Notice2026-03020

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 9, Section 13 to Exempt Box Spread From Position Limits and To Amend Various Phlx Rules

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 17, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7314-7317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-03020]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104821; File No. SR-Phlx-2026-04]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 9, 
Section 13 to Exempt Box Spread From Position Limits and To Amend 
Various Phlx Rules

February 11, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on January 28, 2026, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 2, Section 11 (Lead Market 
Maker Appointments); Options 3, Section 8 (Options Opening Process); 
Options 3, Section 10 (Electronic Execution Priority and Processing in 
the System); Options 3, Section 14 (Complex Orders); Options 3, Section 
15 (Simple Order Risk Protections); Options 3, Section 22 (Limitations 
on Order Entry); Options 8, Section 25 (Floor Allocation); Options 8, 
Section 34 (FLEX Trading); Options 8, Section 39 (Option Minor Rule 
Violations and Order and Decorum Regulations); and Options 9, Section 
13 (Position Limits).
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rulefilings">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rulefilings</a>, 
and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 2, Section 11 (Lead Market 
Maker Appointments); Options 3, Section 8 (Options Opening Process); 
Options 3, Section 10 (Electronic Execution Priority and Processing in 
the System); Options 3, Section 14 (Complex Orders); Options 3, Section 
15 (Simple Order Risk Protections); Options 3, Section 22 (Limitations 
on

[[Page 7315]]

