Notice2026-06251

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend the Initial Listing Standards Set Forth in Sections 101 and 102 of the NYSE American Company Guide

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 1, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16262-16267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-06251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-105105; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2026-02]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a 
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend the 
Initial Listing Standards Set Forth in Sections 101 and 102 of the NYSE 
American Company Guide

March 27, 2026.

I. Introduction

    On January 29, 2026, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend the initial listing standards set forth 
in Sections 101 and 102 of the NYSE American Company Guide (``Company 
Guide''). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the 
Federal Register on February 4, 2026.\3\ On March 20, 2026, pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer 
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change.\5\ On 
March 20, 2026, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule 
change, which superseded the original proposed rule change in its 
entirety.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104760 (Jan. 30, 
2026), 91 FR 5119 (``Notice'').
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 105060, 91 FR 14604 
(March 25, 2026). The Commission designated May 5, 2026, as the date 
by which the Commission shall approve, disapprove, or institute 
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule 
change. See id.
    \6\ Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change added an 
explanation for the Exchange's proposed amendment to the 
stockholders' equity requirement of Initial Listing Standard 2 as 
set forth in Section 101(b)(2) of the Company Guide. The full text 
of Amendment No. 1 can be found on the Commission's website at: 
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyseamer-2026-02/srnyseamer202602-731567-2276994.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyseamer-2026-02/srnyseamer202602-731567-2276994.pdf</a> (``Amendment No. 1'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 16263]]

    The Commission has received no comment letters on the proposed rule 
change. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on 
the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, from 
interested persons and is approving the proposed rule change, as 
modified by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated basis.

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment 
No. 1

    The Exchange proposes several amendments to Sections 101 and 102 of 
the Company Guide to increase the Exchange's requirements for initial 
listing and help ensure adequate liquidity for listed securities. The 
Exchange also proposes to make conforming changes to Section 1003(b)(i) 
of the Company Guide.

Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares Requirements for Initial Listing

