Notice2026-04804
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Connectivity Fee Schedule Related to Connectivity to Third Party Systems and Third Party Data Feeds
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 12, 2026
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12252-12257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-04804]
[[Page 12252]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-104948; File No. SR-NYSENAT-2026-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Connectivity Fee Schedule Related to Connectivity to Third Party
Systems and Third Party Data Feeds
March 9, 2026.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on February 26, 2026, NYSE National, Inc. (``NYSE National'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Connectivity Fee Schedule to
amend the list of third party systems and third party data feeds to
which Users can connect and related fees. The proposed change is
available on the Exchange's website at <a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a> and at the
principal office of the Exchange.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Connectivity Fee Schedule to
amend the list of third party systems and third party data feeds to
which Users \4\ can connect an \5\d [sic] related fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For purposes of the Exchange's colocation services, a
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive
colocation services directly from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 83351 (May 31, 2018), 83 FR 26314 at n.9
(June 6, 2018) (SR-NYSENAT-2018-07). As specified in the Fee
Schedule, a User that incurs colocation fees for a particular
colocation service pursuant thereto would not be subject to
colocation fees for the same colocation service charged by the New
York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., and
NYSE Texas, Inc. (together, the ``Affiliate SROs''). Each Affiliate
SRO has submitted substantially the same proposed rule change to
propose the change described herein.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 103413 (July 9, 2025),
90 FR 31535 (July 14, 2025) (SR-NYSENAT-2025-14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, Users are offered connectivity to the execution systems
of third party markets and other service providers (``Third Party
Systems'') and connectivity to data feeds from third party markets and
other content service providers (``Third Party Data Feeds'') at the
Mahwah, New Jersey data center (``MDC'').\6\ The Exchange proposes to
amend the two lists to add new items and amend related fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Through its Fixed Income and Data Services (``FIDS'')
business, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (``ICE'') operates the
MDC. The Exchange and the Affiliate SROs are indirect subsidiaries
of ICE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Changes
Changes to Connectivity to Third Party Systems
The Exchange proposes to add 24X; \7\ Bruce ATS; \8\ and Texas
Stock Exchange (TSXE) \9\ (collectively, the ``Proposed Third Party
Systems'') to the list of Third Party Systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 24X-Form 1 Application and Exhibits, August 27, 2024, at
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/other-commission-orders-notices-information/24x-form-1">https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/other-commission-orders-notices-information/24x-form-1</a>.
\8\ See Form ATS-N at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&filenum=013-00206&owner=include&count=40">https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&filenum=013-00206&owner=include&count=40</a>.
\9\ See TXSE-Form 1 Application and Exhibits, April 4, 2025, at
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/other-commission-orders-notices-information/txse-form-1">https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/other-commission-orders-notices-information/txse-form-1</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To make these changes, the table under ``Connectivity to Third
Party Systems'' would be amended as follows (proposed additions
italicized):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third party systems
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
24X.
B3 Bovespa.
Blue Ocean ATS (BOATS).
Boston Options Exchange (BOX).
Bruce ATS.
* * * * *
Small Exchange.
Texas Stock Exchange (TSXE).
TMX Group.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not propose to change the monthly recurring fee
Users pay for access to each Third Party System. A User would continue
to be able to choose which systems it wants from any Third Party
System. It would not have to receive any systems, or pay for any
bandwidth, that it did not choose.
Changes to Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds
The Exchange proposes to add 24X,\10\ Bruce ATS,\11\ and Texas
Stock Exchange (TSXE) \12\ (collectively, the ``Proposed Third Party
Data Feeds'') to the list of Third Party Data Feeds, with the following
fees:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See note 7, supra.
\11\ See note 8, supra.
\12\ See note 9, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> 24X, for $4,000 a month;
<bullet> Bruce ATS, for $1,250 a month; and
<bullet> Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE), for $1,300 a month.
