Rule2026-02916
Hexythiazox; Pesticide Tolerances
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
February 13, 2026
Effective
February 13, 2026
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of the insecticide hexythiazox and its metabolites in or on lemon/lime, subgroup 10-10B at 0.6 parts per million (ppm). This regulation also establishes separate regional tolerances for grapefruit, subgroup 10- 10C (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm and orange, subgroup 10-10A (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), Gowan Company submitted a petition to EPA requesting that EPA establish a maximum permissible level for residues of this pesticide.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 30 (Friday, February 13, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6781-6785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-02916]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0322; FRL-13116-01-OCSPP]
Hexythiazox; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of the
insecticide hexythiazox and its metabolites in or on lemon/lime,
subgroup 10-10B at 0.6 parts per million (ppm). This regulation also
establishes separate regional tolerances for grapefruit, subgroup 10-
10C (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm and orange, subgroup 10-10A (CA, AZ,
TX only) at 0.5 ppm. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), Gowan Company submitted a petition to EPA requesting that EPA
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of this pesticide.
DATES: This rule is effective on February 13, 2026. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 14, 2026 and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of this document).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0322, is available online at
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Additional information about dockets
generally, along with instructions for visiting the docket in person,
is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Director, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (202) 566-1030; email address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07554341554968736e6462744762776629606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="46140200140829322f2523350623362768212930">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural
[[Page 6782]]
producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes
is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help
readers determine whether this document might apply to them:
<bullet> Crop production (NAICS code 111).
<bullet> Animal production (NAICS code 112).
<bullet> Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
<bullet> Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What is EPA's authority for taking this action?
EPA is issuing this rulemaking under section 408 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(A)(i) allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit
for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures
and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This
includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings
but does not include occupational exposure. FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C)
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue . . .''
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. If you fail to file an objection to the
final rule within the time period specified in the final rule, you will
have waived the right to raise any issues resolved in the final rule.
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify the docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OPP-2024-0322 in the subject line on the first page of your submission.
All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must
be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before April 14, 2026.
The EPA's Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), in which the
Hearing Clerk is housed, urges parties to file and serve documents by
electronic means only, notwithstanding any other particular
requirements set forth in other procedural rules governing those
proceedings. See ``Revised Order Urging Electronic Filing and
Service,'' dated June 22, 2023, which can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-06/2023-06-22%20-%20revised%20order%20urging%20electronic%20filing%20and%20service.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-06/2023-06-22%20-%20revised%20order%20urging%20electronic%20filing%20and%20service.pdf</a>.
Although the EPA's regulations require submission via U.S. Mail or hand
delivery, the EPA intends to treat submissions filed via electronic
means as properly filed submissions; therefore, the EPA believes the
preference for submission via electronic means will not be prejudicial.
When submitting documents to the OALJ electronically, a person should
utilize the OALJ e-filing system at <a href="https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/eab/eab-alj_upload.nsf">https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/eab/eab-alj_upload.nsf</a>.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If you wish to
include CBI in your request, please follow the applicable instructions
at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules</a> and clearly
mark the information that you claim to be CBI. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice.
II. Petitioned for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of September 5, 2025 (90 FR 42897) (FRL-
12474-06-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 4F9135) by Gowan Company, LLC, P.O. Box 5569, Yuma, AZ
85366-5569. The pesticide petition requested that 40 CFR 180.448 be
amended by converting the existing regional tolerance for residues of
the insecticide hexythiazox and its metabolites in or on the raw
agricultural commodities of citrus crop group 10-10 at 0.6 parts per
million (ppm) to include a national tolerance for crop subgroup 10-10B
lemon/lime at 0.6 ppm, while establishing separate, remaining regional
tolerances for grapefruit, subgroup 10-10C (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm
and orange, subgroup 10-10A (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm. That document
referenced a summary of the petition that was prepared by the
petitioner and has been included in the docket. There was one (1) non-
substantive comment received on October 6, 2025, in response to the
notice of filing.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and
other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for hexythiazox including exposure resulting from
the tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of
exposures and risks associated with hexythiazox follows.
In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been
previously published for tolerance rulemakings for the same pesticide
chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical
remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between
tolerance rulemakings, and EPA considers referral back to those
sections as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA
considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking.
EPA has previously published tolerance rulemakings for hexythiazox
in which EPA concluded, based on the available information, that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm would result from aggregate
exposure to hexythiazox and established tolerances for residues of the
chemical. EPA is not reprinting previously published sections from
these rulemakings as described further in this rulemaking, as they
remain unchanged.
Toxicological profile. For a detailed discussion of the
toxicological profile of hexythiazox, see Unit III. of the hexythiazox
tolerance rulemaking published in the Federal Register of July 20, 2020
(85 FR 43697) (FRL-10008-84).
