Notice2026-03588

Hearing Designation Order Issued to 97.5 Licensee TX, LLC

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 24, 2026

Issuing agencies

Federal Communications Commission

Abstract

In this document the Media Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) commences a hearing in connection with an application filed by 97.5 Licensee TX, LLC, seeking Commission consent to the transfer of control of three broadcast radio stations in El Paso, Texas. By this document, the Commission has designated substantial and material questions of fact for hearing before an administrative law judge, namely: whether the current licensee maintained proper control of the stations; whether the licensee and proposed buyer, a non-U.S. citizen, engaged in an unauthorized transfer of control of the stations; whether the parties engaged in misrepresentation and/or lack of candor before the Commission; and whether the licensee and the proposed buyer have the necessary character qualifications to remain or become, respectively, a Commission licensee.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8873-8876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-03588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[MB Docket No. 26-19; DA 26-76; FR ID 331414]


Hearing Designation Order Issued to 97.5 Licensee TX, LLC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document the Media Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal 
Communications Commission (Commission) commences a hearing in 
connection with an application filed by 97.5 Licensee TX, LLC, seeking 
Commission consent to the transfer of control of three broadcast radio 
stations in El Paso, Texas. By this document, the Commission has 
designated substantial and material questions of fact for hearing 
before an administrative law judge, namely: whether the current 
licensee maintained proper control of the stations; whether the 
licensee and proposed buyer, a non-U.S. citizen, engaged in an 
unauthorized transfer of control of the stations; whether the parties 
engaged in misrepresentation and/or lack of candor before the 
Commission; and whether the licensee and the proposed buyer have the 
necessary character qualifications to remain or become, respectively, a 
Commission licensee.

DATES: Persons desiring to participate as parties in the hearing shall 
file a petition for leave to intervene no later than March 26, 2026.

[[Page 8874]]


ADDRESSES: File documents with the Office of the Secretary, Federal 
Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554, with a 
copy mailed to each party to the proceeding. Each document that is 
filed in this proceeding must display on the front page the docket 
number of this hearing, MB Docket No. 26-19.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brendan Holland, Media Bureau, at 
(202) 418-2757 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a38283f343e3b3474323536363b343e1a3c3939743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0765756269636669296f686b6b6669634761646429606871">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Hearing Designation 
Order (Order), MB Docket No. 26-19, DA 26-76, adopted and released on 
January 23, 2026. The complete text of this document is available on 
the Commission's website at <a href="https://www.fcc.gov/document/975-licensee-tx-llc-hearing-designation-order">https://www.fcc.gov/document/975-licensee-tx-llc-hearing-designation-order</a> or by using the search function on the 
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) webpage at 
<a href="http://www.fcc.gov/ecfs">www.fcc.gov/ecfs</a>. Alternative formats are available to persons with 
disabilities by sending an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5f3f6f6808581f5d3d6d69bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7919494e2e7e397b1b4b4f9b0b8a1">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> or by calling the 
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 
418-0432 (TTY).