To make these changes, the list of available Third Party Data Feeds
under ``Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds'' would be amended as
follows (proposed deletions in brackets, proposed additions
italicized):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly recurring
Third party data feed connectivity fee per
third party data feed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
24X............................................ $4,000
B3 Bovespa..................................... 3,900
Blue Ocean ATS (BOATS)......................... 750
Boston Options Exchange (BOX).................. 1,300
Bruce ATS...................................... 1,250
[[Page 12253]]
* * * * * * *
Small Exchange................................. 1,000
Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE).................... 1,300
TMX Group...................................... 2,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access to the Proposed Third Party Systems
The Exchange would provide access to the Proposed Third Party
Systems as conveniences to Users.
As with the current Third Party Systems, Users would connect to the
Proposed Third Party Systems over the internet protocol (``IP'')
network, a local area network available in the MDC.
As with the current Third Party Systems, in order to obtain access
to a Proposed Third Party System, the User would enter into an
agreement with the relevant proposed third party, pursuant to which it
may charge the User for access to the Proposed Third Party System. The
Exchange would then enable unicast connectivity between the User and
the Proposed Third Party System over the IP network.\13\ The Exchange
would charge the User for the connectivity to the Proposed Third Party
System. A User would only receive, and would only be charged for,
access to the Proposed Third Party System for which it enters into
agreements with the relevant third party.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Information flows over existing network connections in two
formats: ``unicast'' format, which is a format that allows one-to-
one communication, similar to a phone line, in which information is
sent to and from the Exchange; and ``multicast'' format, which is a
format in which information is sent one-way from the Exchange to
multiple recipients at once, like a radio broadcast.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has no affiliation with the providers of any of the
Proposed Third Party Systems. Establishing a User's access to a
Proposed Third Party System would not give the Exchange any right to
use the Proposed Third Party System. Connectivity to a Proposed Third
Party System would not provide access or order entry to the Exchange's
execution system, and a User's connection to a Proposed Third Party
System would not be through the Exchange's execution system.
The Exchange proposes to charge the same monthly recurring fee for
connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Systems that it does for the
current Third Party Systems. Specifically, when a User requested access
to a Proposed Third Party System, it would identify the applicable
third party and what bandwidth connection would be required. The fees
for such bandwidth connection would vary based on the size of the
connection, not on the particular Third Party System the User chooses.
The Exchange is not proposing to change the pricing of any of these
bandwidth connections; the Exchange is simply expanding the list of
Third Party Systems that Users may access via these bandwidth
connections.
Connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds
The Exchange would provide connectivity to the Proposed Third Party
Data Feeds as a convenience to Users.
As with the existing connections to Third Party Data Feeds, the
Exchange would receive a Proposed Third Party Data Feed from the
content service provider at the relevant source. The Exchange would
then provide connectivity to that data to Users for a fee. Users would
connect to the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds over the IP network. The
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds would include trading and other
information concerning the securities that are traded on the relevant
third party systems.
As with the existing connections to Third Party Data Feeds, in
order to connect to a Proposed Third Party Data Feed, a User would
enter into a contract with the third party content service provider,
pursuant to which it may charge the User for the data feed. The
Exchange would receive the Proposed Third Party Data Feed in remote
locations and transport it over its fiber optic network to the MDC.
After the content service provider and User entered into an agreement
and the Exchange received authorization from the content service
provider, the Exchange would retransmit the data to the User over the
User's port. The Exchange would charge the User for connectivity to the
Proposed Third Party Data Feed. A User would only receive, and would
only be charged the fee for, connectivity to a Proposed Third Party
Data Feed for which it entered into a contract.
The Exchange has no affiliation with the sellers of the Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds and would have no right to use those feeds other
than as a redistributor of the data. None of the Proposed Third Party
Data Feeds would provide access or order entry to the Exchange's
execution system. The Proposed Third Party Data Feeds would not provide
access or order entry service to the execution systems of the third
parties generating the feeds. The Exchange would receive the Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds via arms-length agreements and would have no
inherent advantage over any other distributor of such data.
Application and Impact of the Proposed Changes
The proposed rule change would not apply differently to distinct
types or sizes of market participants. Rather, it would apply to all
Users equally. As is currently the case, the purchase of any colocation
service is completely voluntary and the Connectivity Fee Schedule is
applied uniformly to all Users.
