Rule2026-05591

Air Plan Revisions; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; New Source Review; Stationary Source Permits

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 23, 2026
Effective
April 22, 2026

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing conditional approval of five permitting rules as a revision to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD or the "District") portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These are revisions to the District's New Source Review (NSR) air permitting program rules for new and modified sources of air pollution under part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or "Act").

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 55 (Monday, March 23, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13774-13777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-05591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2025-0625; FRL-12877-03-R9]


Air Plan Revisions; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality 
Management District; New Source Review; Stationary Source Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing 
conditional approval of five permitting rules as a revision to the 
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD or the 
``District'') portion of the California State Implementation Plan 
(SIP). These are revisions to the District's New Source Review (NSR) 
air permitting program rules for new and modified sources of air 
pollution under part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or 
``Act'').

[[Page 13775]]


DATES: This rule is effective on April 22, 2026.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2025-0625 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. All 
documents in the docket are listed on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> 
website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly 
available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain 
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the 
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. 
Publicly available docket materials are available through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, or please contact the person identified in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability 
information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or 
if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable 
accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cecelia Working, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; by phone: (213) 244-1911; or by 
email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aaddc5d8c1c3c4cd84c9cfc9cfeacfdacb84cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e49514c55575059105d5b5d5b7e5b4e5f10595148">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' 
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action and Interim Final Determination To Stay or Defer 
Sanctions
II. Public Comments and EPA Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action and Interim Final Determination To Stay or Defer 
Sanctions

    On July 24, 2025 (90 FR 34785), the EPA proposed to conditionally 
approve the rules listed below. Table 1 lists the rules addressed by 
this proposal with the dates they were amended or revised by the MDAQMD 
and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the agency 
that serves as the governor's designee for California SIP submittals.

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Adoption/
                Rule No.                             Rule title               amendment date     Submitted date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1301....................................  New Source Review Definitions...          3/25/2024           8/7/2024
1302 \a\................................  New Source Review Procedure.....          3/25/2024           8/7/2024
1303....................................  New Source Review Requirements..          3/25/2024           8/7/2024
1304....................................  New Source Review Emissions               3/25/2024           8/7/2024
                                           Calculations.
1305....................................  New Source Review Emission                3/25/2024           8/7/2024
                                           Offsets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Subsections 1302(C)(5)(d) and 1302(C)(7)(c)(iii) of Rule 1302 specifically state that subsections 1302(C)(5)
  and 1302(C)(7)(c) are not submitted to the EPA and are not intended to be included as part of the California
  SIP.

A. What was the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?

    The August 7, 2024 submittal is intended to address certain 
deficiencies that the EPA had identified in earlier versions of the 
MDAQMD Rules 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, and 1305. The deficiencies pertain 
to certain applicable nonattainment NSR (NNSR) requirements under the 
CAA, in part D of title I of the Act, and the implementing regulations 
under 40 CFR part 51.165. Portions of the MDAQMD are currently 
designated as Moderate nonattainment for the 1987 PM<INF>10</INF> NAAQS 
and as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 and 2015 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS.\1\ The rules listed in Table 1 are intended to replace the rules 
currently in the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 40 CFR 81.305.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our proposed rule, we determined that the MDAQMD's submitted 
rules could not be fully approved without supplementation from the 
MDAQMD and CARB. However, we determined that the submitted rules could 
be conditionally approved based upon commitments from the MDAQMD and 
CARB to supplement MDAQMD Rule 1304 through submission, as a SIP 
revision (within one year of our final conditional approval action), of 
a revised MDAQMD rule that would rescind the deficient provision from 
MDAQMD Rule 1304.\2\ Please see our proposed rule for more information 
concerning the background for this action and for a more detailed 
discussion of the rationale for our conditional approval of MDAQMD 
Rules 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, and 1305.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 90 FR 34785, 34787-88.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Interim Final Determination To Defer Sanctions

