Proposed Rule2026-04338

Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Texas; Control of Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 4, 2026

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the CAA section 111(d) state plan submitted by the State of Texas for sources subject to the Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills Emission Guidelines (EG). The Texas MSW landfills plan was submitted to fulfill the state's obligations under CAA section 111(d) to implement and enforce the requirements under the MSW Landfills EG. The EPA is proposing to approve the state plan and amend the agency regulations in accordance with the requirements of the CAA.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 42 (Wednesday, March 4, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 42 (Wednesday, March 4, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10556-10559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-04338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[EPA-R06-OAR-2023-0478; FRL-12671-01-R6]


Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for 
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Texas; Control of Emissions From 
Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the CAA 
section 111(d) state plan submitted by the State of Texas for sources 
subject to the

[[Page 10557]]

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills Emission Guidelines (EG). The 
Texas MSW landfills plan was submitted to fulfill the state's 
obligations under CAA section 111(d) to implement and enforce the 
requirements under the MSW Landfills EG. The EPA is proposing to 
approve the state plan and amend the agency regulations in accordance 
with the requirements of the CAA.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 3, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2023-0478, at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact 
Matthew Gesualdo, (214) 665-6530, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2344465056424f474c0d4e4257574b4654634653420d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f196948284909d959edf9c908585999486b1948190df969e87">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. For the 
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available 
electronically at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. While all documents in the 
docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly 
available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Gesualdo, EPA Region 6 Office, 
Regional Haze and SO<INF>2</INF> Section, 214-665-6530, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8cfcddbddc9c4ccc786c5c9dcdcc0cddfe8cdd8c986cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5631332523373a3239783b3722223e33211633263778313920">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. We encourage the public to submit comments 
via <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Please call or email the contact 
listed above if you need alternative access to material indexed but not 
provided in the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    Section 111 of the CAA, ``Standards of Performance for New 
Stationary Sources,'' directs the EPA to establish emission standards 
for stationary sources of air pollution that could potentially endanger 
public health or welfare. These standards are referred to as New Source 
Performance Standards (NSPS). Section 111(d) addresses the process by 
which the EPA and states regulate standards of performance for existing 
sources. When NSPS are promulgated for new sources, section 111(d) and 
EPA regulations require that the EPA publish an Emission Guideline (EG) 
to regulate the same pollutants from existing facilities. While NSPS 
are directly applicable to new sources, EG for existing sources 
(designated facilities) are intended for states to use to develop a 
state plan to submit to the EPA.
    State plan submittal and revisions under CAA section 111(d) must be 
consistent with the applicable EG and the requirements of 40 CFR part 
60, subpart B, and part 62, subpart A. The regulations at 40 CFR part 
60, subpart B, contain general provisions applicable to the adoption 
and submittal of state plans under CAA section 111(d). Additionally, 40 
CFR part 62, subpart A, provides the procedural framework by which the 
EPA will approve or disapprove such plans submitted by a state. Once 
approved by the EPA, the state plan becomes federally enforceable. If a 
state does not submit an approvable state plan to the EPA, the EPA is 
responsible for developing, implementing, and enforcing a federal plan.
    The MSW landfills NSPS for new landfills and EG for existing 
landfills were first promulgated by EPA on March 12, 1996, in 40 CFR 
part 60, subparts WWW and Cc, respectively (61 FR 9905). On August 29, 
2016, the EPA finalized revisions to the MSW landfills NSPS and EG in 
40 CFR part 60, subparts XXX and Cf, respectively (81 FR 59332; 81 FR 
59313). The 2016 EG revision updates the control requirements and 
monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping provisions for existing MSW 
landfill sources.
    The current MSW landfills EG, found at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, 
concerns the regulation of landfill gas and its components, including 
methane, from MSW landfills for which construction, reconstruction, or 
modification was commenced on or before July 17, 2014. The deadline to 
submit a state plan to the EPA was May 30, 2017. On May 21, 2021, EPA 
finalized the MSW landfills federal plan in 40 CFR part 62, subpart OOO 
(86 FR 27756). The MSW landfills federal plan at 40 CFR part 62, 
subpart OOO, applies to states that do not have an EPA-approved state 
plan. The MSW landfills federal plan is currently in effect in Texas.
    In order to fulfill obligations under CAA section 111(d), the Texas 
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) submitted a revised state 
plan for the control of emissions from existing MSW landfills for the 
State of Texas on September 15, 2023. The Texas MSW landfills plan 
implements and enforces the applicable provisions under the MSW 
landfills EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, and additionally meets the 
relevant requirements of the CAA section 111(d) implementing 
regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. The Texas submittal and the 
supplements are included in the public docket for this rulemaking 
(Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2023-0478).

