Notice2026-06158

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule To Waive the Combined Cap on Submitting Broker Credits Paid for QCC Trades and Floor Broker Rebates Paid Through the Manual Billable Rebate Program for the Month of March 2026

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 31, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16052-16055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-06158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-105088; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2026-32]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the 
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule To Waive the Combined Cap on Submitting 
Broker Credits Paid for QCC Trades and Floor Broker Rebates Paid 
Through the Manual Billable Rebate Program for the Month of March 2026

March 26, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that on March 17, 2026, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 16053]]

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule 
(the ``Fee Schedule'') to waive the maximum combined Submitting Broker 
credits paid for QCC trades and Floor Broker rebates paid through the 
Manual Billable Rebate Program for the month of March 2026. The 
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at 
<a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a> and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend the Fee Schedule to waive 
the maximum combined Submitting Broker credits paid for QCC trades and 
Floor Broker rebates paid through the Manual Billable Rebate Program 
for the month of March 2026.
    The Exchange imposes a limit on the maximum combined Submitting 
Broker credits paid for QCC trades and Floor Broker rebates paid 
through the Manual Billable Rebate Program per month per firm (the 
``Cap'').\4\ Because of elevated volumes on the Exchange, the Exchange 
proposes to waive the Cap for the month of March 2026 and to use the 
period during which the Cap is waived to evaluate an adjustment to the 
amount of the Cap. The proposed waiver is being adopted in anticipation 
of firms reaching the Cap before month's end and potentially 
redirecting their order flow away from the Exchange. In the absence of 
the proposed waiver, firms may choose to redirect such order flow to a 
competing market. Accordingly, the purpose of the proposal is to 
encourage Submitting Brokers and Floor Brokers to continue to direct 
order flow to the Exchange, despite increasing industry volumes making 
it less difficult to reach the Cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Fee Schedule, Endnote 17 (providing that Submitting 
Broker credits paid for QCC trades and Floor Broker rebates paid 
through the Manual Billable Rebate Program shall not combine to 
exceed $3,000,000 per month per firm).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although the Exchange cannot predict with certainty how many firms 
would be impacted by this change, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed change would incent firms to continue to direct their order 
flow to the Exchange, thus increasing liquidity to the benefit of all 
market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly 
discriminatory. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is subject to 
significant competitive forces in the market for options securities 
transaction services that constrain its pricing determinations in that 
market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for 
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, 
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, 
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current 
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in 
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most 
important to investors and listed companies.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS 
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are currently 18 registered options exchanges competing for 
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding 
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market 
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options 
trades.\8\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF 
options order flow. More specifically, in January 2026, the Exchange 
had 10.39% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity 
and ETF options trades.\9\ In such a low-concentrated and highly 
competitive market, no single options exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of options order flow. Within this 
environment, market participants can freely and often do shift their 
order flow among the Exchange and competing venues in response to 
changes in their respective pricing schedules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety of 
formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, available 
here: <a href="https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics">https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics</a>.
    \9\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of 
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see 
id., the Exchange's market share in multiply-listed equity and ETF 
options decreased from 13.08% in January 2025 to 10.39% for the 
month of January 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed waiver of the Cap is reasonable because it is designed 
to encourage the role performed by Submitting Brokers in facilitating 
QCC transactions and Floor Brokers in facilitating the execution of 
orders via open outcry, functions that the Exchange wishes to support 
for the benefit of all market participants, and would allow the 
Exchange time to evaluate changes to the amount of the Cap. Absent the 
proposed waiver, the Exchange believes that, as soon as firms reach the 
Cap, they are likely to redirect order flow away from the Exchange, 
which may adversely impact other market participants trading on the 
Exchange. To the extent that the proposed waiver encourages Submitting 
Brokers and Floor Brokers to facilitate transactions on the Exchange 
instead of on a competing market, all market participants at the 
Exchange would benefit from the increased liquidity. The Exchange 
believes the proposed waiver should continue to incent Submitting 
Brokers and Floor Brokers to encourage market participants to aggregate 
their executions at the Exchange as a primary execution venue. To the 
extent that the proposed change achieves its purpose in attracting more 
volume to the Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to 
make the Exchange a more competitive venue for order execution, thus 
improving market quality for all market participants.
    The Exchange believes the proposed waiver of the Cap is an 
equitable allocation of its fees and credits and is not unfairly 
discriminatory because the proposal is based on the amount and type of 
business transacted on the Exchange. Submitting Brokers and Floor 
Brokers are not obligated to execute QCC transactions or manual 
transactions to earn credits and rebates

[[Page 16054]]

applied toward the Cap. However, the proposed waiver is designed to 
continue to encourage the roles performed by Submitting Brokers and 
Floor Brokers in facilitating the execution of QCC transactions and 
orders via open outcry, functions that the Exchange wishes to support 
for the benefit of all market participants.
    To the extent that the proposed waiver of the Cap continues to 
attract manual transactions and QCCs to the Exchange, this increased 
order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue 
for order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed waiver 
would improve market quality for all market participants on the 
Exchange and attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving 
market-wide quality and price discovery. The resulting increased volume 
and liquidity would provide more trading opportunities and tighter 
spreads to all market participants and thus would promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, 
in general, protect investors and the public interest.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does 
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above the Exchange believes 
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional 
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price 
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities 
for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting 
Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which 
promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of 
orders, large and small.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 7, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The proposed waiver of the Cap would apply 
equally to all similarly situated Submitting Brokers and Floor Brokers. 
To the extent that there is an additional competitive burden on non-
Submitting Brokers or non-Floor Brokers, the Exchange believes that any 
such burden would be appropriate because Submitting Brokers and Floor 
Brokers serve an important function in facilitating the execution of 
QCC transactions and orders in open outcry, to the benefit of all 
market participants.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one 
of the other 17 competing options exchanges if they deem the Exchange's 
fee levels to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must 
continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges 
and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publicly-available 
information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange has 
more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed 
equity and ETF options trades.\11\ Therefore, currently no exchange 
possesses significant pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed 
equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, in January 2026, 
the Exchange had 10.39% market share of executed volume of multiply-
listed equity and ETF options trades.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety 
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, 
available here: <a href="https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics">https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics</a>.
    \12\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of 
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see 
id., the Exchange's market share in multiply-listed equity and ETF 
options decreased from 13.08% in January 2025 to 10.39% for the 
month of January 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed waiver of the Cap reflects 
this competitive environment because it is designed to continue to 
incent Submitting Brokers and Floor Brokers to direct manual and QCC 
transactions to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract order 
flow. To the extent that Submitting Brokers and Floor Brokers are 
encouraged to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for all 
transactions, all Exchange market participants stand to benefit from 
the improved market quality and increased opportunities for price 
improvement. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually 
review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain 
competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this 
competitive environment.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \14\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \15\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4133342d246c222e2c2c242f3532013224226f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3042455c551d535f5d5d555e4443704355531e575f46">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEARCA-2026-32 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2026-32. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the

[[Page 16055]]

Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please 
use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the 
Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). 
Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and copying at 
the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal 
identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in 
part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is 
obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should 
refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2026-32 and should be submitted on or 
before April 21, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-06158 Filed 3-30-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 31, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.