Notice2026-02563

Erythritol From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 10, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of erythritol from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5920-5922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-02563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-193]


Erythritol From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative 
Countervailing Duty Determination

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters 
of erythritol from the People's Republic of China (China). The period 
of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023.

DATES: Applicable February 10, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Doyle, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2805.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 16, 2025, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination 
of this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation of erythritol from 
China, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(3), and aligned this CVD 
investigation with the final determination in the companion less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation.\1\ On June 24, 2025, we issued a post-
preliminary analysis memorandum regarding certain programs.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Erythritol from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and 
Alignment of Final Determination with Final Antidumping Duty 
Determination, 90 FR 21000 (May 16, 2025) (Preliminary 
Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
(PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Analysis Memorandum for 
the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Erythritol from the 
People's Republic of China,'' dated June 24, 2025 (Post-Preliminary 
Analysis).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, 
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative 
proceedings by 47 days.\3\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents 
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an 
additional 21 days.\4\ Accordingly, the deadline for this final 
determination is now February 4, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated 
November 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete discussion of the events that followed the 
Preliminary Determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ 
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made 
available to the public via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered 
users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Affirmative Determination in the Countervailing Duty 
Investigation of Erythritol from the People's Republic of China,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by the scope of this investigation is 
Erythritol from China. For a complete description of the scope of this 
investigation, see Appendix I.

Scope Comments

    In the Preliminary Scope Memorandum, we set aside a period of time 
for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope) in 
scope-specific case briefs or other written comments.\6\ We received 
comments from interested parties on the scope of the investigation as 
it appeared in the Preliminary Determination. For a summary of the 
product coverage comments submitted to the record for this final 
determination, and accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments 
timely received, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\7\ After 
analyzing these comments, we made one change to the scope of the 
investigation. Commerce is therefore modifying the scope language as it 
appeared in the Initiation Notice and Preliminary Determination. See 
the scope in Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value and Countervailing 
Duty Investigations of Erythritol from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum,'' dated July 11, 2025 
(Preliminary Scope Memorandum).
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Final Scope Decision Memorandum,'' dated 
concurrently with this final determination (Final Scope Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, Commerce conducted 
verification the information reported by Baolingbao Biology Co., Ltd. 
(Baolingbao Biology) and Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology for use in the 
final determination. We used standard verification procedures, 
including an examination of relevant accounting records and original 
source documents provided at verification.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire 
Responses of Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 
16, 2025; see also Memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire 
Responses of Baolingbao Biology Company Limited in the 
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Erythritol from the People's 
Republic of China,'' dated July 18, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received

    The subsidy programs under investigation and the issues raised in 
the case and rebuttal briefs that were submitted by interested parties 
in this investigation are discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. For a list of

[[Page 5921]]

the issues raised by interested parties and addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum, see Appendix II to this notice.

Methodology

    Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section 
701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found to be 
countervailable, Commerce determines that there is a subsidy, i.e., a 
financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit 
to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\9\ For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our final determination, see 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; see also section 771(5)(E) of the Act 
regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding 
specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In making this final determination, Commerce relied, in part, on 
facts otherwise available, including with an adverse inference, 
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For a full discussion 
of our application of adverse facts available (AFA), see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum at the section entitled ``Uses of Facts Available 
and Application of Adverse Inferences.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See also Preliminary Determination PDM at 5-17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination and Post-Preliminary 
Analysis

    Based on our review and analysis of the information at verification 
and comments received from interested parties, we made changes to the 
subsidy rate calculations for Baolingbao Biology, Shandong Sanyuan, and 
all other producers/exporters, including the addition of subsidy 
programs included in the Post-Preliminary Analysis. For a discussion of 
these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

All-Others Rate

    Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that Commerce shall 
determine an estimated all-others rate for companies not individually 
examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of 
the estimated subsidy rates established for those companies 
individually examined, excluding any zero and de minimis rates and any 
rates based entirely under section 776 of the Act.
    In this investigation, Commerce calculated individual estimated 
subsidy rates for Baolingbao Biology and Shandong Sanyuan that are not 
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on the facts otherwise available. 
Consequently, Commerce calculated the all-others rate using a weighted 
average of the individual estimated subsidy rates calculated for the 
examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged values for 
the subject merchandise.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally 
calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates 
calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the 
estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents; and 
(C) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for 
the examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. 
sale values for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as 
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. 
See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662 
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 
at Comment 1. As complete publicly ranged sales data were available, 
Commerce based the all-others rate on the publicly ranged sales data 
of the mandatory respondents. For a complete analysis of the data, 
see Memorandum, ``Calculation of the All-Others Rate for the Final 
Determination,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination

    Commerce determines that the following estimated countervailable 
subsidy rates exist for the period January 1, 2023, through December 
31, 2023:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                         Company                            (percent ad
                                                             valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baolingbao Biology Co., Ltd.............................            4.54
Shandong Sanyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.................            8.63
All Others..............................................            8.12
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose its calculations performed to 
interested parties in this final determination within five days of its 
public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five 
days of the date of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    As a result of our Preliminary Determination, and pursuant to 
sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, we instructed U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits and suspend 
liquidation of entries of subject merchandise from China that were 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after May 
16, 2025, the date of the publication of the Preliminary Determination 
in the Federal Register.\12\ In accordance with section 703(d) of the 
Act, we instructed CBP to discontinue the suspension of liquidation of 
all entries of subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse, 
on or after September 13, 2025 but to continue the suspension of 
liquidation of all entries of subject merchandise on or before 
September 12, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Preliminary Determination, 90 FR at 21000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final 
affirmative injury determination, we will issue a CVD order, reinstate 
the suspension of liquidation under section 706(a) of the Act, and 
require a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties for entries 
of subject merchandise in the amounts indicated above. Pursuant to 
section 705(c)(2) of the Act, if the ITC determines that material 
injury, or threat of material injury, does not exist, this proceeding 
will be terminated, and all estimated duties deposited or securities 
posted as a result of the suspension of liquidation will be refunded or 
cancelled.

ITC Notification

    In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify 
the ITC of its final affirmative determination that countervailable 
subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of erythritol 
from China. As Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in 
accordance with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC will determine, 
within 45 days, whether the domestic industry in the United States is 
materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of 
import of erythritol from China. In addition, we are making available 
to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information in our 
files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such 
information, either publicly or under administrative protective order 
(APO), without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
    If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material 
injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all cash 
deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does 
exist, Commerce will issue a CVD order directing CBP to assess, upon 
further instruction by Commerce, countervailing duties on all imports 
of the subject merchandise that are entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the 
suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the

[[Page 5922]]

``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice will serve as the final reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This determination is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 705(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).

    Dated: February 4, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

    The product within the scope of this investigation is 
erythritol, which is a sugar alcohol, commonly referred to as a 
polyol, typically produced by the fermentation of glucose using 
enzymes and yeast or yeast-like fungi (though the scope includes 
erythritol produced using any other feedstock or organism). 
Erythritol is an organic compound with the molecular formula C4 H10 
O4 and a Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number of 149-32-
6. Other names for erythritol include meso-erythritol,(2R, 3S)-
butan-1,2,3,4-tetrol, butane-1,2,3,4-tetrol, or meso-1,2,3,4-
Tetrahydryoxybutane.
    Erythritol typically appears as a white crystalline, odorless 
product that rapidly dissolves in water. While erythritol is 
typically produced in the crystalline form or as a fine powder or in 
directly compressible form, the scope of this investigation covers 
all physical forms and grades of erythritol, including organic 
erythritol.
    The merchandise covered by this investigation is classifiable 
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 
subheading 2905.49.4000. Erythritol may also enter under HTSUS 
subheading 2106.90.9998. Although the HTSUS subheadings and the CAS 
registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes, 
the written description of the merchandise covered by this 
investigation is dispositive.
    Specifically excluded from the scope are certain tabletop sugar 
substitute products that contain erythritol as an ingredient. 
Tabletop sugar substitute products include erythritol as an 
ingredient as well as a high intensity sweeter such as monk fruit, 
stevia, sucralose, aspartame, and saccharin. The following tabletop 
sugar substitute products are excluded: finished goods packaged and 
labeled for retail sale or individual consumption.

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Subsidies Valuation Information
IV. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce's Decision to Countervail the 
Provision of Electricity for LTAR Program Is Based on Substantial 
Evidence and Is in Accordance With Law
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce's Decision To Countervail the 
Provision of Land-Use Rights for LTAR Is Based on Substantial 
Evidence and Is in Accordance With Law
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Erred in Its Calculation of the 
Benefit for the Provision of Land Use-Rights for LTAR Program
    Comment 4: Other Subsidies
    Comment 5: Whether To Modify the Benchmark Applied to Baolingbao 
Biology's ``Flat'' Electricity Purchases for the Provision of 
Electricity for LTAR Program
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Erred in Its Selection of Discount 
Rate To Allocate Baolingbao Biology's Benefits During the AUL Period
    Comment 7: Whether To Modify the Benefit Calculation for 
Shandong Sanyuan for the Provision of Electricity for LTAR Program
    Comment 8: Whether Commerce's Decision To Countervail the 
Provision of LNG for LTAR Program Is Based on Substantial Evidence 
and Is in Accordance With Law
    Comment 9: Whether Commerce Erred in Its Benchmark Calculation 
for the Provision of LNG for LTAR Program
    Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Include Shandong Sanyuan's 
Benefit From the Income Tax Deduction For Research and Development 
Expenses Under the Enterprise Income Tax Law in the Final 
Determination
    Comment 11: Whether Commerce's Decision To Countervail the Urban 
Land-Use Tax Reduction Program for High-Tech Enterprises Is Contrary 
to Law
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2026-02563 Filed 2-9-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 10, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.