Notice2026-02121

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule To Adopt a New Methodology for Assessment and Collection of the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF)

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 3, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4985-4989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-02121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104745; File No. SR-MEMX-2026-02]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Fee Schedule To Adopt a New Methodology for Assessment and 
Collection of the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF)

January 29, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on January 28, 2026, MEMX LLC (``MEMX'' or the ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change 
to amend the Exchange's fee schedule related to the Options Regulatory 
Fee (``ORF'') to adopt a new methodology for assessment and collection 
of ORF for transactions that occur on the Exchange (``On-Exchange 
ORF''). The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The

[[Page 4986]]

Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C 
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its current assessment and 
collection of a regulatory fee to assess On-Exchange ORF only for 
options transactions that occur on the Exchange that would clear in the 
customer \3\ range at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC''). The 
Exchange would no longer assess a regulatory fee for options 
transactions that occur on other exchanges. This proposal only proposes 
to amend the method of assessment and collection of the fee. A future 
rule filing would be filed to set the applicable On-Exchange ORF rate 
in advance of assessing and collecting it under the proposed method. 
The following provides more detail regarding the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Currently, the ORF is assessed by MEMX Options and collected 
via OCC on executions for the account of Public Customers, including 
Professionals, and Broker-Dealers including Foreign Broker-Dealers. 
These market participants clear in the ``C'' range at OCC. ORF will 
continue to be assessed to executions for the account of these 
market participants under the proposed methodology. On the Exchange, 
a ``Public Customer'' means a person that is not a broker or dealer 
in securities and includes both Priority Customers and 
Professionals. A ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that 
is a Public Customer and is not a Professional. A ``Professional'' 
is any person or entity that (a) is not a broker or dealer in 
securities, and (b) places more than 390 orders in listed options 
per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial 
account(s). Executions for the account of an OCC clearing member 
firm proprietary account, joint back office account clearing in the 
Firm range, or account of a market maker clearing in the Market 
Maker range are not charged an ORF, nor would they be charged an ORF 
under the current proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    Today, ORF is assessed by MEMX to each Member for all options 
transactions, cleared or ultimately cleared by the Member in the 
``customer'' range, regardless of the exchange on which the transaction 
occurs. The ORF is collected by OCC on behalf of the Exchange from 
either: (1) a Member that was the ultimate clearing firm \4\ for the 
transaction; or (2) a non-Member that was the ultimate clearing firm 
where a Member was the executing clearing firm \5\ for the transaction. 
The Exchange uses reports from OCC to determine the identity of the 
executing clearing firm and ultimate clearing firm. Pursuant to a 
separately filed rule change, the current ORF rate of $0.0015 will 
sunset as of June 30, 2026.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange takes into account any CMTA transfers when 
determining the ultimate clearing firm for a transaction. CMTA or 
Clearing Member Trade Assignment is a form of ``give up'' whereby 
the position will be assigned to a specific clearing firm at the 
OCC.
    \5\ Throughout this filing, ``executing clearing firm'' means 
the clearing firm through which the entering broker indicated that 
the transaction would be cleared at the time it entered the original 
order which executed, and that clearing firm could be a designated 
``give up'', if applicable. The executing clearing firm may be the 
ultimate clearing firm if no CMTA transfer occurs. If a CMTA 
transfer occurs, however, the ultimate clearing firm would be the 
clearing firm that the position was transferred to for clearing via 
CMTA.
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104608 (January 14, 
2026) 91 FR 2393 (January 20, 2026) (SR-MEMX-2025-36). Further, in 
order to avoid confusion, the Exchange is proposing to delete the 
language on the Fee Schedule that states that the ORF will 
automatically sunset on June 30, 2026, and replace it with a header 
above the current ORF that states ``Effective through June 30, 
2026''. The Exchange is proposing to describe the On Exchange ORF 
methodology below this section, with the header ``Effective as of 
July 1, 2026''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To illustrate how the ORF is assessed and collected, the Exchange 
provides the following set of examples.
    1. For all transactions executed on the Exchange, if the ultimate 
clearing firm is a Member of the Exchange, the ORF is assessed to and 
collected from that Member. If the ultimate clearing firm is not a 
Member of the Exchange, the ORF is collected from that non-Member 
clearing firm but assessed to the executing clearing firm.
    2. If the transaction is executed on an away exchange, the ORF is 
only assessed and collected if either the executing clearing firm or 
ultimate clearing firm are Members of the Exchange. If the ultimate 
clearing firm is a Member of the Exchange, the ORF is assessed to and 
collected from that ultimate clearing firm. If the ultimate clearing 
firm is not a Member of the Exchange, the ORF is assessed to the 
executing clearing firm (again, only if that executing clearing firm is 
a Member of the Exchange), and collected from the ultimate clearing 
firm. Thus, to reiterate, if neither the executing clearing firm nor 
the ultimate clearing firm are members of the Exchange, no ORF is 
assessed or collected.
    Finally, the Exchange does not assess the ORF on outbound linkage 
trades. ``Linkage trades'' are tagged in the Exchange's system, so the 
Exchange can distinguish them from other trades.
ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
    Today, revenue generated from ORF, when combined with all of the 
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, is designed to recover a 
material portion of the regulatory costs to the Exchange of the 
supervision and regulation of Member customer options business 
including performing routine surveillances, investigations, 
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, 
interpretive, and enforcement activities. Regulatory costs include 
direct regulatory expenses and certain indirect expenses for work 
allocated in support of the regulatory function. The direct expenses 
include in-house and third-party service provider costs to support the 
day-to- day regulatory work such as surveillances, investigations and 
examinations. The indirect expenses include support to the regulatory 
function from such areas as human resources, legal, compliance, 
information technology, facilities and accounting as well as shared 
costs necessary to operate the Exchange to carry out its regulatory 
function, such as hardware, data center costs, and connectivity. Today, 
these indirect expenses are estimated to be approximately 20% of the 
Exchange's total regulatory costs for 2026. Thus, direct expenses are 
estimated to be approximately 80% of total regulatory costs for 
2026.\7\ In addition, based on the Exchange's analysis of its 
regulatory work associated with options regulation, and considering 
other regulatory revenue, it is the Exchange's practice that revenue 
generated from ORF not exceed 75% of total annual regulatory costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ These expectations are estimated and may be subject to 
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal for On-Exchange ORF
    MEMX appreciates the evolving changes in the market and regulatory 
environment and has been evaluating its current methodologies and 
practices for the assessment and collection of ORF while considering 
industry and Commission feedback. As a result of this review, the 
Exchange is proposing the On-Exchange ORF, which assesses a regulatory 
fee to only Exchange transactions that would clear in the Customer 
range at OCC (as is the case today).\8\ The following scenarios reflect 
how the On-Exchange ORF will be assessed and collected:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. If a Member is the executing clearing firm on a transaction that 
occurred on the Exchange, the fee would be assessed to and collected 
from that Member by OCC on behalf of the Exchange.
    2. If a Member is the executing clearing firm and the transaction 
is ``given up'' to a clearing give-up (the ``clearing firm''), the On-
Exchange ORF is assessed to the executing clearing

