Rule2026-03264

Electronic Driver Vehicle Inspection Reports

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 19, 2026
Effective
March 23, 2026

Issuing agencies

Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Abstract

FMCSA clarifies the requirement to complete a Driver Vehicle Inspection Report (DVIR) based upon a public comment filed by the National Tank Truck Carriers (NTTC). The DVIR may already be completed electronically, however the explicit language in this rule will make this clear. This will encourage motor carriers and drivers to utilize electronic, cost-saving methods when completing DVIRs.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7893-7896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-03264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 396

[Docket No. FMCSA-2025-0115]
RIN 2126-AC89


Electronic Driver Vehicle Inspection Reports

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department 
of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA clarifies the requirement to complete a Driver Vehicle 
Inspection Report (DVIR) based upon a public comment filed by the 
National Tank Truck Carriers (NTTC). The DVIR may already be completed 
electronically, however the explicit language in this rule will make 
this clear. This will encourage motor carriers and drivers to utilize 
electronic, cost-saving methods when completing DVIRs.

DATES: Effective March 23, 2026.
    Petitions for reconsideration of this final rule must be submitted 
to the FMCSA Administrator no later than March 23, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bill Mahorney, Chief, Enforcement 
Division, FMCSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (202) 
493-0001, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#32505b5e5e1c5f535a5d405c574b72565d461c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd9d2d7d795d6dad3d4c9d5dec2fbdfd4cf95dcd4cd">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. If you have questions on viewing or 
submitting material to the docket, call Dockets Operations at (202) 
366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FMCSA organizes this final rule as follows:

I. Availability of Rulemaking Documents
II. Executive Summary
    A. Purpose and Summary of the Regulatory Action
    B. Summary of Major Provisions
    C. Costs and Benefits
III. Abbreviations
V. Legal Basis
VI. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments
    A. Proposed Rulemaking
    B. Comments and Responses
VII. Changes From the NPRM
VIII. International Impacts
IX. Section-by-Section Analysis
X. Regulatory Analyses
    A. E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
    B. E.O. 14192 (Unleashing American Prosperity Through 
Deregulation)
    C. Congressional Review Act
    D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    E. Assistance for Small Entities
    F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    G. Paperwork Reduction Act
    H. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)
    I. Privacy
    J. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
    K. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

I. Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    To view any documents mentioned as being available in the docket, 
go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FMCSA-2025-0115/document">https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FMCSA-2025-0115/document</a> and 
choose the document to review. To view comments, click this final rule, 
then click ``Browse Comments.'' If you do not have access to the 
internet, you may view the docket online by visiting Dockets Operations 
at U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help 
you, please call (202) 366-9317 or (202) 366-9826 before visiting 
Dockets Operations.

II. Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMV Commercial motor vehicle
DOT Department of Transportation
DVIR Driver Vehicle Inspection Report
eDVIR Electronic Driver Vehicle Inspection Report
E-SIGN The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
FR Federal Register
GPEA Government Paperwork Elimination Act
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PIA Privacy Impact Assessment
PII Personally identifiable information
PTA Privacy Threshold Analysis
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NSTA National School Transportation Association
NTTC National Tank Truck Carriers
The Secretary The Secretary of Transportation
UMRA The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
U.S.C. United States Code

V. Legal Basis

    The Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-554, Title II, 98 
Stat. 2832, Oct. 30, 1984), as amended, (the 1984

[[Page 7894]]

