Notice2026-03881

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 26, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9553-9555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-03881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-869]


Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From India: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
certain producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of 
subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of 
review (POR), March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024.

DATES: Applicable February 26, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Papakostas or Seth Brown, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0086 or (202) 482-0029, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 11, 2025, Commerce published the Preliminary Results and 
invited comments from interested parties.\1\ On August 5 and 6, 2025, 
Titan Tire Corporation (the petitioner), ATC Tires Private Ltd. and ATC 
AP Tires Private Limited (collectively, ATC), and Asian Tire Factory 
Ltd. and Lyallpur Rubber Mills (collectively, ATF) submitted timely-
filed case briefs.\2\ On August 14, 2025, the petitioner, ATC, and ATF 
submitted timely-filed rebuttal briefs.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India: 
Preliminary Results and Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2023-2024, 90 FR 30871 (July 11, 2025) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Case Brief of Titan Tire 
Corporation,'' dated August 6, 2025; see also ATC's Letter,'' Case 
Brief of ATC Tires Private Ltd., ATC Tires AP Private Ltd., and 
Yokohama Off-Highway Tires America, Inc.,'' dated August 6, 2025; 
and ATF's Letter, ``Letter in Lieu of Case Brief,'' dated August 5, 
2025.
    \3\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief of Titan Tire 
Corporation,'' dated August 14, 2025; see also ATC's Letter, 
``Rebuttal Brief of ATC Tires Private Ltd., ATC Tires AP Private 
Ltd., and Yokohama Off-Highway Tires America, Inc.,'' dated August 
14, 2025; and ATF's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated August 14, 
2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, 
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative

[[Page 9554]]

proceedings by 47 days.\4\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents 
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an 
additional 21 days.\5\ On December 22, 2025, Commerce extended the 
deadline for the final results until February 5, 2026.\6\ On January 
27, 2026, Commerce further extended the deadline for the final results 
until February 24, 2026.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated 
November 24, 2025.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
2023-2024 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated December 
22, 2025.
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Second Extension of Deadline for Final 
Results of 2023-2024 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated 
January 27, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\8\ The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS System. ACCESS 
is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the 2023-2024 Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review of Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order <SUP>9</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India: 
Antidumping Duly Order, 82 FR 12553 (March 6, 2017) (Order); see 
also Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India: Notice of 
Correction to Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 25598 (June 2, 2017) 
(Correction).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise covered by the Order is certain new pneumatic off-
the-road tires from India. For a full description of the scope of the 
Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of the Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties 
raised, and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
is attached as Appendix I to this notice.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made no 
changes to the margin calculations for ATC or ATF.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

    The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the rate to be 
applied to companies not selected for individual examination when 
Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to 
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the 
all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the 
weighted-average dumping margin for respondents that were not 
individually examined in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) 
of the Act provides that the all-others rate should be calculated by 
weight averaging the weighted-average dumping margins determined for 
individually examined respondents, excluding rates that are zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts available.
    We calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of zero for one of 
the two mandatory respondents, ATF. Therefore, we have assigned a 
dumping margin to the companies not selected for individual examination 
in this review based on the rate calculated for the other mandatory 
respondent, ATC. The companies not selected for individual examination 
are listed in Appendix II.

Final Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we determine the following estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period March 1, 2023, 
through February 29, 2024:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The exporters or producers not selected for individual 
review are listed in Appendix II.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATC Tires Private Ltd.; ATC Tires AP Private Limited........        3.78
Asian Tire Factory Ltd.; Lyallpur Rubber Mills..............        0.00
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination \11\......        3.78
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations 
of the final results of an administrative review within five days of a 
public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five 
days of the date of publication of the notice of final results in the 
Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, 
because we have made no changes to the Preliminary Results, there are 
no new calculations to disclose.

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject 
merchandise covered by the final results of this review. Commerce 
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days 
after the date of publication date of the final results of this review 
in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court 
of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not 
to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a 
request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).
    ATC and ATF did not report the actual entered value for their U.S. 
sales; thus, we calculated importer-specific per-unit duty assessment 
rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties calculated 
for the examined sales and dividing this amount by the total quantity 
of those sales. Where either a respondent's weighted-average dumping 
margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(1), or an importer specific assessment rate is zero or de 
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by ATC or ATF for which 
the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to 
the intermediary (i.e., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was 
destined for the United States.\12\ In such instances, we will instruct 
CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is 
no rate for the intermediate

[[Page 9555]]

company(ies) involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, for the companies listed in Appendix II which were not 
selected for individual examination, we will assign an assessment rate 
based on the rate calculated for ATC, as described in the ``Rate for 
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination'' section, above.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Instructions

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on, or after, the date of publication of 
this notice in the Federal Register, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies 
listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is 
less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 
19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; 
(2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not covered in 
this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific cash deposit rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if 
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or 
the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, 
then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most 
recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will 
continue to be zero, the all-others rate established in the LTFV 
investigation.\14\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Order, 82 FR at 12554; see also Correction, 82 FR at 
25599.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order of their responsibility concerning the 
return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO 
materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification of Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: February 23, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Differential Pricing Analysis
    Comment 2: Whether To Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to ATC
    Comment 3: Whether to Grant a Constructed Export Price (CEP) 
Offset to ATC
    Comment 4: Whether to Apply AFA to ATF
V. Recommendation

Appendix II

Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

1. Apollo Tyres Ltd.
2. CEAT Ltd.
3. JK Tyres and Industries Ltd.
4. K.R.M. Tyres
5. Mahansaria Tyres Private Limited
6. MRF Limited
7. MRL Tyres Limited
8. Speedways Rubber Company
9. Sun Tyres & Wheel Systems
10. TVS Srichakra Limited

[FR Doc. 2026-03881 Filed 2-25-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 26, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.