    Section 101 of the Company Guide sets forth four quantitative 
initial listing standards, one of which must be met for an issuer to 
qualify for initial listing on the Exchange.\7\ Each of the Initial 
Listing Standards requires an issuer to satisfy a required market value 
of publicly-held shares.\8\ Currently, securities subject to resale 
restrictions are not excluded from the Exchange's market value of 
publicly-held shares calculations. The Exchange states that a security 
with a substantial number of restricted securities could satisfy the 
Exchange's initial listing requirements and list on the Exchange, even 
though, as a result of the resale restrictions, the security is 
illiquid.\9\ According to the Exchange, it is concerned that illiquid 
securities may trade infrequently, in a more volatile manner, with a 
wider bid-ask spread, and could be more susceptible to price 
manipulation.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Section 101(a) of the Company Guide (``Initial Listing 
Standard 1''); Section 101(b) of the Company Guide (``Initial 
Listing Standard 2''); Section 101(c) of the Company Guide 
(``Initial Listing Standard 3''); and Section 101(d) of the Company 
Guide (``Initial Listing Standard 4'') (together, the ``Initial 
Listing Standards'').
    \8\ See Section 101 of the Company Guide. See also Section 
102(b) of the Company Guide (setting forth a minimum market value of 
publicly-held shares for issuers seeking to qualify for listing 
under Initial Listing Standard 1).
    \9\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 5.
    \10\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To address this concern, the Exchange proposes to adjust the market 
value of publicly-held shares requirements applicable to the Initial 
Listing Standards so that they can be met only on the basis of 
unrestricted publicly-held shares, as described below. The Exchange 
states that excluding restricted securities will better reflect the 
liquidity of, and investor interest in, a security.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In connection with this change, the Exchange proposes to add to 
Section 101 new definitions for ``Restricted Securities,'' ``Publicly-
Held Shares,'' ``Unrestricted Securities'' and ``Unrestricted Publicly-
Held Shares.'' For purposes of Section 101, the Exchange proposes to 
define ``Restricted Securities'' as any securities subject to resale 
restrictions for any reason, including, but not limited to, restricted 
securities (1) acquired directly or indirectly from the issuer or an 
affiliate of the issuer in unregistered offerings such as private 
placements or Regulation D offerings; \12\ (2) acquired through an 
employee stock benefit plan or as compensation for professional 
services; \13\ (3) acquired in reliance on Regulation S, which cannot 
be resold within the United States; \14\ (4) subject to a lockup 
agreement or a similar contractual restriction; \15\ or (5) considered 
``restricted securities'' under Rule 144.\16\ The Exchange proposes to 
define ``Publicly-Held Shares'' as shares not held directly or 
indirectly by an officer, director, or any person who is the beneficial 
owner of more than 10 percent of the total shares outstanding. 
Determinations of beneficial ownership in calculating publicly-held 
shares shall be made in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange 
Act. The Exchange proposes to define ``Unrestricted Securities'' as 
securities that are not Restricted Securities. And the Exchange 
proposes to define ``Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares'' as Publicly-
Held Shares that are Unrestricted Securities.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See, e.g., 17 CFR 230.144(a)(3)(i) and (ii) (stating that 
securities acquired from the issuer in transactions not involving 
any public offering or are subject to the resale limitations under 
Regulation D are considered restricted securities).
    \13\ See, e.g., 17 CFR 230.701(g) (stating that securities 
issued pursuant to certain compensatory benefit plans and contracts 
relating to compensation are considered restricted securities).
    \14\ See 17 CFR 230.144(a)(3)(v) (stating that securities of 
domestic issuers acquired in a transaction in reliance on Regulation 
S are considered restricted securities).
    \15\ The Exchange states that securities issued in such 
transactions would typically include a ``restrictive'' legend 
stating that the securities cannot be freely resold unless they are 
registered with the Commission or in a transaction exempt from the 
registration requirements, such as the exemption available under 
Rule 144. See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 6, n. 8.
    \16\ See 17 CFR 230.144(a)(3) (defining ``restricted 
securities'').
    \17\ The Exchange states that the proposed definitions are 
substantively identical to those included in the rules of The Nasdaq 
Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''). See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 
10 (citing Nasdaq Rule 5005(a)). See also Securities Exchange Act 
Release No. 86314 (July 5, 2019), 84 FR 33102 (July 11, 2019) (SR-
NASDAQ-2019-009) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 3 and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified 
by Amendment No. 3, to Revise the Exchange's Initial Listing 
Standards Related to Liquidity) (approving a requirement to 
calculate market value of publicly-held shares based on unrestricted 
securities only and adopting associated definitions) (``Nasdaq 2019 
Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Initial Listing Standard 2, Initial Listing Standard 3, and Initial 
Listing Standard 4 currently require that an issuer must have a market 
value of shares publicly held of $15,000,000, $15,000,000, and 
$20,000,000, respectively. The Exchange proposes that each of these 
numerical requirements instead be met based on the market value of 
Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares. Initial Listing Standard 1, through 
reference to Section 102(b) of the Company Guide, currently requires 
that an issuer must have an aggregate market value of publicly-held 
shares of $3,000,000. The Exchange proposes to replace the existing 
market value of publicly-held shares requirement for Initial Listing 
Standard 1 contained in Section 102(b) with a requirement of 
$15,000,000 in market value of Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares and to 
move this requirement to Section 101(a).\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The Exchange states that Nasdaq previously adjusted all of 
its publicly-held shares requirements to represent requirements for 
unrestricted publicly-held shares. See Amendment No. 1, supra note 
6, at 6 (citing Nasdaq 2019 Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange proposes to make changes to Sections 102 
and 1003(b)(i) of the Company Guide to clarify that the proposed 
definition of Publicly-Held Shares in Section 101 of the Company Guide 
is also applicable to those sections. Specifically, Section 102 
currently provides that the terms ``public distribution'' and ``public 
shareholders'' include both shareholders of record and beneficial 
holders but are exclusive of the holdings of officers, directors, 
controlling shareholders, and other concentrated (i.e., 10% or 
greater), affiliated, or family holdings. As amended, while these terms 
will apply to both shareholders of record and beneficial holders, they 
will include only Publicly-Held Shares as defined in Section 101 for 
purposes of calculation.\19\ Section 1003(b)(i)(A) currently provides 
that a listed common stock will normally be subject to delisting 
procedures if the number of shares publicly held (exclusive of holdings 
of officers, directors, controlling shareholders, or other family or 
concentrated holdings) is less than 200,000. As amended, this