Summary of the Hearing Designation Order

    By an application (Transfer Application) filed with the Commission 
on March 14, 2023, and last amended on October 29, 2024, Luz Maria 
Rygaard (Rygaard), a U.S. citizen, sought Commission consent to the 
transfer of control of 97.5 Licensee TX, LLC (97.5 Licensee) to Lorena 
Margarita Per[eacute]z Toscano (Toscano), a citizen of Mexico. 97.5 
Licensee is the licensee of three broadcast radio stations, KBNA-FM, 
KAMA(AM), and KQBU(AM), each of which is authorized by the Commission 
to serve El Paso, Texas. Contemporaneously with the submission of the 
Transfer Application, the Parties also filed a related Petition for 
Declaratory Ruling seeking Commission approval for the stations to 
become 100% foreign-owned consistent with the Commission's Rules and 
governing statute.
    Section 310(d) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 310(d), provides that no 
station license shall be transferred or assigned unless the Commission, 
on application, determines that the public interest, convenience, and 
necessity will be served thereby. If the transaction would not violate 
a statute or rule, the Commission considers whether it could result in 
public interest harms by substantially frustrating or impairing the 
objectives or implementation of the Act or related statutes. Under 
Section 309(d) of the Act, ``[i]f a substantial and material question 
of fact is presented or if the Commission for any reason is unable to 
find that grant of the application would be consistent [with the public 
interest, convenience, and necessity],'' it must formally designate the 
application for a hearing in accordance with Section 309(e) of the Act. 
47 U.S.C. 309(d)-(e).
    After conducting a detailed review of the record in this 
proceeding, including information and materials provided by the parties 
in response to letters of inquiry from the Bureau, the Bureau believes 
that substantial and material questions of fact exist regarding whether 
the parties have engaged in an unauthorized transfer of control, as 
well as engaged in misrepresentations and/or lack of candor in their 
dealings with the Commission. Accordingly, based on the record before 
the Commission, we are unable to find that grant of the Transfer 
Application would be consistent with the public interest, as required 
by sections 309(a), 309(e), and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 
1934, as amended (the Act). The Transfer Application is being held in 
abeyance pending resolution of this proceeding.
    Unauthorized Transfer of Control to a Foreign Citizen. The record 
developed by the Bureau thus far appears to indicate that there has 
been an unauthorized transfer of control of the stations to a foreign 
national. Ceding control of a station to anyone other than the 
authorized licensee of the station without prior Commission approval is 
a violation of the Act and the Commission's rules. In determining 
whether an individual or entity has de facto control of a broadcast 
applicant or licensee, the Commission traditionally looks to whether 
the party in question establishes the policies governing station 
programming, personnel, and finances.
    In this case, evidence provided by the parties fails to 
substantiate conclusively that Rygaard established the policies 
governing the Stations' programming, personnel, and finances of the 
stations. In addition, among the factors suggesting that an 
unauthorized transfer has occurred are that a company owned by the 
proposed buyer had begun programming and operating the stations in 
December 2022 pursuant to an unwritten agreement, and that the proposed 
buyer acquired the right to collect a multi-million dollar debt owed by 
the stations at the same time that Rygaard purchased control of the 
stations for a nominal amount. The Bureau's investigation also 
determined that the parties are related (as cousins) and that Toscano 
and her father have connections to the earlier ownership and operation 
of the stations, raising further questions about Rygaard's role as 
licensee.
    Misrepresentations and/or Lack of Candor. The Commission and the 
courts have recognized that ``[t]he FCC relies heavily on the honesty 
and probity of its licensees in a regulatory system that is largely 
self-policing.'' Contemporary Media, Inc. v. FCC, 214 F.3d 187, 193 
(D.C. Cir. 2000) (Contemporary Media). As such, full and clear 
disclosure of all material facts in every application is essential to 
the efficient administration of the Commission's licensing process. The 
proper analysis of an application depends on the accuracy and 
completeness of information and data that only the applicant can 
provide.
    Ultimately, misrepresentation and lack of candor raise serious 
concerns as to the likelihood that the Commission can rely on an 
applicant, permittee, or licensee to be truthful. Policy Regarding 
Character Qualifications In Broadcast Licensing Amendment of Rules of 
Broadcast Practice and Procedure Relating to Written Responses to 
Commission Inquiries and Making of Misrepresentations to the Commission 
by Permittees and Licensees, Report, Order, and Policy Statement, 102 
FCC 2d 1179, 1209-11, paras. 54-61 (1986 Character Policy Statement). 
Misrepresentation is a false statement of fact made with intent to 
deceive the Commission and lack of candor is a concealment, evasion, or 
other failure to be fully informative, accompanied by an intent to 
deceive the Commission. Both are proscribed by the Rules at Sec.  
1.17(a)(1), which provides that no person shall, in any written or oral 
statement of fact, intentionally provide material factual information 
that is incorrect or intentionally omit material information that is 
necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from 
being incorrect or misleading. 47 CFR 1.17(a)(1).
    Based on the record developed, the Bureau believes that Rygaard and 
Toscano have not been fully forthcoming in either the Transfer 
Application or in the responses to the Bureau's investigation. Rather, 
the evidence raises serious concerns that the parties have consistently 
engaged in misrepresentation and/or lack of candor before the 
Commission with the result of misleading the Commission as to who 
actually controls the stations. Accordingly, we find there are 
substantial and material questions of fact as to whether the parties 
have lacked candor and/or made

[[Page 8875]]

