Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that certain exporters of passenger vehicle and light truck tires (passenger tires) from the People's Republic of China (China) made sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. We are also rescinding this administrative review for 16 companies because either all requests for review were withdrawn or these companies had no reviewable entries during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6197-6200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-02779]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-016]
Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds
that certain exporters of passenger vehicle and light truck tires
(passenger tires) from the People's Republic of China (China) made
sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during
the period of review (POR) August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024. We
are also rescinding this administrative review for 16 companies because
either all requests for review were withdrawn or these companies had no
reviewable entries during the POR. We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable February 11, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6412.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 10, 2015, Commerce published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty (AD) order on passenger tires from China.\1\ On
September 20, 2024, based on timely requests for review from the
petitioner \2\ and other interested parties,\3\ in accordance with 19
CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of the
Order covering 20 exporters of the subject merchandise.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping
Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing
Duty Order, 80 FR 47902 (August 10, 2015) (Order).
\2\ The petitioner is the United Steel, Paper and Forestry,
Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC.
\3\ See Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd.'s (Pirelli's) Letter, ``Pirelli's
Request for AD Review,'' dated August 5, 2024; Petitioner's Letter,
``Request for Administrative Reviews,'' dated August 28, 2024;
Jiangsu General Science Technology Co., Ltd.'s (Jiangsu General's)
and Qingdao Keter International Co., Limited's (Keter's) Letter,
``Request for Administrative Review,'' dated August 30, 2024;
Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd.'s (Hankook Tire's) and Jiangsu Hankook
Tire Co., Ltd.'s (Jiangsu Hankook's) Letter, ``Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated August 30, 2024; Giti Tire Global
Trading Pte. Ltd.'s (Giti's) Letter, ``Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated September 3, 2024; Qingdao Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd's
(Qingdao Lakesea's) Letter, ``Request for Administrative Review,''
dated September 3, 2024; Sailun Group Co. Ltd.'s (Sailun Group's)
Letter, ``Sailun and Linglong Request for Administrative Review,''
dated September 3, 2024; Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd.'s
(Sumitomo's) Letter, ``Request for Administrative Review,'' dated
September 3, 2024; and Qingdao Transamerica Tire Industrial Co.,
Ltd.'s (Transamerica's) Letter, ``Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated August 30, 2024.
\4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 77079 (September 20, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this
administrative proceeding by 90 days.\5\ On July 16, 2025, Commerce
extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this
administrative review by 90 days.\6\ Due to the lapse in
[[Page 6198]]
appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, on November 14, 2025,
Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceeding by 47
days.\7\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents that were
electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS)
during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce
tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an additional 21
days.\8\ Finally, on December 17, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline
for the preliminary results by 30 days.\9\ Accordingly, the deadline
for these preliminary results is now February 5, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of 2023-2024 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated
July 16, 2025.
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated
November 24, 2025.
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of 2023-2024 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated
December 17, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\10\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included in Appendix I. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic
of China; 2023-2024,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted
by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order are passenger tires from China.
For a full description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the requested review in the
Federal Register. For the companies identified in Appendix II,\11\ all
parties timely withdrew their requests for review by the 90-day
withdrawal deadline. Because all parties timely withdrew their requests
for a review of these exporters, consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce is rescinding this review, in part, with respect to these
companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Pirelli's Letter, ``Pirelli's Withdrawal Request for AD
Review,'' dated October 16, 2024; Sailun Group's Letter, ``Sailun,
Sailun Tire America's, and Linglong Withdrawal Request of
Administrative Review,'' dated October 20, 2024; Sumitomo's Letter,
``Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated November
25, 2024, and ``Letter to Confirm Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review and Request to Deselect Companies as Mandatory
Respondents or Suspend the Deadlines to Respond to the Initial
Questionnaire,'' dated December 4, 2024; Zhaoqing Junhong Co.,
Ltd.'s Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,''
dated December 4, 2024; Giti's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated December 5, 2024; Petitioner's
Letter, ``Withdrawal of Requests for Administrative Review,'' dated
December 17, 2024; Jiangsu General's and Keter's Letter,
``Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated December
17, 2024; Jiangsu Hankook's and Hankook Tire's Letter, ``Withdrawal
of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated December 18, 2024; and
Qingdao Lakesea's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated December 19, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), Commerce will
rescind an administrative review when there are no entries of subject
merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.\12\
Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended
entries are liquidated at the AD assessment rate calculated for the
review period.\13\ Therefore, for an administrative review of a company
to be conducted, there must be a suspended entry that Commerce can
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the
AD assessment rate calculated for the POR.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the Republic of
Korea: Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2021-2022,
88 FR 24758 (April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy
Steel Cut- to Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany:
Recission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR
4157 (January 24, 2023).
