Proposed Rule2026-04534

Trump Accounts Contribution Pilot Program

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 9, 2026

Issuing agencies

Treasury DepartmentInternal Revenue Service

Abstract

This document contains proposed regulations relating to the Trump accounts contribution pilot program under which the Trump accounts of eligible children can receive $1,000 pilot program contributions. Eligible children must be U.S. citizens with valid Social Security numbers born in 2025 through 2028. The proposed regulations would provide guidance on making an election for the Trump account of an eligible child to receive a $1,000 pilot program contribution. The proposed regulations would affect eligible children and individuals who would make elections with respect to those children.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 45 (Monday, March 9, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11203-11212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-04534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 301

[REG-117002-25]
RIN 1545-BS00


Trump Accounts Contribution Pilot Program

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations relating to the 
Trump accounts contribution pilot program under which the Trump 
accounts of eligible children can receive $1,000 pilot program 
contributions. Eligible children must be U.S. citizens with valid 
Social Security numbers born in 2025 through 2028. The proposed 
regulations would provide guidance on making an election for the Trump 
account of an eligible child to receive a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution. The proposed regulations would affect eligible children 
and individuals who would make elections with respect to those 
children.

DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing 
must be received by April 8, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments 
electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> (indicate IRS and REG-117002-25) by following the 
online instructions for submitting comments. Requests for a public 
hearing must be submitted as prescribed in the ``Comments and Requests 
for a Public Hearing'' section. Once submitted to the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The 
Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS will 
publish for public availability any comments submitted to the IRS's 
public docket. Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:01:PR (REG-117002-25), 
Room 5503, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin 
Station, Washington, DC 20044.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations, 
Molly E. Lovern at (202) 317-5416; concerning submissions of comments 
or a public hearing, the Publications and Regulations Section at (202) 
317-6901 (not toll-free numbers) or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#611114030d080209040013080f0612210813124f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a0a0f18161319121f1b0813141d093a130809541d150c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> 
(preferred).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority

    This document contains proposed amendments to the Procedure and 
Administration Regulations (26 CFR part 301) to implement section 6434 
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) relating to the Trump accounts 
contribution pilot program. Section 6434(d) authorizes the Secretary of 
the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate (Secretary) to prescribe rules 
for the time and manner for elections under section 6434. The proposed 
regulations are also issued under the authority of section 7805(a) of 
the Code, which authorizes the Secretary to ``prescribe all needful 
rules and regulations for the enforcement of [the Code], including all 
rules and regulations as may be necessary by reason of any alteration 
of law to internal revenue.''

Background

I. Overview

    Section 70204 of Public Law 119-21, 139 Stat. 72 (July 4, 2025), 
commonly known as the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, added new 
sections 530A and 6434 to the Code relating to Trump accounts. Section 
530A of the Code provides for the establishment of a Trump account for 
an eligible individual as defined in section 530A(b)(2) and cross-
references section 6434. Section 6434 provides for a one-time $1,000 
contribution from the Secretary to the Trump account of an eligible 
child with respect to whom an election under section 6434 is made 
($1,000 pilot program contribution).
    These proposed regulations would implement section 6434. The 
Treasury Department and the IRS are proposing regulations under section 
530A in another notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-117270-25) published 
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.

II. Trump Accounts Generally

    A Trump account is a type of traditional individual retirement 
account (IRA) established for the exclusive benefit of an eligible 
individual or the individual's beneficiaries under section 530A. 
Section 530A directs the Secretary to create or organize the first 
Trump account (initial Trump account) for each eligible individual. An 
eligible individual is any individual (i) who has not attained age 18 
before the close of

[[Page 11204]]

the calendar year in which an election to open an initial Trump account 
(initial Trump account election) is made, (ii) for whom a social 
security number has been issued before the date of the initial Trump 
account election, and (iii) for whom the initial Trump account election 
is made.
    A Trump account is subject to certain special rules on 
contributions, investments, distributions, and reporting that are 
inapplicable to other individual retirement arrangements under section 
408 of the Code. After the period beginning when a Trump account is 
established and ending on December 31 of the calendar year in which a 
Trump account beneficiary attains age 17 (growth period), most of the 
special rules no longer apply and the rules under section 408 governing 
traditional IRAs generally apply. During the growth period, a 
subsequent Trump account (rollover Trump account) may be established 
for an individual and must be funded by a trustee-to-trustee transfer 
of the entire account balance from the individual's existing Trump 
account. Because a rollover Trump account must be funded by a qualified 
rollover contribution (which is a transfer of the entire account 
balance from the individual's prior Trump account), an individual may 
only have one Trump account containing funds at a time.
    Unlike contributions to other IRAs, which require an IRA owner to 
have includible compensation, under the special rules applicable during 
the growth period of a Trump account, a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution may be made to the Trump account of a child eligible to 
receive the $1,000 pilot program contribution even if the child does 
not have includible income. Because the criteria under section 530A to 
be an eligible individual for the opening of an initial Trump account 
differ from the criteria under section 6434 to be an eligible child 
whose Trump account may receive a $1,000 pilot program contribution, 
only a portion of the individuals eligible for a Trump account will 
also be eligible to receive a $1,000 pilot program contribution. 
However, a child who is eligible for a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution must have a Trump account in order for the Secretary to 
pay the $1,000 pilot program contribution. A child who does not have a 
Trump account for any reason will not receive a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution, even if such child is otherwise eligible for a $1,000 
pilot program contribution.

