Notice2026-06925

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 10, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 69 (Friday, April 10, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18405-18406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-06925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-489-839]


Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye 
(T[uuml]rkiye) was sold in the United States at less than normal value 
during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 
2024.

DATES: Applicable April 10, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Alexander, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4313.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 8, 2025, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this administrative review in the Federal Register and invited 
interested parties to comment.\1\ Due to the lapse in appropriations 
and the Federal Government shutdown, on November 14, 2025, Commerce 
tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by 47 days.\2\ 
Additionally, due to a backlog of documents that were electronically 
filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) during the Federal 
Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce tolled all 
deadlines in administrative proceedings by an additional 21 days.\3\ On 
February 10, 2026, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results 
by 53 days.\4\ Accordingly, the deadline for these final results is now 
April 6, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the Republic of 
T[uuml]rkiye: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024, 90 FR 38462 
(August 8, 2025) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated 
November 24, 2025.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 
Republic of T[uuml]rkiye: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' Dated February 10, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at 
<a href="http://access.trade.gov">http://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Republic of T[uuml]rkiye; 
2023-2024,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order <SUP>6</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Bahrain, Brazil, 
Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, 
Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan and the Republic of 
Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 22139 (April 27, 2021) 
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to the Order is CAAS from T[uuml]rkiye. For 
a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by 
interested parties in this administrative review are addressed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as the appendix to this 
notice.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and our analysis of the comments 
received from interested parties, Commerce made certain changes to the 
preliminary weighted-average dumping margin calculations for mandatory 
respondents, Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Kibar Americas, 
Inc., and Kibar Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Assan) and Teknik 
Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. (Teknik).\7\ For further details on the changes 
made since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See the Issues and Decision Memorandum for descriptions of 
these changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

    The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment 
of a weighted-average dumping margin to be determined for companies not 
selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its 
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) 
of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation, for guidance when determining the weighted-average 
dumping margin for companies that were not individually examined in an 
administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that 
the all-others rate should be calculated by weight averaging the 
weighted-average dumping margins determined for individually examined 
respondents, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based 
entirely on facts available.
    Consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we calculated a 
weighted-average dumping margin for the non-examined company using the 
simple average of the calculated rates of the mandatory respondents, 
which are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of 
facts available.\8\ The non-examined company subject to this review is 
ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally 
calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a 
simple average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins 
calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average 
of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the 
examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sales 
values for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as 
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. 
See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662 
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 
at Comment 1. As complete publicly ranged sales data were not 
available, Commerce based the rate for the non-examined companies on 
the simple average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins 
calculated for the examined respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Administrative Review

    As a result of this review, we determine the following estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins for the period April 1, 2023, through 
March 31, 2024:

[[Page 18406]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Weight-
                                                                average
                    Exporter or producer                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assan Al[uuml]minyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S..................        4.01
Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S.................................       14.19
Non-Selected Company........................................        9.10
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these 
final results to interested parties within five days after public 
announcement, or if there is no public announcement, within five days 
of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because Assan's and Teknik's 
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less 
than 0.5 percent), we calculated importer-specific ad valorem 
assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the 
sales. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de 
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with Commerce's clarification of its assessment 
practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by 
any of the above-referenced respondents for which they did not know the 
merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate such entries at the all-others rate established in the less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of 4.85 percent ad valorem \10\ if 
there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the 
transaction.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Order, 86 FR at 22142.
    \11\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the company not selected for individual examination, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate all applicable entries of subject merchandise 
during the POR at the rate listed in the table above.
    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is 
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment 
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until 
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has 
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the company-specific cash deposit rate for 
Assan and Teknik will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this review for each respondent 
(except, if that rate is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be 
zero); (2) for producers or exporters not covered in this review but 
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recently-completed segment of this proceeding in which they were 
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or a 
prior segment of the proceeding but the producer is, then the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently 
completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the 
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or 
exporters will continue to be 4.85 percent, the all-others rate 
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\12\ These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Order, 86 FR at 22142.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the 
amount of the countervailing duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion 
to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply 
with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance 
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) 
and 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: April 6, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Assan's Indirect Selling Expense (ISE) Calculation
    Comment 2: Inclusion of Non-Turkish Origin Sales of CAAS
    Comment 3: Calculation of Average Raw Material Metal Premium 
Cost for Assan
    Comment 4: Assan's Sales Side Duty Drawback Adjustment
    Comment 5: Calculation of Assan's Cost-Side Duty Drawback 
Adjustment
    Comment 6: Calculation of Assan's ``Other Discounts'' in the 
Home Market
    Comment 7: Calculation of Teknik's Billing Adjustment
    Comment 8: Existence of a Meaningful Difference in Methodologies 
for Teknik
    Comment 9: Teknik's ISE Calculation
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2026-06925 Filed 4-9-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 10, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.