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In February 2025, we notified interested parties of our intent to
rescind this administrative review, in part, with respect to three
companies because there were no suspended entries of subject
merchandise produced or exported by these companies during the POR, and
we invited interested parties to comment<INF>.</INF>\15\ The petitioner
submitted comments on the Intent to Rescind Memorandum, alleging that
there were entries from both Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
(Yongsheng) and Qingdao Fullrun Tech Tyre Corp., Ltd. (Fullrun
Tech).\16\ In response to these concerns, we obtained entry documents
for Yongsheng, which we placed on the record.\17\ This information
shows that, while Yongsheng was the manufacturer of the entries at
issue, there is no indication that it had knowledge that this
merchandise was destined for the United States.\18\ Therefore, we are
rescinding this administrative review for Yongsheng, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In
Part,'' dated February 13, 2025 (Intent to Rescind Memorandum).
\16\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitioner's Comments on
Commerce's Intent to Rescind,'' dated February 20, 2025.
\17\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Entry Documents,'' dated December 4, 2025.
\18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, in the absence of any suspended entries of subject
merchandise from Shandong Duratti Rubber Corporation Co., Ltd.
(Duratti), we are rescinding the administrative review for Duratti, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). However, with respect to Fullrun
Tech, as discussed below, we preliminarily determine that this company
is part of the China-wide entity.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19
CFR 351.213. We calculated constructed export prices in accordance with
section 772(b) of the Act. Because China is a non-market economy (NME)
country, within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, we
calculated NV in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. In
addition, Commerce has relied on partial adverse facts available under
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act for Transamerica and Shandong Haohua
Tire Co., Ltd. (Haohua). For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Separate Rates
As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, Commerce
preliminarily finds that Fullrun Tech has not established its
eligibility for a separate rate. As such, we preliminarily determine
that Fullrun Tech is part of the China-wide entity.
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following companies have
demonstrated their eligibility for a
[[Page 6199]]
separate rate in this review:\19\ (1) Transamerica; (2) Haohua; and (3)
Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd. (Triangle Tyre).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Separate Rates.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment
of a rate to apply to companies not selected for individual examination
when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when
determining the dumping margin for respondents that are not
individually examined in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A)
of the Act states that the all-others rate should be calculated by
averaging the weighted-average dumping margins for individually-
examined respondents, excluding dumping margins that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts available. For these preliminary
results, we preliminarily determined a dumping margin for the separate
rate respondent, Triangle Tyre, as the weighted average of the
calculated rate of the mandatory respondents, Transamerica and Haohua,
which are not zero or de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis
of facts available.