III. Trump Accounts Contribution Pilot Program

    In general, section 6434 provides that when an individual makes an 
election with respect to an eligible child of the individual, the 
election results in a one-time, $1,000 pilot program contribution into 
the eligible child's Trump account. The term ``Trump account'' has the 
same definition as in section 530A.
    Section 6434(a) provides that an individual makes an election for 
the Trump accounts contribution pilot program with respect to an 
eligible child of that individual. With such election, the eligible 
child is treated as making a $1,000 payment against the income tax 
liability imposed by subtitle A of the Code for the taxable year for 
which the election is made. Section 6434 does not require that the 
election be made for a particular calendar year. Although the eligible 
child is receiving the benefit of the pilot program election, the 
eligible child does not make the pilot program election.
    Section 6434(b) provides that the same amount of the $1,000 payment 
is paid by the Secretary to the Trump account of the eligible child for 
which the election in section 6434(a) was made ($1,000 pilot program 
contribution). The $1,000 pilot program contribution into the eligible 
child's Trump account therefore cannot occur without an election having 
been made for that child. Section 6434(b) authorizes the Secretary to 
pay the $1,000 pilot program contribution only ``to the Trump account 
with respect to which such eligible child is the account beneficiary.'' 
Pursuant to section 6434(f)(1), a $1,000 pilot program contribution 
made under section 6434 is not subject to reduction or offset by the 
mandatory offsets of subsections (c) (past-due support), (d) (debts 
owed to Federal agencies), (e) (past-due, legally enforceable state 
income tax obligations), and (f) (unemployment compensation debts) of 
section 6402 of the Code or any other similar offset. Similarly, 
section 6434(f)(2) prohibits reduction or offset of such $1,000 pilot 
program contributions by other assessed Federal taxes subject to 
collection including levy. Section 6434(g) prevents overpayment 
interest under section 6611(a) of the Code from accruing prior to 
January 1, 2028, with respect to any payment under section 6434.
    Section 6434(c) defines the term ``eligible child'' for purposes of 
section 6434. It provides that an eligible child is a qualifying child 
under section 152(c) of the Code; is born during the 2025, 2026, 2027, 
or 2028 calendar year; has had no prior pilot program election made by 
any individual; and is a United States citizen.
    Section 6434(e)(1) requires the pilot program election to include 
the social security number of the eligible child for whom the election 
is made. Section 6434(e)(2) cross-references section 24(h)(7) of the 
Code to define the term ``social security number'' for section 6434. 
The social security number must be issued before the election is made.
    Section 6434(d) authorizes the Secretary to provide the rules for 
the time and manner of making the pilot program election.

Explanation of Provisions

    Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1 would establish the framework for the 
Trump accounts contribution pilot program. First, it would provide the 
general rule that a pilot program-electing individual must make a pilot 
program election with respect to an eligible child of such individual 
in order for the Secretary to make a $1,000 pilot program contribution 
into the Trump account for which such eligible child is the 
beneficiary. Second, it would define several terms solely for purposes 
of section 6434, including the terms ``eligible child,'' ``pilot 
program election,'' ``pilot program-electing individual,'' ``special 
taxable year,'' and ``social security number.'' Third, it would 
identify how the deemed payment upon the processing of a pilot program 
election generates an overpayment of tax for the eligible child in the 
amount of $1,000, which is then refunded to the eligible child as a 
$1,000 pilot program contribution into such child's Trump account. 
Fourth, it would provide the rules for the timing of the pilot program 
election. Lastly, it would provide the rules for the manner of making 
the pilot program election.

I. General Rule

    Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(a) would provide that a pilot program-
electing individual must make a pilot program election with respect to 
an eligible child of the pilot program-electing individual in order for 
the Secretary to make a $1,000 pilot program contribution into the 
Trump account of the eligible child. This general rule would conform 
with the statutory scheme of section 6434(a), which provides that after 
a pilot program election, an eligible child is treated as making a 
$1,000 payment against an income tax liability under subtitle A of the 
Code, and section 6434(b), which provides that the $1,000 amount 
treated as a payment under section 6434(a) is paid by the Secretary to 
the Trump account of the eligible child.

[[Page 11205]]

II. Definitions

    Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b) would define terms that apply solely 
for purposes of Sec.  301.6434-1.
    Under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(1), the term ``eligible child'' 
would mean an individual (i) who the pilot program-electing individual 
anticipates will be that individual's qualifying child under section 
152(c) for the taxable year of the pilot program-electing individual in 
which the pilot program election is made, (ii) who is born in calendar 
year 2025, 2026, 2027, or 2028, (iii) who is a United States citizen, 
(iv) to whom a social security number has been issued, and (v) with 
respect to whom no prior pilot program election has been made by any 
individual and processed by the Secretary. The birth year and 
citizenship requirements in proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(1)(ii) and 
(iii) would implement section 6434(c)(1) and (3), and the social 
security number requirement in proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(1)(iv) 
would implement section 6434(e).
    The relationship requirement between the pilot program-electing 
individual and the eligible child, reflected as part of the eligible 
child definition in proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(1)(i), is mandated by 
section 6434(a), which provides that an election is made by an 
individual ``with respect to an eligible child of the individual,'' and 
section 6434(c), which provides that an eligible child is a qualifying 
child as defined in section 152(c). Although an individual may 
anticipate that an eligible child will be the individual's qualifying 
child under section 152(c) for an ongoing taxable year, whether an 
eligible child is indeed any individual's qualifying child under 
section 152(c) with respect to that individual's taxable year cannot be 
conclusively determined until the close of such taxable year. However, 
section 6434 does not require elections to be made with reference to a 
closed taxable year of the pilot program-electing individual. Thus, to 
provide the pilot program-electing individual the flexibility to make 
the pilot program election at any time during a calendar year rather 
than wait until after the close of a taxable year, proposed Sec.  
301.6434-1(b)(1)(i) permits the child's eligibility as long as a pilot 
program-electing individual anticipates the eligible child will be that 
individual's qualifying child under section 152(c) for the taxable year 
in which the election is made. For additional information on who is a 
qualifying child under section 152(c), potential pilot program-electing 
individuals (including parents, foster parents, and other relatives) 
can look to IRS Publication 501, Dependents, Standard Deduction, and 
Filing Information.
    Lastly, with respect to the definition of the term eligible child, 
under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(1)(v), a child would no longer be 
eligible once a pilot program election is made and processed for that 
child. This is required by section 6434(c)(2), which provides that an 
eligible child, among other requirements, is a child with respect to 
whom no prior pilot program election has been made. Proposed Sec.  
301.6434-1(b)(1)(v) would ensure that an eligible child is not 
prevented from receiving a $1,000 pilot program contribution based on 
an erroneous or malicious election by conditioning the eligibility 
criteria on the making and processing of an election, rather than 
solely the making of an election.
    Under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(2), the term ``pilot program 
election'' means an election under section 6434.
    Under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(3), the term ``pilot program-
electing individual'' means an individual authorized to make a pilot 
program election with respect to an eligible child. An individual is 
authorized to make a pilot program election with respect to an eligible 
child who the individual anticipates will be the individual's 
qualifying child under section 152(c) for the taxable year of the 
individual in which the pilot program election is made, which is the 
same requirement reflected in proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(1)(i) for 
the definition of eligible child. The definition of pilot program-
electing individual in proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(3) would cross-
reference the relevant portion of the definition of eligible child in 
proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(1)(i). This definition accomplishes the 
purpose of section 6434 to facilitate investment into and financial 
growth of an eligible child's Trump account by enabling a pilot program 
election to be made at any time during the calendar year. If section 
6434 was interpreted to instead require pilot program elections to be 
made with respect to a calendar-based taxable year of the pilot 
program-electing individual for which the eligible child was such 
individual's qualifying child under section 152(c), the earliest a 
pilot program election could possibly be made would be after the close 
of the taxable year of the pilot program-electing individual during 
which the eligible child was born. Such an interpretation would impose 
a restriction on making a pilot program election not found in section 
6434 and would limit the maximum growth potential of contributions into 
the eligible child's Trump account. Furthermore, under section 6434, 
the payment is deemed to be made by the eligible child and has no 
connection to any taxable year of the pilot program-electing 
individual, thereby providing no clear basis to tie a pilot program 
election to a taxable year of the pilot program-electing individual. If 
a pilot program-electing individual makes an election in anticipation 
that an eligible child will be the individual's qualifying child under 
section 152(c) and complies with all other rules promulgated by the 
Secretary for section 6434 elections, the pilot program election will 
not be rendered ineffective solely on the basis that it is later 
determined that the eligible child does not meet the definition of a 
qualifying child of the individual for the taxable year in which the 
pilot program election is made.
    Under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(4), the term ``Secretary'' means 
the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's delegate. See section 
7701(a)(11)(B) of the Code.
    Under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(5), the term ``social security 
number'' has the meaning given such term in section 24(h)(7)(B), 
determined by substituting ``before the date of the election made under 
section 6434'' for ``before the due date of such return'' in section 
24(h)(7)(B)(ii).
    Under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(6), the term ``special taxable 
year'' means a taxable period of an eligible child that arises upon the 
processing of a pilot program election and is deemed to close 
immediately after arising, for which no Federal income tax liability is 
owed, and which bears no relationship to the Federal income tax 
liability of the pilot program-electing individual for any taxable 
period. This special taxable year is distinct from any calendar-based 
taxable year for the eligible child's Federal income tax liability and 
does not sever or modify the eligible child's calendar-based taxable 
period. To implement the requirements of section 6434(a), (b), and (f) 
as explained in Section III of this Explanation of Provisions, proposed 
Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(1) would provide that a pilot program election is 
made with respect to the eligible child's special taxable year, rather 
than with respect to any calendar-based taxable year for the eligible 
child's Federal income tax liability.
    As explained in Section III of this Explanation of Provisions, an 
overpayment can only be determined after the close of a taxable year by 
comparing the amount of tax liability owed to the amount of payments 
made. Like the proposed definition of pilot program-electing 
individual, the

