Notice2026-04676
Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 10, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the companies under review either sold certain steel racks and parts thereof (steel racks) from the People's Republic of China (China) in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024, or do not qualify for a separate rate. Further, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to four companies and preliminarily rescinding this review with respect to one company. Commerce invites interested parties to comment on the preliminary results of this review.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11500-11504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-04676]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-088]
Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that the companies under review either sold certain steel
racks and parts thereof (steel racks) from the People's Republic of
China (China) in the United States at prices below normal value (NV)
during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2023, through August 31,
2024, or do not qualify for a separate rate. Further, Commerce is
rescinding this review with respect to four companies and preliminarily
rescinding this review with respect to one company. Commerce invites
interested parties to comment on the preliminary results of this
review.
[[Page 11501]]
DATES: Applicable March 10, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luke Caruso, AD/CVD Operations, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2081.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 3, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register a
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on steel racks from China.\1\ After receiving
review requests, on October 17, 2024, Commerce initiated this review
with respect to twelve companies.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List, 89 FR 71254 (September
3, 2024); see also Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping
Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; and Countervailing
Duty Order, 84 FR 48584 (September 16, 2019) (Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 83644 (October 17, 2024) (Initiation
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this
administrative review by 90 days.\3\ On August 26, 2025, Commerce
extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this
review by 113 days until December 22, 2025.\4\ Due to the lapse in
appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, on November 14, 2025,
Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by 47
days.\5\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents that were
electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS)
during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce
tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an additional 21
days.\6\ As a result, the deadline for issuing the preliminary results
of this review is March 2, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated August
26, 2025.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated
November 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included in Appendix I. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available
to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain
Steel Racks and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China;
2023-2024,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is steel racks from China. A
full description of the scope of the Order is in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of the Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if all parties who
requested a review withdraw their requests within 90 days of the date
of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review in
the Federal Register. All parties that requested a review of Xiamen
Luckyroc Industry Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Luckyroc); and Nanjing Dongsheng
Shelf Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Dongsheng) timely withdrew their review
requests.\8\ Therefore, consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce
is rescinding this review with respect to Xiamen Luckyroc and
Dongsheng.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Xiamen Luckyroc's Letter, ``Withdraw of Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated December 10, 2024; see also United
Material Handling, Inc.'s Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated January 6, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), Commerce may rescind an
administrative with respect to a particular exporter or producer, if it
concludes that, during the period covered by the review, there were no
suspended entries, exports, or sales of subject merchandise, as the
case may be. Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. (Hebei) and Ningbo Xinguang Rack
Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Xinguang Rack) reported no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR and Commerce found no evidence of suspended
POR entries of their subject merchandise. Commerce notified all
interested parties of its intent to rescind the instant review with
respect to Hebei and Ningbo Xinguang Rack because there were no
reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise from these
companies during the POR.\9\ Commerce invited interested parties to
comment on Commerce's intention to rescind the review with respect to
these companies.\10\ No parties commented on this matter. Therefore,
consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), Commerce is rescinding this
review with respect to Hebei and Ningbo Xinguang Rack. The companies
rescinded from this review with these preliminary results are listed in
Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In
Part,'' dated February 4, 2026; see also Memorandum, ``Release of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Entry Data,'' dated October 28,
2024 (CBP Data Release).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Partial Rescission of the Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to
generally rescind an administrative review of an antidumping duty order
with respect to a company for which Commerce concludes there were no
suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\11\ Normally,
upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are
liquidated at the antidumping duty assessment rate for the review
period.\12\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted,
there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the calculated
antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Rescission of
Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January
24, 2023).