Access to most of the Proposed Third Party Systems and connectivity
to most of the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds were requested by Users,
but the Exchange believes that it would gain at most a handful of new
customers due to the proposed change.
Competitive Environment
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which other
vendors offer colocation services as a means to facilitate the trading
and other market activities of those market participants who believe
that colocation enhances the efficiency of their operations. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining
prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation
of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting
market competition in its broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12254]]
As explained below, the Exchange's provision of access to the
Proposed Third Party Systems (``Access'') and connectivity to the
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds (``Connectivity'') may compete with
access and connectivity provided by other third parties. Third-party
vendors are not at any competitive disadvantage created by the
Exchange.
The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues relating to colocation services or related fees, and the
Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in
complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\15\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\16\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange further believes
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,\17\ because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).0
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is reasonable.
In considering the reasonableness of proposed services and fees,
the Commission's market-based test considers ``whether the exchange was
subject to significant competitive forces in setting the terms of its
proposal . . . , including the level of any fees.'' \18\ If the
Exchange meets that burden, ``the Commission will find that its
proposal is consistent with the Act unless `there is a substantial
countervailing basis to find that the terms' of the proposal violate
the Act or the rules thereunder.'' \19\ Here, the Exchange is subject
to significant competitive forces in setting the terms on which it
offers its proposal, in particular because substantially similar
substitutes are available and the Exchange has not placed present or
future third party vendors at a competitive disadvantage created by the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90209 (October 15,
2020), 85 FR 67044, 67049 (October 21, 2020) (Order Granting
Accelerated Approval to Establish a Wireless Fee Schedule Setting
Forth Available Wireless Bandwidth Connections and Wireless Market
Data Connections) (SR-NYSE-2020-05, SR-NYSEAMER-2020-05, SR-
NYSEARCA-2020-08, SR-NYSECHX-2020-02, SR-NYSENAT-2020-03, SR-NYSE-
2020-11, SR-NYSEAMER-2020-10, SR-NYSEArca-2020-15, SR-NYSECHX-2020-
05, SR-NYSENAT-2020-08) (``Wireless Approval Order''), citing
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR
74770, 74781 (December 9, 2008) (``2008 ArcaBook Approval Order'').
See NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
\19\ See Wireless Approval Order, supra note 18, at 67049,
citing 2008 ArcaBook Approval Order, supra note 18, at 74781.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Substantially Similar Substitutes Are Available
As described above,\20\ Users may access Proposed Third Party
Systems and connect to Proposed Third Party Data Feeds independent of
the options provided by the Exchange, creating competition for the
Exchange's proposed Access and Connectivity. More specifically, a User
may access a Proposed Third Party System by, first, entering into an
agreement with the relevant proposed third party for access, if
required, and second, accessing the Proposed Third Party System through
one of the Telecoms. Likewise, a User may connect to a Proposed Third
Party Data Feed by, first, entering into an agreement with the relevant
third party for connectivity, and second, connecting to the Proposed
Third Party Data Feed through one of the Telecoms. Users that establish
access or connectivity independent of the Access and Connectivity
offered by the Exchange are not at any competitive disadvantage created
by the Exchange. As of December 31, 2025, more than 98% of the circuits
for which Users contracted were supplied by the Telecoms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See ``Competitive Environment,'' above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Users are third parties and are not required to make such
information public, the Exchange does not have visibility into how many
Users currently access the Proposed Third Party Systems or connect to
the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds independently, as described
above.\21\ However, the market for access to the Proposed Third Party
Systems and connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds is
competitive, and there is no reason to believe that other actual or
potential Users would not obtain access and connectivity independently
if they considered it to be in their commercial interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The Exchange believes that currently Users may access at
least two of the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds from one or more
other Users who redistribute such access, but, as they are third
parties, the Exchange does not have visibility into whether Users
intend to access Proposed Third Party Systems or connect to Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds for their own use, or if they offer, or
intend to offer, other Users such access or connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Such Users compete, or would compete, with the Exchange's Access
and Connectivity and exert, or would exert, significant competitive
forces on the Exchange in setting the terms of its proposal, including
the level of the Exchange's proposed fees.\22\ If the Exchange were to
set its proposed fees too high, Users could respond by instead
selecting other substantially similar access and connectivity by
independently establishing access and connectivity as described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See 2008 ArcaBook Approval Order, supra note 18, at 74789
and n.295 (recognizing that products need not be identical to be
substitutable).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Users Are Not at a Competitive Disadvantage Created by the Exchange
The Exchange does not believe that FIDS would have any competitive
advantage over Users that establish independent access to Proposed
Third Party Systems or connectivity to Proposed Third Party Data Feeds.