Order Entry); Options 8, Section 25 (Floor Allocation); Options 8, 
Section 34 (FLEX Trading); Options 8, Section 39 (Option Minor Rule 
Violations and Order and Decorum Regulations); Options 9, Section 13 
(Position Limits). Each rule change will be described below.
Options 2, Section 11
    The Exchange proposes to re-letter Options 2, Section 11(i) as (g) 
and to correct a cross-citation to paragraph (d) of Options 2, Section 
11 to paragraph (e). The proposed amendments are non-substantive.
Options 3, Section 8
    The Exchange proposes to add the words ``unmatched contracts'' in 
Options 3, Section 8, Opening Process. The addition of this rule text 
at Options 3, Section 8(k)(A) will add context to the words ``side of 
the imbalance.'' The same language appears in Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'') 
Options 3, Section 8(j)(1). This amendment is non-substantive.
Options 3, Section 10
    The Exchange proposes to relocate the rule text in Options 3, 
Section 10(b) which states,
    Applicability. This rule does not apply to the Block Order 
Mechanism described within Options 3, Section 11(a), the Facilitation 
Mechanism described within Options 3, Section 11(b), the Solicited 
Order Mechanism described within Options 3, Section 11(d), PIXL 
described within Options 3, Section 13, and orders described within 
Options 3, Section 12, unless Options 3, Section 10 is specifically 
referenced within Phlx Rules applicable to the aforementioned 
functionality.
    The Exchange proposes to relocate this rule text, without change, 
immediately before Options 3, Section 10(c) so that the priority 
overlays appear after subparagraph (a) to Options 3, Section 10. This 
amendment is non-substantive.
Options 3, Section 14
    The Exchange proposes to relocate the description of a Cancel-
Replacement Complex Order from Options 3, Section 14(a)(15) to Options 
3, Section 14(a)(20), without change, within the Complex Order rule. 
Relocating this rule text will harmonize the rule text with ISE Options 
3, Section 14(a)(20). This amendment is non-substantive.
Options 3, Section 15
    The Exchange proposes to remove the words ``as is the case today,'' 
from Options 3, Section 15(c)(3) which describes the Post-Only Quoting 
Protection. This rule text is unnecessary in this rule. This amendment 
is non-substantive.
Options 3, Section 22
    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 22, Limitations 
on Order Entry, to amend ``Members'' to ``Member'' in Options 3, 
Section 22(a). This technical amendment is non-substantive.
Options 8, Section 34
    The Exchange inadvertently numbered Options 3, Section 34(i) with 
duplicate (2)s. At this time, the Exchange proposes to renumber Options 
3, Section 34(i) as (1)-(5). This technical amendment is non-
substantive.
Options 9, Section 13
    Phlx proposes to amend Options 9, Section 13, Position Limits, at 
subparagraph (l) which currently states,
    Equity Option Hedge Exemptions. The following qualified hedge 
transactions and positions described in paragraphs 1-5 below shall be 
exempt from established position limits as prescribed under sections 
(g) and (d)(i) above. Hedge transactions and positions established 
pursuant to paragraphs (6) and (7) below are subject to a position 
limit equal to five (5) times the standard limit established under 
sections (g) and (d)(i).
    First, the Exchange proposes to remove references to subparagraph 
(d)(i) which do not exist in the rule and instead cite to subparagraph 
(a) which contains position limits for certain securities.
    Second, the Exchange proposes to correct an error with respect to 
hedge transactions to permit box spreads to be exempt from established 
position limits as prescribed under Options 9, Section 13(a) \3\ and 
(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The reference to Options 9, Section 13(d)(i) is being 
amended to subparagraph (a) with this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the rule text states that hedge transactions and 
positions established pursuant to Options 9, Section 13(l)(6) and (7) 
below are subject to a position limit equal to five (5) times the 
standard limit established under Options 9, Section 13(g) and 
(d)(i).\4\ Paragraph (l)(6) references a box spread \5\ and paragraph 
(l)(7) references OTC options positions.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See id.
    \5\ Options 9, Section 13(l)(6) states that a long call position 
accompanied by a short put position with the same strike price and a 
short call position accompanied by a long put position with a 
different strike price (``box spread'').
    \6\ Options 9, Section 13(l)(7) states that a listed option 
position hedged on a one-for-one basis with an over-the-counter 
(``OTC'') option position on the same underlying security. The 
strike price of the listed option position and corresponding OTC 
option position must be within one strike of each other and no more 
than one expiration month apart.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Phlx filed a rule proposal making clear that the five times 
standard was limited to OTC options contracts,\7\ however Phlx 
inadvertently cited to Options 9, Section 14(l)(6) when it relocated 
rules in a subsequent rule change that copied SR-Cboe-2003-30.\8\ The 
five times standard should apply only to OTC options contracts as 
evidenced by NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') Commentary .07 to Rule 
5.17-O, Commentary .09 to NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'') Rule 
904, and FINRA Rule 2360(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45889 (May 9, 2002), 
67 FR 34980 (May 16, 2002) (SR-Phlx-2002-33) (Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia 
Stock Exchange, Inc. To Eliminate Position and Exercise Limits for 
Certain Qualified Hedge Strategies).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51322 (March 4, 
2005), 70 FR 12260 (March 11, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2005-17) (Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and 
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Position Limits and Exercise 
Limits).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At this time, the Exchange proposes to remove the citation to 
Options 9, Section 14(l)(6) with respect to a position limit equal to 
five (5) times the standard limit. The Exchange proposes to add 
paragraph (l)(6) to the list of exempt transactions in the first 
sentence of Options 9, Section 14(l) to properly reflect that box 
spreads are exempt from the position limits prescribed under Options 9, 
Section 13(a) and (d). At this time, the Exchange has been applying a 
stricter standard. With this change, members and member organizations 
would not have a position limit for a box spread and, therefore, would 
not have to unwind any position as a result of this amendment.
Market Maker and Lead Market Maker Defined
    The Exchange proposes to amend various references to the term 
``Specialist.'' Phlx removed the word ``Specialist'' in a prior rule 
change \9\ and replaced the word with ``Lead Market Maker.'' The 
Exchange inadvertently missed some changes in Options 3, Section 25; 
Options 8, Section 34; and Options 8, Section 39. Further, the Exchange 
proposes to replace the word ``ROT'' with ``Market Maker'' in Options 
8, Section 25. The term ``ROT'' was removed in SR-Phlx-2020-03 as well. 
These amendments are non-substantive.

[[Page 7316]]

