Rule2026-05730

Establishment of the Nashoba Valley Viticultural Area

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 24, 2026
Effective
April 23, 2026

Issuing agencies

Treasury DepartmentAlcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

Abstract

The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the approximately 18,367-acre "Nashoba Valley" American viticultural area (AVA) in Worcester County, Massachusetts. The Nashoba Valley viticultural area is not located within, nor does it contain, any other established viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13967-13970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-05730]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

27 CFR Part 9

[Docket No. TTB-2023-0012; T.D. TTB-204; Notice No. 230]
RIN 1513-AD07


Establishment of the Nashoba Valley Viticultural Area

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes 
the approximately 18,367-acre ``Nashoba Valley'' American viticultural 
area (AVA) in Worcester County, Massachusetts. The Nashoba Valley 
viticultural area is not located within, nor does it contain, any other 
established viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural areas to 
allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to 
allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase.

DATES: This final rule is effective April 23, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and 
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G 
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background on Viticultural Areas

TTB Authority

    Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act), 
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe 
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt 
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among 
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading 
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with 
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The 
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act 
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, 
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury 
has delegated certain administrative and enforcement authorities to TTB 
through Treasury Order 120-01.
    Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to 
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their 
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine 
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets 
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the 
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and 
lists the approved AVAs.

Definition

    Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) 
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features as described in part 9 of 
the regulations and, once approved, a name and a delineated boundary 
codified in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow 
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or 
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the 
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to 
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and 
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of 
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine 
produced in that area.

Requirements

    Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) 
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and allows any interested 
party to petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region as an AVA. 
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes standards 
for petitions to establish or modify AVAs. Petitions to establish an 
AVA must include the following:
    <bullet> Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is 
nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;
    <bullet> An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of 
the proposed AVA;
    <bullet> A narrative description of the features of the proposed 
AVA affecting viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical 
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and 
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA;
    <bullet> If the proposed AVA is to be established within, or 
overlapping, an existing AVA, an explanation that both identifies the 
attributes of the proposed AVA that are consistent with the existing 
AVA and explains how the proposed AVA is sufficiently distinct from the 
existing AVA and therefore appropriate for separate recognition;

[[Page 13968]]

    <bullet> The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS) 
map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of 
the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
    <bullet> A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA 
boundary based on USGS map markings.

Nashoba Valley Petition

    TTB received a petition from the Justin Pelletier, Chief Operating 
Officer and Quality Control Manager of Nashoba Valley Winery, proposing 
the establishment of the ``Nashoba Valley'' AVA in Worcester County, 
Massachusetts. The proposed Nashoba Valley AVA covers approximately 
18,367 acres and is not located within any other AVA. There are three 
commercial vineyards covering a total of approximately 16 acres within 
the proposed AVA.
    According to the petition, the distinguishing features of the 
proposed AVA include its soils and climate. The petition states that 
most of the soils within the proposed Nashoba Valley AVA have a parent 
soil of supraglacial till, subglacial till, alluvial deposits, and 
glaciofluvial deposits. The most common soils in the proposed AVA 
belong to the Paxton soil series and comprise approximately 21 percent 
of the soils in the AVA. These soils are well-drained loamy soils and 
are moderately deep to very deep. The petition states that well-drained 
soils aid in minimizing fungal infections and rot. Additionally, the 
soil depth allows for unobstructed root growth, as roots can penetrate 
moderately deeply before hitting denser soils and very deeply before 
touching bedrock.
    Throughout the growing season, average monthly temperatures within 
the proposed Nashoba Valley AVA range from a low of 47 degrees 
Fahrenheit (F) to 72 degrees F. July is typically the warmest month 
when the average high temperature is 82 degrees F. The proposed Nashoba 
Valley AVA has an average of 1,697 growing degree days (GDDs) \1\ 
calculated in degrees Celsius,\2\ which places it in Region III of the 
Winkler system. According to the petition, the warm climate within the 
proposed AVA is suitable for growing grape varietals such as Albarino, 
Cabernet Franc, Chardonnay, Riesling, and St. Croix, among others.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Albert J. Winkler, General Viticulture (Berkeley: 
University of California Press, 1974), pages 61-64. In the Winkler 
climate classification system, annual heat accumulation during the 
growing season, measured in annual Growing Degree Days (GDDs), 
defines climatic regions. One GDD accumulates for each degree 
Celsius that a day's mean temperature is above 10 degrees C, the 
minimum temperature required for grapevine growth. The Winkler scale 
regions are as follows: Region Ia, 850-1,111 GDDs; Region Ib, 1,112-
1,389 GDDs; Region II, 1,390-1,667 GDDs; Region III, 1,668-1,944 
GDDs; Region IV, 1,945-2,222 GDDs; Region V, 2,223-2,700 GDDs.
    \2\ Unless otherwise noted, all GDD accumulations listed in this 
document are in degrees Celsius.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The petition also states that wind is another climate feature that 
affects viticulture. Between March and May, when grapevines begin 
producing buds, shoots, and flowers, average wind speeds in the 
proposed AVA range from 6.6 to 4.7 miles per hour. According to the 
petition, light winds during this period reduce the risk of frost 
damage to new growth. However, stronger winds can damage shoots and 
buds, leading to a smaller grape harvest. During the summer months of 
June to August, when increased humidity and rainstorms are common, 
average wind speeds range from 4.2 to 3.9 miles per hour. The petition 
states that these summer winds reduce the time needed for vineyards to 
dry and thus lessen the chance for molds and mildews to form.
    To the immediate north of the proposed Nashoba Valley AVA are Fort 
Devens and the Bolton Flats Wildlife Management Area, which are not 
available for commercial viticulture. Farther north, the soils are not 
as well-drained as those of the proposed AVA, average wind speeds are 
lower, and average GDD accumulations are lower and in the Region II 
Category. East of the proposed AVA, the soils have a high water table 
and are not as well-drained as soils within the proposed AVA. Annual 
GDD accumulations east of the proposed AVA are slightly higher but 
still within the Region III category, while average monthly wind speeds 
are also higher. South of the proposed AVA, the region is largely urban 
with little land available for commercial viticulture. Annual GDD 
accumulations are within the Region II category, and average monthly 
wind speeds are slightly lower than within the proposed AVA. West of 
the proposed AVA, soils are shallower and have a slow water 
infiltration rate. Annual GDD accumulations are within the Region II 
category, and average monthly wind speeds are slower than within the 
proposed AVA.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received