The Exchange's proposed service for Access and Connectivity does not
have (a) any special access to the Proposed Third Party Systems and
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds or (b) advantage within the MDC, as all
distances in the MDC are normalized.
Moreover, the Exchange does not believe that FIDS would have any
competitive advantage because it would charge for connectivity only,
not the Proposed Third Party System or Proposed Third Party Data Feed
itself. All Users that connect to a Proposed Third Party System or
Proposed Third Party Data Feed, whether they elect to connect using the
Exchange's proposed service or not, would have to pay a third party for
the Proposed Third Party System or a third party for the Proposed Third
Party Data Feed.
Nor does the Exchange believe that FIDS has a competitive advantage
by virtue of the fact that ICE owns and operates the MDC's meet-me-
rooms. Users purchasing Access or Connectivity--like Users of any other
colocation service--would require a circuit connecting out of the MDC,
and in most cases, such circuits are provided
[[Page 12255]]
by Telecoms.\23\ Currently, 17 Telecoms operate in the meet-me-rooms
and provide a variety of circuit choices. It is in the Exchange's best
interest to set the fees that Telecoms pay to operate in the meet-me-
rooms at a reasonable level \24\ so that market participants, including
Telecoms, will maximize their use of the MDC. By setting the meet-me-
room fees at a reasonable level, the Exchange encourages Telecoms to
participate in the meet-me-rooms and to sell circuits to Users for
connecting into and out of the MDC. These Telecoms then compete with
each other by pricing such circuits at competitive rates. These
competitive rates for circuits help draw in more Users and Hosted
Customers to the MDC, which directly benefits the Exchange by
increasing the customer base to whom the Exchange can sell its
colocation services, which include cabinets, power, ports, and
connectivity to many third-party data feeds, and because having more
Users and Hosted Customers leads, in many cases, to greater
participation on the Exchange. In this way, by setting the meet-me-room
fees at a level attractive to telecommunications firms, the Exchange
spurs demand for all of the services it sells at the MDC, while setting
the meet-me-room fees too high would negatively affect the Exchange's
ability to sell its services at the MDC.\25\ Accordingly, there are
real constraints on the meet-me-room fees the Exchange charges, such
that the Exchange does not have an advantage in terms of costs when
compared to third parties that enter the MDC through the meet-me-rooms
to provide services to compete with the Exchange's services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Note that in the case of wireless connectivity, a User in
colocation still requires a fiber circuit to transport data. If a
Telecom is used, the data is transmitted wirelessly to the relevant
pole, and then from the pole to the meet-me-room using a fiber
circuit.
\24\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98002 (July 26,
2023), 88 FR 50232 (August 1, 2023) (SR-NYSENat-2023-12) (``MMR
Notice'').
\25\ See id. at 50235. Importantly, the Exchange is prevented
from making any alteration to its meet-me-room services or fees
without filing a proposal for such changes with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If anything, the Exchange would be subject to a competitive
disadvantage vis-[agrave]-vis Users regarding access to the Proposed
Third Party Systems or connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data
Feeds. Users that choose to independently establish access or
connectivity may negotiate terms with the Telecoms through whom such
access and connectivity is delivered, in response to competitive
forces. Such prices are not required to be filed by any party with the
Commission. In contrast, the Exchange's service and pricing would be
standardized as set out in this filing, and the Exchange would be
unable to respond to pricing pressure from its competitors without
seeking a formal fee change in a filing before the Commission.