[[Page 11206]]

proposed definition of special taxable year accomplishes the purpose of 
section 6434 by allowing for the $1,000 pilot program contribution to 
be deposited by the Secretary into the Trump account without waiting 
for the close of a calendar-based taxable year, thus facilitating the 
financial growth of the Trump account. Determining an overpayment from 
a special taxable year also meets the statutory intent that the 
contribution be made at any time during a calendar year rather than 
after the close of the taxable year for which an election is made--at 
the earliest. Additionally, as explained more thoroughly in Section III 
of this Explanation of Provisions, the proposed definition of a special 
taxable year ensures that an eligible child's deemed payment upon 
election under section 6434(a) generates an overpayment of $1,000 
instead of the deemed payment being reduced or eliminated if it were 
used to satisfy a child's potentially unpaid Federal income tax 
liability for a calendar-based taxable year election.
    Under proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(b)(7), the term ``Trump account'' 
has the meaning given to the term in section 530A(b)(1). This 
definition includes an initial Trump account and a rollover Trump 
account.

III. Effect of a Pilot Program Election

    Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(1) would provide that a pilot program 
election must be made by a pilot program-electing individual with 
respect to the special taxable year of an eligible child of the pilot 
program-electing individual. Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(2) would 
provide that upon the processing of an election with respect to an 
eligible child, the eligible child would be treated as making a $1,000 
payment against a Federal income tax liability under subtitle A of the 
Code for the eligible child's special taxable year, resulting in a 
$1,000 overpayment. Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(3) would provide that 
the $1,000 overpayment described in Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(2) will be 
refunded by the Secretary as a $1,000 pilot program contribution to the 
eligible child's Trump account.
    Section 6434 fits into the existing framework for the refund of an 
overpayment of tax but creates some special rules for the determination 
and the refunding of the overpayment. In Jones v. Liberty Glass Co., 
332 U.S. 524, 531 (1947), the Supreme Court explained that an 
overpayment of tax for a taxable year is determined by comparing the 
amount by which payments exceed the amount of tax properly due at the 
close of the taxable year. Under these rules, a taxpayer who pays 
$1,000 towards a taxable year but owes zero Federal income tax 
liability for that taxable year will have an overpayment of $1,000. See 
also section 6401(c) (``An amount paid as tax shall not be considered 
not to constitute an overpayment solely by reason of the fact that 
there was no tax liability in respect of which such amount was 
paid.''). In contrast, for example, a taxpayer who pays $1,000 towards 
a taxable year but owes $500 for that taxable year will have an 
overpayment of only $500. Once the IRS determines the amount of an 
overpayment, the full amount of the overpayment may not necessarily be 
refunded to a taxpayer. Section 6402(a) provides the IRS the discretion 
to credit an overpayment against ``any liability in respect of an 
internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the 
overpayment.'' Additionally, before the IRS can refund any remaining 
overpayment, the refund must be reduced and offset against any past-due 
non-tax debts of the taxpayer described in the provisions of section 
6402(c), (d), (e), and (f), otherwise known as mandatory Treasury 
Offset Program offsets.
    Concerning the determination of an overpayment, section 6434(b) 
provides that the ``amount treated as a payment under subsection (a) 
shall be paid by the Secretary'' to the eligible child's Trump account. 
Section 6434(a) provides that the eligible child for whom an election 
is made is treated as ``making a payment . . . in an amount equal to 
$1,000.'' For most children who have no Federal income tax liability, 
the plain language of section 6434(a) and (b) is consistent with the 
Supreme Court's explanation of how to determine an overpayment in Jones 
v. Liberty Glass. However, if section 6434(a) were to be construed as 
providing for a deemed payment of $1,000 for a taxable year for which 
an eligible child owes a Federal income tax liability, then that child 
would have an overpayment only if the deemed payment exceeded the tax 
owed and, if so, such overpayment would be less than $1,000. Read in 
conjunction, however, section 6434(a) and (b) instruct that the 
Secretary's contribution to an eligible child's Trump account must be 
in the amount of $1,000.
    Moreover, section 6434(f) creates safeguards to ensure the entire 
$1,000 amount is contributed to an eligible child's Trump account. As 
explained above, section 6402(a) provides that the IRS has the 
discretion to credit an overpayment to a taxpayer's unpaid tax 
liabilities and is required to reduce the refund of any remaining 
overpayment by the mandatory Treasury Offset Program offsets of section 
6402(c), (d), (e), and (f). Section 6434(f), which is described in 
proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(4), ensures that the entire $1,000 
overpayment amount described in proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(2) would 
be contributed into the eligible child's Trump account as provided in 
section 6434(a) and (b).
    To implement the requirements of section 6434(a), (b), and (f), 
proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(1) would provide that a pilot program 
election is made with respect to the eligible child's special taxable 
year instead of the calendar year generally used for individual income 
taxes. The use of a special taxable year instead of a calendar year 
ensures that the plain language of section 6434(a), (b), and (f)--that 
when an election is made with respect to an eligible child, the result 
is a $1,000 pilot program contribution to the eligible child's Trump 
account--may be accomplished with respect to any eligible child for 
whom an election is made in compliance with section 6434 and proposed 
Sec.  301.6434-1.
    Additionally, section 6434(b) and (i) require that the $1,000 pilot 
program contribution is made specifically to the section 530A Trump 
account of the eligible child. Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(3) would 
provide that the $1,000 contribution will be made to the Trump account 
of the eligible child. Under section 6434(b) and (i) and proposed Sec.  
301.6434-1(c)(3) and (b)(7), the $1,000 contribution may be made to an 
eligible child's initial Trump account or to a rollover Trump account 
in the case of an eligible child who has a rollover Trump account. 
Because section 6434 only authorizes the Secretary to pay the $1,000 
contribution ``to the Trump account with respect to which such eligible 
child is the account beneficiary,'' it does not allow for an eligible 
child who does not have a Trump account to receive a $1,000 pilot 
program contribution; nor does it allow for an eligible child to 
receive the $1,000 pilot program contribution in any manner other than 
as a contribution to the eligible child's Trump account. Thus, if an 
eligible child with respect to whom a pilot program election is made 
does not have an established Trump account for any reason--including if 
a Trump account was never established for the eligible child, or if an 
eligible child's Trump account ceased to be a Trump account for any 
reason including death of the eligible child--the Secretary is not 
authorized to remit the $1,000 pilot program contribution to any 
recipient because such a remittance would not be ``to the Trump account 
with respect to which such eligible child is the account beneficiary.'' 
See