    In addition, on July 24, 2025,\3\ the EPA published an Interim 
Final Determination to stay the imposition of the offset sanction and 
defer the imposition of the highway sanction that was triggered by our 
June 30, 2023 limited disapproval of an earlier version of the MDAQMD's 
NSR rules.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 90 FR 34766.
    \4\ 88 FR 42258.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Public Comments and EPA Action

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
The public comment period on the proposed rule opened on July 24, 2025, 
the date of its publication in the Federal Register, and closed on 
August 25, 2025. During this period, the EPA received one comment 
letter submitted by an anonymous commenter. The EPA also received one 
comment letter from an anonymous commenter on the interim final 
determination to defer sanctions that accompanied the proposed rule. 
Copies of the comment letters are included in the docket for this 
action and accessible at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
    Comment #1: The commenter requests that the EPA require the MDAQMD 
and permit applicants to include carbon dioxide emission estimates and 
the associated social cost calculations for new or modified sources, 
provide technical guidance on using the federal social cost of carbon 
in permit evaluations, and consider the long-term climate and economic 
consequences of exempting or under-evaluating carbon dioxide emissions 
in future permit decisions.
    Response to Comment #1: The EPA does not agree with the commenter. 
This action relates to the MDAQMD's minor and NNSR programs and the 
EPA's minor and NNSR regulations do not require states to regulate 
carbon dioxide.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 75 FR 31514, 31520 (June 3, 2010) (``There is no NAAQS 
for CO<INF>2</INF> or any of the other well-mixed GHGs, nor has EPA 
proposed any such NAAQS; therefore, unless and until we take further 
such action, we do not anticipate that the nonattainment NSR program 
will apply to GHGs.''). EPA rulemakings have clarified that 
stationary source preconstruction permitting requirements for GHGs 
do not apply to nonmajor sources. Id; see also 80 FR 26183 (May 7, 
2015), 80 FR 50199 (August 19, 2015). Our position on these topics 
remains unchanged.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 13776]]

    Comment #2: The commenter encourages the EPA to assess the 
potential greenhouse gas emissions impact of deferred sanctions, 
provide guidance to state and local agencies on incorporating carbon 
dioxide co-benefit analyses into SIP-related compliance and enforcement 
decisions, and ensure that regulatory flexibility does not compromise 
long-term environmental resilience or undermine the public trust in CAA 
enforcement.
    Response to Comment #2: As we explain above in our response to the 
comment we received on the proposed action on MDAQMD's rules, the EPA 
does not regulate carbon dioxide or other well-mixed greenhouse gases 
through the minor or NNSR programs. In addition, the EPA does not 
consider the comment on regulatory flexibility to be germane to this 
action, which is limited to our evaluation of the MDAQMD's minor and 
NNSR rules for compliance with specific statutory and regulatory 
provisions that we describe in detail in our proposed rulemaking 
documents. Our proposed action contains our analysis of how the 
MDAQMD's submittal addresses, for the most part, the substantive minor 
and NNSR statutory and regulatory requirements. Our proposed action 
also contains the EPA's analysis that Rule 1304 contains a remaining 
deficiency and the fact that CARB and the MDAQMD have provided a 
written commitment to address this deficiency within one year of the 
effective date of this final action. This analysis provides the basis 
for our stay of the imposition of sanctions.
    The comments we received on our proposed action and on our interim 
final determination do not change our assessment of the submitted 
rules, as described in our proposed action. Therefore, the EPA is 
taking final action to conditionally approve the submitted rules into 
the SIP. Pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(4), we are finalizing our 
conditional approval of the August 7, 2024 submittal of MDAQMD Rules 
1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, and 1305, on the basis that they mostly address 
the substantive statutory and regulatory requirements for minor and 
NNSR permit programs. Our approval is conditional on the basis of a 
commitment by CARB and the MDAQMD to revise Rule 1304 to correct the 
remaining deficiency within one year of the effective date of this 
final conditional approval action. Our action will be codified through 
revisions to 40 CFR 52.220 (Identification of plan--in part) and 40 CFR 
52.248 (Identification of plan--conditional approval). Pursuant to 40 
CFR 52.31(d)(3)(iii), our conditional approval of the August 7, 2024 
submission stays the application of the offset and highway sanctions 
unless this conditional approval converts to a disapproval or the EPA 
proposes to or takes final action to disapprove in whole or in part the 
revised SIP the State submits to fulfill its commitment in the 
conditionally-approved plan.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is incorporating by reference the MDAQMD Rules 1301, 
1302, 1303, 1304, and 1305, which the MDAQMD adopted on March 25, 2024. 
These rules are intended to address the CAA's statutory and regulatory 
requirements for NNSR permit programs for major sources emitting 
nonattainment air pollutants under part D of title I of the CAA. The 
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available 
through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and at the EPA Region IX Office 
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to review state choices 
and approve those choices if they meet the minimum criteria of the Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law.
    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders">https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders</a>.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review.

