Notice2026-03915

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by The Options Clearing Corporation Concerning a Change in Types of Acceptable Collateral and an Update To Mitigate Wrong-Way Risk

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 27, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 39 (Friday, February 27, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9897-9904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-03915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104882; File No. SR-OCC-2026-001]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by The Options Clearing 
Corporation Concerning a Change in Types of Acceptable Collateral and 
an Update To Mitigate Wrong-Way Risk

February 24, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Exchange Act'' or ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice 
is hereby given that on February 12, 2026, The Options Clearing 
Corporation (``OCC'' or ``Corporation'') filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule 
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have 
been prepared primarily by OCC. The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the 
Proposed Rule Change

    This proposed rule change would discontinue two underutilized 
collater [sic] types and update OCC's rules to mitigate wrong-way risk. 
As the sole clearing agency for standardized equity options listed on 
national securities exchanges registered with the SEC, and with respect 
to the other products it clears, OCC is exposed to certain risks, 
including credit risk arising from its relationships with the Clearing 
Members for which OCC becomes the buyer to every seller and the seller 
to ever buyer with respect to listed options. In order to manage 
counterparty credit risk and mitigate related systemic risks, OCC 
requires Clearing Members to collateralize financial obligations that 
result from maintaining options, futures and stock loan positions at 
OCC.
    OCC maintains policies filed with the Commission as OCC rules that 
are designed to address such credit risk, including the Collateral Risk 
Management (``CRM'') Policy. The CRM Policy identifies OCC's approach 
for managing the risks associated with accepting collateral 
deposits.\3\ Specifically, the CRM Policy sets the governance processes 
for establishing and maintaining standards used to determine acceptable 
forms of collateral, as well as the methodology for establishing the 
valuation practices, including applicable haircuts and concentration 
limits to effectively manage OCC's credit exposure.\4\ In addition, the 
CRM Policy describes the requirements for periodically evaluating the 
forms of accepted collateral and the ongoing adequacy of the valuation 
processes.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Act Release No. 82311 (Dec. 13, 2017), 82 FR 
60252, 60252-53 (Dec. 19, 2017) (SR-OCC-2017-008).
    \4\ See id.
    \5\ See id. at 60253.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with regulatory obligations,\6\ OCC and its Board 
reviews these risk management policies at least annually. Through these 
annual reviews, OCC has identified certain changes to: (i) discontinue 
two underutilized collateral types, and (ii) update OCC's rules design 
to mitigate wrong-way risk. In connection with these changes, OCC also 
proposes to reorganize and restate OCC Rule 604 (Form of Margin Assets) 
to improve its clarity and concision.\7\ Pursuant to the provisions of 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange 
Act'' or ``Act''),\8\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\9\ OCC is filing with 
Commission a proposed rule change to make those changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(3)(i) (requiring, among other 
things, that a covered clearing agency subject its risk management 
policies, procedures and systems to review on a specified periodic 
basis and approval by the board of directors annually).
    \7\ See <a href="https://www.theocc.com/getmedia/9d3854cd-b782-450f-bcf7-33169b0576ce/occ_rules.pdf#page=59">https://www.theocc.com/getmedia/9d3854cd-b782-450f-bcf7-33169b0576ce/occ_rules.pdf#page=59</a>. OCC's full By-Laws and Rules can 
also be found on OCC's public website: <a href="https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules">https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules</a>.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed changes to OCC's By-Laws and Rules are included in 
Exhibits 5A and 5B to File No. SR-OCC-2026-001, respectively. Proposed 
changes to OCC's CRM Policy, Default Management Policy, Liquidity Risk 
Management Framework (``LRMF''), Margin Policy, Recovery and Orderly 
Wind-Down (``RWD'') Plan, Risk Management Framework, and STANS 
Methodology Description (collectively, the ``Policies'') are included 
in confidential Exhibits 5C, 5D, 5E, 5F, 5G, 5H, and 5I to File No. SR-
OCC-2026-001. Material proposed to be added is underlined and material 
proposed to be deleted is marked in strikethrough text. All capitalized 
terms not defined herein have the same meaning as set forth in the OCC 
By-Laws and Rules.

[[Page 9898]]

