Notice2026-04697

Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 10, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

On February 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (the Court) issued its final judgment in Export Packers Company Limited v. United States, Court No. 24-00061, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s remand redetermination pertaining to the final scope ruling of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (China). In the underlying scope ruling, Commerce determined that individually quick frozen (IQF) cooked garlic cloves imported by Export Packers Company Limited (Export Packers) were covered by the scope of the order. Commerce is notifying the public that the Court's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final scope ruling, and that Commerce's final scope ruling finds that Export Packers' IQF cooked garlic cloves are outside the scope of the order.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11512-11513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-04697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-831]


Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended 
Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On February 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade 
(the Court) issued its final judgment in Export Packers Company Limited 
v. United States, Court No. 24-00061, sustaining the U.S. Department of

[[Page 11513]]

Commerce (Commerce)'s remand redetermination pertaining to the final 
scope ruling of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the 
People's Republic of China (China). In the underlying scope ruling, 
Commerce determined that individually quick frozen (IQF) cooked garlic 
cloves imported by Export Packers Company Limited (Export Packers) were 
covered by the scope of the order. Commerce is notifying the public 
that the Court's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final 
scope ruling, and that Commerce's final scope ruling finds that Export 
Packers' IQF cooked garlic cloves are outside the scope of the order.

DATES: Applicable March 5, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles DeFilippo or Jacob Saude, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3797 or (202) 
482-0981, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 21, 2024, Commerce issued its Final Scope Ruling 
finding that Export Packers' IQF cooked garlic cloves were covered by 
the scope of the Order.\1\ Export Packers appealed Commerce's Final 
Scope Ruling. On April 18, 2025, the Court remanded the Final Scope 
Ruling to Commerce, holding that: (1) based on its reading of the plain 
language of the scope of the Order, Export Packers' IQF cooked garlic 
cloves are ``clearly prepared by heat processing and physically 
transformed by that process;'' (2) Commerce improperly focused on the 
Trinity and Amexim scope rulings in its analysis pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.225(k)(1), which analyzed blanched garlic, whereas the inquiry 
merchandise is ``cooked'' garlic; (3) Commerce's reliance on the 
Trinity and Amexim scope rulings in its analysis of the inquiry 
merchandise's physical characteristics under 19 CFR 351.225(k)(2) was 
``plainly unreasonable''; and (4) Commerce's remaining analysis of the 
factors listed in 19 CFR 351.225(k)(2) was not supported by substantial 
evidence.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Memorandum, ``Final Scope Ruling on Export Packers' 
Certain Individually Quick Frozen Cooked Garlic Cloves,'' dated 
February 21, 2024 (Final Scope Ruling); see also Antidumping Duty 
Order: Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China, 59 FR 59209 
(November 16, 1994) (Order).
    \2\ See Export Packers Company Limited v. United States, 780 F. 
Supp. 3d 1342 (CIT 2025) (Remand Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its final remand redetermination, issued on December 9, 2025, 
Commerce found, under protest, the Export Packers' IQF cooked garlic 
cloves to be outside the scope of the Order.\3\ On February 23, 2026, 
the Court sustained Commerce's final redetermination.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Export Packers Company Limited v. United States, Court No. 
24-00061, Slip Op. 25-45, dated April 18, 2025 (Final Remand).
    \4\ See Export Packers Company Limited v. United States, Slip 
Op. 26-19 (CIT February 23, 2026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\5\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\6\ 
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant 
to sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in 
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of 
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Court's February 
23, 2026, judgment constitutes a final decision of the Court that is 
not in harmony with Commerce's Final Scope Ruling. Thus, this notice is 
published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \6\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United 
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Scope Ruling

    In accordance with the Court's February 23, 2026, final judgment, 
Commerce is providing notice of its Final Scope Ruling, finding that 
Export Packers' IQF cooked garlic cloves are outside the scope of the 
Order.

Liquidation of Suspended Entries

    Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
that, pending any appeals, the cash deposit rate will be zero percent 
for entries of IQF cooked garlic cloves imported by Export Packers. In 
the event that the CIT's final judgment is not appealed or is upheld on 
appeal, Commerce will instruct CBP to lift suspension of liquidation of 
such entries, and to liquidate entries of IQF cooked garlic cloves 
imported by Export Packers without regard to antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: March 4, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2026-04697 Filed 3-9-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 10, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.