Proposed Rule2026-04798

Guidance on Tax-Exempt Refunding Bonds

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 12, 2026

Issuing agencies

Treasury DepartmentInternal Revenue Service

Abstract

This document contains proposed regulations that would update certain arbitrage rules and definitions applicable to tax-exempt and other tax-advantaged bonds by clarifying the time and manner for requesting refunds of overpayment of rebate to the United States, the special transition rule for transferred proceeds, the limitation on allocations to expenditures, and the IRS address for filing defeasance notices. These proposed regulations would also revise the provision addressing certain perpetual State guarantee funds, the definition of tax-exempt bond, and the definition of refunding issue. The proposed regulations would affect issuers of tax-advantaged bonds.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12118-12123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-04798]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-117298-21]
RIN 1545-BQ20


Guidance on Tax-Exempt Refunding Bonds

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that would update 
certain arbitrage rules and definitions applicable to tax-exempt and 
other tax-advantaged bonds by clarifying the time and manner for 
requesting refunds of overpayment of rebate to the United States, the 
special transition rule for transferred proceeds, the limitation on 
allocations to expenditures, and the IRS address for filing defeasance 
notices. These proposed regulations would also revise the provision 
addressing certain perpetual State guarantee funds, the definition of 
tax-exempt bond, and the definition of refunding issue. The proposed 
regulations would affect issuers of tax-advantaged bonds.

DATES: Electronic or written comments and requests for a public hearing 
must be received by May 11, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments 
electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> (indicate IRS and REG-117298-21) by following the 
online instructions for submitting comments. Requests for a public 
hearing must be submitted as prescribed in the ``Comments and Requests 
for a Public Hearing'' section. Once submitted to the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The 
Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS will 
publish for public availability any comment submitted to the IRS's 
public docket. Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:01:PR (REG-117298-21), 
Room 5503, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin 
Station, Washington, DC 20044.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations, 
Brian Choi of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial 
Institutions and Products), (202) 317-3154 (not a toll-free number); 
concerning submission of comments or request for a public hearing, 
Publications and Regulations Section at (202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free 
number) or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4a4a1b6b8bdb7bcb1b5a6bdbab3a794bda6a7fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3a3a6b1bfbab0bbb6b2a1babdb4a093baa1a0fdb4bca5">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> (preferred).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority

    This document contains proposed regulations under sections 148 and 
150 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) that would amend the Income Tax 
Regulations (26 CFR part 1). Section 148(i) provides an express 
delegation of authority for the Secretary of the Treasury or the 
Secretary's delegate (Secretary) to prescribe such regulations as may 
be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of section 148. 
The proposed regulations are also issued under the express delegation 
of authority under section 7805(a) of the Code, which authorizes the 
Secretary to ``prescribe all needful rules and regulations for the 
enforcement of [the Code], including all rules and regulations as may 
be necessary by reason of any alteration of law in relation to internal 
revenue.''

Background

    On June 18, 1993, the Treasury Department and the IRS published 
comprehensive final regulations (TD 8476) in the Federal Register (58 
FR 33510) on the arbitrage investment restrictions and related 
provisions for bonds the interest on which is exempt from Federal 
income tax under section 103 of the Code (tax-exempt bonds). The 1993 
final regulations have been amended in certain limited respects and, as 
amended, are referred to as the ``existing regulations'' in this 
preamble.
    The exclusion from gross income under section 103 of the interest 
on a State or local bond does not extend to an arbitrage bond. Section 
148 defines an ``arbitrage bond'' and generally prohibits the 
investment of tax-exempt bond proceeds in investments producing a yield 
that is materially higher than the yield on the bond issue. See section 
148(a) through (e) and (g). The rules related to this prohibition 
commonly are referred to as the ``yield restriction rules.'' In 
situations in which higher yielding investments of bond proceeds are 
permitted, section 148(f) provides, with certain exceptions, that bonds 
of an issue will be treated as arbitrage bonds and therefore not tax-
exempt, unless the issuer rebates to the United States at specific 
intervals the yield on investments that is in excess of the yield on 
the issue. The rules related to this provision are commonly referred to 
as the ``rebate rules.'' Failure to meet the requirements of either of 
these sets of rules results in the bonds of an issue being arbitrage 
bonds under section 148.