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), 
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these 
statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    OCC proposes to make the following changes to its By-Laws, Rules, 
and Policies:
a. Discontinue Underutilized Collateral Types
    Due to underutilization, OCC is discontinuing letters of credit 
\10\ and GSE debt securities \11\ as acceptable collateral types under 
OCC's rules. Utilization of these collateral types has historically 
been low relative to other eligible collateral types. Since 2023, when 
OCC modified its rules concerning its acceptance of letters of credit 
and the valuation of GSE debt securities,\12\ OCC has observed a 
decline in utilization of these collateral types. For instance, no 
Clearing Member has pledged GSE debt securities as margin collateral 
since July 11, 2023. From July 3, 2023 through June 30, 2024, use of 
letters of credit decreased by 78% (from $115 million to $25 million), 
with the remaining amount comprised of a single letter of credit for a 
single Clearing Member.\13\ Currently, no letters of credit remain on 
deposit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ OCC Rule 604(c) currently allows Clearing Members to 
deposit letters of credit issued by a bank or trust company approved 
by OCC for that purpose subject to certain criteria identified 
therein and the Interpretations and Policies (``I&Ps'') to Rule 604.
    \11\ OCC's By-Laws define ``GSE debt securities'' to mean such 
debt securities issued by Congressionally chartered corporations as 
the Risk Committee may from time to time approve for deposit as 
margin. OCC's acceptance of GSE debt securities as collateral is 
governed by Rule 604(b)(2) and the I&Ps to Rule 604.
    \12\ See Exchange Act Release No. 98101 (August 10, 2023), 88 FR 
55775 (Aug. 16, 2023) (SR-OCC-2022-012).
    \13\ OCC has communicated this proposed change with that member. 
Discontinuing letters of credit is not expected to have a material 
impact on that Clearing Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Continuing to maintain support for these underutilized collateral 
types would impose burdens on OCC and its Clearing Members, including 
the cost associated with ongoing risk monitoring and reviews of OCC's 
procedures related to these collateral types, as well as the costs of 
maintaining systems to facilitate OCC's acceptance of these collateral 
types. For example, if OCC were to continue to accept this collateral, 
OCC and its Clearing Members would need to test the functionality to 
support these collateral types in the new clearance and settlement 
system, Ovation, that OCC has been developing to replace its current 
system, Encore. In light of the decline in utilization, OCC does not 
believe these costs are justified. Accordingly, OCC determined to phase 
out these collateral types. On December 19, 2024, OCC issued an 
Information Memo \14\ announcing that OCC had determined to disallow 
letters of credit and GSE debt securities by exercising its discretion 
under I&P .06 to Rule 604 \15\ to withdraw its approval for the 
institutions approved as letter of credit issuers and disapproving GSE 
debt securities as acceptable collateral under I&P .15 to Rule 604.\16\ 
As the next phase, this proposed rule change would remove these 
collateral types from OCC's rules as follows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ OCC Information Memo #55740 (Dec. 19, 2024), available at 
<a href="https://infomemo.theocc.com/infomemos?number=55740">https://infomemo.theocc.com/infomemos?number=55740</a>.
    \15\ OCC Rule 604, I&P .06 (``[OCC] reserves the right in its 
sole discretion to refuse or revoke approval of any institution as 
an issuer of letters of credit at any time.'').
    \16\ OCC Rule 604, I&P .15 (``[OCC] may in its discretion 
determine that a security which meets the criteria listed in Rule 
604(b) is nevertheless disapproved as margin collateral with respect 
to all accounts of all Clearing Members, and therefore not grant 
margin credit, based on such factors as (i) trade volume, (ii) 
number of outstanding shareholders, (iii) number of outstanding 
shares, (iv) volatility and liquidity and (v) any other factors the 
Corporation determines are relevant.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, OCC would remove those provisions of the By-Laws and Rules 
that govern the acceptance and valuation of these collateral types. 
Specifically, OCC would delete Rule 604(b)(2) (GSE Debt Securities) and 
Rule 604(c) (Letters of Credit) in their entirety. OCC would also amend 
Rule 604(g) and (e) (renumbered as proposed Rules 604C(a) and (b), 
respectively), which concerns OCC's valuation of Government securities 
and GSE debt securities, to remove reference to GSE debt securities. 
OCC would make the same change to I&P .17 to Rule 604, which concerns 
the manner in which Clearing Members may deposit Government securities 
and GSE debt securities. OCC would also delete I&Ps .01 through .06 and 
.09 through .10 to Rule 604, each of which concerns standards for 
letters of credit issuers or limitations on the acceptance of letters 
of credit. Remaining provisions of Rule 604 would be renumbered as 
discussed below in connection with the reorganization and restatement 
of Rule 604. OCC would also make the following amendments to other By-
Laws and Rules:
    <bullet> Rule 101 (Definitions) would be amended to remove the 
definition for the term ``Restricted Letter of Credit.''
    <bullet> Rule 705 (Forms of Margin) would be amended to delete 
reference to GSE debt securities and letters of credit as acceptable 
forms of margin in X-M accounts.
    <bullet> Rule 1104 (Creation of Liquidating Settlement Account) 
would be amended to remove provisions in paragraphs (a) and (d) related 
to the contribution of funds received from a letter of credit issuer in 
the event of a Clearing Member default.
    <bullet> By-Law Article I (definitions) would be amended to remove 
the definition for the term ``GSE debt securities'' and renumber other 
definitions accordingly.
    <bullet> By-Law Article VI, Section 27 (Close-Out Netting) would be 
amended to delete reference to letters of credit as margin assets and 
provisions related thereto in paragraphs (f) and (h).
    OCC would also amend the CRM Policy to remove provisions related to 
letters of credit and GSE debt securities. Specifically, OCC would:
    <bullet> Delete a paragraph specific to how OCC manages the 
counterparty credit risk presented by letter of credit issuers.
    <bullet> Delete a sentence in the discussion of how OCC manages 
sovereign credit risk specific to a foreign-based entity approved to 
issue letters of credit.
    <bullet> Delete three sentences in the discussion of how OCC 
manages concentration risk specific to letters of credit.
    <bullet> Delete a reference to ``government sponsored entity 
securities'' in the discussion of how OCC applies collateral haircuts 
to certain collateral, including Government securities and GSE debt 
securities.
    OCC would also make conforming amendments to other rules that 
reference letters of credit and/or GSE debt securities. Specifically, 
OCC would:
    <bullet> Delete a reference to letters of credit in the Default 
Management Policy's discussion of how OCC would transfer the proceeds 
from any demand of payment on a letter of credit to the appropriate 
liquidity settlement account in the event of a Clearing Member's 
default.
    <bullet> Delete letters of credit and GSE debt securities from the 
LRMF's list of other liquidity resources that may be used to address 
foreseeable liquidity shortfalls

[[Page 9899]]