In sum, because the Exchange is subject to significant competitive
forces in setting the terms on which it offers its proposal, in
particular because the Exchange believes that a substantially similar
substitute is available, and the Exchange has not placed actual or
proposed Users that already have or establish access or connectivity at
a competitive disadvantage created by the Exchange, the proposed fees
for the Exchange's connectivity to Proposed Third Party Systems and
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds are reasonable.\26\ If the Exchange
were to set its prices for access to Proposed Third Party Systems or
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds at a level that Users found to be too
high, Users could easily choose to connect to Proposed Third Party
Systems or Proposed Third Party Data Feeds through Telecoms, as
detailed above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Wireless Approval Order, supra note 18. There is no fee
change proposed for the Proposed Third Party Systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Considerations
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to make the proposed
changes, as connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Systems and access
to the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds was generally requested by
Users.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Equitable
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is equitable.
The Exchange believes that the fees for connectivity to the
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds are an equitable allocation of fees.
The proposed fee for 24X is equitable because the market rate for
connecting to 24X is greater. The proposed fee for Bruce ATS and Texas
Stock Exchange are both equitable, and comparable to the fees charged
for Third Party Data Feeds.
The Exchange does not propose to change the monthly recurring fee
Users pay for access to each Third Party System. A User would continue
to be able to choose which systems it wants from any Third Party
System. It would not have to receive any systems, or pay for any
bandwidth, that it did not choose.
Without this proposed rule change, Users would have fewer options
for connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Systems and Proposed Third
Party Data Feeds. By offering Access and Connectivity, the Exchange
gives each User additional options for addressing its needs, responding
to User demand for options. Offering these additional services would
help each User tailor its data center operations to the requirements of
its business operations by allowing it to select the form and latency
of connectivity that best suits its needs. Users that do not opt to
utilize the Exchange's proposed Access or Connectivity would still be
able to access Proposed Third Party Systems or connect to Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds using Telecoms.
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is equitable because
it will result in fees being charged only to Users that voluntarily
select to receive the corresponding services and because those services
will be available to all Users.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the services and fees
proposed herein are equitably allocated because, in addition to the
services being completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on
an equal basis (i.e., the same products and services are available to
all Users). All Users that voluntarily select the Exchange's Access or
Connectivity would be charged the same amount for the same services.
Users who opt not to use Access or Connectivity would not be charged.
In this way, the proposed rule change equitably allocates the proposed
fees only to Users who choose to use the Exchange's Access or
Connectivity.
The Proposed Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is not unfairly
discriminatory, for the following reasons.
Without this proposed rule change, Users would have fewer options
for access to Proposed Third Party Systems or connectivity to Proposed
Third Party Data Feeds. The proposed change would provide Users with an
additional choice with respect to the form and optimal latency of the
access they use to connect to Proposed Third Party Systems or
connectivity to Proposed Third Party Data Feeds, allowing a User to
select the connectivity that better suits its needs, helping it tailor
its colocation operations to the requirements of its business
operations. Users that do not opt to utilize the Exchange's proposed
Access or Connectivity would still be able to access the Proposed Third
Party Systems or connect to Proposed Third Party Data Feeds using
Telecoms.
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is not unfairly
discriminatory because it will result in fees being charged only to
Users that
[[Page 12256]]
voluntarily select to receive the corresponding services and because
those services will be available to all Users. Furthermore, the
Exchange believes that the services and fees proposed herein are not
unfairly discriminatory because, in addition to the services being
completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis
(i.e., the same products and services are available to all Users). All
Users that voluntarily select the Exchange's Access or Connectivity
would be charged the same amount for the same services.