Explanation of Provisions

    These proposed regulations would update the existing regulations to 
reflect a statutory change, clarify aspects of the existing 
regulations, and provide rules for situations not addressed in the 
existing regulations.

1. Section 1.148-2 Removal of Provision Regarding 150 Percent Debt 
Service Limitation

    The Tax Reduction Act of 1997, Public Law 105-34, section 1443, 111 
Stat. 787, 1054 (1997), amended section 148(d), which provides special 
arbitrage rules for reasonably required reserve or replacement funds 
applicable to tax-exempt bonds, by striking section 148(d)(3) (former 
section 148(d)(3)), which had imposed a limitation on investment in 
``nonpurpose investments'' applicable to bonds issued on or before 
August 5, 1997. These proposed regulations would remove existing Sec.  
1.148-2(f)(2)(iv), which relates to former section 148(d)(3).

2. Section 1.148-3 Amendment to Rules for Recovery of Overpayments of 
Rebate

    Section 1.148-3(i)(1) of the existing regulations provides that, in 
general, an

[[Page 12119]]

issuer may recover an overpayment for an issue of tax-exempt bonds by 
establishing to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Internal 
Revenue that the overpayment occurred. An overpayment is the excess of 
the amount paid to the United States for an issue under section 148 
over the sum of the ``rebate amount'' for the issue (as defined in 
existing Sec. Sec.  1.148-1(b) and 1.148-3(b)) as of the most recent 
``computation date'' (as defined in existing Sec.  1.148-3(e)) and all 
amounts that are otherwise required to be paid under section 148 as of 
the date the recovery is requested by the issuer. These amounts include 
overpayments of arbitrage rebates, penalties in lieu of arbitrage 
rebates, and yield reduction payments.
    Existing Sec.  1.148-3(i)(3)(i) provides that an issuer must 
request a refund of an overpayment (claim) no later than the date that 
is two years after the final computation date for the issue to which 
the overpayment relates (filing deadline). Existing Sec.  1.148-3(e)(2) 
provides that the final computation date generally is the date that an 
issue is discharged (for example, retired at maturity or redeemed 
earlier). Existing Sec.  1.148-3(g) provides that each rebate payment 
must be paid no later than 60 days after the computation date to which 
the payment relates.
    In certain circumstances involving payments to the United States 
made under section 148 after the final computation date, the filing 
deadline in the existing regulations may not provide an adequate 
opportunity for issuers of tax-advantaged bonds to recover such 
overpayments. Rev. Proc. 2024-37, 2024-41 I.R.B. 755 (October 7, 2024), 
extended the time for filing claims to ensure that issuers have a 
reasonable opportunity to recover overpayments made both before and 
after the final computation date. Section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2024-37 
provides that an issuer must file a claim with respect to an issue of 
bonds no later than two years after (1) the date that is 60 days after 
the final computation date of the issue to which the payment relates; 
or (2) with respect to the portion of the overpayment paid more than 60 
days after the final computation date, the date that the payment was 
made to the United States. These proposed regulations would amend 
existing Sec.  1.148-3(i)(3)(i) to reflect the revised filing deadline 
provided in Rev. Proc. 2024-37.