Toxicological points of departure/levels of concern. All points of
departure (POD), toxicity endpoints, and levels of concern (LOC) for
hexythiazox remain unchanged from the
[[Page 6783]]
previous human health risk assessment (July 8, 2020) which can be found
in docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-20224-0200 at <a href="https://wwwregulations.gov">https://wwwregulations.gov</a>. In
addition, the hazard characterization also remains unchanged. For a
summary of the toxicological points of departure/levels of concern for
hexythiazox used for human health risk assessment, see Tables 4.1.1.
and 4.1.2. of the document entitled ``Hexythiazox: Human Health Risk
Assessment for the Section 3 Registration of Hexythiazox on Citrus,
Fruit, Subgroup 10-10B (Lemon/Lime).'' (Human Health Risk Assessment),
dated December 17, 2025, in docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0322 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
Exposure assessment. An aggregate dietary (food + drinking water)
exposure and risk assessment was conducted using the Dietary Exposure
Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database
Version 4.02. This software uses 2005-2010 food consumption data from
the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey, What We Eat in America. An acute dietary exposure
assessment is not required since no endpoint attributable to a single
oral exposure was identified from the available toxicity database. The
chronic dietary risk assessment was conducted using tolerance level
residues, modeled drinking water estimates, assumed 100% crop treated
and used the EPA's default processing factors. The chronic dietary
exposure estimate for the most highly exposed population subgroup,
children 1-2 years old, was 86% of the chronic population adjusted dose
(cPAD).
Drinking water and non-occupational exposures. The most recent
estimated drinking water concentrations from the previous human health
risk assessment (July 8, 2020) can be found in docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-
2024-0200 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. This new action would not
exceed those calculated in the last hexythiazox drinking water
assessment.
There are no new residential uses of hexythiazox at this time;
however, all previously registered hexythiazox product labels with
residential use sites require that handlers wear specific clothing
(e.g., long-sleeved shirt and long pants) and/or use Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE) (e.g., gloves). Therefore, EPA has made the
assumption that these products are not for homeowner use and has not
conducted a quantitative residential handler assessment.
Cumulative exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires
that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' Unlike other
pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based
on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism
of toxicity finding as to hexythiazox and any other substances, and
hexythiazox does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of this action, therefore, EPA has
not assumed that hexythiazox has a common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances.
Safety factor for infants and children. EPA continues to conclude
that there are reliable data to support the reduction of the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor for hexythiazox from 10X to
1X since there is no evidence of increased susceptibility to in utero
and/or postnatal exposure to hexythiazox. See Unit III. of the July 20,
2020, rulemaking for a discussion of EPA's rationale for that
determination.
Aggregate risks and determination of safety. EPA determines whether
acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing
dietary (food + drinking water) exposure estimates to the acute
population-adjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic population-adjusted dose
(cPAD). Short- and intermediate-term risks are evaluated by comparing
the estimated total food, water, and residential exposure to the
appropriate points of departure to ensure that an adequate margin of
exposure (MOE) exists. There are no new residential uses of hexythiazox
proposed at this time, therefore, a residential assessment is not
required. However, residential exposures are anticipated from the
registered use of hexythiazox and worst-case residential exposures have
been carried forward from the 2020 Hexythiazox Human Health Risk
Assessment for purpose of aggregate assessment. The short-term and
intermediate-term aggregate assessment resulted in no risk estimates of
concern when aggregating residential post-application exposures with
the updated chronic dietary exposures. MOEs were 1,200 and 1,400 for
the short- and intermediate-term aggregate assessments, respectively
(LOC = 100).
Hexythiazox is classified as ``Likely to be Carcinogenic to
Humans'' based upon increased incidences of malignant and combined
benign/malignant liver tumors in female mice, and benign mammary gland
tumors observed in male rats. The evidence was not strong enough to
warrant the use of a linear low dose extrapolation model applied to the
animal data (Q1*) for a quantitative estimation of human risk. The
findings demonstrate that the chronic reference dose (RfD) is
protective of the tumors observed at 163 mg/kg/day. EPA concludes that
quantification of risk using a non-linear approach; i.e., the chronic
RfD, for hexythiazox will adequately account for all chronic toxicity,
including carcinogenicity from exposure to hexythiazox. Therefore, a
separate cancer assessment was not conducted, and the chronic exposure
assessment is considered protective of any cancer exposures.
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the U.S. general population, or to infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to hexythiazox residues. More detailed information
on this action can be found in the Human Health Risk Assessment.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Samples were analyzed for residues of hexythiazox and its
metabolite PT-1-3 using a common moiety high-performance liquid
chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection, Morse
Laboratories Method No. Meth-220. The method provides for conversion of
residues determined as PT-1-3 to hexythiazox equivalents using a
molecular weight conversion factor of 1.55. The limit of quantitation,
determined as the lowest level of method validation, was 0.02 ppm for
hexythiazox in/on lemon. Therefore, adequate enforcement methodology is
available to enforce the tolerance expressions for hexythiazox in/on
lemon.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRL) established by
the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section
408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations Food and
Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food standards
program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA
[[Page 6784]]
may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons for
departing from the Codex level.