misrepresentations to the Commission, which must be explored at 
hearing.
    The Parties' Responses to the Bureau's Inquiries. It is well-
established that the Commission has broad investigatory authority 
pursuant to its licensing function. See., e.g., 47 U.S.C. 154(i) 
through (j), 403. Consistent with this authority, Sec.  73.1015 of the 
Rules authorizes the Commission to require from a broadcast licensee 
written statements of fact relevant to any matter within its 
jurisdiction. 47 CFR 73.1015. It is important that licensees, as well 
as applicants and permittees, respond fully and honestly to such 
requests for information and in a timely manner, as the failure to do 
so impedes the Commission's ability to carry out its responsibilities. 
In the present case, the parties' responses often lacked credible 
explanations and sufficient detail, and in many cases failed to fully 
respond to the Bureau's request for information. Accordingly, the 
Bureau finds that a hearing is also necessary to confirm whether the 
Parties violated Sec.  73.1015 of the Rules.
    There are Substantial and Material Questions of Fact Concerning the 
Parties' Qualifications to be a Commission Licensee. The character of 
an applicant is one of the essential factors that the Commission 
considers in determining whether an applicant has the requisite 
qualifications to be a Commission licensee. 47 U.S.C. 308(b). Because a 
defect in character would warrant the Commission's refusal to grant a 
license in the original application, it likewise would support a 
Commission determination to revoke a license or permit. 47 U.S.C. 
312(a)(2). The same is true with regard to whether an existing licensee 
has displayed the behavior and truthfulness to remain a licensee.
    The Commission has long recognized that, in assessing character 
qualifications in broadcasting matters, the relevant character traits 
the Commission is concerned with ``are those of `truthfulness' and 
`reliability.' '' 1986 Character Policy Statement, 102 F.C.C.2d at 
1209, para. 55. Misrepresentation and a lack of candor demonstrate a 
failure to be truthful under the Commission's character qualifications 
policy, and parties that deliberately make misrepresentations or lack 
candor may engage in disqualifying conduct. See 1986 Character Policy 
Statement 102 F.C.C.2d at 1210-11, paras. 60-61; and Contemporary 
Media, 214 F.3d at 196. The Commission has also recognized that ``any 
violations of the Communications Act, Commission rules or Commission 
policies can be said to have a potential bearing on character 
qualifications.'' 1986 Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d at 1209, 
para. 56. It therefore is appropriate to consider ``any violation of 
any provision of the Act, or of our Rules or policies, as possibly 
predictive of future conduct and, thus, as possibly raising concerns 
over the licensee's future truthfulness and reliability.'' 1986 
Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d. at 1209-10, para. 57. Such 
violations also can be a basis for revocation of a license or 
construction permit. 47 U.S.C. 312(a).
    In the present case the Bureau finds that the record raises 
substantial and material questions of fact as to both Rygaard's and 
Toscano's character, in terms of whether each has the propensity to 
deal honestly with the Commission and to comply with the Act, the 
Rules, and Commission policies. Therefore, the Bureau designates the 
matter for hearing to determine whether the parties have the necessary 
character qualifications to become, or remain, a Commission licensee.
    Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to Sections 308, 309(d), 
309(e), 310(b), 310(d), and 312(a) through (c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 
308, 309(d), 309(e), 310(b), 310(d), and 312(a) through (c), the 
applications and licenses ARE DESIGNATED FOR HEARING before an FCC 
administrative law judge, at a time and location specified in a 
subsequent Order, upon the following issues:
    (a) To determine whether Luz Maria Rygaard is and/or has been 
exercising affirmative control of KBNA-FM, KAMA(AM), and KQBU(AM).
    (b) To determine whether there has been an unauthorized de facto 
transfer of control of KBNA-FM, KAMA(AM), and KQBU(AM) to Pro Radio LLC 
and/or Lorena Margarita Per[eacute]z Toscano in violation of Sections 
310(b) and 310(d) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 310(b), 310(d), and Sec. Sec.  
1.5000 et seq. and 73.3540(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 1.5000 
et seq., 73.3540(a).
    (c) To determine whether Luz Maria Rygaard engaged in 
misrepresentation and/or lack of candor in applications and 
communications with the Commission in violation of Sec. Sec.  1.17 and/
or 73.1015 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 1.17, 73.1015.
    (d) To determine, in light of evidence adduced regarding the 
foregoing issues (a) through (c) whether Luz Maria Rygaard possesses 
the character qualifications to be or remain a Commission licensee and 
whether the licenses for KBNA-FM, KAMA(AM), and KQBU(AM) should be 
revoked consistent with Section 312(a)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 
312(a)(1).
    (e) To determine whether Lorena Margarita Per[eacute]z Toscano has 
exercised and continues to exercise de facto control over KBNA-FM, 
KAMA(AM), and KQBU(AM).
    (f) To determine whether Lorena Margarita Per[eacute]z Toscano 
engaged in misrepresentation and/or lack of candor in applications and 
communications with the Commission in violation of Sec. Sec.  1.17 and/
or 73.1015 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 1.17, 73.1015.
    (g) To determine, in light of evidence adduced regarding the 
foregoing issues (a), (b), (e), and (f), whether Lorena Margarita 
Per[eacute]z Toscano possesses the character qualifications to be a 
Commission licensee.
    (h) To determine, in light of evidence adduced regarding the 
foregoing issues whether the pending applications seeking Commission 
consent to the transfer of control of the licenses of KBNA-FM, 
KAMA(AM), and KQBU(AM) from Luz Maria Rygaard to Lorena Margarita 
Per[eacute]z Toscano should be granted, dismissed, or denied.
    It is further ordered that, pursuant to Sections 309(e) and 312(c) 
of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 309(e), 312(c), and Sec. Sec.  1.91(c) 
and1.221(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 1.91(c), 1.221(c), to 
avail themselves of the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence 
at a hearing in this proceeding, Luz Maria Rygaard and 97.5 Licensee 
TX, LLC, in person or by an attorney, shall file with the Commission, 
within twenty (20) days of the mailing of this Hearing Designation 
Order, Order to Show Cause Why an Order of Revocation Should not be 
Issued, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, a written appearance 
stating that they will appear at the hearing and present evidence on 
the issues specified above.
    It is further ordered that if Luz Maria Rygaard waives her rights 
to a hearing pursuant to Sec.  1.92(a)(1) or (a)(3) of the Rules, 47 
CFR 1.92(a)(1) or (a)(3), she may submit a timely written statement 
denying or seeking to mitigate or justify the circumstances or conduct 
complained of in the order to show cause.
    It is further ordered that, pursuant to Sec. Sec.  1.91 and 1.92 of 
the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 1.91 and 1.92, that if Luz Maria Rygaard 
fails to file a written appearance within the time specified above, or 
has not filed prior to the expiration of that time a petition to 
accept, for good cause shown, such written appearance beyond expiration 
of said 20 days, the right to a hearing shall be deemed waived. Where a 
hearing is waived, the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an order 
terminating the