3. Section 1.148-5 Amendment to the Special Transition Rule for 
Transferred Proceeds

    Existing Sec.  1.148-5 provides rules for computing the yield and 
value of investments allocated to an issue for various purposes under 
section 148. See existing Sec.  1.148-5(a). In general, under existing 
Sec.  1.148-5(d)(1), the value of an investment on a date must be 
determined consistently for all purposes of section 148 on that date 
using one of three valuation methods: (1) outstanding principal amount 
plus accrued unpaid interest for a plain par investment; (2) present 
value for a fixed rate investment; or (3) fair market value for any 
investment. In certain instances, existing Sec.  1.148-5(d)(2) and (3) 
require investments to be valued at present value or fair market value.
    Existing Sec.  1.150-1(d) defines a ``refunding issue'' generally 
to mean an issue of obligations the proceeds of which are used to pay 
principal, interest, or redemption price on another issue, provided the 
obligor of one issue is also the obligor of the other issue or a 
related party (as defined in existing Sec.  1.150-1(b)) with respect to 
the obligor of the other issue. Pursuant to existing Sec.  1.148-
9(b)(1), when proceeds of a refunding issue discharge any of the 
outstanding principal of a prior issue, proceeds of the prior issue 
become transferred proceeds of the refunding issue and cease to be 
proceeds of the prior issue. Under existing Sec.  1.148-9(c)(1)(ii), 
when proceeds of a prior issue become transferred proceeds of a 
refunding issue, investments (and the related payments and receipts) of 
proceeds of the prior issue are allocated to the transferred proceeds. 
Existing Sec.  1.148-5(d)(4) provides that the value of a ``nonpurpose 
investment'' (defined in existing Sec.  1.148-1(b)) that is allocated 
to transferred proceeds of a refunding issue on a transfer date may not 
exceed the value of that investment on the transfer date used for 
purposes of applying the arbitrage restrictions to the refunded issue.
    Questions have been raised about the meaning of the phrase 
``arbitrage restrictions'' in existing Sec.  1.148-5(d)(4), which the 
existing regulations do not define. Some issuers have interpreted that 
phrase to refer only to the yield restriction rules and not to the 
rebate rules. The Treasury Department and the IRS disagree with such an 
interpretation. If this special rule for transferred proceeds is not 
applied for all purposes of section 148, an issuer could, for example, 
avoid rebating excess investment yield by refunding the bonds and using 
a different valuation method for investments than was used in 
determining rebate for the prior issue. Proposed Sec.  1.148-5(d)(4) 
would clarify that the limit under this special transition rule for 
transferred proceeds is the value of that investment on the transfer 
date used for all purposes of applying section 148 to the refunded 
issue.

4. Section 1.148-6 Amendment to Allocation to Expenditures

    Existing Sec.  1.148-6(d)(1)(i) provides reasonable accounting 
methods for allocating funds from different sources to expenditures for 
the same governmental purpose. Existing Sec.  1.148-6(d)(1)(ii) 
provides that an allocation of gross proceeds of an issue to an 
expenditure must involve a current outlay of cash for a governmental 
purpose of the issue. A ``current outlay of cash'' means an outlay 
reasonably expected to occur not later than five banking days after the 
date as of which the allocation of gross proceeds to the expenditure is 
made. Existing Sec.  1.148-6(d)(1)(iii) generally requires the issuer 
to account for the allocation of proceeds to expenditures not later 
than 18 months after the later of the date the expenditure is paid or 
the date the project, if any, that is financed by the issue is placed 
in service. This allocation must be made in any event by the date 60 
days after the fifth anniversary of the issue date or the date 60 days 
after the retirement of the issue, if earlier.
    There have been questions about whether an issuer can allocate from 
a source of funds that the issuer receives after the cash outlay but 
before the deadline to account for its allocations. These questions 
evidence a confusion between the period allowed for making allocations 
(the timing rule in existing Sec.  1.148-6(d)(1)(iii)) and the date as 
of which the allocation to the expenditure is made under the current 
outlay of cash requirement in existing Sec.  1.148-6(d)(1)(ii). The 
timing rule allows an issuer an extended period in which to do its 
accounting for expenditures of gross proceeds; this rule does not 
change the sources of funds that an issuer had available on the 
reasonably expected date of the cash outlay. Proposed Sec.  1.148-
6(d)(1)(ii) would eliminate this confusion by clarifying that to 
allocate funds from a specific source to an expenditure, those funds 
must be held by or on behalf of the issuer on the date of the cash 
outlay.