that would not be covered by OCC's committed resources and help OCC 
seek to avoid unwinding, revoking, or delaying the same-day settlement 
of payment obligations in the event of the default of the Clearing 
Member who deposited them.
    OCC would also make conforming amendments to its RWD Plan to delete 
references to remove descriptions related to letters of credit and/or 
GSE debt securities. Specifically, OCC would:
    <bullet> Delete letters of credit and GSE debt securities from a 
description of the collateral accepted through cross-margin 
arrangements.
    <bullet> Delete a description of OCC's external interconnection 
with letter of credit banks.
    <bullet> Delete a reference to letters of credit as one of the 
types of banking relations for which OCC maintains tools to address 
credit risks resulting from bank failures.
    <bullet> Delete a reference to GSE debt securities as among the 
collateral OCC may pledge to the syndicated bank credit facility that 
OCC maintains as a source of committed liquidity to meet settlement 
obligations as a central counterparty.
b. Wrong-Way Risk Updates
    With respect to the collateral that Clearing Members pledge to 
satisfy margin requirements, ``wrong-way risk'' is the risk that the 
value of the collateral is positively correlated with the 
creditworthiness of the Clearing Member.\17\ OCC manages such wrong-way 
risk by (1) limiting the valuation of collateral that would likely lose 
value in the event that the Clearing Member providing the collateral 
defaults, and (2) prohibiting participants from receiving value for 
depositing their own, or an affiliate's, debt or equity securities as 
collateral.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Separately, OCC has established a margin add-on charge, the 
Specific Wrong-Way Risk (``SWWR'') Add-on, to address specific 
wrong-way risk related to a Clearing Member's positions in cleared 
contracts related to securities, including index-linked securities, 
issued by that Clearing Member or its affiliates. See Exchange Act 
Release No. 87718 (Dec. 11, 2019), 84 FR 68992 (Dec. 17, 2019) (SR-
OCC-2019-010). SWWR is the risk that a clearing agency's exposure to 
a participant is highly likely to increase when the creditworthiness 
of that participant is deteriorating. See Exchange Act Release No. 
78961 (Sept. 29, 2016), 81 FR 70786, 70816 n.317 (Oct. 13, 2016) 
(S7-03-14).
    \18\ Notwithstanding this prohibition, securities of 
participants can be used to hedge options positions on such 
securities. See OCC Rule 604, I&P .16. In that event, OCC 
systematically limits the number of shares the Clearing Member is 
allowed to deposit to the delta offset. See infra note 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC is proposing changes to address the wrong-way risk related to a 
Clearing Member's cleared positions in exchange traded products 
(``ETPs'') \19\ that hold spot cryptocurrency \20\ for which the 
Clearing Member serves as the custodian of the fund's cryptocurrency 
holdings.\21\ Under OCC's existing Margin Policy, OCC applies a SWWR 
Add-on based on the assumption that, when a Clearing Member defaults, 
the value of any equity security issued by the Clearing Member or its 
affiliates would fall to zero. OCC proposes to amend the Margin Policy 
to extend this approach to a Clearing Member's positions in spot 
cryptocurrency fund shares for which the Clearing Member or its 
affiliates serve as the custodian of the fund's cryptocurrency holdings 
(e.g., all fund shares, call options and put options would be valued at 
zero). OCC believes that extending the SWWR Add-on to spot 
cryptocurrency ETPs when the Clearing Member is affiliated with the 
custodian of such ETP is appropriate given the unique custody risks 
associated with cryptocurrencies. For example, a cybersecurity event 
affecting a Clearing Member and its affiliates may result in the theft 
or loss of the cryptocurrency and a potential decline in the value of 
the ETP at the same time that the Clearing Member may default on 
obligations to OCC. OCC does not expect this change to have any impact 
on existing Clearing Members, only one of whom has an affiliate that is 
a trust custodian for a spot cryptocurrency ETP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ OCC's By-Laws define ``fund share'' to mean a publicly 
traded security, as defined in Section 3(a)(10) of the Exchange Act, 
15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10), that represents an interest in a trust, 
investment company, commodity pool, or similar entity holding and/or 
trading in one or more investments and, where the investments are 
commodities, that is subject to any applicable advisory exemption or 
other relief or guidance issued by the CFTC. As such, the definition 
encompasses ETPs.
    \20\ On January 10, 2024, the Commission approved proposed rule 
changes filed by several national securities exchanges to list spot 
bitcoin-based, commodity-based ETPs. See Exchange Act Release No. 
99306 (Jan 10, 2024), 89 FR 3008 (Jan. 17, 2024) (SR-NYSEARCA-2021-
90, et al.). This proposed rule change would apply to those fund 
shares and any other commodity-based ETPs holding cryptocurrency 
that are subsequently approved or listed.
    \21\ Under I&P .15 and .16 to current Rule 604, OCC already 
limits such ETPs as collateral to the amount that is risk reducing 
for activity in cleared positions. See OCC Information Memo #54918 
(July 22, 2024), available at <a href="https://infomemo.theocc.com/infomemos?number=54918">https://infomemo.theocc.com/infomemos?number=54918</a>. Such cleared positions include both stock 
borrow positions and options positions following the Commission's 
approval of proposed rule changes filed by national securities 
exchanges to permit the listing and trading of options on such fund 
shares. See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 101128 (Sept. 20, 2024), 
89 FR 78942 (Sept. 26, 2024) (SR-ISE-2024-03). OCC began clearing 
options on such fund shares after staff of the CFTC's Division of 
Clearing and Risk issued a staff advisory regarding the clearing of 
options on spot commodity-based ETPs. See Staff Advisory Relating to 
the Clearing of Options on Spot Commodity Exchange Traded Funds 
(ETFs), CFTC Letter No. 24-16 (Nov. 15, 2024), available at <a href="https://www.cftc.gov/csl/24-16/download">https://www.cftc.gov/csl/24-16/download</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Rule 604 Restatement
    In addition to the substantive changes to OCC's By-Laws, Rules and 
Procedures discussed above, OCC also proposes to reorganize and restate 
Rule 604 to provide a clearer and more transparent presentation of the 
details. In particular, OCC proposes to (i) subdivide Rule 604 into 
three parts--Rule 604A, Rule 604B, and Rule 604C--to align with the 
three topics currently addressed by Rule 604, namely (A) the form of 
margin collateral that OCC accepts, (B) how OCC holds and invests such 
collateral, and (C) how OCC values the collateral; (ii), to incorporate 
those of the eighteen existing I&Ps that remain after the deletions 
specific to letters of credit, discussed above, into the relevant text 
of Rules 604A through 604C, so that the provisions applicable to a 
particular type collateral are consolidated within the Rules governing 
these three topics, and (iii) make other textual edits to improve 
clarity without changing the meaning of the existing rules, including 
the following types of changes:
    <bullet> Dividing lengthy paragraphs into subdivisions organized 
logically by topic, as discussed in connection with the reorganization 
discussed below.
    <bullet> Adding titles to paragraphs, as appropriate, to improve 
clarity and organization.
    <bullet> Restate provisions in the active voice.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Exhibit 5B, proposed Rules 604A(b)(2)(D), 
604A(b)(4)(D), 604A(b)(4)(F), 604A(b)(5), 604B(b)(1), 604B(c)(1), 
604B(c)(2), 604B(d)(1), 604B(d)(2), 604B(d)(3), 604B(e), 604B(f)(1), 
604B(g)(1), Rule 604C(b), Rule 604C(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Restate provisions using plain language (e.g., replacing 
``shall'' with ``must,'' ``will,'' ``is'' or ``may,'' as the context 
dictates, and otherwise eliminating formal legal phrases).\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Exhibit 5B, proposes Rules 604A(b)(2)(B), 
604A(b)(2)(C), 604A(b)(3)(A), 604A(b)(3)(B)(ii), 604A(b)(4)(D), 
604A(b)(4)(E), 604A(b)(4)(F), 604A(b)(5), Rule 604B(a), 604B(b)(1), 
604B(b)(2)(A), 604B(b)(3), 604B(b)(4), 604B(c)(1), 604B(c)(3). 
604B(d)(2), 604B(d)(3), 604B(d)(4), 604B(e), 604B(f)(1), 604B(f)(2), 
604B(g)(1), 604B(g)(2), 604C(a), 604C(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Renumbering cross-references to other Rules or I&Ps, 
consistent with the proposed reorganization and restatement.
i. Rule 604A (Form of Margin Assets)
    Proposed Rule 604A would capture the existing requirements for 
eligible collateral, other than GSE debt securities and letters of 
credit, currently captured in Rule 604(a) (Cash) and Rule