China-Wide Entity
Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide
entity applies to this administrative review.\20\ Because no party
requested a review of the China-wide entity, the China-wide entity is
not under review. Therefore, the rate previously established for the
China-wide entity (i.e., 76.46 percent) remains the China-wide entity
rate this review.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\21\ See Order, 80 FR at 47904, n.19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that the following estimated weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the POR August 1, 2023, through July
31, 2024:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qingdao Transamerica Tire Industrial Co., Ltd............... 61.43
Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd............................... 62.56
Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd...................................... 61.47
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed to interested parties in these preliminary results within
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Case briefs and other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c), we have modified the deadline for interested parties to
submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after
the date for filing case briefs.\22\ Interested parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table
of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\23\ An
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its
entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the established
deadline. As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii),
we request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their
briefs a public, executive summary for each issue raised in their
briefs.\24\ Further, we request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not
including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as
the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for
relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note
that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\24\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\25\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically filed hearing request must be received
successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system,
ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. ET within 30 days after the date of publication of
this notice.\26\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) the party's name,
address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; (3)
whether any participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of issues
to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those
raised by each party in their respective case and rebuttal briefs. An
electronically filed request must be received successfully in its
entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days of the
publication date of this notice. If a request for a hearing is made,
parties will be notified of the time and date of the hearing.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See 19 CFR 351.301(c).
\27\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A), upon completion of this
administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review.\28\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because Haohua and
Transamerica reported the entered value for their U.S. sales, we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on
the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's
examined sales to the total entered value of those sales. Where either
a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific
rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Commerce's assessment practice,\30\ for entries that
were not reported in the U.S. data submitted by Haohua and
Transamerica, we will instruct to CBP to liquidate such entries at the
China-wide rate. Additionally, where Commerce determines that an
[[Page 6200]]
exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR, any suspended entries of subject
merchandise that entered under that exporter's CBP case number during
the POR will be liquidated at the dumping margin assigned to the China-
wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full
discussion of this practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Triangle Tyre, the separate rate respondent, the assessment
rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin calculated
using the rates assigned to Haohua and Transamerica in the final
results of this review.\31\ Finally, we intend to liquidate entries
containing subject merchandise exported by the companies under review
that we determine in the final results to be part of the China-wide
entity at the China-wide rate of 76.46 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments: 2014-2015, 81
FR 29528 (May 12, 2016), and accompanying PDM at 10-11, unchanged in
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 54042 (August 15,
2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated antidumping
duties, where applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Finally, for the companies for which we are rescinding this review,
Duratti and Yongsheng, we intend to instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit
rate of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP for these companies no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the companies
listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be
that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if
the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will
be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed exporters not listed in the final results of review that have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter's weighted-average dumping margin published of the most
recently-completed segment of this proceeding; (3) for all Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for
the China-wide entity (i.e., 76.46 percent); \32\ and (4) for all
exporters of subject merchandise which are not located in China and are
not eligible for a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate applicable to Chinese exporter(s) that supplied that non-Chinese
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See Order, 80 FR at 47904, n.19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results
Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, including the results of our
analysis of the issues raised in any case briefs, not later than 120
days after the date of publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties and/or an
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the
countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: February 5, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Rescinded Based on Timely Withdrawals of Requests for Review
1. Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire (Anhui)
Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire (Chongqing) Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire
(Fujian) Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd.; Giti
Tire Greatwall Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire (Hualin) Company, Ltd.; Giti
Tire (Yinchuan) Company, Ltd.
2. Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd.
3. Jiangsu General Science Technology Co., Ltd.
4. Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd.
5. Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd.
6. Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Corp., Ltd.
7. Qingdao Keter International Co., Limited
8. Qingdao Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd.
9. Qingdao Powerich Tyre Co., Ltd.
10. Dynamic Tire Corp.; Shandong Jinyu Industrial Co.; Sailun Tire
International Corp.; Husky Tire Corp.; Seatex PTE. Ltd.; Seatex
International Inc.; Sailun Group (HongKong) Co., Limited; Sailun HK;
Sailun Jinyu HK; Sailun Group Co., Ltd.; Sailun Group; Sailun Jinyu
Group Co., Ltd.; and Sailun Jinyu
11. Sailun Tire Americas Inc.
12. Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd.
13. Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co., Ltd.; Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan)
Co., Ltd.; and Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd.
14. Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2026-02779 Filed 2-10-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.