Notice2026-02896
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
February 13, 2026
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 30 (Friday, February 13, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6961-6963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-02896]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-104803; File No. SR-CboeEDGA-2026-001]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Fee Schedule
February 10, 2026.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 28, 2026, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGA'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule to add language to bring the Fee Schedule into
compliance with Regulation NMS Rule 610(d), which becomes effective on
February 2, 2026. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Commission's website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>), the
Exchange's website (<a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/">https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/</a>), and at the principal office of the Exchange.
[[Page 6962]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``EDGA Equities'') to add language to bring
the Fee Schedule into compliance with Regulation NMS Rule 610(d), which
becomes effective on February 2, 2026. The Exchange proposes to
implement these changes effective February 2, 2026.
On September 18, 2024, the Commission adopted several amendments to
Regulation NMS in order to increase the transparency of exchange fees
and rebates.\3\ As part of these amendments, the Commission adopted
Regulation NMS Rule 610(d), which provides that ``[a] national
securities exchange shall not impost, nor permit to be imposed, any fee
or fees, or provide, or permit to be provided, and rebate or other
remuneration, for the execution of an order in an NMS stock that cannot
be determined at the time of execution.'' \4\ On October 31, 2025, the
Commission granted temporary exemptive relief from compliance with
Regulation NMS Rule 610(d).\5\ The compliance date for Regulation NMS
Rule 610(d) is the first business day of February 2026, which is
Monday, February 2, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101070 (September
18, 2024), 89 FR 81620 (October 8, 2024), File No. S7-30-22,
Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees, and
Transparency of Better Priced Orders (``Rule 610(d) Adopting
Release'').
\4\ 17 CFR 242.610(d).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104172 (October 31,
2025), 90 FR 51418 (November 17, 2025), File No. S7-30-22,
Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees, and
Transparency of Better Priced Orders (``Temporary Exemptive
Relief'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the Exchange establishes certain transaction fees and
rebates for equities executions that are based on tiers calculated
using volume figures from trading or quoting activity in the current
month. This means that the fees and rebates at the Exchange associated
with a given equities execution often cannot be determined at the time
of execution, but only retroactively at the end of the month in which
an execution occurred. In order to ensure that its transaction fees and
rebates for equities executions are consistent with Regulation NMS Rule
610(d), the Exchange proposes to add the following language to the
``General Notes'' section of its Fee Schedule:
<bullet> In compliance with Regulation NMS Rule 610(d), effective
February 2, 2026, unless otherwise indicated, all volume figures will
be derived from quoting or trading activity in the prior month.
Consequently, all new Members will receive the base rates in their
first month of trading.
This change will ensure that all Exchange participants will be able
to ascertain at the time of execution all the transaction fees and
rebates associated with the execution of an order of an NMS stock at
the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\6\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as well as Section 6(b)(4) \9\
as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\8\ Id.
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the addition of the text under the ``General
Notes'' section of the Fee Schedule provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members
because it allows the Exchange to preserve its current quoting and
trading incentives while also complying with Regulation NMS Rule
610(d). Currently, Members are assessed certain transaction fees and
paid certain transaction rebates based on tiers calculated using volume
figures from trading and quoting activity in the current month. In
order to comply with Regulation NMS Rule 610(d), the Exchange is adding
language that provides that all transaction fees and transaction
rebates shall be calculated using volume figures from trading and
quoting activity in the prior month (unless otherwise indicated). As
such, all transaction fees and transaction rebates associated with the
execution of an order in an NMS stock at the Exchange can be determined
at the time of execution of such order. All existing fees and rebates
remain otherwise unchanged.
The Exchange believes that its modified Fee Schedule is not
unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will apply its revised
transaction fee and transaction rebate calculations equally to all
Members, in that all Members will receive transaction fees and
transaction rebates based on the previous month's volume and quotation
activity. Therefore, all Members will be able to determine relevant
transaction fees and transaction rebates at the time of execution of an
NMS stock on the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above,
the Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
[[Page 6963]]
The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the Exchange's
proposal will apply to all Members equally in that all Members are
subject to Regulation NMS Rule 610(d) and will be able to determine
their applicable transaction fees and transaction rebates based on
tiers by utilizing the previous month's trading and quoting activity.
Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose
any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market. Members have numerous
alternative venues that they may participate on and direct their order
flow, including other equities exchanges, off-exchange venues, and
alternative trading systems. Additionally, the Exchange represents a
small percentage of the overall market. Based on publicly available
information, no single equities exchange has more than 15% of the
market share.\10\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of order flow. Indeed, participants can readily
choose to send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues
if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable.
Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \11\ The fact
that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the
courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C.
Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for
order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S.
national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the
broker-dealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide
range of choices of where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no
exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted'
because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker dealers'. . . .''.\12\
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change
imposes any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See <a href="https://www.cboe.com/en/markets/us/equities/market-statistics/">https://www.cboe.com/en/markets/us/equities/market-statistics/</a> (last accessed January 26, 2026).
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\12\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \14\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#790b0c151c541a1614141c170d0a390a1c1a571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8cacdd4dd95dbd7d5d5ddd6cccbf8cbdddb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-CboeEDGA-2026-001 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGA-2026-001. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGA-2026-001
and should be submitted on or before March 6, 2026.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-02896 Filed 2-12-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on February 13, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.