[[Page 12120]]

5. Section 1.148-11 Amendment to Transition Rule for Certain State 
Guarantee Funds

    Existing Sec.  1.148-11(d)(1) provides a rule that allows certain 
State perpetual trust funds (for example, certain State permanent 
school funds) to pledge funds to guarantee tax-exempt bonds without 
resulting in arbitrage-restricted replacement proceeds. The demand for 
public school bond guarantees continues to grow as student populations 
expand and existing school buildings age. As a result, certain State 
perpetual trust funds were approaching the limited capacity under 
existing Sec.  1.148-11(d)(1) to provide such guarantees without 
resulting in arbitrage-restricted replacement proceeds. In Notice 2023-
39, 2023-22 I.R.B. 877 (May 30, 2023), the Treasury Department and the 
IRS stated their intent to propose regulations to revise the 
determination of the amount of tax-exempt bonds that such funds could 
guarantee under this special rule and requested comments on the interim 
guidance set forth in the Notice. The comments received supported the 
revision to the regulations. Accordingly, proposed Sec.  1.148-
11(d)(1)(i) would include this proposed change and would revise the 
cross-reference in Sec.  1.148-11(d)(1)(i)(E) by substituting 
paragraphs (d)(1)(i)(A) through (d)(1)(i)(C) for paragraphs (d)(1)(i) 
through (d)(1)(iii).

