hexamethylcyclopenta [g ]-2-benzopyran (HHCB) and phthalic anhydride and the draft hazard assessments for o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) and p- dichlorobenzene (p-DCB). The peer review meeting will be held June 8 through 12, 2026, for the SACC to consider the draft risk evaluations for HHCB and phthalic anhydride, the draft hazard assessments for o-DCB and p-DCB, the technical support documents, and their public comments. EPA is also announcing the availability of and soliciting public comment on the draft documents and charge questions that will be provided to the SACC for this peer review. The draft risk evaluations and draft hazard assessments were prepared under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and will be submitted to the SACC for peer review.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19131-19133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-07172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2026-1189; FRL-13266-01-OCSPP]


1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-Hexamethylcyclopenta [g]-2-
Benzopyran (HHCB); Phthalic Anhydride; o-Dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) and p-
Dichlorobenzene (p-DCB); Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) 
Peer Review; Draft Risk Evaluations; Notice of SACC Meeting; 
Availability of Draft Documents and Request for Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is 
announcing that there will be two virtual public meetings of the 
Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC). On May 26, 2026, a 
preparatory meeting will be held for the SACC to consider the scope and 
clarity of the draft charge questions for the peer review of the draft 
risk evaluations for 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-
hexamethylcyclopenta [g ]-2-benzopyran (HHCB) and phthalic anhydride 
and the draft hazard assessments for o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) and p-
dichlorobenzene (p-DCB). The peer review meeting will be held June 8 
through 12, 2026, for the SACC to consider the draft risk evaluations 
for HHCB and phthalic anhydride, the draft hazard assessments for o-DCB 
and p-DCB, the technical support documents, and their public comments. 
EPA is also announcing the availability of and soliciting public 
comment on the draft documents and charge questions that will be 
provided to the SACC for this peer review. The draft risk evaluations 
and draft hazard assessments were prepared under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA) and will be submitted to the SACC for peer review.

DATES: 

Preparatory Public Meeting

    Meeting date: May 26, 2026, 1 p.m. to approximately 4 p.m. (ET).
    Registration: To request time to present oral comments during the 
preparatory meeting, you must register by noon (12 p.m. ET) on May 18, 
2026, and submit a written version of your oral comments by noon (12 
p.m. ET) on May 22, 2026. For those not making oral comments, 
registration will remain open until the end of this meeting on May 26, 
2026.

SACC Peer Review Public Meeting

    Meeting dates: June 8 through 12, 2026, 10 a.m. to approximately 5 
p.m. (ET).
    Registration: To request time to present oral comments during the 
SACC peer review meeting, you must register by noon (12 p.m. ET) June 
1, 2026, and submit a written version of your oral comments by noon (12 
p.m. ET) on June 5, 2026. For those not making oral comments, 
registration will remain open through the end of this meeting on June 
12, 2026.
    Comments: To ensure proper receipt of comments, it is imperative 
that you identify docket identification (ID): EPA-HQ-OPPT-2025-1610 in 
the subject line on the first page of your comments and follow the 
instructions in this document.
    Submit written comments on the draft risk evaluations, draft hazard 
assessments, and technical support documents for consideration by the 
SACC for peer review on or before May 29, 2026.
    To request time to present oral comments during one of the virtual 
public meetings, you must register online by the deadlines set in this 
section of the document. Oral comments during the peer review meeting 
are limited to five minutes unless arrangements have been made with the 
Designated Federal Official (DFO), within the constraints of the 
meeting agenda. In addition, each speaker should submit a written 
transcript or copy of their oral comments and any supporting materials 
(e.g., presentation slides) to the DFO prior to the meetings for 
distribution to the SACC by the deadlines set in this section of the 
document.
    Special Accommodations: To allow sufficient time for EPA to process 
your request for special accommodation before both the preparatory and 
SACC peer review meetings, please submit the request at least ten 
business days in advance of the relevant meeting.

ADDRESSES: 
    Comments: Submit written comments, identified by docket ID: EPA-HQ-
OPPT-2026-1189, through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Do not electronically submit any 
information you consider to be

[[Page 19132]]

Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Members of the public should also 
be aware that personal information included in any written comments may 
be posted on the internet at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Additional 
information on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more 
information about dockets generally, is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.
    Meeting(s) registration: Online registration for both the 
preparatory and the SACC peer review meetings will be available in 
April 2026. Please refer to the SACC website at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review">https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review</a> to complete and submit the registration form(s) 
approximately one month prior to each meeting. After registering, you 
will receive the webcast and streaming service meeting links and audio 
teleconference information.
    Special accommodation requests: To request an accommodation for a 
disability, please contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    DFO: Dr. Alaa Kamel, Science Advisory Committee Branch, mail code 
7602M, Regulatory and Information Services Division, Office of Mission 
Critical Operations, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency; telephone number: (202) 
564-5336 or call the SACC main office: (202) 564-8450; email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e68d878b838ac8878a8787a6839687c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e151f131b12501f121f1f3e1b0e1f50191108">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Executive Summary

A. What action is the Agency taking?

    EPA is announcing that there will be two virtual public meetings of 
the SACC. On May 26, 2026, there will be a preparatory meeting for the 
SACC to consider the scope and clarity of the draft charge questions 
for the peer review; and on June 8 through 12, 2026, there will be a 
peer review meeting for the SACC to consider the draft risk evaluations 
for HHCB and phthalic anhydride, the draft hazard assessments for o-DCB 
and p-DCB, the technical support documents, and their public comments. 
EPA is also announcing the availability of and soliciting public 
comments on the draft documents and charge questions that will be 
provided to the SACC for this peer review.