[[Page 16264]]

provision will provide for delisting when the number of Publicly-Held 
Shares (as defined in Section 101 as proposed to be amended) is less 
than 200,000.\20\ Section 1003(b)(i)(B) currently provides that a 
listed common stock will normally be subject to delisting procedures if 
the total number of public shareholders is less than 300. As amended, 
this provision will provide for delisting if the total number of 
holders of Publicly-Held Shares is less than 300.\21\ Section 
1003(b)(i)(C) currently provides that a listed common stock will 
normally be subject to delisting procedures if the aggregate market 
value of shares publicly held is less than $1,000,000 for more than 90 
consecutive days. As amended, this provision will provide for delisting 
where the aggregate market value of Publicly-Held Shares is less than 
$1,000,000 for more than 90 consecutive days.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See proposed Section 102 of the Company Guide.
    \20\ See proposed Section 1003(b)(i)(A) of the Company Guide.
    \21\ See proposed Section 1003(b)(i)(B) of the Company Guide.
    \22\ See proposed Section 1003(b)(i)(C) of the Company Guide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares Requirement for Companies Listing in 
Connection With an Underwritten Public Offering

    Currently, when applying the Initial Listing Standards in the case 
of a company listing in connection with a public offering, previously 
issued shares (``Already Outstanding Shares'') that are not held by an 
officer, director or 10% shareholder of the company are counted as 
publicly-held shares and are additive to the shares being sold in the 
offering. The Exchange states that it has observed that previously non-
public companies that must rely on Already Outstanding Shares in order 
to meet the applicable market value of publicly-held shares requirement 
generally have experienced higher volatility on the date of listing 
than those of similarly situated companies that meet the requirement 
solely on the basis of offering proceeds.\23\ The Exchange states that, 
in some cases, Already Outstanding Shares may not contribute to 
liquidity to the same degree as shares sold in a public offering 
because Already Outstanding Shares are typically held by longer-term 
investors.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 7.
    \24\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consequently, the Exchange proposes to add a requirement to Section 
101 of the Company Guide that will provide that, in addition to meeting 
all of the requirements of one of the Initial Listing Standards, any 
company listing in connection with an initial public offering (``IPO'') 
(including through the issuance of American Depository Receipts) or 
other underwritten public offering must have a market value of 
Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares of at least $15,000,000. This 
requirement must be satisfied from the offering proceeds.\25\ The 
Exchange states that a company listing under Initial Listing Standard 4 
also will be required to have $20,000,000 in market value of 
Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares.\26\ The Exchange states that in its 
experience, the market for securities that list after IPOs or other 
underwritten offerings that are smaller than $15,000,000 has tended to 
be less liquid and those companies are more likely to fall below 
compliance with continued listing standards.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See proposed Section 101 of the Company Guide. The Exchange 
states that companies listing on Nasdaq's Capital Market listing 
tier must have a market value of unrestricted publicly-held 
securities of $15,000,000 and companies listing in conjunction with 
an IPO must meet this requirement solely with the offering proceeds. 
See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 7 (citing Nasdaq Rules 
5505(b)(1)(B), 5505(b)(2)(C), and 5505(b)(3)(C)).
    \26\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 7 (citing Section 
101(d)(2) of the Company Guide).
    \27\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 7. The Exchange 
states that the proposed approach is consistent with a recently-
adopted amendment to the Nasdaq listing rules. See id. (citing 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 102622 (Mar. 12, 2025), 90 FR 
12608 (Mar. 18, 2025) (SR-NASDAQ-2024-084) (Notice of Filing of 
Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a 
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, to Modify 
Certain Initial Listing Liquidity Requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

$4.00 Stock Price Requirement for Initial Listing

    Currently, Section 102(b) of the Company Guide provides that the 
Exchange requires a minimum market price of $3.00 per share for 
applicants seeking to qualify for listing pursuant to Initial Listing 
Standard 1, Initial Listing Standard 2, or Initial Listing Standard 4, 
and a minimum market price of $2.00 per share for applicants seeking to 
qualify for listing pursuant to Initial Listing Standard 3. The 
Exchange proposes to amend these requirements to provide that companies 
seeking to list under any of the Initial Listing Standards will be 
required to have a stock price of $4.00 per share and to move these 
requirements from Section 102(b) to Section 101(a)-(d) of the Company 
Guide.\28\ The Exchange states that companies that have listed with a 
stock price of less than $4.00 are more likely over time to trade at 
abnormally low price levels, which makes them potentially susceptible 
to manipulation.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See proposed Sections 101 and 102 of the Company Guide.
    \29\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 8. The Exchange 
states that the proposed $4.00 stock price requirement is consistent 
with the initial listing requirement for all common stock listings 
on the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') and for the listing of 
companies on Nasdaq's Capital Market listing tier, subject to the 
exception from the penny stock rule. See id. See also 17 CFR 
240.3a51-1 (defining ``penny stock''). The Exchange also states that 
the proposed $4.00 stock price is consistent with the price 
requirement to meet the exception from the definition of penny stock 
in Rule 3a51-1(a)(2). See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 8 
(citing 17 CFR 240.3a51-1(a)(2)(i)(C)). The Exchange states that 
securities listed on the Exchange are included in the 
``grandfather'' exception to the definition of penny stock in Rule 
3a51-1(a)(1) for securities registered or listed on a national 
securities exchange that has been continuously registered as a 
national securities exchange since April 20, 1992 and has maintained 
quantitative listing standards that are substantially similar to or 
stricter than those listing standards that were in place on that 
exchange on January 8, 2004. See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 
8, n.17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Measurement of Total Market Capitalization and Stock Price Requirements

