Notice2026-03339

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 20, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico to correct certain ministerial errors. The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 34 (Friday, February 20, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8184-8186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-03339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-844]


Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Amended Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the 
final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) 
order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico to correct 
certain ministerial errors. The period of review (POR) is November 1, 
2022, through October 31, 2023.

DATES: Applicable February 20, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Clahane, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5449.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 4, 2025, Commerce published the Final Results of the 
administrative review of the AD order on rebar from Mexico in the 
Federal Register.\1\ On September 15, 2025, we received timely filed 
allegations of ministerial errors from Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and 
I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, the 
Deacero Group), the mandatory respondent in this administrative 
review,\2\ and the Rebar Trade Action

[[Page 8185]]

Coalition (RTAC) (the petitioners).\3\ On September 22, 2025, we 
received timely filed rebuttal comments from the petitioners.\4\ We are 
amending the Final Results to correct certain ministerial errors raised 
by the petitioners.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 90 FR 
42740 (September 2, 2025) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Deacero Group's Letter, ``Ministerial Error Comments,'' 
dated September 15, 2025 (Deacero Group Ministerial Error 
Allegation); see also Petitioners' Letter, ``RTAC's Ministerial 
Error Allegations,'' dated September 15, 2025 (Petitioners' 
Ministerial Error Allegations).
    \3\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``RTAC's Rebuttal Ministerial Error 
Allegations,'' dated September 22, 2025 (Petitioners' Rebuttal 
Ministerial Error Allegations).
    \4\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitioners' Response to OARC's 
Ministerial Error Allegations,'' dated September 22, 2025.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Analysis of Ministerial Error 
Allegations,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial 
Error Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, 
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative 
proceedings by 47 days.\6\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents 
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an 
additional 21 days.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated 
November 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legal Framework

    Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
defines a ``ministerial error'' as including ``errors in addition, 
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting 
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other 
unintentional error which the administering authority considers 
ministerial.'' \8\ With respect to final results of administrative 
reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ``will analyze any 
comments received and, if appropriate, correct any . . . ministerial 
error by amending the final results of review. . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.224(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ministerial Errors

    In its ministerial error comments, the Deacero Group alleged that 
Commerce made ministerial errors in its: (1) application of partial 
adverse facts available (AFA) for certain international freight 
expenses; and (2) its application of partial AFA to indirect selling 
expenses.\9\ In its allegation, the petitioners argued that Commerce's 
application of partial AFA to the Deacero Group's U.S. freight was 
inaccurate.\10\ In the ministerial error rebuttal comments, the 
petitioners argued that the Deacero Group's ministerial error 
allegations concerning freight and indirect selling expenses were 
untimely alleged and not ministerial in nature.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Deacero Group Ministerial Error Allegation at 2-9.
    \10\ See Petitioners' Ministerial Error Allegations at 4-6.
    \11\ See Petitioners' Rebuttal Ministerial Error Allegations at 
4-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We agree with the petitioners that we made a ministerial error 
regarding the application of AFA to the Deacero Group's U.S. freight 
expenses in the Final Results, pursuant to section 751(h) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.224(f), and have amended our calculations to correct 
this error.\12\ Regarding the Deacero Group's allegations concerning 
the application of AFA to indirect selling expenses and certain 
international freight expenses, we disagree that these allegations 
constitute ministerial errors within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(f). 
Accordingly, we have not amended our calculations with respect to these 
allegations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico; 2022-2023: Analysis of 
Ministerial Error Allegations,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby 
adopted by, this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete discussion of the ministerial error allegations, as 
well as Commerce's analysis, see the Ministerial Error Memorandum.\13\ 
The Ministerial Error Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at 
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of Review

    As a result of correcting the ministerial error described above, we 
determine the following estimated weighted-average dumping margin for 
the period November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Weighted-
                                                         average dumping
                   Exporter/producer                          margin
                                                            (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S.                     36.34
 Estructurales, S.A. de C.V............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with 
these amended final results of review to parties in this review within 
five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Normally, Commerce would issue assessment instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) no earlier than 41 days after the 
date of publication of the amended final results of this review in the 
Federal Register. However, in this case, a timely request for panel 
review under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement has been filed, 
and a suspension of liquidation is in place. Therefore, we will not 
issue assessment instructions until the suspension of liquidation has 
been lifted. When the suspension of liquidation lifts such that we can 
issue assessment instructions, and where the respondent reported the 
entered value of its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific AD 
assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated 
for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these 
amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales.\14\ 
Where the respondent did not report entered value, we calculated a per-
unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the examined sales made to that importer by the 
total quantity associated with those sales. To determine whether an 
importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also calculated an importer-
specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values. Where 
either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de 
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-
specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis,

[[Page 8186]]

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without 
regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice, for entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR produced by the Deacero Group for 
which the producer did not know that its merchandise was destined for 
the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries 
at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following amended cash deposit requirements will be effective 
for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these 
amended final results of this administrative review, as provided by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the 
Deacero Group will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the amended final results of this administrative review; 
(2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating 
in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding in which the producer or exporter participated; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the 
original investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will 
be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to 
be 20.58 percent, the rate established in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation.\16\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Antidumping 
Duty Order, 79 FR 65925, 65926 (November 6, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an APO 
of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these amended final results in 
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.224(e).

    Dated: February 13, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2026-03339 Filed 2-19-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 20, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.