[[Page 11207]]

section 6434(b). Accordingly, proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(3) would 
provide that the $1,000 overpayment described in proposed Sec.  
301.6434-1(c)(2) will not be refunded unless the eligible child has an 
established Trump account and that no refund will be paid under the 
provisions of section 6434 except as a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution to the eligible child's Trump account.
    Lastly, proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(c)(5) would provide that a pilot 
program election is not a claim for credit or refund of an overpayment. 
Section 301.6402-2, which establishes the rules for a claim for credit 
or refund, provides that only the taxpayer with the overpayment may 
file such a claim. Section 6434(a), however, instructs that a pilot 
program election is not made by the eligible child for whom an 
overpayment for contribution is generated; it is instead made by a 
pilot program-electing individual with respect to an eligible child of 
the pilot program-electing individual. Because it is the filing of the 
pilot program election by the pilot program-electing individual that 
generates the overpayment that is refunded as a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution into the eligible child's Trump account and the eligible 
child is not the person making such pilot program election, the pilot 
program election cannot be a claim for credit or refund.

IV. Timing of Election

    Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(d) would provide timing rules for pilot 
program elections as authorized by section 6434(d). The rules of 
proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(d) would clarify that an election may only be 
made during the time period prescribed, that relief for an untimely 
election is not available under Sec. Sec.  301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 
301.9100-3, that only the first election made and processed with 
respect to an eligible child will result in a $1,000 contribution to 
the eligible child's Trump account, and that no subsequent elections 
will be processed after the first election is processed.
    Section 6434 does not set forth a specific period in which a pilot 
program election must be made but instead prescribes that elections 
must be made at such time as the Secretary provides. Under proposed 
Sec.  301.6434-1(d)(1)(i), elections may be made starting on the day 
that a child becomes eligible. An election made on any earlier date 
would not be allowed under section 6434 because it would not be ``an 
election . . . with respect to an eligible child.'' Proposed Sec.  
301.6434-1(d)(1)(ii) would provide that the last day for a pilot 
program election with respect to an eligible child would be December 31 
of the calendar year in which the eligible child reaches age 17. This 
corresponds with the termination of the growth period, after which a 
child is no longer eligible to open a Trump account pursuant to section 
530A(1)(A)(ii)(I) and (2)(A) and many of the special rules in section 
530A no longer apply to the account. This broad election period--from 
the date of eligibility to the final date of growth period--is intended 
to ensure all children are able to receive a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution if they meet all section 6434 eligibility criteria during 
the time period in which a child would be eligible to have a Trump 
account opened. In cases where a pilot program election is not made 
until near the end of the growth period, the Secretary can nonetheless 
still make a $1,000 pilot program contribution to an eligible child's 
Trump account after the growth period ends as long as a Trump account 
was established for the eligible child under section 530A and has not 
ceased to exist for any reason.
    Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(d)(2) would provide that only the first 
pilot program election processed by the IRS with respect to an eligible 
child will result in a $1,000 contribution to the eligible child's 
Trump account. Once the first pilot program election is processed no 
further election will be processed. This rule conforms with the section 
6434(c)(2) requirement that an eligible child means a child with 
respect to whom no prior pilot program election has been made. Because 
this rule only applies once an election is processed, it would ensure 
that an unprocessed erroneous or malicious pilot program election would 
not preclude an eligible child from receiving a pilot program 
contribution.

V. Manner of Election

    Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(e)(1) would provide that a pilot program 
election must be made by a pilot program-electing individual on the 
form prescribed by the Secretary or through an electronic application 
or web page made available by the Secretary, in accordance with 
applicable instructions. The IRS is using Form 4547, Trump Account 
Election(s), for this purpose in calendar year 2026. A pilot program 
election may be made any time during the period in proposed Sec.  
301.6434-1(d)(1), including at the same time that the pilot program-
electing individual files such individual's Federal income tax return. 
The pilot program election, however, is not a part of any individual's 
tax return and is independent of the filing of a tax return. The IRS 
has released instructions for making pilot program elections via Form 
4547 and will provide instructions for making pilot program elections 
via an electronic application or web page when made available by the 
Secretary. Proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(e)(2) would reiterate the 
requirement of section 6434(e) that an eligible child's social security 
number is included with the pilot program election for that eligible 
child. Because the length of time varies in which a social security 
number may be obtained, this rule reinforces the broad pilot program 
election timing proposed in Sec.  301.6434-1(d)(1).

Proposed Applicability Date

    The regulations are proposed to apply on or after January 1, 2026. 
In accordance with section 7805(b)(2), the Treasury Department and the 
IRS intend to publish final regulations within 18 months of the date of 
enactment of section 6434.