[[Page 9900]]

604(b) (Securities) and certain interpretations and policies that 
address OCC's authority to disapprove otherwise eligible collateral or 
accept collateral that does not meet the minimum requirements. 
Specifically, the first sentence of Rule 604(a), which provides that 
Clearing Members may deposit U.S. dollars in accordance with procedures 
acceptable to OCC, would be renumbered Rule 604A(a) and amended to 
provide that such deposits may be made ``[t]o satisfy margin 
requirements.'' The same amendment would be added to the beginning of 
each provision that introduces an acceptable type of margin 
collateral.\24\ As so amended, the introductory paragraph to existing 
Rule 604 would no longer be necessary and would therefore be 
deleted.\25\ Other provisions of current Rule 604(a) would be relocated 
to proposed Rule 604B (Holding and Investing Margin Assets), as 
discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See Exhibit 5B, Proposed Rules 604A(b)(1) (Government 
Securities); 604A(b)(2) (Stocks); 604A(b)(4) (Money Market Fund 
Shares).
    \25\ For the same reason, OCC proposes to delete the 
introductory paragraph to current Rule 604(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Current Rule 604(b), which concerns the deposit of securities to 
satisfy margin requirements, would be renumbered Rule 604A(b). The 
first sentence of current Rule 604(b)(1), which concerns the deposit of 
Government securities, would become Rule 604A(b)(1). Other provisions 
of current Rule 604(b) would be relocated to Rule 604B, as discussed 
below. Current Rule 604(b)(4)(i), which concerns the deposit of stocks, 
would be renumbered Rule 604A(b)(2). The existing definition of 
``stocks'' as applicable to Rule 604, which includes ETPs (i.e., ``fund 
shares'') \26\ and exchange traded notes (``ETNs'' or ``index-linked 
securities'') \27\ as those terms are defined in Article I of OCC's By-
Laws, would be relocated from Rule 604(b)(4)(iii) to the introductory 
paragraph of proposed Rule 604A(b)(2).\28\ The term ``stock'' would be 
used throughout the remainder of the proposed rule, rather than 
``common stock,'' except where the provision applies specifically to a 
particular type of stock, such as a fund share or index-linked 
security. In addition, OCC would subdivide other relevant provisions of 
Rule 604(b)(4)(i) \29\ into items (A), (B) and (D), which would provide 
that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ OCC's By-Laws define ``fund share'' to mean a publicly 
traded security, as defined in Section 3(a)(10) of the Exchange Act, 
15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10), that represents an interest in a trust, 
investment company, commodity pool, or similar entity holding and/or 
trading in one or more investments and, where the investments are 
commodities, that is subject to any applicable advisory exemption or 
other relief or guidance issued by the CFTC. As such, the definition 
encompasses ETPs.
    \27\ OCC By-Laws define ``index-linked security'' to mean a debt 
security listed on a national securities exchange, the payment upon 
maturity of which is based in whole or in part upon the performance 
of an index or indexes of equity securities or futures contracts, 
one or more physical commodities, currencies or debt securities, or 
a combination of any of the foregoing. As such, the definition 
encompasses ETNs.
    \28\ For the avoidance of doubt, ``includes'' as used in this 
definition means ``includes, but is not limited.'' The definition is 
meant to indicate that fund shares and index-linked securities are 
included within the meaning of ``stock.'' However, per proposed Rule 
604A(b)(2)(A), ``stock'' also includes any covered security within 
the meaning of Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933.
    \29\ The penultimate sentence of current Rule 604(b)(4)(i) would 
be deleted as redundant of proposed Rule 604B(b), which relocates 
the third sentence of current Rule 604(d). The final sentence of 
current Rule 604(b)(4)(i) would be relocated to proposed Rule 604C, 
as discussed below.

    (A) A stock must be a ``covered security'' within the meaning of 
Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 \30\ (i.e., 
authorized for listing on a national securities exchange);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See 17 U.S.C. 77r(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (B) A stock that is neither an underlying security nor a fund 
share that has as its reference index an index that underlies any 
cleared contract must have a market value of at least $3 per share, 
as determined by the Corporation, subject to OCC's right to waive 
the minimum value requirement; \31\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Exchange Act Release No. 61006 (Nov. 16, 2009), 74 FR 
61182 (Nov. 23, 2009) (SR-OCC-2009-15) (establishing a minimum value 
requirement for collateral other than ``Options-Related Stocks,'' 
which are already subject to minimum requirements by virtue of OCC's 
agreements with and the rules of the options exchanges).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (D) A Clearing Member may not deposit a stock that is suspended 
from trading by the market that listed or qualified the stock for 
trading because of volatility, lack of liquidity, or similar 
characteristics, subject to OCC's discretion in cases where markets 
do not take the same action with respect to the stock.