Act) provides broad authority to regulate drivers, motor carriers, and 
vehicle equipment. Section 211 of the 1984 Act grants the Secretary of 
Transportation (the Secretary) broad power, in carrying out motor 
carrier safety statutes and regulations, to ``prescribe recordkeeping 
and reporting requirements'' and to ``perform other acts the Secretary 
considers appropriate'' (49 U.S.C. 31133(a)(8) and (10)). The FMCSA 
Administrator has been delegated authority under 49 CFR 1.87(f) to 
carry out the functions vested in the Secretary by 49 U.S.C. chapter 
311, subchapters I and III, relating to commercial motor vehicle (CMV) 
programs and safety regulation.
    Two Federal statutes govern the Agency's implementation of 
electronic document and signature requirements. The Government 
Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) (Pub. L. 105-277, Title XVII (Secs. 
1701-1710), 112 Stat. 2681-749, 44 U.S.C. 3504 note) was enacted on 
October 21, 1998, to improve customer service and governmental 
efficiency through the use of information technology. The Electronic 
Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN) (Pub. L. 106-
229, 114 Stat. 464, 15 U.S.C. 7001-7031) was signed into law on June 
30, 2000. E-SIGN was designed to promote the use of electronic contract 
formation, signatures, and recordkeeping in private commerce by 
establishing legal equivalence between traditional paper-based methods 
and electronic methods. The GPEA defines an electronic signature as a 
method of signing an electronic communication that: (a) Identifies and 
authenticates a particular person as the source of the electronic 
communication; and (b) indicates such person's approval of the 
information contained in the electronic communication (section 
1710(1)). It also requires Federal agencies to provide individuals and 
entities the options of: (a) submitting information to or transacting 
with the Agency electronically; and (b) using electronic records 
retention when practicable. The GPEA states that electronic records and 
their related electronic signatures shall not be denied legal effect, 
validity, or enforceability merely because they are in electronic form 
(section 1707). It also encourages agencies to use electronic signature 
alternatives (section 1704).
    For any transaction in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, 
E-SIGN supersedes all pre-existing requirements that paper records be 
kept so long as: (a) such records are generated in commercial, 
consumer, and business transactions between private parties; and (b) 
those parties consent to using electronic methods. Specifically, the 
statute establishes the legal equivalence for contracts, signatures, 
and other legally required documents, whether in traditional paper or 
electronic form (15 U.S.C. 7001(a)(1)).

VI. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments

A. Proposed Rulemaking

    On May 30, 2025, FMCSA published in the Federal Register (90 FR 
22957) an NPRM titled ``Electronic Driver Vehicle Inspection Reports.'' 
The NPRM proposed to clarify the requirement to complete a DVIR, based 
upon a public comment filed by NTTC. Although a DVIR was already 
allowed to be completed electronically, the NPRM proposed explicit 
language to make this clear. This was intended to encourage motor 
carriers and drivers to utilize electronic, cost-saving methods when 
completing DVIRs.

B. Comments and Responses

    FMCSA solicited comments concerning the NPRM for 60 days ending 
July 29, 2025. By that date, five comments were received--four in 
support and one recommended revision.
    One individual and three trade organizations (NTTC, Owner Operator 
Independent Drivers Association, and the American Trucking 
Associations) were in favor of the proposal. One trade organization, 
the National School Transportation Association (NSTA), offered a 
suggestion.
    The individual who commented in support also noted that explicitly 
allowing electronic DVIRs (eDVIRs) will promote their use and thereby 
increase efficiency. He also noted that this increased efficiency might 
justify reinstating a requirement for no-defect DVIRs by drivers of 
passenger-carrying CMVs.\1\ He reasoned that the requirement to submit 
no-defect DVIRs could be reintroduced without substantially increasing 
paperwork burden for those drivers using eDVIRs due to the speed at 
which eDVIRs may be completed relative to paper-based DVIRs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The final rule, ``Passenger Carrier No-Defect Driver Vehicle 
Inspection Report,'' Aug. 18, 2020, 85 FR 50787, which eliminated 
the requirement for completion of no-defect DVIRs by drivers of 
passenger-carrying CMVs, may be found at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/document/FMCSA-2019-0075-0014">https://www.regulations.gov/document/FMCSA-2019-0075-0014</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FMCSA does not agree with the commenter suggesting the Agency 
consider reinstating the requirement for the submission of no-defect 
DVIRs. The Agency stands by its rationale presented in the preamble to 
the December 18, 2014 (79 FR 75437) final rule. There is no basis for 
introducing regulatory burdens for drivers to prepare reports 
documenting there were no defects or deficiencies observed by or 
reported to the driver during the work shift, and for motor carriers to 
retain such reports, regardless of whether it is performed 
electronically.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The approved information collection titled ``Inspection, 
Repair and Maintenance,'' Office of Management and Budget control 
number 2126-0003 may be found at <a href="https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAOMBHistory?ombControlNumber=2126-0003">https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAOMBHistory?ombControlNumber=2126-0003</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NSTA requested that FMCSA continue to allow paper-based DVIRs as a 
compliance alternative. FMCSA will continue to do so.

VII. Changes From the NPRM

    This final rule makes no changes from the NPRM.

VIII. International Impacts

    Motor carriers and drivers are subject to the laws and regulations 
of the countries where they operate, unless an international agreement 
states otherwise. Drivers and carriers should be aware of the 
regulatory differences between nations.

