Rule2026-05459

Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act Regulations Statutory Updates

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 19, 2026
Effective
May 4, 2026

Issuing agencies

Small Business Administration

Abstract

The United States Small Business Administration (SBA) is amending the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act regulations in 13 CFR part 142 to reflect changes made to the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 by the Administrative False Claims Act of 2023. These changes, among other things, revise the name of the administrative action from "Program Fraud Civil Remedies" to "Administrative False Claims" and increase the threshold for a claim from $150,000 to $1,000,000. The Administrative False Claims Act mandates that the Agency issue regulations to update part 142 and this direct final rule conforms the regulations to the Administrative False Claims Act by adopting the new statutory requirements without change.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13217-13219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-05459]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 142

RIN 3245-AI29


Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act Regulations Statutory Updates

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Small Business Administration (SBA) is 
amending the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act regulations in 13 CFR 
part 142 to reflect changes made to the Program Fraud Civil Remedies 
Act of 1986 by the Administrative False Claims Act of 2023. These 
changes, among other things, revise the name of the administrative 
action from ``Program Fraud Civil Remedies'' to ``Administrative False 
Claims'' and increase the threshold for a claim from $150,000 to 
$1,000,000. The Administrative False Claims Act mandates that the 
Agency issue regulations to update part 142 and this direct final rule 
conforms the regulations to the Administrative False Claims Act by 
adopting the new statutory requirements without change.

DATES: This rule is effective May 4, 2026, without further action, 
unless significant adverse comment is received by April 20, 2026. If 
significant adverse comment is received, SBA will publish a timely 
withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by number SBA-2026-0067 
or RIN 3245-AI29, in the Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    SBA will post all comments on <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. If you wish to 
submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User 
Notice at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>, please send an email to Kandace Zelaya 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fbb09a959f9a989ed5a19e979a829abb88999ad59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c883a9a6aca9abade692ada4a9b1a988bbaaa9e6afa7be">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> and highlight the information that you 
consider to be CBI and explain why you believe SBA should hold this 
information as confidential. SBA will review the information and make 
the final determination whether it will publish the information. All 
other comments must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal 
described above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kandace Zelaya, Office of General 
Counsel, (504) 589-2033, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f341e111b1e1c1a51251a131e061e3f0c1d1e51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="074c666963666462295d626b667e664774656629606871">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    This direct final rule implements regulatory changes required by 
the Administrative False Claims Act of 2023 (AFCA), Public Law 118-159, 
sec. 5203, 138 Stat. 2440 (December 23, 2024). The specific regulatory 
changes are further described below.

II. Description of Regulatory Changes

    SBA is revising the title of part 142 from ``Program Fraud Civil 
Remedies Act Regulations'' to ``Administrative False Claims Act 
Regulations.'' In addition, SBA is revising all references to ``Program 
Fraud Civil Remedies'' within part 142 to ``Administrative False 
Claims.''
    SBA is revising 13 CFR 142.1 by adding a reference to the 
Administrative False Claims Act of 2023, Public Law 118-159, sec. 5203, 
138 Stat. 2440 (2024).
    The AFCA expanded the list of claims that a Federal agency can 
pursue by imposing liability for submissions of ``reverse false 
claims.'' A reverse false claim is when a person acts improperly--not 
to obtain money from the Government--but to avoid having to pay money 
to the Government. Thus, SBA is revising the definition of a ``claim'' 
in 13 CFR 142.3 by modifying paragraph (a)(2) to state that a claim 
includes any request, demand, or submission made to SBA which ``has the 
effect of concealing or improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation 
to pay or transmit property, services, or money.'' Additionally, the 
AFCA adopted the definition of ``obligation'' from the Federal False 
Claims Act (FCA) (31 U.S.C. 3729-3733). Thus, SBA is adding a 
parenthetical to paragraph (a)(2) to explain that ``obligation'' has 
the meaning given the term in 31 U.S.C. 3729(b).
    The AFCA also adopted the definition of ``material'' from the FCA. 
Therefore, SBA is revising 13 CFR 142.5(a)(2) to include a 
parenthetical explaining that ``material'' has the meaning given the 
term in 31 U.S.C. 3729(b).
    SBA is revising 13 CFR 142.7 to replace ``the Program Fraud Civil 
Remedies Act'' with ``the Administrative False Claims Act.''
    SBA is revising 13 CFR 142.9 to increase the threshold for a claim 
or a group of related claims from $150,000 to $1,000,000. Additionally, 
SBA is restructuring the existing text into a new paragraph (a) and 
adding two new paragraphs. SBA is adding a new paragraph (b) to this 
regulation to provide that the maximum amount of a claim or a group of 
related claims shall be adjusted for inflation in the same manner and 
to the same extent as civil monetary penalties under the Federal Civil 
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. 2461 note). SBA is adding 
a new paragraph (c) to this regulation to incorporate the revised 
statute of limitations included in the AFCA. The AFCA revised the 
statute of limitations for bringing an action to the later of 6 years 
after the date of the violation or 3 years after the date on which 
facts material to the action are known or reasonably should have been 
known by