    TTB published Notice No. 230 in the Federal Register on January 5, 
2024 (89 FR 721), proposing to establish the Nashoba Valley AVA. In the 
notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the 
name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed AVA. The 
notice also included information from the petition comparing the 
distinguishing features of the proposed AVA to the surrounding areas. 
For a detailed description of the evidence relating to the name, 
boundary, and distinguishing features of the proposed AVA and for a 
detailed comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed 
viticultural area to the surrounding areas, see Notice No. 230. In 
Notice No. 230, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the name, 
boundary, and other required information submitted in support of the 
petition. The comment period for Notice No. 230 closed on March 5, 
2024.
    In response to Notice No. 230, TTB received five comments. Four of 
the comments explicitly support the establishment of the proposed 
Nashoba Valley AVA, and some provide additional views of the 
distinctive characteristics of the region. One commenter (comment 2) 
notes that the climate, soil composition, and daily sunlight of the 
region have discernible effects on the products of the Nashoba Valley 
and that the AVA will help distinguish regional wines from wines from 
vineyards with different conditions across the State. Another (comment 
3) highlights the distinctive soil that makes the land in the AVA area 
unique and notes that wines from the region have already been 
recognized in magazines such as Wine Enthusiast and Food and Wine.
    The fifth commenter (comment 1) states that they generally support 
the establishment of the Nashoba Valley Viticultural Area and agrees 
that the petition demonstrated the distinctiveness of the terroir of 
the proposed AVA. The commenter further states that the petition would 
be stronger with more evidence of the area's ``national 
distinctiveness,'' and questions whether there is sufficient ``national 
recognition of the proposed area by the wine industry and consumers.'' 
The commenter states that the proposal would benefit from additional 
evidence of ``national distinctiveness'' and that the petitioner could 
supplement the record by providing references to the Nashoba Valley and 
its wine production from ``historical documents, newspapers, magazines, 
books, or websites'' or conduct surveys with ``wine experts, retailers, 
or consumers outside the local area to gauge their awareness and 
perception of the Nashoba Valley name and wines.''
    While TTB agrees that additional evidence could lend further 
support to

[[Page 13969]]

the petition, TTB believes that the evidence submitted is sufficient to 
determine whether the AVA should be established. With regard to the 
evidence, TTB notes that Sec.  9.12(a)(1) requires evidence that the 
name of a proposed AVA must be ``currently and directly associated with 
an area in which viticulture exists'' and that the area be ``nationally 
or locally known by the name specified in the petition'' (emphasis 
added). Additionally, Sec.  9.12(a)(3) requires an AVA petition to 
include ``a description of the common or similar features of the 
proposed AVA affecting viticulture that make it distinctive'' and to 
explain how those features affect viticulture and how they differ from 
the features of the surrounding region. TTB believes these and the 
other criteria set forth in Sec.  9.12 have been met and that the 
rulemaking record shows sufficient basis for establishing the AVA. TTB 
also notes that the regulations do not require a petition to contain 
evidence that the proposed AVA is nationally recognized for its wine or 
winegrape production or information regarding the level of consumers' 
and wine experts' current awareness of the region and its wines.