There are Codex MRLs established for residues of hexythiazox in or
on citrus fruit (group) at 0.5 ppm. The additional field trial data on
lemon, and an updated OECD tolerance calculation supports a national
tolerance for hexythiazox on lemon/lime, subgroup 10-10B at 0.6 ppm.
Therefore, EPA is establishing a national tolerance for hexythiazox on
lemon/lime, subgroup 10-10B at 0.6 ppm and is not harmonizing with
Codex.
A regional tolerance (CA, AZ, TX only) will remain for the raw
agricultural commodities of orange, subgroup 10-10A and grapefruit,
subgroup 10-10C to harmonize with the Codex MRL for Fruit, citrus,
group 10-10. The OECD calculations for orange, subgroup 10-10A and
grapefruit, subgroup 10-10C were 0.2 ppm and 0.15 ppm and are below the
Codex MRL of 0.5 ppm for citrus; therefore, EPA is recommending
removing the currently established fruit, citrus, group 10-10 tolerance
of 0.6 ppm and establishing regional tolerances for orange, subgroup
10-10A and grapefruit, subgroup 10-10C at 0.5 ppm to harmonize with
Codex.
C. Effective and Expiration Date(s)
In general, a tolerance action is effective on the date of
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. For actions in
the final rule that lower or revoke existing tolerances, EPA will set
an expiration date for the existing tolerance of six months after the
date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register, in order
to allow a reasonable interval for producers in exporting members of
the World Trade Organization's (WTO's) Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS)
Measures Agreement to adapt to the requirements.
D. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
To harmonize with Codex, the Agency is establishing regional
tolerances for orange, subgroup 10-10A (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm and
grapefruit, subgroup 10-10C (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm. In addition,
to reflect the updates to the existing regulations from this pesticide
petition, the regional tolerance for fruit, citrus group 10-10 (CA, AZ,
TX only) will be removed from the table in Paragraph (c) of 40 CFR
180.448.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, a tolerance is established for residues of the ovicide/
miticide hexythiazox and its metabolites in or on lemon/lime, subgroup
10-10B at 0.6 ppm. Regional tolerances are established for orange,
subgroup 10-10A (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm and grapefruit, subgroup
10-10C (CA, AZ, TX only) at 0.5 ppm. The existing regional tolerance
for residues of hexythiazox in or on fruit, citrus group 10-10 (CA, AZ,
TX only) will be removed from the table in Paragraph (c) of 40 CFR
180.448.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/regulations/and-executive-orders">https://www.epa.gov/regulations/and-executive-orders</a>.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), because it establishes or modifies a
pesticide tolerance or a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 408 in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866.
B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 2025) does not apply
because actions that establish a tolerance under FFDCA section 408 are
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., because it does not contain any
information collection activities.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
Since tolerance actions that are established on the basis of a
petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., do not apply to this
action.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more (in 1995 dollars and adjusted annually for inflation) as described
in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any
State, local, or Tribal governments or on the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it will
not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have Tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because it will
not have substantial direct effects on Tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian Tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because tolerance actions like this one are exempt from
review under Executive Order 12866. However, EPA's 2021 Policy on
Children's Health applies to this action. This rule finalizes tolerance
actions under the FFDCA, which requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . .
.'' (FFDCA 408(b)(2)(C)). The Agency's consideration is summarized in
Unit III.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355)
(May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
[[Page 6785]]
J. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve technical standards that would require
Agency consideration under NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 10, 2026.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Amend Sec. 180.448 by:
0
a. In paragraph (a)
0
i. Adding to the table the table heading ``Table 1 to Paragraph (a)'';
and
0
ii. Adding in alphabetical order an entry for ``Lemon/Lime, subgroup
10-10B''.
0
b In paragraph (c):
0
i. Adding to the table the table heading ``Table 2 to Paragraph (c)'';
0
ii. Removing the existing entry for ``Fruit, citrus group 10-10 (CA,
AZ, TX only)''; and
0
iii. Adding in alphabetical order entries for ``Grapefruit, subgroup
10-10C (CA, AZ, TX only)'' and ``Orange, subgroup 10-10A (CA, AZ, TX
only)''.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 180.448 Hexythiazox; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Lemon/Lime, subgroup 10-10B................................. 0.6
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 2 to Paragraph (c)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Grapefruit, subgroup 10-10C (CA, AZ, TX only)............... 0.5
* * * * *
Orange, subgroup 10-10A (CA, AZ, TX only)................... 0.5
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2026-02916 Filed 2-12-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on February 13, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.