    Currently, Initial Listing Standard 3 requires a total market 
capitalization of $50,000,000 and Initial Listing Standard 4 requires 
applicants to have either (i) $75,000,000 in total market 
capitalization or (ii) total assets and total revenue of $75,000,000 
each in its last fiscal year, or in two of its last three fiscal 
years.\30\ The Exchange states that, in applying these total market 
capitalization standards when a company lists in connection with an IPO 
or other underwritten offering, the Exchange uses the public offering 
price for determining whether the company has met the total market 
capitalization requirement.\31\ However, Initial Listing Standard 3 and 
Initial Listing Standard 4 do not currently specify how total market 
capitalization should be calculated when listing a company that is 
publicly-traded on the over-the-counter market or is transferring from 
another national securities exchange. The Exchange proposes to amend 
Initial Listing Standard 3 and Initial Listing Standard 4 to provide 
that current publicly-traded companies listing under those listing 
standards must have a total market capitalization that meets the 
applicable requirement for 90 consecutive trading days prior to 
applying for listing and must also meet the proposed $4 stock price 
requirement over that same period.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Section 101(c) and (d) of the Company Guide.
    \31\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 8.
    \32\ See Section 101(c) and (d) of the Company Guide. The 
Exchange states that the proposed approach is the same as that 
adopted by the NYSE in applying its global market capitalization 
test for initial listing and by Nasdaq's Capital Market listing tier 
in listing companies that qualify solely under its market value of 
listed securities standard. See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 9 
(citing Section 102.01C(II) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual; 
Nasdaq Rule 5505(b)(2)(A)).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 16265]]