B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    EPA established the SACC in 2016 in accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 
2625(o), to provide independent advice and expert consultation with 
respect to the scientific and technical aspects of issues relating to 
the implementation of TSCA. The SACC operates in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 10, and supports activities 
under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution Prevention Act, 42 
U.S.C. 13101 et seq., and other applicable statutes.

C. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of 
particular interest to those involved in the manufacture, processing, 
distribution, and disposal of the subject chemical substances, and/or 
those interested (including members of at-risk communities; non-
governmental organizations; and federal, state, and local officials) in 
the assessment of risks involving chemical substances and mixtures 
regulated under TSCA.

D. What should I consider as I submit my comments to EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI or other sensitive information 
to EPA through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or email. To include 
information in your comment that you consider to be CBI or otherwise 
protected, please contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT to obtain special instructions before submitting that 
information.
    2. Tips for preparing comments. When preparing and submitting your 
comments, see the commenting tips at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>. See also the instructions in Unit III of this 
document.

E. How can I stay informed about SACC activities?

    You may subscribe to the following listserv for alerts regarding 
this and other SACC-related activities: <a href="https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAEPAOPPT_101">https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAEPAOPPT_101</a>.

II. Background

A. What is the purpose of SACC?

    The SACC provides independent advice and recommendations to the EPA 
on the scientific and technical aspects of risk assessments, 
methodologies, and pollution prevention measures and approaches for 
chemicals regulated under TSCA. The SACC is composed of experts in 
toxicology, environmental risk assessment, exposure assessment, and 
related sciences (e.g., chemistry, biology, toxicology, pharmacology, 
biotechnology, nanotechnology, biochemistry, biostatistics, 
physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, computational 
toxicology, epidemiology, environmental fate, and environmental 
engineering and sustainability). When needed, the SACC committee will 
be assisted by ad hoc reviewers with specific expertise in the topics 
under consideration.

B. Why is EPA conducting these risk evaluations?

    TSCA requires EPA to conduct risk evaluations on high-priority 
chemical substances and identifies the minimum components EPA must 
include in all chemical substance risk evaluations. The purpose of 
conducting risk evaluations is to determine whether a chemical 
substance presents an unreasonable risk to human health or the 
environment under the conditions of use. These evaluations include 
assessing risks to relevant potentially exposed or susceptible 
subpopulations. As part of this process, EPA: (1) Integrates hazard and 
exposure assessments using the best available science that is 
reasonably available to assure decisions are based on the weight of the 
scientific evidence and (2) Conducts peer review for risk evaluation 
approaches that have not been previously peer reviewed. For more 
information about the three stages of EPA's process for ensuring the 
safety of existing chemicals (i.e., prioritization, risk evaluation, 
and risk management), go to <a href="https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/how-epa-evaluates-safety-existing-chemicals">https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/how-epa-evaluates-safety-existing-chemicals</a>.

C. Why did EPA develop these documents?

    HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-
hexamethylcyclopenta[[gamma]]-2-benzopyran (CASRN 1222-05-5)), commonly 
known by the trade name Galaxolide, phthalic anhydride (CASRN 85-44-9), 
o-DCB (ortho- or 1,2-dichlorobenzene (CASRN 95-50-1)) and p-DCB (para- 
or 1,4-dichlorobenzene (CASRN 106-46-7)), were designated in December 
2019 as high-priority substances under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical 
Safety for the 21st Century Act, and are currently in the risk 
evaluation process. EPA published draft and final scopes in April and 
August 2020, respectively. The scope documents outlined the hazards, 
exposures, conditions of use, and the potentially exposed or 
susceptible subpopulations the Agency expected to consider in its risk 
evaluations.
    On January 22, 2026, EPA leadership re-committed the Agency to 
phasing out mammalian animal testing and further incorporating New 
Approach Methods (NAMs) approaches into chemical risk

[[Page 19133]]

evaluations. These NAMs approaches have been incorporated into 
forthcoming risk evaluations.