Special Analyses

I. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess costs 
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits 
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety 
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
    The proposed regulations have been designated by the Office of 
Management and Budget's (OMB's) Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs (OIRA) as subject to review under Executive Order 12866 
pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA, July 4, 2025) between the 
Treasury Department and the OMB regarding review of tax regulations. 
OIRA has determined that the proposed rulemaking is economically 
significant under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866 and subject 
to review under Executive Order 12866 and section 1(b) of the MOA. 
Accordingly, the proposed regulations have been reviewed by OMB. This 
proposed rule is not expected to be considered a regulatory action 
under Executive Order 14192 because it imposes no more than de minimis 
costs.
Need for Regulation
    The proposed regulations would explain how to make a Trump accounts 
contribution pilot program election

[[Page 11208]]

under section 6434 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The proposed 
regulations would also define terms for the purpose of implementing 
section 6434, clarify the tax consequences of making a pilot program 
election, and explain the time and manner of making a pilot program 
election.
The Statute and the Proposed Regulations
    Public Law 119-21, commonly known as the One, Big, Beautiful Bill 
Act of 2025, added new sections 530A and 6434 to the Code. Section 530A 
describes Trump accounts and section 6434 describes the Trump accounts 
contribution pilot program. The proposed regulations explain how the 
pilot program in section 6434 will be implemented.
    Section 530A defines a Trump account as a traditional individual 
retirement account (IRA) with some special rules. Most special rules 
that distinguish Trump accounts from other IRAs apply only during the 
growth period. The first day of the growth period is the day the 
account is established, and the final day of the growth period is 
December 31 of the calendar year in which the account beneficiary 
attains age 17. The rules for traditional IRAs generally apply after 
the growth period. A Trump account may be established for the benefit 
of a child prior to the calendar year in which the child attains age 18 
if the child has been issued a social security number.
    In general, distributions from Trump accounts are not permitted 
during the growth period. The entire balance of a Trump account may be 
rolled over in a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer to a rollover Trump 
account. The entire balance of a Trump account may be rolled over in a 
direct trustee-to-trustee transfer to an account established under a 
section 529A \1\ ABLE program (ABLE account) of the account beneficiary 
in the calendar year the account beneficiary attains age 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 529A was enacted by the Stephen Beck, Jr., Achieving 
a Better Life Experience Act of 2014, which was enacted as part of 
the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014, Public Law 113-295 (128 
Stat. 4010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Investments in a Trump account must track the returns of a broad 
index of equities in primarily U.S. companies for which regulated 
futures contracts are traded, avoid the use of leverage, and avoid 
annual fees and expenses above 0.1%.
    Trump accounts may receive contributions from nonprofits, 
governments, employers, and individuals. In general, contributions to a 
Trump account are subject to an annual limit of $5,000, adjusted for 
inflation.
    Governments and nonprofits may only make contributions through the 
Treasury Department, and such contributions must be made in equal 
amounts to the Trump accounts of every account beneficiary in a 
qualified class. Contributions from governments and nonprofits through 
the Treasury Department do not count towards the $5,000 annual 
contribution limit.
    Section 6434 describes the Trump accounts contribution pilot 
program. In the pilot program, the Secretary will pay $1,000 to the 
Trump accounts of eligible children for whom elections under section 
6434 are made. A U.S. citizen born in 2025, 2026, 2027, or 2028, who 
has been issued a social security number, and for whom no request for a 
pilot program contribution has previously been processed is eligible 
for a pilot program contribution. Pilot program contributions do not 
count towards the $5,000 annual contribution limit.
    The proposed regulations would define the following terms for the 
purposes of implementing section 6434: eligible child, pilot program 
election, pilot program-electing individual, and special taxable year. 
A pilot program election is an election under section 6434, that is, a 
request for a pilot program contribution to the eligible child's Trump 
account. An eligible child is a U.S. citizen born in 2025, 2026, 2027, 
or 2028, who has been issued a social security number, for whom no 
pilot program election has previously been processed, and who is 
anticipated by the pilot program-electing individual to be that 
individual's qualifying child under section 152(c). A pilot program-
electing individual is an individual who is authorized to make a pilot 
program election on behalf of an eligible child. The definitions of 
eligible child and pilot program-electing individual incorporate the 
following relationship: the pilot program-electing individual must 
anticipate that the eligible child will be a qualifying child of the 
individual for tax purposes for the taxable year in which the pilot 
program election is made. A special taxable year is a taxable year of 
the eligible child that is (1) created when a pilot program election is 
processed, (2) deemed to close immediately after arising, (3) defined 
to have zero tax liability, (4) distinct from any calendar-based 
taxable year for the child's income tax liability, and (5) not 
associated with any taxable period of the pilot program-electing 
individual.
    The proposed regulations would clarify the tax consequences of 
making a pilot program election. Under the proposed regulations, when a 
pilot program election is processed by the Secretary, the Secretary 
would treat the eligible child as if the eligible child had made a 
$1,000 payment for the special taxable year. Because a special taxable 
year has zero tax liability, treating the child as if they had made a 
$1,000 payment against Federal income tax would result in an 
overpayment for the special taxable year. The IRS would not offset that 
overpayment by any other debts owed by the eligible child or the pilot 
program-electing individual. The Secretary would remit the full $1,000 
overpayment for the special taxable year as a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution to the Trump account of the eligible child.
    The proposed regulations would also explain the time and manner of 
making a pilot program election. A pilot program election would be made 
by a pilot program-electing individual with respect to an eligible 
child who the pilot program-electing individual anticipates will be the 
individual's qualifying child under section 152(c) for the taxable year 
of the individual during which the election is made. The first day a 
pilot program election can be made is the day the child becomes an 
eligible child, and the final day a pilot program election can be made 
is the final day of the calendar year in which the child attains age 
17. The pilot program election would be made on a form, electronic 
application, or web page provided by the IRS. The pilot program 
election would not be made on the pilot program-electing individual's 
tax return.
Baseline
    The Treasury Department and the IRS have assessed the benefits and 
costs of the proposed regulations relative to a no-action baseline 
reflecting anticipated Federal income tax-related behavior in the 
absence of these proposed regulations.
Affected Entities and Taxpayers
    The proposed regulations are expected to affect 15 million children 
in 12 million families.
Economic Effects of the Proposed Regulations
    The proposed regulations would make several choices that allow a 
pilot program election to be made as early as a few weeks after the 
birth of an eligible child instead of waiting until the following 
calendar year. For example, for a child born in 2027, these choices 
provide the opportunity to earn up to

[[Page 11209]]

one additional year of investment returns, depending on the child's 
date of birth. The Treasury Department and the IRS used historical 
returns for a broad index of U.S. equities to quantify the benefit of 
an additional six months of investment returns by age 18.\2\ Among 
birth cohorts from June 1926 to May 2007, the median difference in 
account value at age 18 between $1,000 invested at birth and $1,000 
invested six months after birth was $300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Kenneth R. French Data Library. <a href="https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html">https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Qualifying Child Standard