IX. Section-by-Section Analysis

    This section-by-section analysis describes the changes to the 
regulatory text in numerical order.
    Two places in section 396.11 are revised by specifically noting 
that the reports required in that section may be created and maintained 
in electronic format, in accordance with section 390.32.
    Similarly, section 396.13 is revised to specifically allow for the 
electronic creation and maintenance of the reports required in that 
section, in accordance with section 390.32.

X. Regulatory Analyses

A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), and 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures

    FMCSA has considered the impact of this final rule under E.O. 12866 
(58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), Regulatory Planning and Review, and DOT 
Order 2100.6B.\3\ The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 
within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) determined that this 
final rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of 
E.O. 12866, and has not reviewed it under that E.O.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ DOT Order 2100.6B is available at <a href="https://www.transportation.gov/regulations/dot-order-21006b-policies-and-procedures-rulemakings">https://www.transportation.gov/regulations/dot-order-21006b-policies-and-procedures-rulemakings</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This rulemaking revises the regulations to clarify that a DVIR may 
be completed electronically. This will

[[Page 7895]]

encourage motor carriers and drivers to use electronic, cost-saving 
methods when completing DVIRs and will likely result in cost savings 
for those entities that choose to switch to electronic methods. FMCSA 
does not have data on the number of entities impacted by this rule. 
Absent this information, FMCSA is unable to quantify the cost savings 
associated with this rulemaking.
    FMCSA does not anticipate that this rulemaking will impact safety. 
Motor carriers and intermodal equipment providers are required to 
undergo inspections and correct all violations found.

B. E.O. 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)

    E.O. 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation, was issued 
on January 31, 2025 (90 FR 9065, Jan. 31, 2025). E.O. 14192 requires 
that, for ``each new [E.O. 14192 regulatory action] issued, at least 
ten prior regulations be identified for elimination.''
    Implementation guidance for E.O. 14192 was issued by OMB 
(Memorandum M-25-20, Mar. 26, 2025) defines two different types of E.O. 
14192 actions: an E.O. 14192 deregulatory action, and an E.O. 14192 
regulatory action.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ OMB, Guidance Implementing Section 3 of Executive Order 
14192, Titled ``Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation,'' 
Memorandum M-25-20, (Mar. 26, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An E.O. 14192 deregulatory action is defined as ``an action that 
has been finalized and has total costs less than zero. This final rule 
is expected to have total costs less than zero, and therefore is 
considered an E.O. 14192 deregulatory action.

C. Congressional Review Act

    This final rule is not a major rule as defined under the 
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808).'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A major rule means any rule that OMB finds has resulted in 
or is likely to result in (a) an annual effect on the economy of 
$100 million or more; (b) a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers, individual industries, geographic regions, Federal, 
State, or local government agencies; or (c) significant adverse 
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, 
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to 
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export 
markets (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small Entities)

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended 
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,\6\ 
requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of the regulatory 
action on small business and other small entities and to minimize any 
significant economic impact. The term small entities means small 
businesses and not-for-profit organizations that are independently 
owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and 
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000 (5 
U.S.C. 601(6)). Accordingly, DOT policy requires an analysis of the 
impact of all regulations on small entities, and mandates that agencies 
strive to lessen any adverse effects on these businesses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 857, (Mar. 29, 1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This final rule will impact motor carriers and drivers that 
currently use a paper-based DVIR process and chose to switch to 
electronic, cost-saving methods. FMCSA anticipates that the majority of 
motor carriers who wish to use an electronic process are already doing 
so, and therefore, this final rule will not impact a substantial number 
of small entities.
    FMCSA does not have information to estimate the cost savings 
associated with switching to an electronic process for DVIR creation, 
maintenance, and signature but anticipates that any cost savings would 
be de minimis.
    Given that this rulemaking is not expected to impact a substantial 
number of small entities, the Agency is comfortable certifying as such. 
Consequently, I certify that the action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