    OCC would also relocate the second sentence of current Rule 
604(b)(4)(iii), which provides that fund shares and index-linked 
securities must be of a class approved by the Corporation for deposit 
as margin, as proposed Rule 604(b)(4)(C). As reorganized, OCC would 
further amend the provision to remove unnecessary and redundant 
reference to the other requirements Rule 604(b)(4). Current Rule 
604(b)(4)(ii), which concerns the manner of depositing securities, 
requirements for securities depositories, as defined below, and the 
Clearing Member's interest in any dividends or gains received on stocks 
deposited as margin, would be relocated to proposed Rule 604B, as 
discussed below.
    Current I&Ps .15 and .16 to Rule 604, which address the 
circumstances in which OCC may disapprove securities that otherwise 
meet the requirements of Rule 604, would be relocated to proposed Rule 
604A(b)(3). Proposed Rule 604A(b)(3)(A) would relocate I&P .15, which 
concerns the factors OCC may use in exercising its authority to 
disapprove a security as margin collateral with respect to all accounts 
of all Clearing Members, and therefore not grant margin credit. 
Proposed Rule 604A(b)(3)(B) would relocate the provisions related to 
disapproval of securities as margin collateral for a particular 
Clearing Member found in I&P .16 current to Rule 604. That Rule would 
be further subdivided into sections addressing (i) disapproval with 
respect to some or all of the shares of a stock to address 
concentration risk, and (ii) disapproval with respect to stocks issued 
by such Clearing Member or an affiliate of such Clearing Member to 
address wrong-way risk. The final sentence of I&P .16 to current Rule 
604, which provides an exception for securities disapproved under this 
Rule to the extent they hedge cleared contracts held in the same 
account, would be relocated to proposed Rule 604A(b)(3)(C).
    Current Rule 604(b)(3) (Money Market Fund Shares or ``MMF 
Shares''), would be relocated to proposed Rule 604A(b)(4).\32\ An 
introductory paragraph would be added that authorizes Clearing Members 
to deposit MMF shares to satisfy margin requirements if such MMF Shares 
satisfy the requirements found in existing items (i) through (v), which 
would be renumbered as Items A through F.\33\ In addition, the 
provision regarding limits to address wrong-way risk (current Rule 
604(b)(3)(iii)/proposed Rule 604A(b)(4)(D)) would be restated to 
conform the language to other provisions regarding wrong-way risk in 
Rule 604A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ No MMF Shares are currently deposited as collateral, and 
additional changes to the Rules are contemplated before MMF Shares 
could be accepted. OCC is not seeking to pursue such changes at this 
time. The proposed changes are merely to restate the existing 
requirements consistent with the broader reorganization of exiting 
Rule 604.
    \33\ The last two sentences of current Rule 604(b)(3)(i) would 
be reorganized into its own item (B) of Rule 604A(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, I&P .13 to current Rule 604 would be relocated to propose 
Rule 604A(b)(5). That provision would address OCC's authority to accept 
securities deposited by Clearing Members that do not satisfy the 
requirements of propose Rule 604A and that such securities and any 
securities that cease to meet the requirements of Rule 604A will be 
subject to OCC's lien and other rights under the Rule and By-Laws, but 
that they will be valued at zero for margin purposes unless and

[[Page 9901]]