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\13\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States,
380 F.Supp.3d 1328, 1337 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section
751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that
``{w{time} hile the statute does not explicitly require that an
entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to
a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used
as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can
only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended''; see
also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 86 FR 36102 (July 8,
2021), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4;
and Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian
Federation: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that ``for an
administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable,
suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment
rate'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although Nanjing Kingmore Logistics Equipment Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd. (Nanjing Kingmore) claimed that it
[[Page 11502]]
exported subject merchandise during the POR,\14\ there is no record
evidence of a suspended POR entry of subject merchandise from Nanjing
Kingmore.\15\ In the absence of any suspended entries of subject
merchandise from Nanjing Kingmore, we are preliminarily rescinding this
administrative review with respect to Nanjing Kingmore in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Nanjing Kingmore Logistics Equipment Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd.'s (Kingmore) Letters, ``Separate Rate Certification,'' dated
November 18, 2024, and ``Nanjing Kingmore's Separate Rate
Certification Supplemental Questionnaire Response'' dated February
13, 2026.
\15\ See Memoranda, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Entry Data,'' dated October 28, 2024, and ``Re-Release of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Entry Data,'' dated December 6,
2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Commerce calculated constructed export price
in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Further, because China is a
non-market economy (NME) country within the meaning of section 771(18)
of the Act, Commerce calculated NV in accordance with section 773(c) of
the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying the
preliminary results of review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Separate Rates
In all proceedings involving an NME country, Commerce maintains a
rebuttable presumption that all companies are subject to government
control and, thus, should be assessed a single weighted-average dumping
margin with the exception of companies that can affirmatively
demonstrate an absence of government control, both in law (de jure) and
in fact (de facto), with respect to their exports (i.e., can
affirmatively demonstrate that they are eligible for a separate
rate).\16\ Commerce has preliminarily determined that information on
the record by Jiangsu JISE Intelligent Storage Equipment Co., Ltd.
(Jiangsu JISE) and the mandatory respondent, which is a single entity
comprising Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd.,
Nanjing Jinshidai Storage Equipment Co., Ltd., and Hebei Nova
Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd. (collectively Nova),\17\
demonstrates that these companies are eligible for a separate rate.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, and Affirmative Critical Circumstances, In Part: Certain
Lined Paper Products from the People's Republic of China, 71 FR
53079, 53082 (September 8, 2006); see also Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People's Republic of China, 71 FR 29303, 29307 (May
22, 2006).
\17\ See Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 89 FR 82213
(October 10, 2024), unchanged in Certain Steel Racks and Parts
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 90 FR 30629 (July
10, 2025).
\18\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, Nanjing Urgo Logistics Equipment Co (Urgo) has not
demonstrated its eligibility for a separate rate because it did not
file a separate rate application or separate rate certification.
Therefore, Commerce has preliminarily determined that Urgo is
ineligible for a separate rate and is, thus, part of the China-wide
entity and subject to the China-wide entity rate (i.e., 144.50
percent).
The China-Wide Entity
Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide
entity applies to this administrative review.\19\ Under this policy,
the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party
specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the
entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide
entity,\20\ the entity is not under review, and the entity's rate
(i.e., 144.50 percent) \21\ is not subject to change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\20\ The China-wide entity includes Guangdong Xinmiao Storage
Equipment Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Kingmore Storage Equipment
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Starshine Industry Equipment Co.,
Ltd., and Nanjing Peter Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd. The record
shows no suspended POR entries for these companies which did not
have a separate rate during the POR; thus, they remain part of the
China-wide entity.
\21\ See Order, 84 FR at 48585.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rate for Non-Individually Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address what
estimated weighted-average dumping margin to apply to respondents not
selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)
of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act,
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance regarding establishing an estimated
weighted-average dumping margin for respondents that are not
individually examined in an administrative review.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that Commerce will base
the all-others rate in an investigation on the weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the
individually examined respondents, excluding dumping margins that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Where the
weighted-average dumping margins for each of the individually examined
respondents is zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available,
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that Commerce may use ``any
reasonable method'' to establish the estimated all-others rate.