    The proposed regulations would clarify how to apply the statutory 
requirement that the eligible child be a qualifying child of the pilot 
program-electing individual. The proposed regulations would require a 
pilot program election to be made by an individual who anticipates that 
the eligible child will be a qualifying child for the year in which the 
pilot program election is made. An alternative would be to require a 
pilot program election to be made by an individual for whom the 
eligible child was a qualifying child for a closed tax year. The 
forward-looking standard would allow the pilot program election to be 
made earlier than the backward-looking standard. For example, under the 
forward-looking standard, an election for a child born in 2027 could be 
made as soon as the child is issued a social security number. Under a 
backward-looking standard, an election for a child born in 2027 could 
not be made until 2028.
    This choice and several others would allow a pilot program election 
to be made as early as a few weeks after birth instead of waiting until 
the following calendar year. For a child born in 2027, these choices 
provide the opportunity to earn up to one additional year of investment 
returns, depending on the child's date of birth. The Treasury 
Department and the IRS used historical returns for a broad index of 
U.S. equities to quantify the benefit of an additional six months of 
investment returns by age 18.\3\ Among birth cohorts from June 1926 to 
May 2007, the median difference in account value at age 18 between 
$1,000 invested at birth and $1,000 invested six months after birth was 
$300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Kenneth R. French Data Library. <a href="https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html">https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Taxable Period of Payment Against Tax

    The proposed regulations would clarify the taxable period in which 
the child is treated as making a $1,000 payment against tax. The 
proposed regulations would apply the $1,000 payment to a special 
taxable year that is created when a pilot program election is 
processed, deemed to close immediately after arising, and defined to 
have zero tax liability. An alternative would be to apply the $1,000 
payment to an ordinary taxable year of the eligible child. Applying the 
$1,000 payment to a special taxable year allows the refund to be 
processed earlier, that is before the end of an ordinary taxable year.
    This choice and several others would allow a pilot program election 
to be made as early as a few weeks after birth instead of waiting until 
the following calendar year. For example, for a child born in 2027, 
these choices provide the opportunity to earn up to one additional year 
of investment returns, depending on the child's date of birth. The 
Treasury Department and the IRS used historical returns for a broad 
index of U.S. equities to quantify the benefit of an additional six 
months of investment returns by age 18.\4\ Among birth cohorts from 
June 1926 to May 2007, the median difference in account value at age 18 
between $1,000 invested at birth and $1,000 invested six months after 
birth was $300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Kenneth R. French Data Library. <a href="https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html">https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manner of Pilot Program Election

    The proposed regulations would clarify how to make a pilot program 
election. The proposed regulations would require a pilot program 
election to be made on a form, electronic application, or web page. 
Under the proposed regulations, a pilot program election could be made 
at the same time as when a tax return is filed, but it would be on a 
form that is independent from the pilot program-electing individual's 
tax return. An alternative would be to require a pilot program election 
to be made on the pilot program-electing individual's tax return. 
Requiring the pilot program election to be made on a form that is 
independent from the pilot program-electing individual's tax return 
would allow the pilot program election to be made earlier than a pilot 
program election made on a tax return.
    This choice and several others would allow a pilot program election 
to be made as early as a few weeks after birth instead of waiting until 
the following calendar year. For example, for a child born in 2027, 
these choices provide the opportunity to earn up to one additional year 
of investment returns, depending on the child's date of birth. The 
Treasury Department and the IRS used historical returns for a broad 
index of U.S. equities to quantify the benefit of an additional six 
months of investment returns by age 18.\5\ Among birth cohorts from 
June 1926 to May 2007, the median difference in account value at age 18 
between $1,000 invested at birth and $1,000 invested six months after 
birth was $300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Kenneth R. French Data Library. <a href="https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html">https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Earliest Allowable Pilot Program Election

    The proposed regulations would clarify the earliest a pilot program 
election can be made. The proposed regulations would require a pilot 
program election to be made no earlier than the day that a child 
becomes eligible. An alternative would be to require a pilot program 
election to be made no earlier than January 1 of the year after a child 
becomes eligible. Allowing a pilot program election to be made as early 
as the day that a child becomes eligible is possible because of three 
other choices in the proposed regulations: (1) requiring a forward-
looking qualifying child standard, (2) applying the $1,000 payment to a 
special taxable year, and (3) requiring the pilot program election to 
be on a form independent from a tax return. The proposed regulations 
made these choices to allow for the earliest possible pilot program 
election allowable by statute, which is the day that the child becomes 
eligible.
    This choice and several others would allow a pilot program election 
to be made as early as a few weeks after birth instead of waiting until 
the following calendar year. For example, for a child born in 2027, 
these choices provide the opportunity to earn up to one additional year 
of investment returns, depending on the child's date of birth. The 
Treasury Department and the IRS used historical returns for a broad 
index of U.S. equities to quantify the benefit of an additional six 
months of investment returns by age 18.\6\ Among birth cohorts from 
June 1926 to May 2007, the median difference in account value at age 18 
between $1,000 invested at birth and $1,000 invested six months after 
birth was $300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Kenneth R. French Data Library. <a href="https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html">https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latest Allowable Pilot Program Election

    The proposed regulations would clarify the latest that a pilot 
program election can be made. The proposed regulations would require a 
pilot

[[Page 11210]]