The Exchange also proposes to change ``a'' to ``an'' within Options 8, 
Section 25(a). This amendment is non-substantive. The Exchange also 
proposes to renumber Options 8, Section 25(c)(3)(B)(3) as Options 8, 
Section 25(c)(3)(B)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act 88213 (February 14, 2020), 85 FR 
9859 (February 20, 2020) (SR-Phlx-2020-03) (Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Relocate Rules 
From Its Current Rulebook Into Its New Rulebook Shell) (``Rulebook 
Relocation'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to reserve Options 3, Section 26. 
This section is being reserved as another rule is proposed in this 
section for ISE.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\10\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular, in that it 
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to 
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system, and, in general to protect 
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to re-letter Options 2, Section 11(i) as 
(g) and to correct a cross-citation to paragraph (d) of Options 2, 
Section 11 to paragraph (e) are non-substantive.
    The Exchange's proposal to (1) add the words ``unmatched 
contracts'' in Options 3, Section 8, Opening Process; (2) relocate the 
rule text in Options 3, Section 10(b); (3) relocate the description of 
a Cancel-Replacement Complex Order from Options 3, Section 14(a)(15) to 
Options 3, Section 14(a)(20); (4) remove the words ``as is the case 
today,'' from Options 3, Section 15(c)(3); (5) amend ``Members'' to 
``Member'' in Options 3, Section 22(a); (6) renumber Options 8, Section 
34(i) as (1)-(5); (7) replace the term ``Specialist'' with ``Lead 
Market Maker'' and the word ``ROT'' with ``Market Maker''; and (8) 
reserve Options 3, Section 26, are consistent with the Act as these 
amendments are non-substantive technical amendments to the rules.
    Phlx's proposal to amend Options 9, Section 14(1) to correct an 
error with respect to hedge transactions to permit box spreads to be 
exempt from established position limits as prescribed under Options 9, 
Section 13(a) and (d) is consistent with the Act. Current Options 9, 
Section 14(l)(6) references a box spread \12\ and current Options 9, 
Section 14(l)(8) references OTC options positions.\13\ Phlx filed a 
rule proposal making clear that the five times standard was limited to 
OTC options contracts,\14\ however Phlx inadvertently cited to Options 
9, Section 14(l)(6) when it relocated rules in a subsequent rule change 
that copied SR-Cboe-2003-30.\15\ Removing the citation to Options 9, 
Section 14(l)(6) with respect to a position limit equal to five (5) 
times the standard limit and adding paragraph (l)(6) to the list of 
exempt transactions in the first sentence of Options 9, Section 14(l) 
would properly reflect that box spreads are exempt from the position 
limits prescribed under Options 9, Section 13(a) and (d). At this time, 
the Exchange has been applying a stricter standard.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Options 9, Section 14(l)(6) states that a long call 
position accompanied by a short put position with the same strike 
price and a short call position accompanied by a long put position 
with a different strike price (``box spread'').
    \13\ Options 9, Section 14(l)(8) states that a listed option 
position hedged on a one-for-one basis with an over-the-counter 
(``OTC'') option position on the same underlying security. The 
strike price of the listed option position and corresponding OTC 
option position must be within one strike of each other and no more 
than one expiration month apart.
    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45889 (May 9, 
2002), 67 FR 34980 (May 16, 2002) (SR-Phlx-2002-33) (Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the 
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. To Eliminate Position and Exercise 
Limits for Certain Qualified Hedge Strategies).
    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51322 (March 4, 
2005), 70 FR 12260 (March 11, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2005-17) (Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and 
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Position Limits and Exercise 
Limits).
    \16\ A similar change is being proposed to Nasdaq ISE, LLC rules 
at Options 9, Section 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Today, NYSE Arca Commentary .07 to Rule 5.17-O, Commentary .09 to 
NYSE American Rule 904 and FINRA Rule 2360(b)(3)(A)(ii) apply the five 
times standard only to OTC options contracts and exempt box spreads 
from their position limit rules. At this time, the Exchange has been 
applying a stricter standard. With this change, members and member 
organizations would not have a position limit for a box spread and, 
therefore, would not have to unwind any position as a result of this 
amendment.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    The Exchange's proposal to amend Options 9, Section 13(l) to remove 
a reference to box spreads at paragraph (l)(6) so that they do not 
appear to have five times the position limit does not impose an undue 
burden on intra-market competition because all Phlx members and member 
organization that transact box spreads would be exempt from the 
position limits in Options 9, Section 13(a) and (d).
    The Exchange's proposal to amend Options 9, Section 13(l) to remove 
a reference to box spreads at paragraph (l)(6) so that they do not 
appear to have five times the position limit does not impose an undue 
burden on inter-market competition as other options exchanges \17\ have 
similar position limit rules that exempt box spreads from position 
limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See NYSE Arca Commentary .07 to Rule 5.17-O, Commentary .09 
to NYSE American Rule 904 and FINRA Rule 2360(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \18\ and 
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \20\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\21\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests 
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the 
proposed rule change may become operative immediately upon filing. The 
Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is 
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest as 
the proposal raises no new or novel issues. Accordingly, the Commission 
waives the 30-day operative delay and

[[Page 7317]]

designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \22\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0c2c5dcd59dd3dfddddd5dec4c3f0c3d5d39ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5624233a337b35393b3b333822251625333578313920">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-Phlx-2026-04 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-Phlx-2026-04. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-Phlx-2026-04 and should be submitted on 
or before March 10, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-03020 Filed 2-13-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 17, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.