6. Section 1.150-1 Amendments to Definitions

a. Amendment to the Definition of Tax-Exempt Bond
    Existing Sec.  1.150-1(b) defines ``tax-exempt bond'' to mean any 
bond the interest on which is excludable from gross income under 
section 103(a). For purposes of section 148, the definition also 
includes a certificate of indebtedness issued by the United States 
Treasury pursuant to the Demand Deposit State and Local Government 
Series program described in 31 CFR part 344 (the SLGS regulations). 
Existing Sec.  1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(E) defines ``eligible tax-exempt 
bonds'' for purposes of the safe harbor for longer-term working capital 
financings in existing Sec.  1.148-1(c)(4)(ii). This definition 
similarly includes a certificate of indebtedness issued pursuant to the 
Demand Deposit State and Local Government Series program described in 
the SLGS regulations.
    Section 344.7(b) of the SLGS regulations provides that at any time 
the Secretary determines that issuance of obligations sufficient to 
conduct the orderly financing operations of the United States cannot be 
made without exceeding the statutory debt limit, the Bureau of the 
Fiscal Service may invest any unredeemed Demand Deposit securities in 
special 90-day certificates of indebtedness. When regular Treasury 
borrowing operations resume, the special 90-day certificates of 
indebtedness, along with accrued interest, are reinvested in Demand 
Deposit securities. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined 
that the involuntary conversion of a Demand Deposit security into 
special 90-day certificates of indebtedness during a debt limit 
contingency may lead to a failure to comply with the rules under 
section 148, such as the yield restriction rules, which would result in 
an arbitrage bond. To address this situation, proposed Sec.  1.150-
1(b)(2) would add the special 90-day certificate of indebtedness to the 
definition of tax-exempt bond for purposes of section 148. Proposed 
Sec.  1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(E)(3) similarly would amend the safe harbor for 
longer-term working capital financings to add the special 90-day 
certificate of indebtedness to the definition of eligible tax-exempt 
bonds.
b. Amendment to the Definition of Refunding Issue
    Existing Sec.  1.150-1(d) defines a ``refunding issue'' generally 
to mean an issue of obligations the proceeds of which are used to pay 
principal, interest, or redemption price on another issue, provided the 
obligor of one issue is also the obligor of the other issue or a 
related party with respect to the obligor of the other issue.
    For this purpose, if proceeds are used to finance a purpose 
investment (as defined in existing Sec.  1.148-1(b)), the obligor means 
the conduit borrower of the purpose investment rather than the actual 
issuer of the bonds, except that, for qualified mortgage loans, 
qualified student loans, and similar program investments (as defined in 
existing Sec.  1.148-1), the obligor does not include the ultimate 
recipients of the loans (for example, the homeowner or the student). 
Existing Sec.  1.150-1(d)(2)(iii) provides, with one exception, that 
the use of the proceeds of an issue that refunds a purpose investment 
by the actual issuer of the conduit financing issue determines whether 
that issue is also a refunding of the issue that originally financed 
the purpose investment. Existing Sec.  1.150-1 does not provide a 
definition of ``proceeds'' for this purpose.
    Questions have arisen regarding the determination of whether an 
issue that is used to refinance qualified student loans is a refunding 
issue. Issuers have expressed concern that if the borrowers of the 
refinancing loans repay their original loans and the issuer then uses 
the funds to redeem the bonds that financed the original loans, the 
bonds might be treated as refunding bonds and, because this redemption 
would often occur more than 90 days after the issuance of the bonds 
used for refinancing the qualified student loans, potentially treated 
as advance refunding bonds the interest on which would not be exempt 
from Federal income tax. This would prevent issuers from issuing tax-
exempt bonds to refinance the qualified student loans of their existing 
borrowers. In Notice 2024-32, 2024-16 I.R.B. 897 (April 15, 2024), the 
Treasury Department and the IRS provided that an issue is not a 
refunding issue to the extent that the actual issuer reasonably expects 
as of the issue date of the issue to use net proceeds of the issue 
within two years of the issue date to refinance one or more obligations 
that are qualified student loans. Proposed Sec.  1.150-1(d)(2)(iii)(C) 
would add this provision to the special rules for purpose investments. 
This special rule would apply even if the actual issuer's ultimate use 
of the proceeds lent to the borrowers is the payment of principal, 
interest, or redemption price on another issue.
    Another question that has arisen concerns whether the use of 
investment proceeds from the repayments of qualified student loans or 
qualified mortgage loans allocated to one issue to redeem bonds of 
another issue, a practice sometimes referred to as ``cross-calling,'' 
results in bonds of the former issue being treated as taxable advance 
refunding bonds. An issuer engaged in cross-calling first uses proceeds 
of the issue to make qualified student loans or qualified mortgage 
loans and then uses the repayments of the loans to redeem bonds, 
generally selecting bonds with the highest interest rates. In Notice 
2024-32, the Treasury Department and the IRS defined ``proceeds'' for 
purposes of determining whether an issue is a refunding issue to 
include any sales proceeds, investment proceeds, or transferred 
proceeds (all as defined in existing Sec.  1.148-1(b)), but the 
definition expressly excludes investment proceeds (or transferred 
proceeds allocable to investment proceeds) received from investing in a 
qualified student loan or qualified mortgage loan. Proposed Sec.  
1.150-1(d)(6) would add this definition.

[[Page 12121]]

7. Section 1.150-5 Amending the Address for Filing Notices and 
Elections

    Existing Sec.  1.150-5(a) provides that certain notices and 
elections must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW, Attention: T:GE:TEB:O, Washington, DC 20024 or 
such other place designated by publication of a notice in the Internal 
Revenue Bulletin. The address specified in the existing regulations is 
outdated, and the use of this outdated address is inefficient because 
it delays appropriate routing of the notices and elections. Proposed 
Sec.  1.150-5(a) would delete the specified address and expand the 
options for publication of the address to include any publication in 
the Internal Revenue Bulletin or on the IRS website, such as at <a href="https://www.irs.gov/bondsmailing">https://www.irs.gov/bondsmailing</a> or a successor IRS web page. These revisions 
will increase efficiency by facilitating the timely receipt of the 
filings by the IRS and permit the IRS to more efficiently publish any 
address changes for the filings of the specified notices and elections.