[[Page 13218]]

the agency head, but in no event more than 10 years after the 
violation.
    SBA is making two minor technical corrections to 13 CFR 142.12. In 
paragraph (a), SBA is replacing ``the Office of Hearings and Appeals'' 
with ``OHA'' because the term is defined previously in Sec.  142.10. In 
paragraph (d), SBA is replacing ``the ALJ'' with ``OHA.''
    As discussed above, the AFCA revised the statute of limitations for 
bringing a claim and, thus, SBA is revising 13 CFR 142.9 to state when 
SBA will bring an action by issuing a complaint and incorporating the 
new timeframes set in the AFCA. Consequently, SBA is revising 13 CFR 
142.14(b) to remove the six-year limitation on serving the notice of 
oral hearing, which incorporated the previous statutory language in 31 
U.S.C. 3808(a) that was stricken and replaced under the AFCA. The 
requirement that the ALJ promptly serve a notice of oral hearing upon 
receipt of the complaint and answer will remain.
    The AFCA added a requirement that the reviewing official notify the 
Attorney General in writing not later than 30 days before entering into 
any agreement to compromise or settle allegations of liability under 
the AFCA and before the date on which the reviewing official is 
permitted to refer allegations of liability to a presiding officer. SBA 
is revising 13 CFR 142.38 by adding the new notification requirement to 
paragraph (b).
    Finally, SBA is revising 13 CFR 142.39 to add language from the 
statute that states that a civil action to recover a penalty or 
assessment under this part shall be commenced within 3 years after the 
date on which the determination of liability for such penalty or 
assessment becomes final.

III. Justification for Direct Final Rule

    In general, SBA publishes a rule for public comment before issuing 
a final rule in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 
U.S.C. 553. The Administrative Procedure Act provides an exception to 
this standard rulemaking process, however, where an agency finds good 
cause to adopt a rule without prior public participation. 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(B). The good cause requirement is satisfied when prior public 
participation is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.
    Agencies typically utilize direct final rulemakings for routine, 
non-controversial regulatory actions that are unlikely to receive 
adverse comments. In direct final rulemaking, an agency publishes a 
final rule with a statement that the rule will go into effect unless 
the agency receives significant adverse comment within a specified 
period. Significant adverse comments are comments that provide strong 
justifications why the rule should not be adopted or for changing the 
rule. If the agency receives no significant adverse comment in response 
to the direct final rule, the rule goes into effect on the date listed 
in the DATES section without further notice. If the agency receives 
significant adverse comment, the agency will withdraw the direct final 
rule prior to the effective date and may instead issue a proposed 
rulemaking.
    SBA has determined that prior public participation is unnecessary, 
because the regulatory changes addressed in this direct final 
rulemaking are routine, non-controversial, and not likely to result in 
adverse comments. SBA is implementing changes required by statute which 
are already in effect and is merely updating the regulations in order 
to conform to the statute. Because the changes in this rule are 
prescribed by statute, SBA does not expect significant adverse 
comments.

Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13132, 13175, 13563, 
14192, the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808), Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C., Ch. 35), and the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
(5 U.S.C. 601-612)

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, requires 
agencies to provide a Regulatory Impact Analysis assessing costs and 
benefits and addressing available alternatives for any ``significant 
regulatory action.'' The Office of Management and Budget has determined 
that this direct final rule does not constitute a ``significant 
regulatory action.''
    Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, 
reaffirms the principles of Executive Order 12866 and requires agencies 
to adopt regulations through a process that involves public 
participation and, to the extent feasible, base regulations on the open 
exchange of information and perspectives from affected stakeholders and 
the public as a whole. SBA has developed this direct final rule in a 
manner consistent with these requirements. Moreover, Executive Order 
13563 requires agencies to assess the benefits and costs of any 
regulations and address available alternatives to direct regulation. 
This rule implements statutory changes and is not expected to have an 
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely 
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, 
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities. As a 
result, no Regulatory Impact Analysis is required.

Executive Order 14192

    This rule is not an Executive Order 14192 regulatory action because 
it is not significant under Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 12988

    This action meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 
minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action 
does not have preemptive effect or retroactive effect.

