Notice2026-04710

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 11, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 47 (Wednesday, March 11, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 47 (Wednesday, March 11, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12035-12038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-04710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104942; File No. SR-IEX-2026-07]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify 
IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)

March 6, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on February 24, 2026, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' 
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 
II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,\4\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ IEX is filing with the Commission a 
proposed rule change to provide Users a new order handling option they 
can apply to Discretionary Limit orders they submit to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
website at <a href="https://www.iexexchange.io/resources/regulation/rule-filings">https://www.iexexchange.io/resources/regulation/rule-filings</a> 
and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
most significant aspects of such statements.

[[Page 12036]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule filing is to amend IEX Rule 
11.190(b)(7) to add a new optional order handling instruction for 
Discretionary Limit \6\ (``D-Limit'') orders. Currently if the System 
\7\ receives a D-Limit buy (sell) order during a period of ``quote 
instability'',\8\ and the D-Limit order has a limit price equal to or 
higher (lower) than the quote instability determination price level 
(``CQI Price''), the price of the order will be automatically adjusted 
by the System to one (1) minimum price variation (``MPV'') \9\ lower 
(higher) than the CQI Price.\10\ Under this proposal, a User \11\ would 
have the option of either: (i) having the order post to the Order Book 
\12\ at its limit price or execute on entry against eligible resting 
interest on the Order Book; or (ii) selecting an order handling 
instruction to allow the D-Limit order to be price adjusted as 
described above.\13\ In either case, if the D-Limit order posts to the 
Order Book, and the System makes another quote instability 
determination, the order will be subject to automatic price adjustment 
like any other resting D-Limit buy (sell) order (i.e., if the order has 
a price equal to or higher (lower) than the CQI Price, it will be 
automatically adjusted by the System to a price one MPV lower (higher) 
than the CQI Price).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7).
    \7\ See IEX Rule 1.160(nn).
    \8\ See IEX Rule 11.190(g)(1) (detailing the functionality of 
the crumbling quote indicator (``CQI'') which assesses a quote's 
instability).
    \9\ See IEX Rule 11.210.
    \10\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(A) and (B).
    \11\ See IEX Rule 1.160(qq). Users include both Members and 
Sponsored Participants, see IEX Rule 1.160(ll), but the terms 
``Member'' and ``User'' are used interchangeably in this filing.
    \12\ See IEX Rule 1.160(p).
    \13\ The default order handling for incoming D-Limit orders will 
be option (1) as described above. Users can submit this optional 
order handling instruction at both the order and session level.
    \14\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(C) and (D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    A D-Limit order may be a displayed or non-displayed limit order 
that upon entry and when posting to the Order Book is priced to be 
equal to and ranked at the order's limit price, but will be 
automatically adjusted by the System to a price one MPV lower (higher) 
than the CQI Price during periods of quote instability (i.e., when the 
CQI is ``on'').\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(A)-(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, if the CQI is ``on'' when the System receives a 
D-Limit buy (sell) order with a limit price equal to or higher (lower) 
than the CQI Price, the price of the order will be automatically 
adjusted by the System to one MPV lower (higher) than the CQI 
Price.\16\ Similarly, when unexecuted shares of a D-Limit buy (sell) 
order are posted to the Order Book, if a quote instability 
determination is made and such shares are ranked and displayed (in the 
case of a displayed order) by the System at a price equal to or higher 
(lower) than the CQI Price, the price of the order will be 
automatically adjusted by the System to a price one MPV lower (higher) 
than the CQI Price.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(A) and (B).
    \17\ See IEX Rule 11.190(b)(7)(C) and (D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal
    Unless otherwise instructed by the User, a D-Limit order that 
arrives when a quote instability determination is in effect will not be 
subject to a price adjustment, as described below. Specifically, an 
incoming D-Limit buy (sell) order with a limit price equal to or higher 
(lower) than the CQI Price, which arrives during a period of quote 
instability, would not be automatically price adjusted to one minimum 
price variation (MPV) lower (higher) than the CQI price, unless the 
User has selected that order handling instruction.
    Nothing in this proposal changes the core functionality of a D-
Limit order, i.e., the manner in which the System automatically price 
adjusts D-Limit orders; rather, the proposal is designed to give Users 
more control over the price at which their incoming D-Limit orders book 
or trade. Additionally, IEX is not proposing any changes to how a 
resting D-Limit order to buy (sell) priced equal to or higher (lower) 
than the CQI Price will be automatically adjusted in the event of a 
quote instability determination.
    The proposed change is responsive to informal feedback from Members 
\18\ seeking more flexibility in how their D-Limit orders will function 
on entry. Specifically, IEX understands that some Members would prefer 
that their D-Limit orders not automatically price adjust on entry 
during periods of quote instability, because such Members have entered 
the order with a limit price consistent with their trading objectives 
at that time with the preference that the order either post to the 
Order Book at its limit price or execute against eligible resting 
interest on the Order Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See IEX Rule 1.160(s). As discussed in note 11, supra, the 
terms ``Member'' and ``User'' are used interchangeably in this 
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, IEX designed this limited but targeted optional order 
handling instruction to give Members the flexibility to elect to enter 
D-Limit orders that will not be automatically price-adjusted on entry 
when that better suits their trading objectives.\19\ To effect this 
proposed change, IEX proposes to modify IEX Rules 11.190(b)(7)(A) 
(describing the treatment of buy orders on entry) and 11.190(b)(7)(B) 
(describing the treatment of sell orders on entry) by adding language 
to each of these paragraphs stating that the price adjustment 
functionality only will apply to a D-Limit order on entry if the buy 
(sell) order has a limit price that is equal to or higher (lower) than 
the CQI Price, ``and the order was submitted with an optional 
instruction to allow for price adjustment on entry.'' IEX is proposing 
no other changes to the D-Limit order type.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Implementation
    The Exchange will announce the implementation date of the proposed 
rule change by Trading Alert at least ten days in advance of such 
implementation date and within 90 days of effectiveness of this 
proposed rule change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\20\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\21\ in particular, in that it is 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in 
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest because it is designed 
to provide more flexibility and opportunities for Members to add both 
displayed and non-displayed liquidity to the Exchange. As noted in the 
Purpose section, the proposed rule change is responsive to informal 
feedback from some Members that they do not necessarily wish to have 
their D-Limit orders be price adjusted on entry if they arrive at the 
Exchange while the CQI is ``on.'' In response to this feedback, IEX 
proposes to allow Users the option of either having a D-Limit order be 
subject to price adjustment on