Proposed Applicability Dates

    In general, the proposed regulations are proposed to apply to bonds 
sold on or after the date 90 days after the date of publication of 
final regulations in the Federal Register. However, the removal of 
existing Sec.  1.148-2(f)(2)(iv) is proposed to apply as of the date of 
publication of final regulations in the Federal Register. Proposed 
Sec.  1.148-3(i)(3)(i) is proposed to apply to claims arising from an 
issue of bonds to which Sec.  1.148-3(i) will apply and that are filed 
with the IRS on or after the date of publication of final regulations 
in the Federal Register. Proposed Sec.  1.150-5(a) is proposed to apply 
to notices and elections filed after the date 30 days after the date of 
publication of final regulations in the Federal Register. Issuers of 
tax advantaged bonds may rely on proposed Sec.  1.150-1(b)(2), which 
would add the special 90-day certificate of indebtedness to the 
definition of tax-exempt bond for purposes of section 148, and proposed 
Sec.  1.148-1(c)(4)(ii)(E)(3), which would amend the safe harbor for 
longer-term working capital financings to add the special 90-day 
certificate of indebtedness to the definition of eligible tax-exempt 
bonds, prior to the applicability date of the final regulations.

Special Analyses

I. Regulatory Planning and Review

    These proposed regulations are not subject to review under section 
6(b) of Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement 
(July 4, 2025) between the Treasury Department and the Office of 
Management and Budget regarding review of tax regulations.
    The Executive Order 14192 designation for this proposed rule, if 
finalized, is expected to be deregulatory.

II. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it 
is hereby certified that these proposed regulations would not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The proposed regulations would affect State and local governments that 
issue tax-exempt bonds. States are not considered small entities for 
purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, but small governmental 
jurisdictions (jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000) are 
considered small entities. The Treasury Department and the IRS do not 
have data on how many small governmental jurisdictions may be affected 
by these proposed regulations, but it may be a substantial number. Even 
if a substantial number of small entities were affected, the economic 
impact of these regulations would not be significant. These proposed 
regulations would clarify existing final regulations, incorporate a 
statutory change and integrate guidance published in Rev. Proc. 2024-
37, Notice 2023-39, and Notice 2024-32. Therefore, these proposed 
regulations would not create significant additional obligations for, or 
impose any meaningful economic impact on, a substantial number of small 
entities. Accordingly, the Secretary certifies that the proposed 
regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities and a regulatory flexibility 
analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not required.

III. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) 
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take 
certain other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any 
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a 
State, local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private 
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for 
inflation. These proposed rules do not include any Federal mandate that 
may result in expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments, or 
by the private sector in excess of that threshold.

IV. Submission to the Small Business Administration

    Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these proposed regulations 
have been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business.

V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency 
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule 
either imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State and local 
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts State law, 
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of 
section 6 of the Executive order. These proposed regulations do not 
have federalism implications and do not impose substantial direct 
compliance costs on State and local governments or preempt State law 
within the meaning of the Executive order.

Comments and Requests for Public Hearing

    Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations, 
consideration will be given to any comments that are submitted timely 
to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the ADDRESSES heading. 
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of 
the proposed regulations. Any comments submitted will be made available 
at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or upon request. A public hearing will 
be scheduled if requested in writing by any person who timely submits 
electronic or written comments. Requests for a public hearing are 
encouraged to be made electronically. If a public hearing is scheduled, 
notice of the date, time, and place for the hearing will be published 
in the Federal Register.

Availability of IRS Documents

    The IRS Revenue Procedure and Notices cited in this preamble are 
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and available from the 
Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, 
Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website at <a href="https://www.irs.gov">https://www.irs.gov</a>.

