Appellate Jurisdiction Update
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board) is amending its regulations to remove certain appeal rights to MSPB for actions related to placement or movement of a civil service employee into an excepted service position without civil service protection. This rule reflects the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM's) recission of these rights.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 35 (Monday, February 23, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8359-8360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-03594]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2026 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 8359]]
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
5 CFR Part 1201
Appellate Jurisdiction Update
AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board) is amending
its regulations to remove certain appeal rights to MSPB for actions
related to placement or movement of a civil service employee into an
excepted service position without civil service protection. This rule
reflects the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM's) recission of
these rights.
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 9, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina K. Grippando, Clerk of the Board,
Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20419;
phone: (202) 653-7200; fax: (202) 653-7130; or email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3ced0d3c1e3ced0d3c18dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="117c626173517c6261733f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Civil Service Reform Act grants MSPB jurisdiction to hear
appeals of any action made appealable to MSPB under law, rule, or
regulation. 5 U.S.C. 7701(a). For the benefit of MSPB's stakeholders,
MSPB's regulation at 5 CFR 1201.3 contains a list of the types of
appeals MSPB has been granted jurisdiction to hear.
In 2024, following notice and comment on a proposed rule, OPM
issued a final rule, 5 CFR 302.603, which conferred jurisdiction on
MSPB to hear appeals from: (1) federal employees moved from the
competitive service into the excepted service, or moved between
schedules in the excepted service, when the agency asserts that the
employee would lose appeal rights, competitive status, or other
previously accrued protections as a result of that move; and (2) an
agency's failure to provide required notice to the employee regarding
whether the move would affect the employee's appeal rights, competitive
status, or other accrued protections. After notice and comment on a
proposed rule, MSPB concurrently amended 5 CFR 1201.3 to reflect MSPB's
new jurisdiction over the appeal rights conferred by OPM's rule, 5 CFR
302.603. MSPB's amendment was codified at 5 CFR 1201.3(a)(12).
On February 6, 2026, OPM rescinded 5 CFR 302.603, which had
conferred jurisdiction on MSPB to hear the above employee appeal
rights. Consequently, MSPB now amends 5 CFR 1201.3 to reflect the
removal of these appeal rights, and mirror OPM's new rules, which
rescinded the previously codified basis for MSPB jurisdiction.
II. Summary of Changes
Section 1201.3 Appellate Jurisdiction
The proposed amendment removes the appeal right in 5 CFR
1201.3(a)(12) from the list of appealable actions identified in section
1201.3(a).
III. Effective Date of Amendment
The amendment described above will go into effect on February 23,
2026.
IV. Regulatory Compliance
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), MSPB finds that there is good cause
to issue this final rule without prior notice and comment. This final
rule merely reflects OPM's rescission of the regulatory basis for
MSPB's jurisdiction. MSPB lacks any discretion regarding this change,
and thus in this rulemaking action. OPM's rescission removes MSPB's
jurisdiction over these cases, regardless of whether MSPB updates its
regulations to reflect this fact. Accordingly, notice and public
comment procedures are unnecessary.
Similarly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), MSPB finds that there is
good cause to make this final rule effective immediately upon
publication. This final rule merely reflects the rescission of the
regulatory basis for MSPB's jurisdiction, which took effect on March 9,
2026.
B. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Executive Order 12866
MSPB has examined the impact of this rulemaking as required by
Executive Orders 12866 (Sept. 30, 1993) and 13563 (Jan. 18, 2011),
which direct agencies to evaluate the benefits and costs of the
proposed action. A regulatory impact analysis must be prepared for
major rules with effects of $100 million or more in any one year. This
rulemaking does not reach that threshold but has otherwise been
designated as a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
MSPB certifies that this rulemaking will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because OPM's
proposed rule will apply only to Federal agencies and employees, and
MSPB's proposed rule does not in itself effect any change but only
reflects OPM's amendments to MSPB's regulatory jurisdiction.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
D. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132 (Aug. 10, 1999), it is determined that this proposed rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation
of a Federalism Assessment.
E. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in section
3(a) and (b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 (Feb. 7, 1996).
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking will not result in the expenditure by State, local,
or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
more than $100 million annually. Thus, no written assessment of
unfunded mandates is required.
[[Page 8360]]
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1201
Administrative practice and procedure, Civil rights, Government
employees.
Under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 1204, 1305, and 7701, and 38 U.S.C.
4331, and for the reasons set forth above, 5 CFR part 1201 is amended
as follows:
PART 1201--PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1204, 1305, and 7701, and 38 U.S.C. 4331,
unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 1201.3 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Section 1201.3 by removing paragraph (a)(12).
Gina K. Grippando,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2026-03594 Filed 2-20-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.