E. Assistance for Small Entities

    In accordance with section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory 
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857), 
FMCSA wants to assist small entities in understanding this final rule 
so they can better evaluate its effects on themselves and participate 
in the rulemaking initiative. If the final rule will affect your small 
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal 
regulations to the Small Business Administration's Small Business and 
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman (Office of the National 
Ombudsman, see <a href="https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/oversight-advocacy/office-national-ombudsman">https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/oversight-advocacy/office-national-ombudsman</a>) and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness 
Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each 
agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on 
actions by employees of FMCSA, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). 
DOT has a policy regarding the rights of small entities to regulatory 
enforcement fairness and an explicit policy against retaliation for 
exercising these rights.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1531-
1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their 
discretionary regulatory actions. The Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $206 million (which is the 
value equivalent of $100 million in 1995, adjusted for inflation to 
2024 levels) or more in any 1 year. Though this final rule will not 
result in such an expenditure, and the analytical requirements of UMRA 
do not apply as a result, the Agency discusses the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

G. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This final rule contains no new information collection requirements 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

H. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)

    A rulemaking has implications for federalism under section 1(a) of 
E.O. 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999), Federalism, if it has 
``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    FMCSA has determined that this rulemaking would not have 
substantial direct costs on or for States, nor would it limit the 
policymaking discretion of States. Nothing in this document preempts 
any State law or regulation. Therefore, this rulemaking does not have 
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a 
Federalism Impact Statement.

I. Privacy

    The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005,\7\ requires the Agency 
to assess the privacy impact of a regulation that will affect the 
privacy of individuals. This final rule will not require the collection 
of personally identifiable information (PII).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Public Law 108-447, 118 Stat. 2809, 3268, note following 5 
U.S.C. 552a (Dec. 4, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) applies only to Federal agencies 
and any

[[Page 7896]]

non-Federal agency that receives records contained in a system of 
records from a Federal agency for use in a matching program.
    The E-Government Act of 2002,\8\ requires Federal agencies to 
conduct a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for new or substantially 
changed technology that collects, maintains, or disseminates 
information in an identifiable form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Public Law 107-347, sec. 208, 116 Stat. 2899, 2921 (Dec. 17, 
2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No new or substantially changed technology will collect, maintain, 
or disseminate information as a result of this rule. Accordingly, FMCSA 
has not conducted a PIA.
    The Agency will complete a Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) to 
evaluate the risks and effects the final rule may have on collecting, 
storing, and sharing PII. The PTA will be submitted to FMCSA's Privacy 
Officer for review and preliminary adjudication and to DOT's Privacy 
Officer for review and final adjudication.

J. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)

    This rulemaking does not have Tribal implications under E.O. 13175 
(65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000), Consultation and Coordination with Indian 
Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct 
effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the 
Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

K. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

    FMCSA analyzed this final rule pursuant to the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Agency 
believes this final rule will not have a reasonably foreseeable 
significant effect on the quality of the human environment. This action 
falls under a published categorical exclusion and thus is excluded from 
further analysis and documentation in an environmental assessment or 
environmental impact statement under DOT Order 5610.1D,\9\ Subpart B, 
Subsection (e). Specifically, paragraphs (e)(6)(f)(1), (e)(6)(q), and 
(e)(6)(aa), which cover regulations pertaining to driver/vehicle 
inspections, implementing record preservation procedures, and requiring 
motor carriers, their officers, drivers, agents, representatives, and 
employees directly in control of CMVs to inspect, repair, and provide 
maintenance for every CMV used on a public road, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ DOT Order 5610.1D, ``Procedures for Considering 
Environmental Impacts,'' may be found at <a href="https://www.transportation.gov/mission/dots-procedures-considering-environmental-impacts">https://www.transportation.gov/mission/dots-procedures-considering-environmental-impacts</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 396

    Highway safety, Motor carriers, Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, FMCSA amends 49 CFR part 396 to read as follows:

PART 396--INSPECTION, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE

0
1. The authority citation for part 396 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 31133, 31136, 31151, 31502; sec. 
32934, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; sec. 5524, Pub. L. 114-
94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1560; and 49 CFR 1.87.


0
2. Amend section 396.11 by adding paragraphs (a)(6) and (b)(5) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  396.11  Driver vehicle inspection report(s).

    (a) * * *
    (6) Electronic reporting. The report required by this paragraph (a) 
may be created and maintained in electronic format, in accordance with 
49 CFR 390.32.
    (b) * * *
    (5) Electronic reporting. The report required by this paragraph (b) 
may be created and maintained in electronic format, in accordance with 
49 CFR 390.32.

0
3. Amend section 396.13 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  396.13   Driver inspection.

* * * * *
    (d) The reports required by this section may be created and 
maintained in electronic format, in accordance with 49 CFR 390.32.

    Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87.
Derek Barrs,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2026-03264 Filed 2-18-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 19, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.