Drafting Information

    The principal authors of these regulations are Brian Choi and Zoran 
Stojanovic of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial 
Institutions and Products). However, other personnel from the Treasury 
Department and the IRS participated in their development.

[[Page 12122]]

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Proposed Amendments to the Regulations

    Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS propose to amend 
26 CFR part 1 as follows:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
* * * * *
    Section 1.148-0 through 1.148-11 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 
148(i).
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.148-0 is amended, in paragraph (c), in the table of 
contents for Sec.  1.148-11, by revising the section heading for Sec.  
1.148-11 and adding entries for Sec.  1.148-11(o) and (p) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  1.148-0   Scope and table of contents.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *


Sec.  1.148-11  Applicability dates.

* * * * *
    (o) Certain clarifying amendments.
    (p) Removal of Sec.  1.148-2(f)(2)(iv).
0
Par. 3. Section 1.148-1 is amended by revising paragraph 
(c)(4)(ii)(E)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  1.148-1   Definitions and elections.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (E) * * *
    (3) A certificate of indebtedness, including a special 90-day 
certificate of indebtedness, issued by the United States Treasury 
pursuant to the Demand Deposit State and Local Government Series 
program described in 31 CFR part 344.
* * * * *


Sec.  1.148-2   [Amended]

0
Par. 4. Section 1.148-2 is amended by removing paragraph (f)(2)(iv).
0
Par. 5. Section 1.148-3 is amended by revising paragraph (i)(3)(i) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  1.148-3   General arbitrage rebate rules.

* * * * *
    (i) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) An issuer must request a refund of an overpayment (claim) using 
the form provided by the Commissioner for this purpose. The claim must 
be made with respect to an issue of bonds no later than the date 
(filing deadline) that is two years after--
    (A) The date that is 60 days after the final computation date of 
the issue to which the payment relates; or
    (B) With respect to the portion of the overpayment paid more than 
60 days after the final computation date, the date that the payment was 
made to the United States.
* * * * *
0
Par. 6. Section 1.148-5 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(4) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  1.148-5   Yield and valuation of investments.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (4) Special transition rule for transferred proceeds. The value of 
a nonpurpose investment that is allocated to transferred proceeds of a 
refunding issue on a transfer date may not exceed the value of that 
investment on the transfer date used for purposes of applying section 
148 to the refunded issue.
* * * * *
0
Par. 7. Section 1.148-6 is amended by adding a sentence to the end of 
paragraph (d)(1)(ii) to read as follows:


Sec.  1.148-6   General allocation and accounting rules.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) * * * To allocate funds from a specific source to an 
expenditure, those funds must be held by or on behalf of the issuer on 
the date of the cash outlay.
* * * * *
0
Par. 8. Section 1.148-11 is amended by:
0
1. Revising the section heading.
0
2. Revising paragraphs (d)(1)(i)(E) and (F), and (k)(3)(i).
0
3. Adding paragraphs (o) and (p).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:


Sec.  1.148-11   Applicability dates.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) The fund satisfied each of the requirements of paragraphs 
(d)(1)(i)(A) through (C) of this section on August 16, 1986; and
    (F) As of the sale date of the bonds to be guaranteed, the amount 
of the bonds to be guaranteed by the fund plus the then-outstanding 
amount of bonds previously guaranteed by the fund does not exceed a 
total amount equal to 500 percent of the total costs of the assets held 
by the fund.
* * * * *
    (k) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) Section 1.148-3(i)(3)(i) applies to claims arising from an 
issue of bonds to which Sec.  1.148-3(i) applies and that are filed 
with the Internal Revenue Service on or after [the date of publication 
of final regulations in the Federal Register].
* * * * *
    (o) Certain clarifying amendments. Sections 1.148-
1(c)(4)(ii)(E)(3), 1.148-5(d)(4), 1.148-6(d)(1)(ii), and paragraphs 
(d)(1)(i)(E) and (F) of this section apply to bonds sold on or after 
[the date 90 days after the date of publication of final regulations in 
the Federal Register].
    (p) Removal of Sec.  1.148-2(f)(2)(iv). The removal of Sec.  1.148-
2(f)(2)(iv) applies as of [the date of publication of final regulations 
in the Federal Register].
0
Par. 9. Section 1.150-1 is amended by:
0
1. Adding paragraph (a)(5).
0
2. In paragraph (b), revising the definition of Tax-exempt bond.
0
3. Revising paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2)(iii)(A).
0
4. Redesignating paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(C) as paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(D).
0
5. Adding new paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(C) and paragraph (d)(6).
    The additions and revisions read as follows:


Sec.  1.150-1   Definitions.

    (a) * * *
    (5) Applicability date for special rules for purpose investments 
and definition of proceeds. The definition of tax-exempt bond in 
paragraph (b) of this section and paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2)(iii)(A) and 
(C), and (d)(6) of this section apply to bonds sold on or after [the 
date 90 days after the date of publication of final regulations in the 
Federal Register].
    (b) * * *
    Tax-exempt bond means any bond the interest on which is excludable 
from gross income under section 103(a). For purposes of section 148, 
tax-exempt bond includes:
    (1) An interest in a regulated investment company to the extent 
that at least 95 percent of the income to the holder of the interest is 
interest that is excludable from gross income under section 103; and
    (2) A certificate of indebtedness, including a special 90-day 
certificate of indebtedness, issued by the United States Treasury 
pursuant to the Demand Deposit State and Local Government

[[Page 12123]]

Series program described in 31 CFR part 344.
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) General definition of refunding issue. Refunding issue means an 
issue of obligations the proceeds (as defined in paragraph (d)(6) of 
this section) of which are used to pay principal, interest, or 
redemption price on another issue (a prior issue, as more particularly 
defined in paragraph (d)(5) of this section), including the issuance 
costs, accrued interest, capitalized interest on the refunding issue, a 
reserve or replacement fund, or similar costs, if any, properly 
allocable to that refunding issue.
    (2) * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (A) Refunding of a conduit financing issue by a conduit loan 
refunding issue. Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2)(iii)(B) and 
(C) of this section, the use of the proceeds of an issue that is used 
to refund an obligation that is a purpose investment (a conduit 
refunding issue) by the actual issuer of the conduit financing issue 
determines whether the conduit refunding issue is a refunding of the 
conduit financing issue (in addition to a refunding of the obligation 
that is the purpose investment).
* * * * *
    (C) Issue used to refinance qualified student loans. An issue is 
not a refunding issue to the extent that the actual issuer reasonably 
expects as of the issue date of the issue to use net proceeds of the 
issue within two years of the issue date to refinance one or more 
obligations that are qualified student loans (as defined in paragraph 
(b) of this section).
* * * * *
    (6) Definition of proceeds. For purposes of this paragraph (d), 
proceeds means any sale proceeds, investment proceeds, or transferred 
proceeds (all as defined in Sec.  1.148-1(b)), except that proceeds 
does not include investment proceeds (or transferred proceeds allocable 
to investment proceeds) received from investing in a qualified mortgage 
loan or a qualified student loan.
* * * * *
0
Par. 10. Section 1.150-5 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  1.150-5   Filing notices and elections.

    (a) In general. Notices and elections under the following sections 
must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service at such place 
designated by guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see 
Sec.  601.601(d) of this chapter) or on the IRS website (<a href="https://www.irs.gov">https://www.irs.gov</a>)--
    (1) Section 1.141-12(d)(4);
    (2) Section 1.142(f)(4)-1; and
    (3) Section 1.142-2(c)(2).
    (b) Applicability date. This section applies to notices and 
elections filed on or after [the date 30 days after the date of 
publication of final regulations in the Federal Register].

Frank J. Bisignano,
Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 2026-04798 Filed 3-11-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4831-GV-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 12, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.