For all these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\27\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The proposed change would not affect competition
among national securities exchanges or among members of the Exchange,
but rather between FIDS and its commercial competitors. By offering
Access and Connectivity, the Exchange would give each User additional
options for addressing its needs, responding to User demand for
options. Providing additional services would help each User tailor its
data center operations to the requirements of its business operations
by allowing it to select the form and latency of connectivity that best
suits its needs. Users that do not opt to utilize the Exchange's
proposed Access or Connectivity would still be able to access Proposed
Third Party Systems and connect to Proposed Third Party Data Feeds
using Telecoms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not believe that FIDS would have any competitive
advantage over Users that establish independent access to Proposed
Third Party Systems or connectivity to Proposed Third Party Data Feeds.
The Exchange's proposed service for Access and Connectivity does not
have (a) any special access to the Proposed Third Party Systems and
Proposed Third Party Data Feeds or (b) advantage within the MDC, as all
distances in the MDC are normalized.
Moreover, the Exchange does not believe that FIDS would have any
competitive advantage because it would charge for connectivity only,
not the Proposed Third Party System or Proposed Third Party Data Feed
itself. All Users that connect to a Proposed Third Party System or
Proposed Third Party Data Feed, whether they elect to connect using the
Exchange's proposed service or not, would have to pay a third party for
the Proposed Third Party System or Proposed Third Party Data Feed.
Nor does the Exchange believe that FIDS has a competitive advantage
over any third-party competitors offering access to the Proposed Third
Party Systems or connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data Feeds by
virtue of the fact that ICE owns and operates the MDC's meet-me-rooms.
Users purchasing Access or Connectivity--like Users of any other
colocation service--would require a circuit connecting out of the MDC,
and in most cases, such circuits are provided by third-party Telecoms.
Currently, 17 Telecoms operate in the meet-me-rooms and provide a
variety of circuit choices. It is in the Exchange's best interest to
set the fees that Telecoms pay to operate in the meet-me-rooms at a
reasonable level \28\ so that market participants, including Telecoms,
will maximize their use of the MDC. By setting the meet-me-room fees at
a reasonable level, the Exchange encourages Telecoms to participate in
the meet-me-rooms and to sell circuits to Users for connecting into and
out of the MDC. These Telecoms then compete with each other by pricing
such circuits at competitive rates. These competitive rates for
circuits help draw in more Users and Hosted Customers to the MDC, which
directly benefits the Exchange by increasing the customer base to whom
the Exchange can sell its colocation services, which include cabinets,
power, ports, and connectivity to many third-party data feeds, and
because having more Users and Hosted Customers leads, in many cases, to
greater participation on the Exchange. In this way, by setting the
meet-me-room fees at a level attractive to telecommunications firms,
the Exchange spurs demand for all of the services it sells at the MDC,
while setting the meet-me-room fees too high would negatively affect
the Exchange's ability to sell its services at the MDC.\29\
Accordingly, there are real constraints on the meet-me-room fees the
Exchange charges, such that the Exchange does not have an advantage in
terms of costs when compared to third parties that enter the MDC
through the meet-me-rooms to provide services to compete with the
Exchange's services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See MMR Notice, supra note 24.
\29\ See supra note 25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If anything, the Exchange would be subject to a competitive
disadvantage vis-[agrave]-vis Users regarding access to the Proposed
Third Party Systems or connectivity to the Proposed Third Party Data
Feeds. Users that choose to independently establish access or
connectivity may negotiate terms with the Telecoms or other Users
through whom such access and connectivity is delivered, in response to
competitive forces. Such prices are not required to be filed by any
party with the Commission. In contrast, the Exchange's service and
pricing would be standardized as set out in this filing, and the
Exchange would be unable to respond to pricing pressure from its
competitors without seeking a formal fee change in a filing before the
Commission.
The changes would not put any market participants at a relative
disadvantage compared to other market participants or penalize one or
more categories of market participants in a manner that would impose an
undue burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \30\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\31\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\32\ 17 CFR 240.19b-(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such
[[Page 12257]]
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \33\ of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4a6a1b8b1f9b7bbb9b9b1baa0a794a7b1b7fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0775726b622a64686a6a626973744774626429606871">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-NYSENAT-2026-04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSENAT-2026-04. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions
should refer to file number SR-NYSENAT-2026-04 and should be submitted
on or before April 2, 2026.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-04804 Filed 3-11-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 12, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.