TTB Determination

    After careful review of the petition and the comments received in 
response to Notice No. 230, TTB finds that the evidence provided by the 
petitioner supports the establishment of the Nashoba Valley AVA. 
Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB 
regulations, TTB establishes the ``Nashoba Valley'' AVA in Worcester 
County, Massachusetts.

Boundary Description

    See the narrative description of the boundary of the Nashoba Valley 
AVA in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.

Maps

    The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed 
below in the regulatory text. The Nashoba Valley AVA boundary may also 
be viewed on the AVA Map Explorer on the TTB website, at <a href="https://www.ttb.gov/wine/ava-map-explorer">https://www.ttb.gov/wine/ava-map-explorer</a>.

Impact on Current Wine Labels

    Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a 
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true 
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a 
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine 
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that 
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR 
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name 
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in 
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain 
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another 
reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have 
to obtain approval of a new label. Different rules apply if a wine has 
a brand name containing an AVA name that was used as a brand name on a 
label approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
    With the establishment of the Nashoba Valley AVA, its name, 
``Nashoba Valley,'' will be recognized as a name of viticultural 
significance under Sec.  4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 
4.39(i)(3)). The text of the regulations clarifies this point. 
Consequently, wine bottlers using the name ``Nashoba Valley'' in a 
brand name, including a trademark, or in another label reference as to 
the origin of the wine, will have to ensure that the product is 
eligible to use the AVA name as an appellation of origin.
    The establishment of the Nashoba Valley AVA will not affect any 
existing AVA. The establishment of the Nashoba Valley AVA will allow 
vintners to use ``Nashoba Valley'' as an appellation of origin for 
wines made primarily from grapes grown within the Nashoba Valley AVA if 
the wines meet the eligibility requirements for the appellation.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The 
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other 
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA 
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer 
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory 
flexibility analysis is required.

Executive Order 12866

    It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant 
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866, as amended. 
Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.

Drafting Information

    Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted 
this final rule.

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9

    Wine.

The Regulatory Amendment

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27, 
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  27 U.S.C. 205.

Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas

0
2. Add Sec.  9.299 to read as follows:


Sec.  9.299  Nashoba Valley.

    (a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this 
section is ``Nashoba Valley''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter, 
``Nashoba Valley'' is a term of viticultural significance.
    (b) Approved maps. The 2 United States Geological Survey (USGS) 
1:100,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the 
Nashoba Valley viticultural area are:
    (1) Hudson, MA, 2021; and
    (2) Clinton, MA, 2021.
    (c) Boundary. The Nashoba Valley viticultural area is located in 
Worcester County, Massachusetts. The boundary of the viticultural area 
is described as follows:
    (1) The beginning point is on the Hudson map at the intersection of 
Route 62 (also known as Central Street) and I-495 in Hudson, 
Massachusetts. From the beginning point, proceed southwest, then 
westerly on Route 62 for a total of 4.5 miles, crossing onto the 
Clinton map, to the point where it intersects and becomes concurrent 
with Route 70 (also known as Boylston Street); then
    (2) Proceed north on Route 70/Route 62 for 2.09 miles to its 
intersection with Route 110/Main Street in Clinton, Massachusetts; then
    (3) Proceed south on Route 110/Main Street as it becomes known as 
West Boylston Road, and continue along West Boylston Road for a total 
of 1 mile to its intersection with South Meadow Road; then
    (4) Proceed north along South Meadow Road for 0.95 mile to its 
intersection with Moffett Street in Lancaster, Massachusetts; then
    (5) Proceed northwest along Moffett Street to its intersection with 
an unnamed road known locally as Chace Hill Road; then
    (6) Proceed northeast along Chace Hill Road to its intersection 
with Sterling Street (also known as Route 62); then

[[Page 13970]]

    (7) Proceed northwesterly along Sterling Street/Route 62 to its 
intersection with an unnamed road known locally as Chocksett Road; then
    (8) Proceed northwesterly along Chocksett Road to its intersection 
with Pratts Junction Road; then
    (9) Proceed northwesterly along Pratts Junction Road to its 
intersection with I-190; then
    (10) Proceed northerly along I-190 for 2.35 miles to its 
intersection with Route 117 in Leominster, Massachusetts; then
    (11) Proceed southeasterly along Route 117 for 7.8 miles, crossing 
onto the Hudson map, to its intersection with I-495; then
    (12) Proceed southerly along I-495 to the beginning point.

    Signed: March 16, 2026.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
    Approved: March 16, 2026.
Kenneth J. Kies,
Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2026-05730 Filed 3-23-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 24, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.