The sole mandatory respondent's (Nova) preliminary estimated
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available. Therefore, we have preliminarily assigned
Jiangsu JISE, the only non-individually examined company eligible for a
separate rate, the estimated weighted-average dumping margin calculated
for Nova, consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period September 1,
2023, through August 31, 2024:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., 73.60
Ltd./Nanjing Jinshidai Storage Equipment Co., Ltd./
Hebei Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 11503]]
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to the Following Non-Examined Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiangsu JISE Intelligent Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. 73.60
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations that it performed in
these preliminary results of review to parties to the proceeding within
five days of any public announcement of these preliminary results or,
if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case
briefs to Commerce no later than 21 days after the date of publication
of this notice.\22\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed no later than seven days after the date for
filing case briefs.\23\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents
listing each issue addressed; and (2) a table of authorities.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we
request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their
briefs a public, executive summary for each issue raised in their
briefs.\25\ Further, we request that interested parties limit their
executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not
including citations. We intend to use the executive summaries as the
basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision
memorandum that we will issue for the final results in this
administrative review. We request that interested parties include
footnotes for relevant citations in the executive summary of each
issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements
pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\26\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written hearing request to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Requests should contain: (1) the requesting party's name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of individuals from the requesting
party that will attend the hearing and whether any of those individuals
is a foreign national; and (3) a list of the issues the party intends
to discuss at the hearing. Issues raised in the hearing by a party will
be limited to those raised in the party's case and rebuttal briefs. An
electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in
its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m.
Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Assessment Rates
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the assessment
of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the review
shall be based on the final results of this review. Therefore, upon
issuance of the final results of review, Commerce will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of
subject merchandise covered by this review.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies listed in Appendix II, for which Commerce is
rescinding this review, Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results of review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Commerce will calculate importer or customer-specific assessment
rates for the individually examined respondent, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1).\28\ Specifically, Commerce will calculate importer
or customer-specific ad valorem assessment rates by dividing the total
amount of dumping calculated in the final results of this review for
all reviewed U.S. sales to the importer/customer by the total entered
value of the merchandise sold to the importer/customer.\29\ Where
either the respondent's ad valorem estimated weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer or customer-specific ad
valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,\30\ Commerce will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ We applied the assessment rate calculation methodology
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
\29\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\30\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to a refinement to Commerce's assessment practice, where
sales of subject merchandise exported by an individually examined
respondent were not reported in the U.S. sales data submitted by the
respondent, but the merchandise was entered into the United States
during the POR, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of
such merchandise at the antidumping duty assessment rate for the China-
wide entity.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full
discussion of this practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject
merchandise exported by companies that are not eligible for a separate
rate and which are therefore considered to be part of the China-wide
entity, at the weighted-average dumping margin for the China-wide
entity, i.e., 144.50 percent.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See Order, 84 FR at 48586.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject
merchandise exported by the companies for which it rescinded the review
at the cash deposit rate required at the time of entry.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be in effect for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on, or after, the date of publication of the notice of
the final results of this administrative review in
[[Page 11504]]
the Federal Register, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) for an exporter granted a separate rate in the final results
of this review, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-
average dumping margin established in the final results of this review
for the exporter (except, if the rate is de minimis, then a cash
deposit rate of zero will be required); (2) for a previously
investigated or reviewed exporter of subject merchandise not under
review that has a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to
be the exporter's existing cash deposit rate; (3) for all China
exporters of subject merchandise that do not have a separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
assigned to the China-wide entity, which is 144.50 percent; and (4) for
a non-China exporter of subject merchandise that does not have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the estimated
weighted-average dumping margin applicable to the China exporter(s)
that supplied that non-China exporter.
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Final Results of Review
Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, which will include the results
of its analysis of issues raised in case and rebuttal briefs, within
120 days of publication of these preliminary results of review in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to
comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the
countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review
in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: March 2, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of Methodology
V. Adjustment Under Section 777(A)(f) of the Act
VI. Adjustment for Countervailable Export Subsidies
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Rescinded From Review
1. Xiamen Luckyroc Industry Co., Ltd.
2. Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3. Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd.
4. Ningbo Xinguang Rack Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2026-04676 Filed 3-9-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 10, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.