D. What is the topic of the planned SACC peer review?

    EPA is soliciting comments from the SACC on a variety of charge 
questions related to HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o-DCB, and p-DCB. Many 
of the methods and analyses used in these risk evaluations and hazard 
assessments are not novel and have been reviewed in the development of 
the tools used in various Agency work products or in previous TSCA 
assessments. EPA is focusing peer review on critical inputs and novel 
approaches.
    EPA anticipates requesting the SACC to provide feedback on the 
following documents:
    <bullet> Complete draft risk evaluation for HHCB, including risk 
characterization and associated technical support documents related to 
hazard and exposure assessment.
    <bullet> Complete draft risk evaluation for phthalic anhydride, 
including risk characterization and associated technical support 
documents related to hazard and exposure assessment.
    <bullet> Draft hazard assessments and technical support documents 
for human health and ecological hazard for o-DCB and p-DCB.
    In addition, EPA expects to solicit feedback on the following 
scientific issues, which have been incorporated into forthcoming risk 
evaluations in alignment with the Agency's recent announcement on 
phasing out mammalian animal testing.
1. Use of 5-Day Transcriptomic Studies
    <bullet> Interpretation and application of transcriptomic studies 
for o-DCB and p-DCB.
    <bullet> Application of a transcriptomics study and benchmark dose 
modeling of gene expression in rodent tissues to identify a 
transcriptomic point-of-departure for o-DCB.
2. Advances in Cancer Risk Assessment
    <bullet> Constitutive Androstane Receptor mode of action/adverse 
outcome pathway analysis and non-human relevance determination for p-
DCB.
    <bullet> Application of the Rethinking Carcinogenicity Assessment 
for Agrochemicals Project weight of evidence framework for HHCB and o-
DCB.
3. Application of In Vitro and Computational NAMs
    <bullet> Use of skin sensitization and respiratory sensitization in 
vitro studies and adverse outcome pathways to support hazard 
characterization of phthalic anhydride.
    <bullet> Use of skin irritation and dermal absorption in vitro 
studies to support hazard identification of HHCB.
    <bullet> Computational approaches, including use of the Skin 
Allergy Risk Assessment-Integrated Chemical Environment model for 
phthalic anhydride.
    <bullet> Computational approaches for o-DCB.
4. Additional Non-Cancer Human Health Hazard Issues
    <bullet> Use and interpretation of the Extended One-Generation 
Reproductive Toxicity Study for HHCB.
5. Screening Level Approaches for Occupational and Consumer Exposure 
Assessment
    <bullet> The data and methods utilized in the screening-level 
occupational and consumer exposure assessments for HHCB, including 
evidence regarding bioconcentration and bioaccumulation and associated 
human exposure through fish consumption.
    <bullet> The use of the thin film model for dermal exposure and the 
applicability to the chosen exposure scenarios.
6. Environmental Hazard Technical Support Documentation
    <bullet> The data and methods used to characterize environmental 
hazards of HHCB and phthalic anhydride.

III. Virtual Public Meetings of the SACC

A. What is the purpose of the virtual public meeting(s)?

    The purpose of the preparatory meeting is for the SACC to consider 
and ask questions regarding the scope and clarity of the draft charge 
questions. The purpose of the peer review meeting is for the SACC to 
consider and peer review the draft risk evaluations, draft hazard 
assessments, and technical support documents. These public meetings are 
part of the SACC's peer review of the Agency's methods and novel 
analyses for the draft risk evaluations and draft hazard assessments. 
The agenda for these meetings will be posted in the docket and will 
also be available through the SACC website.
    EPA will consider recommendations from this SACC review and public 
comments in the development of the final TSCA risk evaluations, which 
may inform other EPA efforts related to the assessment and regulation 
of the chemical substances. The Agency is seeking peer review of its 
data analyses and methodologies relevant to human health hazard and 
exposure analyses that have not been previously peer reviewed.

B. How can I participate in the virtual public meeting(s)?

    To participate in these virtual public meetings, you must register 
online to receive the webcast and streaming service meeting links and 
audio teleconference information for each meeting. Online registration 
will be available approximately one month prior to the meeting(s) and 
will remain open until the end of the meeting. To make oral comments 
during one of these meetings, follow the instructions in this document.

C. How can I access the documents?

    The draft risk evaluations, draft hazard assessments, related 
technical supporting materials, and draft charge questions are 
available in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2026-1189 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. EPA will include additional meeting background 
materials as they become available, (e.g., SACC members and the meeting 
agenda) in the docket and through the Peer Review of the Draft Risk 
Evaluations for HHCB and phthalic anhydride and the draft hazard 
assessments for o-DCB and p-DCB website at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review/peer-review-evaluating-hhcb-phthalic-anhydride-o-dcb-and-p-dcb">https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review/peer-review-evaluating-hhcb-phthalic-anhydride-o-dcb-and-p-dcb</a>.

IV. Next Steps

    After the peer review meeting, the SACC will prepare the meeting 
minutes and final report document summarizing its recommendations to 
the EPA, which will also be available in the docket and through the 
SACC website. EPA will consider the SACC recommendations and public 
comments to complete the risk evaluations and unreasonable risk 
determinations under TSCA for these chemical substances. Under TSCA, 
EPA must then initiate risk management actions to address the 
unreasonable risk if identified.

(Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C. 10.)

    Dated: April 10, 2026.
Douglas M. Troutman,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2026-07172 Filed 4-13-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js" defer></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 14, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.