II. The EPA's Evaluation

    The EPA has evaluated the Texas MSW landfills plan to determine 
whether the plan meets applicable requirements from the MSW landfills 
EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, and the CAA section 111(d) 
implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. The EPA's 
detailed rationale and discussion on the Texas MSW landfills plan can 
be found in the EPA Technical Support Document (TSD), located in the 
docket for this rulemaking.
    The state plan submittal package includes all materials necessary 
to be deemed administratively and technically complete according to the 
criteria of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. The state plan document (the 
``Texas State Plan for the Control of Designated Facilities and 
Pollutants'') includes all the necessary authority for the 
implementation and enforcement of the MSW landfill Emission Guidelines 
in the State. Specifically, the State met applicable Federal 
requirements while incorporating the EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, 
into the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 113, 
Subchapter D, Division 6, 2016 Emission Guidelines for Existing 
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (30 TAC Sec.  113.2400-30 TAC Sec.  
113.2412). Both the adopted state plan document and the relevant TAC 
regulations, as well as all other relevant plan submittal materials may 
be found in the docket for this action. Necessary State legal and 
enforcement authorities required for plan approval are located 
elsewhere in Texas's statute, rules and regulations and have been 
reviewed and approved of by the EPA in the course of prior state 
implementation plan as well

[[Page 10558]]

as section 111(d) and/or 129 state plan approvals. See 40 CFR part 52, 
subpart SS, and 40 CFR part 62, subpart SS.
    The Texas MSW landfills plan has been evaluated in detail in the 
TSD. Our evaluation demonstrates that the Texas MSW landfills plan 
meets the requirements in 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf and subpart B, and 
is consistent with the requirements for an approvable section 111(d) 
state plans for MSW landfills.
    Under 40 CFR part 60, subpart B, section 60.24(f) allows for less 
stringent regulations in a state's CAA section 111(d) plan if a 
technical or economic justification supports it. The Texas MSW 
landfills plan includes two provisions which differ from the EG. First, 
Texas used an alternative date range for determining applicability of 
EG requirements in its previous 1998 MSW landfills plan and its current 
2023 MSW landfills plan. The MSW landfills EG contains gas collection 
and control system requirements for designated facilities (as defined 
in the EG) that have accepted waste after November 8, 1987, that meet 
specific design capacity and NMOC (nonmethane organic compound) 
emission rate thresholds (50 megagrams per year (Mg/yr) for closed 
landfills). In the previous Texas MSW landfills plan submitted in 1998 
and approved by EPA in 1999,\1\ TCEQ \2\ provided a detailed technical 
analysis indicating that no designated landfills that closed between 
November 8, 1987, and October 9, 1993, would have estimated NMOC 
emission rates above the 50 Mg/yr control threshold by 2004. In the 
1999 approval,\3\ the EPA concurred with TCEQ that controlling these 
closed landfills would not result in a significant reduction in NMOC 
emissions compared to the cost of installing gas collection systems at 
these sites. In the previous state plan, TCEQ adjusted its definition 
to reflect actual conditions in Texas based on section 60.24(f). As 
part of this state plan, 30 TAC Sec.  113.2406(a) explicitly exempts 
MSW landfills that have not accepted waste since October 9, 1993, and 
do not have additional design capacity available for future waste 
deposition. In its current submittal, Texas states that none of the 
landfills which stopped accepting waste during the relevant 1987-1993 
time period would have current NMOC emissions above the 50 Mg/year 
threshold. Therefore, these closed landfills in Texas (which stopped 
accepting waste during the applicable 1987-1993 time period) would not 
be subject to gas collection and control system requirements nor likely 
result in a reduction in NMOC or landfill emissions even if Texas did 
not exempt these landfills as part of its current MSW landfills plan. 
EPA proposes to find that the state's use of section 60.24(f), to 
exempt certain MSW landfills from the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, 
subpart Cf, is reasonable and proposes to approve the Texas MSW 
landfill plan's alternative date range for determining applicability of 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Texas's 1998 MSW landfill plan implemented the 1996 MSW 
landfill EG requirements under 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW, was 
approved by EPA on June 17, 1999 (64 FR 32427).
    \2\ At the time the Texas 1998 MSW landfill plan was submitted, 
TCEQ was called the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 
(TNRCC).
    \3\ See 64 FR 32427 (June 17, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the adopted 30 TAC 113.2404(b), landfill gas collection and 
control systems that have been approved by the TCEQ and installed in 
accordance with 30 TAC Sec.  115.152 are considered to meet certain 
technical requirements of the emission guidelines, specifically 40 CFR 
60.33f(b) and (c). TCEQ has identified that the purpose of this state 
regulation is to minimize redundant and duplicative requirements for 
landfill gas collection and control systems that fall under both 30 TAC 
Chapter 115 and 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf. Table C.5.1 in the Texas 
submission compares 30 TAC Sec.  115.152 with 40 CFR part 60, subpart 
Cf, and outlines which state rules correspond to each federal 
requirement for the regulatory changes TCEQ intends to implement. The 
EPA is proposing to approve this aspect of Texas's state plan, 
proposing to find that MSW landfills in compliance with 30 TAC Sec.  
115.152 satisfy the requirements of the EG. The EPA's detailed 
rationale and discussion on the Texas MSW landfills plan can be found 
in the EPA Technical Support Document (TSD), located in the docket for 
this rulemaking.

III. Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to approve the Texas MSW landfill plan 
submitted by TCEQ in accordance with the requirements of section 111(d) 
of the CAA and to amend 40 CFR part 62, subpart SS, to codify EPA's 
approval. The EPA is proposing to find that the Texas MSW landfill plan 
meets the Federal requirements provided under CAA section 111(d), the 
MSW landfills EG codified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, and the CAA 
section 111(d) implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. 
Once approved by the EPA, the Texas MSW landfills plan will become 
federally enforceable.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are 
finalizing regulatory text that includes the incorporation by reference 
of Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 113, 
Subchapter D, Division 6, adopted July 14, 2023, and effective July 19, 
2023, which is part of the CAA section 111(d) Plan applicable to 
existing MSW landfills subject to the MSW Landfills Emission 
Guidelines, at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, within TCEQ's jurisdiction 
in the State of Texas. The regulatory provisions of TAC Title 30, Part 
1, Chapter 113, Subchapter D, Division 6, incorporate the MSW Landfills 
Emissions Guidelines promulgated by the EPA at 40 CFR part 60, subpart 
Cf, and establish emission standards and compliance times for the 
control of municipal solid waste landfills, as defined in subpart Cf, 
that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction on or 
before July 17, 2014. The EPA has made and will continue to make TAC 
Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 113, Subchapter D, Division 6, generally 
available at the EPA Region 6 office (please contact the person 
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 
preamble for more information). They are also available at: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. This incorporation by reference has been approved 
by the Office of the Federal Register and the state plan is federally 
enforceable under the CAA as of the effective date of this final 
rulemaking.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a CAA 
section 111(d)/129 submission that complies with the provisions of the 
Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d); 42 U.S.C. 
7429; 40 CFR part 60, subparts B and Cf; and 40 CFR part 62, subpart A. 
Thus, in reviewing CAA section 111(d)/129 state plan submissions, EPA's 
role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria 
of the Act and implementing regulations. Accordingly, this action 
merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements 
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by 
state law. For that reason:

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action as defined in 
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and was therefore 
not

[[Page 10559]]

subject to a requirement for Executive Order 12866 review.

B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation

    This action is not an Executive Order 14192 regulatory action 
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) because it does not contain any 
information collection activities.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This action is certified to not have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.). This action will approve a state plan pursuant to CAA section 
111(d) and will therefore have no net regulatory burden for all 
directly regulated small entities.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any 
State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action will not apply to areas of Indian country within Texas 
and therefore does not have tribal implications as specified in E.O. 
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will neither impose 
substantial direct compliance costs on federally recognized tribal 
governments, nor preempt tribal law. This action will not impose 
substantial direct compliance costs on federally recognized tribal 
governments because no actions will be required of tribal governments. 
This action will also not preempt tribal law as no Texas tribe 
implements a regulatory program under the CAA and thus does not have 
applicable or related tribal laws.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) 
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental 
health or safety risks that EPA has reason to believe may 
disproportionately affect children, per the definitions of ``covered 
regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. Therefore, 
this action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it approves 
a state program.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution and Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, 
May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. This action 
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National 
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with 
the Clean Air Act.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental 
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment 
and disposal.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: February 23, 2026.
Walter Mason,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2026-04338 Filed 3-3-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 4, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.