until such securities meet such requirements.
ii. Rule 604B (Holding and Investing Margin Assets)
    Proposed Rule 604B would relocate existing provisions of Rule 604 
and its interpretations and policies that specify a Clearing Member's 
property interest in margin assets, the manner in which margin assets 
must be deposited by a Clearing Member and held by OCC, the Clearing 
Member's rights to gains received in respect of the margin deposits, 
and OCC's current authority to invest margin cash in Government 
securities for its own account. Specifically, Rule 604B(a) (Clearing 
Member Funds) would relocate the first sentence of existing Rule 
604(d), which concerns a Clearing Member's property interest in margin 
assets.
    Proposed Rule 604B(b) would aggregate existing requirements related 
to the deposit of margin, including (1) the manner in which Clearing 
Members must deposit margin assets and (2) the manner in which the 
Corporation will hold such funds at approved depositories. 
Specifically, proposed Rule 604B(b)(1) would provide that (A) a 
Clearing Member must deposit margin assets with respect to a designated 
account of a Clearing Member in an OCC account in an approved 
depository in OCC's name, or by such other method as OCC may from time 
to time approve (current Rule 604(b)(1) and (4)(i)); (B) that all 
assets pledged to OCC must be free of any lien or other encumbrances 
senior to that of OCC (I&P .07 to current Rule 604); and (C) that 
margin assets in the form of securities are deemed to be deposited when 
OCC receives written confirmation from the depository or confirmation 
that the securities have been pledged to the Corporation (i.e., with 
respect to deposits in lieu of margin under Rule 610) (penultimate 
sentence of current Rule 604(b)(4)(ii)). With respect to conditions for 
approved depositories, Rule 604(b)(2) would relocate provisions 
requiring that (A) except as otherwise under subitem (B) of the 
proposed Rule,\34\ margin assets will be held in accounts at such 
approved depositories designated as Clearing Member margin accounts 
(current Rule 604(d)); (C) the arrangement with the depository must (i) 
permit the securities to be promptly sold by or on OCC's order for the 
account of the Clearing Member without notice and (ii) require the 
Clearing Member to pay all fees and expenses incident to the ownership 
or sale of the securities or the arrangement with the depository 
(current Rule 604(b)(4)(ii)); and (D) OCC will not accept margin 
securities from a depository if such depository, a parent, or an 
affiliate has an equity interest of 20% or more in the depositing 
Clearing Member's total capital (current Rule 604, I&P .11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ Currently, Rule 604(d) provides two exceptions for when 
margin assets need not be held in an account at a depository 
designated as a Clearing Member margin account: (i) margin cash 
invested in Government securities under current Rule 601(a), and 
(ii) funds credited to a Liquidating Settlement Account under 
Chapter XI of OCC's Rules for managing a Clearing Member default. 
For clarity, proposed Rule 604B(b)(2)(B) would add a third exception 
with respect to non-customer margin funds held in an account a 
Federal Reserve Bank, which is currently addressed by I&P .18 to 
Rule 604.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 604B(c) would aggregate provisions concerning the 
commingling of funds, including that: (1) OCC will not commingle margin 
assets with OCC's own funds or use margin assets as working capital 
(current Rule 604(d)); (2) notwithstanding proposed Rule 604B(c)(1), 
OCC may commingle non-customer funds with cash Clearing Fund 
contributions in an account at a Federal Reserve Bank that is not 
designated as a Clearing Member margin account \35\ (current Rule 604, 
I&P .18); and (3) OCC may commingle margin assets for the account of 
any Clearing Member with margin assets as margin for other Clearing 
Members (current Rule 604(d)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See Exchange Act Release No. 90100 (Oct. 6, 2020), 85 FR 
64603 (Oct. 13, 2020) (SR-OCC-2020-010) (approving OCC's proposal to 
hold cash Clearing Fund contributions and certain non-customer cash 
margin assets in OCC's account at the Federal Reserve Bank of 
Chicago).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 604B(d) would relocate current Rule 604(b)(5), which 
concerns restrictions on the types of accounts to which a Clearing 
Member may deposit securities held for the account of others (i.e., 
non-firm accounts). The proposed Rule would subdivide these 
restrictions into those that: (1) prohibit a Clearing Member from 
depositing securities held for the account of a securities customer in 
any account other than a customers' account and customers' lien 
account, (2) prohibit a Clearing Member from depositing securities held 
for any Market Maker in any account other than a Market-Makers' account 
in which such Market Maker is a participant, and (3) prohibit the 
deposit of a ``fully paid security'' or an ``excess margin security'' 
within the meaning of SEC Rule 15c3-3 \36\ in any account except to the 
extent permitted pursuant to interpretative guidance or no-action 
relief of the SEC or another SRO.\37\ The last sentence of current Rule 
604(b)(5), which concerns securities held for the account of a futures 
customer, would be renumbered Rule 604B(d)(4) and amended in line with 
the other provisions of proposed Rule 604(b) to prohibit a Clearing 
Member from depositing securities held for the account of a futures 
customer in any account other than a segregated futures account or 
segregated futures professional account. Current Rule 604(d)'s 
requirement that OCC hold margin assets in respect of a segregated 
futures account in accordance with Section 4d of the Commodity Exchange 
Act \38\ and regulations thereunder \39\ would be renumbered as Rule 
604B(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3.
    \37\ See Exchange Act Release No. 61425 (Jan. 26, 2010), 75 FR 
5366 (Feb. 2, 2010).
    \38\ 7 U.S.C. 6d.
    \39\ See 17 CFR 1.20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 604B(f) would aggregate provisions concerning a 
Clearing Member's rights to any interest, dividend or gain received on 
securities. Specifically, proposed Rule 604B(f)(1) would relocate the 
final sentence of Rule 604(b)(1), which provides that all interest or 
gain received or accrued on Government securities deposited as margin 
collateral, prior to any sale or negotiation, will belong to the 
depositing Clearing Member, and OCC will credit any interest on, or 
proceeds from the maturity of, such Government securities that OCC 
receives to the account of the Clearing Member in respect of which the 
deposit was made. Proposed Rule 604B(f)(2) would relocate the final 
sentence of current Rule 604(b)(4)(ii), which provides that all 
dividends or gain received or accrued on stocks, prior to any sale or 
negotiation, will belong to the depositing Clearing Member.
    Proposed Rule 604B(g) would aggregate provisions concerning OCC's 
investment of margin cash. Specifically, the second sentence of current 
Rule 604(a), which provides OCC's authority to invest margin cash 
deposits, partially or in whole, for its account in Government 
securities, would be renumbered Rule 604B(g)(1). The penultimate 
sentence of current Rule 604(d), which provides that OCC will maintain 
records clearly identifying any Government securities from such 
investment as held in trust for Clearing Members, would become Rule 
604B(g)(2). Current I&P .12 to Rule 04, which provides that OCC will 
invest margin in a segregated futures account or segregated futures 
professional account in accordance with Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission (``CFTC'') Regulations 1.25, 1.26, and 1.27 \40\ and such 
other rules as may be adopted by the CFTC to govern the investment of 
such funds, would become Rule

[[Page 9902]]

604B(g)(3). In addition, that provision would be restated as a 
conditional statement (i.e., ``[i]f the Corporation invests'' such 
segregated futures customer account funds, then proposed Rule 
604B(g)(2) would apply). OCC does not currently invest such futures 
customer cash margin under its Cash and Investment Management 
Policy.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ 17 CFR 1.25-1.27.
    \41\ See Exchange Act Release No. 93916 (Jan. 6, 2022), 87 FR 
1819, 1822 n.29 (Jan 12, 2022) (SR-OCC-2021-014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

iii. Rule 604C (Valuation of Margin Assets)
    Proposed Rule 604C (Holding and Investing Margin Assets) would 
relocate existing provisions of existing Rule 604 and its 
interpretations and policies that specify how OCC values margin assets 
deposited to meet margin requirements. Specifically, current Rule 
604(g), which provides that OCC may elect to value margin assets in the 
form of securities, other than Government securities,\42\ using the 
same multivariate analysis applied under Rule 601 to underlying 
interests rather than assigning any fixed dollar value to such margin 
assets, would be renumbered Rule 604C(a). Current Rule 604(e), which 
concerns collateral haircuts for Government securities and GSE debt 
securities, would be relocated to Rule 604C(b), as amended to remove 
reference to GSE debt securities. With respect to the valuation of MMF 
Shares, the last two sentences of current Rule 604(b)(3)(iv) would 
become Rule 604C(c). Current Rule 604(f), which provides that OCC may 
value assets denominated in a foreign currency using such exchange 
rates and applying such ``haircuts'' as it deems appropriate for its 
protection, would become Rule 604C(d). Finally, the final sentence of 
current Rule 604(b)(4)(i), which provides that OCC will assign no value 
to stock deposited pursuant to Rule 610 \43\ (i.e., deposits in lieu of 
margin) for purposes of Rule 604C, would become Rule 604C(e). Rule 
604C(e) would be further amended to remove reference to Rule 610T, 
which was a rule that predated current Rule 610.\44\ Rule 610T was 
removed from OCC's Rules following a transitional period to the current 
escrow deposit program.\45\ Accordingly, references to the transitional 
Rule 610T throughout OCC's Rules are no longer necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See Exchange Act Release No. 98101 (Aug. 10, 2023), 88 FR 
55775 (Aug. 16, 2023) (SR-OCC-2022-012).
    \43\ OCC would also delete an outdated reference to Rule 610T, 
which was a temporary Rule in effect during a transition period to 
the current means of making deposits in lieu of margin under current 
Rules 610, 610A, 610B and 610C.
    \44\ OCC would apply the same change to Rules 1506, 1701, 2301, 
and 2701. Rule 1506 would be further amended for grammatical 
consistency with those other Rules.
    \45\ See Exchange Act Release No. 78675 (Aug. 25, 2016), 81 FR 
60099, 60105 (Aug. 31, 2016) (SR-OCC-2016-009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