[[Page 8876]]

hearing proceeding and certifying the case to the Commission.
    It is further ordered that, pursuant to Sec.  1.221(c) of the 
Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.221(c), if Luz Maria Rygaard fails to file 
a written appearance within the time specified above, a petition to 
dismiss without prejudice, or a petition to accept for good cause shown 
an untimely written appearance, the captioned applications shall be 
dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
    It is further ordered that, pursuant to Section 309(e), 47 U.S.C. 
309(e), to avail herself of the opportunity to be heard and to present 
evidence at a hearing in this proceeding, Lorena Margarita Per[eacute]z 
Toscano, in person or by an attorney, shall file with the Commission, 
within twenty (20) days of the mailing of this Hearing Designation 
Order, Order to Show Cause Why an Order of Revocation Should not be 
Issued, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, a written appearance 
stating that he will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the 
issues specified above at a hearing.
    It is further ordered that, pursuant to Sec.  1.221(c) of the 
Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.221(c), if Lorena Margarita Per[eacute]z 
Toscano fails to file within the time specified above a written 
appearance, a petition to dismiss without prejudice, or a petition to 
accept for good cause shown an untimely written appearance, the 
captioned applications shall be dismissed with prejudice for failure to 
prosecute.
    It is further ordered that the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, shall be 
made a party to this proceeding without the need to file a written 
appearance.
    It is further ordered that, in accordance with Section 312(d) of 
the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(d), and Sec.  1.91(d) of the Commission's rules, 
47 CFR 1.91(d), the burden of proceeding with the introduction of 
evidence and the burden of proof with respect to the issues (a) through 
(g) above, shall be upon the Commission's Enforcement Bureau.
    It is further ordered that, pursuant to Section 309(e) of the Act, 
47 U.S.C. 309(e), and Sec.  1.254 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 
1.254, the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and 
the burden of proof shall be upon Luz Maria Rygaard and Lorena 
Margarita Per[eacute]z Toscano as to issue (h) above.
    It is further ordered that a copy of each document filed in this 
proceeding subsequent to the date of adoption of this document shall be 
served on the counsel of record appearing on behalf of the Chief, 
Enforcement Bureau. Parties may inquire as to the identity of such 
counsel by calling the Investigations & Hearings Division of the 
Enforcement Bureau at (202) 418-1420. Such service copy shall be 
addressed to the named counsel of record, Investigations & Hearings 
Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.
    It is further ordered that the parties to the captioned application 
shall, pursuant to section 311(a)(2) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 311(a)(2), 
and Sec.  73.3594 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 73.3594, give 
notice of the hearing within the time and in the manner prescribed in 
such Rule, and shall advise the Commission of the satisfaction of such 
requirements as mandated by Sec.  73.3594 of the Commission's rules, 47 
CFR 73.3594.
    It is further ordered that copies of this Hearing Designation 
Order, Order to Show Cause Why an Order of Revocation Should not be 
Issued, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing shall be sent via 
Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and by regular first-class 
mail to:

97.5 Licensee TX, LLC, 2100 Trawood Drive, El Paso, TX 79935
Luz Maria Rygaard, 1034 Sunflower Trail, Austin, TX 78745
Lorena Margarita P[eacute]rez Toscano, Bosques de Olivos 449, Bosques 
de las Lomas, CDMX, 11700, Mexico
Frank R. Montero, Esq., Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC, 1300 N 17th 
Street, Suite 1100, Arlington, VA 22209, Counsel for 97.5 Licensee TX, 
LLC, Luz Maria Rygaard, and Lorena Margarita P[eacute]rez Toscano.

    It is further ordered that a copy of this document, or a summary 
thereof, shall be published or a summary thereof published in the 
Federal Register.

Federal Communications Commission.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2026-03588 Filed 2-23-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 24, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.