program election to be made no later than December 31 of the year the 
child attains age 17. An alternative would be to require a pilot 
program election to be made no later than the year in which the child 
attains age 3. Age 3 is salient because, in general, a refund can be 
claimed no more than three years after a Federal return is filed.\7\ 
Age 17 is salient because it coincides with the end of the period when 
a Trump account can be opened and the end of the growth period. Age 17 
was chosen rather than age 3 to provide more time to make a pilot 
program election. The proposed regulations would clarify that the 
statute of limitations for claiming a refund is not relevant to the 
pilot program election because (1) a pilot program election is not a 
claim for a refund of an overpayment and (2) the $1,000 payment is 
applied to a special taxable year, not to the year of birth or any 
ordinary taxable year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ <a href="https://www.irs.gov/filing/time-you-can-claim-a-credit-or-refund">https://www.irs.gov/filing/time-you-can-claim-a-credit-or-refund</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Investment growth is generally maximized by making the investment 
as early as possible. However, some pilot program-electing individuals 
might not make a pilot program election as early as possible. One 
benchmark for timely pilot program elections may be timely filing of 
tax returns. Around ten percent of taxpayers who are required to file a 
return fail to file a timely return.\8\ For example, for a child born 
in 2027, the choice to require a pilot program election to be made no 
later than December 31 of the year in which the child attains age 17 
provides the opportunity to make the pilot program election as late as 
2044. The Treasury Department and the IRS used historical returns for a 
broad index of U.S. equities to quantify the benefit at age 18 of 
returns on investments made at various ages.\9\ Among birth cohorts 
from 1926 to 2006, Table 1 shows that while an earlier investment 
allows for more growth, there are still typically benefits at age 18 
from making an investment even at age 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Langetieg, P., Payne, M. and Plumley, A., 2017. Counting 
Elusive Nonfilers using IRS Rather than Census Data. Internal 
Revenue Service Statistics of Income Working Paper.
    \9\ Kenneth R. French Data Library. <a href="https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html">https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html</a>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Value at age 18 of investment in broad index of U.S.
                                                                               equities
                 Investment scenario                 -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                        10th Percentile     50th Percentile     90th Percentile
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,000 at birth.....................................               2,980               6,180              13,800
$1,000 at age 1.....................................               2,860               5,690              11,990
$1,000 at age 2.....................................               2,680               4,920              10,040
$1,000 at age 3.....................................               2,400               4,750               9,030
$1,000 at age 4.....................................               2,150               4,260               8,040
$1,000 at age 5.....................................               2,020               3,990               7,110
$1,000 at age 6.....................................               1,770               3,620               6,350
$1,000 at age 7.....................................               1,660               3,280               5,380
$1,000 at age 8.....................................               1,680               3,150               4,670
$1,000 at age 9.....................................               1,480               2,740               4,110
$1,000 at age 10....................................               1,350               2,460               3,560
$1,000 at age 11....................................               1,340               2,350               3,040
$1,000 at age 12....................................               1,180               2,050               2,720
$1,000 at age 13....................................               1,050               1,890               2,390
$1,000 at age 14....................................               1,020               1,630               2,060
$1,000 at age 15....................................                 990               1,400               1,810
$1,000 at age 16....................................                 970               1,240               1,590
$1,000 at age 17....................................                 900               1,160               1,330
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: Percentiles at age 18 are calculated based on birth cohorts 1926 through 2006. For a particular birth
  cohort, the value at age 18 of one dollar invested at birth is calculated as the gross 18-year market return
  for a broad index of U.S. equities.

Prior Pilot Program Election Criterion

    The proposed regulations would clarify how to apply the statutory 
requirement that no prior pilot program election has been made for an 
eligible child. The proposed regulations would specify that a prior 
pilot program election is only disqualifying if the prior pilot program 
election was processed by the Secretary. An alternative would be to 
disqualify a child for whom a prior pilot program election was made 
even if that prior pilot program election was not processed by the 
Secretary. Specifying that a prior pilot program election is only 
disqualifying if it was processed by the Secretary allows children who 
are otherwise eligible to receive the pilot program contribution even 
if an error was made on an initial pilot program election. The proposed 
regulations propose this rule to avoid penalizing eligible children for 
the behavior of individuals who improperly attempt to make pilot 
program elections.
    To assess the benefits of allowing a child for whom a pilot program 
election was made but not processed to receive a $1,000 pilot program 
contribution after a subsequent pilot program election is made 
properly, the best evidence comes from a program in Oklahoma called 
SEED OK. SEED OK generated experimental evidence by embedding a 
randomized controlled trial into the design of the program. In 2007, 
Oklahoma randomly selected Oklahoma families to participate in the SEED 
OK program and, for newborns of consenting families randomly assigned 
to the treatment group, automatically opened Oklahoma 529 accounts for 
qualified higher education expenses and deposited $1,000. Four years 
after the intervention, parents in the treatment group reported that 
their children exhibited higher levels of social-emotional 
development,\10\ mothers were more likely to be using mainstream 
financial products,\11\ and mothers reported fewer depressive 
symptoms.\12\ Thirteen years after the intervention, parents in the 
treatment group had higher levels of educational

[[Page 11211]]

expectations and college preparation.\13\ Like other programs organized 
or run by American states and cities that fund asset-building accounts 
for young children, long-term outcomes on educational attainment, 
employment, earnings, and wealth are not yet available for SEED OK 
families because the oldest participants are still young adults.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Huang, J., Sherraden, M., Kim, Y. and Clancy, M., 2014. 
Effects of Child Development Accounts on early social-emotional 
development: An experimental test. JAMA pediatrics, 168(3), pp.265-
271.
    \11\ Huang, J., Sherraden, M.S., Sherraden, M. and Johnson, L., 
2022. Experimental effects of child development accounts on 
financial capability of young mothers. Journal of Family and 
Economic Issues, 43(1), pp.36-50.
    \12\ Huang, J., Sherraden, M. and Purnell, J.Q., 2014. Impacts 
of Child Development Accounts on maternal depressive symptoms: 
Evidence from a randomized statewide policy experiment. Social 
Science & Medicine, 112, pp.30-38.
    \13\ Sun, S., Huang, J. and Sherraden, M., 2025. The Long-Term 
Impacts of Child Development Accounts on Parental Educational 
Expectations and College Preparation. Social Service Review, 99(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) (PRA) 
generally requires that a Federal agency obtain OMB approval before 
collecting information from the public, whether that collection of 
information is mandatory, voluntary, or required to obtain or retain a 
benefit. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a valid control number assigned by OMB.
    These proposed regulations describe an election required under 
section 6434 as set forth in proposed Sec.  301.6434-1 (pilot program 
election). Specifically, section 6434(d) grants the Secretary the 
authority to establish the time and manner of the pilot program 
election and proposed Sec.  301.6434-1(e) would provide that the pilot 
program election is made on a form prescribed by the Secretary or 
through an electronic application or web page made available by the 
Secretary, in accordance with applicable instructions. A taxpayer would 
use such form or electronic application to make a pilot program 
election for the Trump accounts contribution pilot program under 
section 6434 and to establish eligibility. The information provided on 
the form or electronic application will be used by the IRS for tax 
compliance purposes and to determine election eligibility. The burden 
associated with this election is included in Form 4547, Trump Account 
Election(s), and its instructions and approved with OMB control number 
1545-2336 in accordance with PRA procedures under 5 CFR 1320.10. The 
Secretary may establish an electronic application or web page to 
collect the same information. If established, the burden associated 
with this electronic application will be included on the application 
and approved by OMB in accordance with the same PRA procedures.

III. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Secretary of the Treasury hereby certifies that these proposed 
regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities pursuant to the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6). The proposed rules would affect 
any individual who would like to make a pilot program election or 
receive a $1,000 pilot program contribution. By statute, small entities 
are not permitted to make a pilot program election or to receive a 
$1,000 pilot program contribution. The proposed rules would not impose 
any requirement or obligation upon small entities. Accordingly, a 
regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act is 
not required.

IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) 
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take 
certain other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any 
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a 
State, local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private 
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for 
inflation. These proposed regulations do not include any Federal 
mandate that may result in expenditures by State, local, or Tribal 
governments, or by the private sector in excess of that threshold.