iv. Conforming Changes
    In connection with the reorganization discussed above, OCC would 
amend cross references to Rule 604 in other rules. Specifically, OCC 
would:
    <bullet> Amend Rule 601(c) to refer to proposed Rule 604C when 
referencing the Rule providing for how OCC values margin assets. In 
addition, OCC would add numbering and titles to the multiple paragraphs 
of Rule 601(c) for clarity and ease of reference.
    <bullet> Amend I&P .06 to Rule 601 to refer to proposed Rule 604C 
when referring to the Rule that provides for how OCC values margin 
assets other than stocks. In addition, that I&P would be further 
amended to (i) conform with Rule 604A(b)(2)'s definition of ``stock'' 
and include a cross-reference thereto; and (ii) conform a cross 
reference to the new paragraph numbers under Rule 601(c).
    <bullet> Amend Rule 610 to refer to proposed Rule 604A(b)(1) when 
referencing the Rule governing the eligibility of Government securities 
as collateral.
    <bullet> Amend Rule 705 to refer to proposed Rule 604A(b)(2) when 
referencing the Rule governing eligibility of stock as collateral, and 
to conform with Rule 604A's definition of ``stock.''
    <bullet> Amend I&P .04 to Rule 1002 to refer to proposed Rule 
604B(c)(2) when referencing the Rule providing OCC with authority to 
commingle non-customer margin assets with Clearing Fund contributions 
at an account at a Federal Reserve Bank.
    <bullet> Amend Rules 1006(c) and 1006(f)(1)(C) and the Risk 
Management Framework \46\ to refer to proposed Rule 604B(g) when 
referencing the rules governing OCC's investment of margin cash.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ In addition, OCC would also amend the applicable statement 
in the Risk Management Framework to refer to OCC's Cash and 
Investment Management Policy, which has been filed with the 
Commission. See Exchange Act Release No. 93916, supra note 39.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Amend the CRM Policy and the Margin Policy \47\ to refer 
to proposed Rule 604A when referencing the rules governing eligible 
forms of collateral.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ In addition, OCC would amend the Margin Policy to correct 
an outdated reference to its Business Backtesting Procedures, which 
were retired in favor of OCC's consolidated Backtesting Procedures. 
See Exchange Act Release No. 100998 (Sept. 11, 2024), 89 FR 76171 
(Sept. 17, 2024) (SR-OCC-2024-009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Amend the CRM Policy to refer to proposed Rule 604B when 
referencing the rules governing deposit of margin assets.
    <bullet> Amend a footnote in the CRM Policy concerning the rules 
governing the eligibility of MMF Shares to refer to proposed Rule 
604A(b)(4).
    <bullet> Amend the CRM Policy to refer to proposed Rule 604C(b) 
when referring to the rules governing collateral haircuts applicable to 
Government securities.
    <bullet> Amend the RWD Plan to correct a cross reference to current 
Rule 604(a) when it would be more appropriate to cite to Rule 609(b) 
when referring to OCC's authority to require the deposit of intra-day 
margin in the form of required cash if OCC forecasts that Clearing 
Member's potential settlement obligations could be in excess of OCC's 
liquidity resources.
    <bullet> Amend the Risk Management Framework's discussion of OCC's 
management of collateral risk to reference proposed OCC Rules 604A 
through 604C.
2. Statutory Basis
    OCC believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 
17A of the Act \48\ and the Exchange Act Rules 17Ad-22(e)(1), (3), (5), 
and (21) \49\ thereunder for the reasons discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \49\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1), (3), (5), (21).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \50\ requires, among other things, 
that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt 
and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, 
to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and 
transactions and to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds 
which are in the custody or control of the clearing or agency or for 
which it is responsible. The proposed changes to OCC's rules with 
respect to the management of wrong-way risk and concentration risk are 
intended to ensure that OCC maintains sufficient collateral, in both 
form and amount, to address the default of the depositing Clearing 
Member. OCC would use the margin collateral it has collected from a 
defaulting Clearing Member to protect other Clearing Members and their 
customers from default losses and ensure that OCC can continue the 
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement for the markets it serves. 
In addition, OCC believes the proposed restatement of Rule 604 is 
designed to

[[Page 9903]]