Stockholders' Equity Requirement

    Currently, Initial Listing Standard 2 requires stockholders' equity 
of at least $4,000,000, along with two years of operations, and a 
market value of publicly-held shares of $15,000,000, among other 
requirements.\33\ The Exchange proposes to increase the stockholders' 
equity requirement in Initial Listing Standard 2 to $5,000,000.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See Section 101(b) of the Company Guide.
    \34\ See proposed Section 101(b)(2) of the Company Guide. The 
Exchange states that the proposed change is consistent with a 
comparable requirement for initial listing on Nasdaq's Capital 
Market listing tier under its equity standard and will align the 
Exchange's Initial Listing Standard 2 with its competitor exchanges. 
See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6, at 8 (citing Nasdaq Rule 
5505(b)(1)(A)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities 
exchange.\35\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed 
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\36\ which 
requires, among other things, that the rules of an exchange be designed 
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, 
and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has 
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, 
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \36\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The development and enforcement of meaningful listing standards 
\37\ for an exchange is of critical importance to financial markets and 
the investing public. Among other things, such listing standards help 
ensure that exchange-listed companies will have sufficient public 
float, investor base, and trading interest to provide the depth and 
liquidity to promote fair and orderly markets. Meaningful listing 
standards also are important given investor expectations regarding the 
nature of securities that have achieved an exchange listing, and the 
role of an exchange in overseeing its market and assuring compliance 
with its listing standards.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ This reference to ``listing standards'' is referring to 
both initial and continued listing standards.
    \38\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 88716 (Apr. 
21, 2020), 85 FR 23393 (Apr. 27, 2020) (SR-NASDAQ-2020-001) (Order 
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Delisting Process for 
Securities With a Bid Price at or Below $0.10 and for Securities 
That Have Had One or More Reverse Stock Splits With a Cumulative 
Ratio of 250 Shares or More to One Over the Prior Two-Year Period); 
88389 (Mar. 16, 2020), 85 FR 16163 (Mar. 20, 2020) (SR-NASDAQ-2019-
089) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting 
Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by 
Amendment No. 1, To Amend Rule 5815 To Preclude Stay During Hearing 
Panel Review of Staff Delisting Determinations in Certain 
Circumstances). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81856 
(Oct. 11, 2017), 82 FR 48296, 48298 (Oct. 17, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2017-
31) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting 
Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by 
Amendment No. 1, To Amend the Listed Company Manual To Adopt Initial 
and Continued Listing Standards for Subscription Receipts) (stating 
that ``[a]dequate standards are especially important given the 
expectations of investors regarding exchange trading and the 
imprimatur of listing on a particular market'' and that ``[o]nce a 
security has been approved for initial listing, maintenance criteria 
allow an exchange to monitor the status and trading characteristics 
of that issue . . . so that fair and orderly markets can be 
maintained'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the Exchange has proposed to make more rigorous 
certain of its initial listing standards to help ensure adequate 
liquidity for its listed securities. Specifically, the Exchange 
proposes to exclude securities subject to resale restrictions from the 
Exchange's calculations of market value of publicly-held shares and 
require issuers seeking to list under the Initial Listing Standards to 
satisfy these requirements based on the market value of Unrestricted 
Publicly-Held Shares. Under the Exchange's current initial listing 
standards, a security that may not have a substantial number of 
unrestricted, freely transferable securities outstanding and may be 
considered illiquid may nevertheless satisfy the Exchange's current 
initial listing requirements related to liquidity and qualify to list 
on the Exchange. The Exchange states that illiquid securities may trade 
infrequently and may experience greater volatility, have a wider bid-
ask spread, and be more susceptible to price manipulation.\39\ Further, 
the exclusion of Restricted Shares from the market value of publicly-
held shares requirement, as well as the related definitions, are 
substantially similar to the rules of another national securities 
exchange.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ See supra note 10 and accompanying text.
    \40\ See supra notes 17 and 18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Excluding Restricted Securities from the Exchange's calculations of 
market value of publicly-held shares should allow the Exchange to more 
accurately determine whether a security has adequate distribution and 
liquidity and is thus suitable for listing and trading on the Exchange. 
The proposed amendments should help to ensure that the Exchange lists 
only securities with a sufficient market, with adequate depth and 
liquidity, and with sufficient investor interest to support an exchange 
listing. Accordingly, the proposed changes to the Exchange's 
calculation of a company's market value of publicly-held shares 
requirements for purposes of qualifying the company's securities for 
initial listing, including the proposed new definitions of ``Restricted 
Securities,'' ``Publicly-Held Shares,'' ``Unrestricted Publicly-Held 
Shares,'' and ``Unrestricted Securities,'' are consistent with the 
protection of investors, the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices, and the promotion of fair and orderly markets.
    While the numerical value of the market value of publicly-held 
shares requirement associated with Initial Listing Standard 2, Initial 
Listing Standard 3, and Initial Listing Standard 4 will not change, the 
Exchange proposes to raise the numerical value of the market value of 
publicly-held shares requirement associated with Initial Listing 
Standard 1 to require these companies to have $15,000,000 in market 
value of Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares. The current numerical value 
required under Initial Listing Standard 1, at $3,000,0000, is 
substantially lower than the requirement under the other Initial 
Listing Standards (i.e., $15,000,000 or $20,000,000). The proposed 
amendments will bring the market value of Unrestricted Publicly-Held 
Shares requirement for Initial Listing Standard 1 to the same level as 
Initial Listing Standard 2 and Initial Listing Standard 3. The proposal 
is reasonably designed to enhance the Exchange's initial listing 
standards, particularly those involving issuers with low public float 
and liquidity, thereby protecting investors and the public interest. 
The proposal reasonably addresses a gap in the Exchange's liquidity 
requirements for initial listing that potentially allows issuers that 
may not have sufficient levels of liquidity to list on the Exchange.
    The Exchange also proposes to provide that, in addition to meeting 
all of the requirements of one of the Initial Listing Standards, any 
company listing in connection with an IPO (including through the 
issuance of American Depository Receipts) or other