Executive Order 13132

    This rule does not have federalism implications as defined in 
Executive Order 13132. It will not have substantial direct effects on 
the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in the Executive Order. As 
such it does not warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

Executive Order 13175

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808

    This rule has been determined not to meet the criteria set forth in 
5 U.S.C. 804(2). SBA will submit the rule to Congress and the 
Government Accountability Office consistent with the Congressional 
Review Act's requirements.

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35

    SBA has determined that this rule does not impose additional 
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.

[[Page 13219]]

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires 
administrative agencies to consider the effect of their actions on 
small entities, small nonprofit enterprises, and small local 
governments. Pursuant to the RFA, when an agency issues a rulemaking, 
the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis which 
describes the impact of the rule on small entities. However, the RFA 
requires such analysis only where notice and comment rulemaking is 
required. As discussed above, SBA has found good cause that notice and 
public comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the 
public interest. Accordingly, SBA is not required to conduct a 
regulatory flexibility analysis and is publishing this rule as a direct 
final rule without advance notice and public comment.

List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 142

    Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Fraud, Penalties.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the SBA amends 13 CFR 
part 142 as follows:

PART 142--ADMINISTRATIVE FALSE CLAIMS ACT REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 142 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b); 31 U.S.C. 3803(g)(2).


0
2. The heading for part 142 is revised to read as set forth above.

0
3. Amend Sec.  142.1 by revising the first sentence of paragraph (a) to 
read as follows:


 Sec.  142.1  Overview of regulations.

    (a) * * * This part implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act 
of 1986, 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812, as amended by the Administrative False 
Claims Act of 2023, Public Law 118-159, sec. 5203, 138 Stat. 2440 
(``the Act''). * * *
* * * * *

0
4. Amend Sec.  142.3 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  142.3  What is a claim?

    (a) * * *
    (3) Made to SBA which has the effect of concealing or improperly 
avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay or transmit property, 
services, or money (``obligation'' has the meaning given the term in 31 
U.S.C. 3729(b)).
* * * * *

0
5. Amend Sec.  142.5 by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:


Sec.  142.5  What is a false claim or statement?

    (a) * * *
    (2) Includes or is supported by a written statement which asserts 
or contains a material fact which is false, fictitious, or fraudulent 
(``material'' has the meaning given the term in 31 U.S.C. 3729(b));
* * * * *


Sec.  142.7  [Amended]

0
6. Amend Sec.  142.7 by removing ``Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act'' 
and adding in its place ``Administrative False Claims Act''.

0
7. Revise Sec.  142.9 to read as follows:


Sec.  142.9  When will SBA issue a complaint?

    (a) SBA will issue a complaint:
    (1) If the Attorney General (or designee) approves the referral of 
the allegations for adjudication; and
    (2) In a case of submission of false claims, if the amount of money 
or the value of property or services demanded or requested in a false 
claim, or a group of related claims submitted at the same time, does 
not exceed $1,000,000. A group of related claims submitted at the same 
time includes only those claims arising from the same transaction (such 
as a grant, loan, application, or contract) which are submitted 
together as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
    (b) Adjustment for inflation: the maximum amount in paragraph 
(a)(2) shall be adjusted for inflation in the same manner and to the 
same extent as civil monetary penalties under the Federal Civil 
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. 2461 note).
    (c) The complaint must be served not later than the later of:
    (1) 6 years after the date on which such claim or statement is 
made; or
    (2) 3 years after the date on which facts material to the action 
are known or reasonably should have been known by SBA, but in no event 
later than 10 years after the date on which the claim or statement was 
made.


Sec.  142.12   [Amended]

0
8. Amend Sec.  142.12 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a), remove ``the Office of Hearings and Appeals'' and 
add in its place ``OHA''; and
0
b. In paragraph (d), remove ``the ALJ'' and add in its place ``OHA''.


Sec.  142.14  [Amended]

0
9. Amend Sec.  142.14 in paragraph (b) by removing the last sentence.

0
10. Amend Sec.  142.38 by adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (b) 
to read as follows:


Sec.  142.38  Can the administrative complaint be settled voluntarily?

* * * * *
    (b) * * * A reviewing official shall notify the Attorney General in 
writing not later than 30 days before entering into an agreement to 
compromise or settle allegations of liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802 and 
before the date on which the reviewing official is permitted to refer 
allegations of liability to a Presiding Officer under 31 U.S.C. 
3803(d)(2)(B).
* * * * *

0
11. Amend Sec.  142.39 by adding a sentence at the end to read as 
follows:


Sec.  142.39  How are civil penalties and assessments collected?

    * * * A civil action to recover a penalty or assessment under this 
part shall be commenced within 3 years after the date on which the 
determination of liability for such penalty or assessment becomes 
final.

Kelly Loeffler,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2026-05459 Filed 3-18-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 19, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.