[[Page 12037]]

entry during a period of quote instability or to only be subject to 
price adjustment once the order is posted to the Order Book (and if the 
CQI is ``on'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By providing additional functionality to enable Members to more 
effectively manage D-Limit orders, IEX believes that the proposed rule 
change will promote more use of D-Limit orders, thereby attracting 
additional liquidity to the Exchange, while remaining consistent with 
the purpose of the order type.\22\ To the extent it is successful in 
attracting additional liquidity to the Exchange, this rule proposal 
will benefit all market participants, thereby supporting the purposes 
of the Act to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free 
and open market and a national market system, and in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89686 (August 26, 
2020), 85 FR 54438 (September 1, 2020) (SR-IEX-2019-15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange further believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Act because it would be available to all Members on 
a fair, equal and nondiscriminatory basis regardless of their 
technological sophistication. Moreover, the proposal is designed to 
incentivize the entry of additional D-Limit orders by providing 
flexibility to support Members' ability to manage such orders. To the 
extent that this flexibility incentivizes additional D-Limit orders, 
all market participants will benefit.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest 
because the circumstances under which a D-Limit order will be price 
adjusted are narrowly tailored, transparent, and predictable, as 
described in the Purpose section.
    The proposed functionality would merely allow a Member to have its 
D-Limit order on entry treated in the same manner as a regular limit 
order would be treated on IEX or other exchanges.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See, e.g., IEX Rule 11.190(a)(1); MEMX Rule 11.8(b); NYSE 
Rule 7.31(a)(2); Cboe BZX Rule 11.9(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Exchange does not believe 
that the proposed rule change raises any novel issues not already 
considered by the Commission.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, 
the proposal is designed to enhance IEX's competitiveness with other 
markets by providing additional optional order handling instructions 
for D-Limit users. As discussed in the Purpose section, the proposal is 
designed to incentivize the entry of additional liquidity providing 
orders on IEX by providing flexibility to Members entering D-Limit 
orders with respect to the pricing of such orders on entry. Further, 
IEX believes this proposal will enhance opportunities for price 
discovery and increase the overall displayed (and non-displayed) 
liquidity profile on the Exchange, to the benefit of all market 
participants.
    The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed rule change 
will impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary 
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. All Members 
would be eligible to use the new optional order handling instructions 
for their D-Limit orders or to have their D-Limit orders continue to be 
subject to price adjustment on entry.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has designated this rule filing as non-controversial 
under Section 19(b)(3)(A) \24\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \25\ 
thereunder. Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change meets the 
criteria of subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 \26\ because it would not 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest. Rather, the proposed rule change is designed to benefit 
investors and the public interest by providing enhanced flexibility to 
Members' management of their D-Limit orders if such orders arrive 
during a period of quote instability, as described in the Purpose and 
Statutory Basis sections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    IEX notes (as discussed in the Statutory Basis section) that both 
the D-Limit order type and the standard IEX limit order type were 
approved by the Commission, and this proposed rule change merely allows 
Users to decide if a D-Limit order that arrives during a period of 
quote instability should be posted to the order book or execute against 
resting interest on the Order Book at the order's limit price, in the 
same manner as a regular limit order. Accordingly, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change is noncontroversial and 
satisfies the requirements of Rule 19b-4(f)(6).\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory 
organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to 
file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the 
date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as 
designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this 
requirement.
    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \28\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6614130a034b05090b0b030812152615030548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdcfc8d1d890ded2d0d0d8d3c9cefdced8de93dad2cb">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-IEX-2026-07 on the subject line.

[[Page 12038]]

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-IEX-2026-07. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-IEX-2026-07 and should be submitted on 
or before April 1, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-04710 Filed 3-10-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 11, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.