B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation

    This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 14192 
regulatory action because this action is not significant under 
Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements 
beyond those imposed by state law.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This 
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those 
imposed by state law.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements 
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to 
state, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will 
result from this action.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    This action does not have Tribal implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any 
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian 
Tribe has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction, and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal 
law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks 
that

[[Page 13777]]

the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, 
per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of 
the Executive Order. Therefore, this action is not subject to Executive 
Order 13045 because it merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements. Furthermore, the EPA's Policy on Children's Health does 
not apply to this action.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary 
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would 
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA 
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section 
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be 
inconsistent with the CAA.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

L. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by May 22, 2026. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental 
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: March 11, 2026.
Michael Martucci,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental 
Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(600)(i)(A)(9) and 
(c)(631) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (600) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (9) Previously approved on June 30, 2023, in paragraphs 
(c)(600)(i)(A)(3)-(7) of this section and now deleted with replacement 
in paragraphs (c)(631)(i)(A)(1)-(5) of this section: Rule 1301, ``New 
Source Review Definitions''; Rule 1302, ``New Source Review Procedure'' 
(except subsections (C)(5) and (C)(7)(c)); Rule 1303, ``New Source 
Review Requirements''; Rule 1304 ``New Source Review Emissions 
Calculations''; and Rule 1305, ``New Source Review Emission Offsets''; 
all of which were amended on March 22, 2021.
* * * * *
    (631) The following regulations were submitted electronically on 
August 7, 2024, by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter 
dated August 7, 2024.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Mojave Desert Air Quality 
Management District.
    (1) Rule 1301, ``New Source Review Definitions,'' amended on March 
25, 2024.
    (2) Rule 1302, ``New Source Review Procedure,'' (except subsections 
1302(C)(5) and 1302(C)(7)(c)), amended on March 25, 2024.
    (3) Rule 1303, ``New Source Review Requirements,'' amended on March 
25, 2024.
    (4) Rule 1304, ``New Source Review Emissions Calculations,'' 
amended on March 25, 2024.
    (5) Rule 1305, ``New Source Review Emissions Offsets,'' amended on 
March 25, 2024.
    (B) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
3. Section 52.248 is amended by adding paragraph (n) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.248  Identification of plan--conditional approval.

* * * * *
    (n) The EPA is conditionally approving the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) for Mojave Desert for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, 
2015 ozone NAAQS, and 1987 PM<INF>10</INF> NAAQS with respect to the 
nonattainment New Source Review requirements of CAA section 173. The 
conditional approval is based on a commitment from the Mojave Desert 
Air Quality Management District (District) in a letter dated June 12, 
2025, to adopt a specific rule revision, and a commitment from the 
California Air Resources Board (CARB) dated June 17, 2025, to submit 
the amended District rule to the EPA within 12 months of the effective 
date of the final conditional approval. If the District or CARB fail to 
meet their commitments within one year of the effective date of the 
final conditional approval, the conditional approval is treated as a 
disapproval.

[FR Doc. 2026-05591 Filed 3-20-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 23, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.