V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from 
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either 
imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State and local 
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts State law, 
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of 
section 6 of the Executive order. These proposed regulations do not 
have federalism implications and do not impose substantial direct 
compliance costs on State and local governments or preempt State law 
within the meaning of the Executive order.

VI. Small Business Administration

    Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed 
rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for the Office of 
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact 
on small business.

Comments and Request for a Public Hearing

    Before these proposed amendments to the final regulations are 
adopted as final regulations, consideration will be given to any 
comments that are timely submitted to the IRS as prescribed in this 
preamble under the ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury Department and the 
IRS request comments on all aspects of the proposed regulations. Any 
comments submitted will be available at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or 
upon request. A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in 
writing by any person who timely submits electronic or written 
comments. Requests for a public hearing are also encouraged to be made 
electronically. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date 
and time for the public hearing will be published in the Federal 
Register.

Drafting Information

    The principal author of these proposed regulations is Molly E. 
Lovern of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and 
Administration). Other personnel from the Treasury Department and the 
IRS participated in its development.

Lists of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301

    Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income 
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Proposed Amendments to the Regulations

    Accordingly, the Treasury Department and IRS propose to amend 26 
CFR part 301 as follows:

PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 is amended by adding 
an entry for Sec.  301.6434-1 in numerical order to read, in part, as 
follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
* * * * *
    Section 301.6434-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6434(d).
* * * * *

0
Par. 2. Section 301.6434-1 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  301.6434-1  Election for Trump accounts contribution pilot 
program.

    (a) In general. This section provides rules for the Trump accounts 
contribution pilot program and pilot program election under section 
6434 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). A pilot program-electing 
individual must make a pilot program election with

[[Page 11212]]

respect to an eligible child of such individual in order for the 
Secretary to make a $1,000 contribution into the Trump account for 
which such eligible child is the account beneficiary ($1,000 pilot 
program contribution).
    (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply solely for 
purposes of this section.
    (1) Eligible child. The term eligible child means an individual:
    (i) Who the pilot program-electing individual anticipates will be 
that individual's qualifying child under section 152(c) of the Code for 
the taxable year of the pilot program-electing individual in which the 
pilot program election is made;
    (ii) Who is born after December 31, 2024, and before January 1, 
2029;
    (iii) Who is a United States citizen;
    (iv) To whom a social security number has been issued; and
    (v) With respect to whom no prior pilot program election has been 
made by any individual and processed by the Secretary.
    (2) Pilot program election. The term pilot program election means 
an election under section 6434.
    (3) Pilot program-electing individual. The term pilot program-
electing individual means an individual authorized to make a pilot 
program election with respect to an eligible child. An individual is 
authorized to make a pilot program election if the eligible child for 
whom the pilot program election is to be made meets the requirements in 
paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section with respect to such individual.
    (4) Secretary. The term Secretary means the Secretary of the 
Treasury or the Secretary's delegate.
    (5) Social security number. The term social security number has the 
meaning given such term in section 24(h)(7)(B) of the Code, determined 
by substituting ``before the date of the election made under section 
6434'' for ``before the due date of such return'' in section 
24(h)(7)(B)(ii).
    (6) Special taxable year. The term special taxable year means a 
taxable period of an eligible child for a Federal income tax liability 
under subtitle A of the Code solely for the purposes of section 6434:
    (i) That is deemed to arise solely upon the Secretary's processing 
of a pilot program election with respect to the eligible child;
    (ii) That is deemed to close immediately after arising;
    (iii) For which no Federal income tax liability is owed; and
    (iv) Which bears no relation to the Federal income tax liability of 
the pilot program-electing individual for any taxable period.
    (7) Trump account. The term Trump account has the meaning given 
such term in section 530A(b)(1) of the Code.
    (c) Effect of pilot program election--(1) In general. A pilot 
program election must be made by a pilot program-electing individual 
with respect to the special taxable year of an eligible child of the 
pilot program-electing individual. A pilot program election has no 
effect on any taxable period of the pilot program-electing individual.
    (2) Deemed payment. Upon the Secretary's processing of a pilot 
program election with respect to an eligible child, the eligible child 
will be treated as making a payment in the amount of $1,000 against the 
eligible child's Federal income tax liability under subtitle A of the 
Code for the eligible child's special taxable year, resulting in a 
$1,000 overpayment for the eligible child's special taxable year.
    (3) Refund of overpayment as contribution. The $1,000 overpayment 
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section will only be refunded by 
the Secretary as a $1,000 pilot program contribution directly to the 
Trump account established with respect to the eligible child. Under no 
circumstances will a refund be made under the provisions of section 
6434 except as a $1,000 pilot program contribution to the Trump account 
established with respect to the eligible child.
    (4) Excepted from reduction or offset. The $1,000 overpayment 
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section will be refunded by the 
Secretary as a $1,000 pilot program contribution to the Trump account 
of the eligible child without being offset against past-due debts under 
common law or section 6402(c), (d), (e), and (f) of the Code or 
credited under section 6402(a) against any other assessed Federal tax 
liabilities of the pilot program-electing individual or eligible child.
    (5) Not a claim for credit or refund. A pilot program election does 
not constitute a claim for credit or refund.
    (d) Timing of election--(1) Election period. A pilot program 
election must be made:
    (i) No earlier than the day the eligible child meets the definition 
of an eligible child under paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
    (ii) No later than December 31 of the calendar year in which the 
eligible child attains age 17.
    (2) Resolving multiple elections for an eligible child. Only the 
first pilot program election processed by the Secretary with respect to 
an eligible child will result in a $1,000 overpayment being refunded as 
a $1,000 pilot program contribution by the Secretary into the Trump 
account of such eligible child under paragraph (c)(3) of this section. 
Once the Secretary processes the first pilot program election with 
respect to an eligible child, no further pilot program elections for 
such eligible child will be processed.
    (3) 9100 relief not available. Relief is not available under 
Sec. Sec.  301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3 to make a late pilot 
program election under section 6434.
    (e) Manner of making election--(1) In general. A pilot program 
election must be made by a pilot program-electing individual on the 
form prescribed by the Secretary or through an electronic application 
or web page made available by the Secretary, in accordance with 
applicable instructions. No pilot program election will be processed 
and no $1,000 pilot program contribution to a Trump account under 
paragraph (c)(3) of this section will be made unless the pilot program-
electing individual makes the pilot program election in such manner.
    (2) Social security number required. A pilot program election made 
with respect to an eligible child must include the eligible child's 
social security number. No pilot program election will be processed and 
no $1,000 pilot program contribution to a Trump account under paragraph 
(c)(3) of this section will be made unless such pilot program election 
includes the eligible child's social security number.
    (f) Applicability date. This section applies on or after January 1, 
2026.

Frank J. Bisignano,
Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 2026-04534 Filed 3-6-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4831-GV-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 9, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.