provide for the safeguarding of securities and funds in OCC's custody 
or control by providing additional clarity and transparency about how 
securities and funds are held and/or invested by OCC (i.e., proposed 
Rule 604B) and by removing unnecessary Rules related to the acceptance 
of collateral types that OCC will no longer accept going forward (i.e., 
letters of credit and GSE debt securities).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1)
    Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) requires OCC to establish, maintain 
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to, 
among other things, ensure a clear and transparent legal basis for each 
aspect of OCC's activities in all relevant jurisdictions.\51\ In 
connection with the annual review of its collateral risk management 
practices, OCC has determined to no longer accept certain underutilized 
collateral types, pursuant to existing authority to disapprove such 
collateral. This proposed rule change would remove those collateral 
types from OCC rules, which provide the legal basis for OCC's clearance 
and settlement activity, to enhance their clarity and transparency. In 
addition, OCC proposes to reorganize and restate OCC Rule 604, 
including by organizing the surviving provisions of that Rule by topic 
into Rules 604A, 604B and 604C, integrating the surviving 
interpretations and policies to that Rule into the text of the re-
organized Rules, and restating the rules to reduce the use of passive 
voice and to promote the use of plain language. OCC believes that these 
proposed enhancements to the presentation of Rule 604 are consistent 
with Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) \52\ by enhancing the clarity and 
transparency of its Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1).
    \52\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(3)
    Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(3) requires OCC to establish, maintain 
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to, 
among other things, maintain a sound risk management framework that 
includes policies, procedures and systems that are designed to manage 
risks that arise in or are borne by OCC and which are subject to 
periodic review and annual approval by OCC's Board.\53\ As discussed 
above, the proposed changes arise from OCC's annual review of its 
collateral risk management, presented to and approved by its Board. OCC 
believes the change to recognize the wrong-way risk inherent in spot 
cryptocurrency where the Clearing Member or its affiliate serve as 
custodian of that cryptocurrency, and to impose a SWWR Add-on for such 
cryptocurrency, limits the risk that a Clearing Member may lose the 
cryptocurrency at or around the same time that it may default on its 
obligations to OCC. Accordingly, OCC believes the proposed changes help 
to maintain the soundness of its risk management framework by limiting 
that specific risk borne by OCC, consistent with Exchange Act Rule 
17Ad-22(e)(3).\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(3).
    \54\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5)
    Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5) requires OCC to establish, maintain 
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to, 
among other things, limit the assets it accepts as collateral to those 
with low credit, liquidity, and market risks, and set and enforce 
appropriately conservative collateral concentration limits, and require 
a review of the sufficiency of such concentration limits not less than 
annually.\55\ When adopting the Standards for Covered Clearing 
Agencies, the Commission noted that when assessing compliance with the 
requirements of Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5),\56\ a covered clearing 
agency's policies and procedures generally should account for wrong-way 
risk by limiting the acceptance of collateral that would likely lose 
value in the event that the participant providing the collateral 
defaults.\57\ The Board has approved changes to address the potential 
wrong-way risk associated with collateral in the form of a spot 
cryptocurrency ETP for a Clearing Member who is the custodian or is 
affiliated with the custodian of that ETP. As discussed above, the 
proposed changes are designed to address custody risks that are unique 
to cryptocurrency that could result in a loss of value for the spot 
cryptocurrency ETP for which the Clearing Member or its affiliate 
serves as a custodian at the same time that the Clearing Member may 
experience financial or operational difficulty in meeting its 
obligations to OCC. OCC believes the proposed changes would help to 
ensure that the collateral it accepts from that Clearing Member is of 
low credit risk by limiting the value it would assign to spot 
cryptocurrency ETPs. As such OCC believes that the proposed changes are 
consistent with Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5).\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(5).
    \56\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(5).
    \57\ See Exchange Act Release No. 78961, supra note 15, 81 FR at 
70816.
    \58\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(21)
    Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(21) requires OCC to establish, 
maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably 
designed to, among other things, be efficient and effective in meeting 
the requirements of its participants and the markets it serves, and 
that OCC's management regularly review the efficiency and effectiveness 
of its clearing and settlement arrangements and operating structure, 
including risk management policies, procedures and systems.\59\ In 
connection with OCC's annual review of its collateral risk management, 
OCC has determined to discontinue the acceptance of letters of credit 
and GSE debt securities as margin collateral. Utilization of these 
collateral types by OCC's participants has declined since the last time 
that OCC amended the rules applicable thereto in 2023. GSE debt 
securities have not been pledged since July of 2023 and no letters of 
credit remain on deposit. As such, OCC does not believe that the 
operational burden associated with maintaining these collateral types 
is justified. In making this determination, OCC has also considered the 
burden on OCC and its Clearing Members that would be associated with 
testing the functionality for supporting these collateral types in 
Ovation, OCC's forthcoming clearance and settlement system. 
Accordingly, OCC believes that eliminating these underutilized 
collateral types and removing them from OCC's rules would promote OCC's 
efficiency and effectiveness, consistent with Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-
22(e)(21).\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(21).
    \60\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Act \61\ requires that the rules of a 
clearing agency not impose any burden on competition not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. OCC does not 
believe that the proposed rule changes concerning removing letters of 
credit and GSE debt securities as collateral types under OCC rules, or 
the reorganization or restatement of Rule 604 would impact or impose 
any burden on competition. None of these changes would inhibit access 
to OCC's services or disadvantage or favor any particular user in 
relationship to another, and all

[[Page 9904]]

of the changes would be applied uniformly to all Clearing Members. In 
addition, the changes to collateral types are not expected to have an 
impact on Clearing Members because no GSE debt securities or letters of 
credit are currently deposited. Accordingly, the proposed rule change 
would not unfairly inhibit access to OCC's services or disadvantage or 
favor any particular user in relationship to another user.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While management of wrong-way risk is necessarily specific to the 
firm pledging the collateral, and the impact on any one firm will be 
dependent on the identity of that firm and its affiliates, the 
collateral that it pledges and its cleared contracts, OCC believes that 
the proposed changes are necessary and appropriate in furtherance of 
the purposes of the Act. As discussed above, OCC is proposing changes 
to its collateral risk management to extend its approach to managing 
SWWR to spot cryptocurrency fund shares for which the Clearing Member 
or an affiliate acts as a custodian of the fund's cryptocurrency 
holdings to address collateral risks that are unique to these new types 
of ETPs. To the extent the proposed changes cause any burden on 
competition, OCC believes that they are necessary to fairly account for 
the SWWR inherent in these new products that were not contemplated when 
the current SWWR Add-ons were implemented. OCC further believes that 
these proposed changes would better enable OCC to account for wrong-way 
risk, consistent with and appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of 
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(5) under the Act.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change 
Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with 
respect to the proposed rule change, and none have been received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.
    The proposal shall not take effect until all regulatory actions 
required with respect to the proposal are completed.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#daa8afb6bff7b9b5b7b7bfb4aea99aa9bfb9f4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ceee9f0f9b1fff3f1f1f9f2e8efdceff9ffb2fbf3ea">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-OCC-2026-001 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-OCC-2026-001. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of such filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC's website at <a href="https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules">https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules</a>.
    Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; 
you should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication 
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2026-001 and 
should be submitted on or before March 20, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\63\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-03915 Filed 2-26-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 27, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.