[[Page 16266]]

underwritten offering must have a market value of Unrestricted 
Publicly-Held Shares of at least $15,000,000 and that such standard be 
met solely from proceeds of the offering. The Initial Listing Standards 
currently allow companies to include Already Outstanding Shares in 
calculating their market value of publicly-held shares. The Exchange 
states that Already Outstanding Shares may not contribute to liquidity 
to the same extent as shares sold in a public offering.\41\ According 
to the Exchange, companies meeting the market value of publicly-held 
shares requirement by including Already Outstanding Shares are more 
likely to be subject to volatile trading than similarly situated 
companies that meet the requirement with only the proceeds from the 
offering.\42\ The Exchange also states that offerings smaller than 
$15,000,000 tend to be less liquid and those companies are more likely 
to fall below compliance with continued listing standards.\43\ The 
exclusion of Already Outstanding Shares from the market value of 
publicly-held shares requirement for companies listing in connection 
with an IPO or other underwritten public offering is substantially 
similar to the rules of another national securities exchange.\44\ The 
proposed amendments to require companies listing in connection with an 
IPO or other underwritten public offering to have $15,000,000 market 
value of Unrestricted Publicly-Held Shares, as satisfied from the 
offering proceeds, should allow the Exchange to better determine 
whether a security has adequate liquidity and thus is suitable for 
listing and trading on the Exchange, thus helping to ensure that there 
is sufficient liquidity to provide price discovery and support a fair 
and orderly market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See supra note 24 and accompanying text.
    \42\ See supra note 23 and accompanying text.
    \43\ See supra note 27 and accompanying text.
    \44\ See supra note 27 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to require a $4.00 stock price for initial 
listing under any of the Initial Listing Standards. Companies listing 
on the Exchange under the Initial Listing Standards currently must have 
a minimum market price of $2.00 or $3.00, depending on the standard 
used to qualify for listing. The current $2.00 or $3.00 standard is 
generally lower than the minimum price required for listing on other 
national securities exchanges, whereas the proposed $4.00 standard is 
consistent with the initial listing requirements of other national 
securities exchanges.\45\ The Exchange states that companies that have 
listed with a share price of less than $4.00 are more likely to trade 
at abnormally low price levels, making them potentially susceptible to 
manipulation.\46\ The proposed amendment to require a minimum stock 
price of $4.00 for initial listing on the Exchange should help the 
Exchange to protect investors, prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts, and practices and promote fair and orderly markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ See supra note 29. As described above, the Exchange is able 
to take advantage of a ``grandfather'' provision that excludes such 
securities from the definition of penny stock. See supra note 29.
    \46\ See supra note 29 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to provide that for current publicly-traded 
companies listing under Initial Listing Standard 3 and Initial Listing 
Standard 4, the total market capitalization and $4.00 stock price 
requirements be met for 90 consecutive trading days. The proposed 
procedures are the same as those used by other national securities 
exchanges for similar requirements.\47\ These amendments should allow 
the Exchange to better determine whether the security will have 
adequate liquidity to support fair and orderly markets and will provide 
greater clarity and certainty as to the application of those rules to 
companies seeking listing that are publicly-traded on the over-the-
counter market or transferring from another national securities 
exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ See supra note 32.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to increase the stockholders' equity 
requirement for companies listing under Initial Listing Standard 2 to 
$5,000,000. This amendment will raise the stockholders' equity 
requirement in Initial Listing Standard 2 to be consistent with the 
stockholders' equity requirement in a similar initial listing standard 
of another national securities exchange.\48\ This is amendment is 
consistent with the protection of investors and should help the 
Exchange to promote fair and orderly markets for companies that list 
under Initial Listing Standard 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ See supra note 34.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In general, the proposed changes to the Exchange's initial listing 
standards should help to ensure that the Exchange lists only securities 
with a sufficient market, with adequate depth and liquidity, and with 
sufficient investor interest to support an exchange listing.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposal 
is consistent with the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule 
Change

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning whether the proposed rule change, as modified by 
Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f082859c95dd939f9d9d959e8483b0839593de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d3f382128602e2220202823393e0d3e282e632a223b">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2026-02 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2026-02. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2026-02 and should be submitted 
on or before April 22, 2026.

V. Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by 
Amendment No. 1

    The Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule 
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, prior to the thirtieth day 
after the date of publication of notice of the filing of Amendment No. 
1 in the Federal Register. Amendment No. 1 provides additional clarity 
to the proposal by providing an explanation for Exchange's proposed 
amendment to the stockholders' equity requirement of Initial Listing 
Standard 2, as set forth in Section 101(b)(2) of the Company Guide. In 
addition, the original proposal

[[Page 16267]]

has been subject to public comment \49\ and no comments have been 
received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ See Notice, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Amendment No. 1 does not raise any novel regulatory issues that 
have not previously been subject to comment. Accordingly, the 
Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\50\ to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment 
No. 1, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\51\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEAMER-2026-02), as 
modified by Amendment No. 1, be and hereby is approved on an 
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-06251 Filed 3-31-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 1, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.