Notice2026-07091

Certain Processed Slabs and Methods for Making Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Intervene

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 13, 2026

Issuing agencies

International Trade Commission

Abstract

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") granting a motion to intervene as a respondent filed by non- party C&C North America, Inc. d/b/a Cosentino North America ("Cosentino").

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 70 (Monday, April 13, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18880-18881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-07091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1482]


Certain Processed Slabs and Methods for Making Same; Notice of a 
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Granting a Motion To Intervene

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting a motion to intervene as a respondent filed by non-
party C&C North America, Inc. d/b/a Cosentino North America 
(``Cosentino'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Namo Kim, Esq., Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3459. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6f3f2ffe585fed3dac6f6c3c5dfc2d598d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f2a2b263c5c270a031f2f1a1c061b0c41080019">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 27, 2026, based on a complaint filed by Cambria Company LLC 
of Belle Plaine, Minnesota (``Cambria''). 91 FR 3539-40 (Jan. 27, 
2026). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based upon 
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or 
the sale within the United States of certain processed slabs and 
methods for making same by reason of the infringement of certain claims 
of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,195,762; 10,252,440; and 12,370,718. The 
complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that a domestic industry 
exists in the United States. Id. The Commission's notice of 
investigation names the following as respondents: Architectural 
Surfaces Group LLC of Spicewood, Texas; Arizona Tile, LLC of Tempe,

[[Page 18881]]

Arizona; Caesarstone Ltd. of Kibbutz Sdot-Yam, Israel; Caesarstone USA, 
Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina; Dal-Tile, LLC of Dallas, Texas; LX 
Hausys, Ltd. of Seoul, Republic of Korea; LX Hausys America, Inc. of 
Alpharetta, Georgia; Mohawk Industries, Inc. of Calhoun, Georgia; M S 
International Inc. d/b/a MSI of Orange, California; OHM International 
Inc. of Monroe Township, New Jersey; and Surface Warehouse, L.P. d/b/a 
US Surfaces and d/b/a Vadara Quartz Surfaces of Austin, Texas 
(collectively, ``Respondents''). Id. The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations (``OUII'') is also participating in the investigation. 
Id.
    On March 6, 2026, Cosentino filed a motion to intervene as a 
respondent, arguing that certain processed slab products sold by 
Cosentino could be subject to a general exclusion order requested by 
Cambria, and that disposition without Cosentino may impair or impede 
its ability to protect its interests in its products. Cosentino also 
represented that Respondents do not oppose the motion.
    On March 18, 2026, OUII filed a response supporting Cosentino's 
motion to intervene. On the same day, Cambria also filed a response 
stating that it does not oppose Cosentino's motion, provided that such 
intervention will not delay the target date or the procedural schedule 
of the investigation.
    On March 19, 2026, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 9) 
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.19, 19 CFR 210.19, granting Cosentino's 
motion to intervene as a respondent. The ID finds that the Commission 
looks to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 when considering a motion 
to intervene, and every factor in Rule 24 favors granting the motion. 
That is, (1) Cosentino filed its motion early in discovery; (2) 
Cosentino has an interest in the subject of the investigation because 
its products could be subject to a general exclusion order; (3) 
disposition without Cosentino may impair or impede its ability to 
protect its interests regarding its products; (4) Cosentino is not 
adequately represented by any other party because it is the sole U.S. 
distributor for its products and thus no other party will present 
noninfringement defenses for its products; and (5) there is no evidence 
that intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of 
the original parties' rights. ID at 2-3.
    No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID. Consentino is 
granted respondent status in this investigation.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on April 8, 
2026.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 8, 2026.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026-07091 Filed 4-10-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js" defer></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 13, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.