[[Page 4987]]

firm, (the On-Exchange ORF remains the obligation of the executing 
clearing firm under the proposal), but the On-Exchange ORF will be 
collected from the clearing firm, regardless of whether that clearing 
firm is a Member of the Exchange.
    The Exchange expects to provide Members sufficient information in 
connection with their invoice in order to reconcile charges associated 
with ORF. In addition, the proposed method for collecting On-Exchange 
ORF will only consider CMTAs reported to the Exchange and not those 
reported directly to OCC. As described above, today's ORF is the 
responsibility of the executing clearing firm and collected from the 
CMTA ultimate clearing firm (which may be a non-Member) as an 
administrative convenience. The Exchange understands that a CMTA may be 
added at order entry, via post-trade edit on the Exchange, or post-
trade at OCC. CMTA transfers that occur at OCC do not necessarily 
contain reliable information regarding the Exchange on which the 
original transaction occurred.\9\ Without specific information as to 
where the original transaction occurred, the Exchange would not be able 
to accurately account for CMTA transfers that occur at OCC. Therefore, 
the Exchange will only account for CMTAs that occur on the Exchange 
(which may be a non-Member) and exclude CMTAs occurring at OCC.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Under the current methodology for assessing ORF, the 
Exchange on which the transaction occurred is irrelevant.
    \10\ Adjustments that were made the same day as the trade on 
MEMX will be taken into account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With this proposal, the Exchange intends to collect ORF under its 
current methodology for assessment and collection of ORF until at least 
June 30, 2026. The Exchange is prepared to implement On-Exchange ORF 
effective July 1, 2026 if by April 1, 2026 all U.S. options exchanges 
charging an ORF have filed to modify their current methodologies of 
assessment of the fee to limit the fee to transactions occurring on 
their respective exchange.\11\ However, if all other options exchanges 
have not filed to adopt a similar methodology by April 1, the Exchange 
will delay implementation commensurate with the additional time 
required for other options exchanges to adopt a similar method for 
collection and assessment of ORF. The Exchange will at that time file a 
separate rule filing with the amount of the On-Exchange ORF in advance 
of assessing and collecting the fee under the proposed method. As is 
the case today, the Exchange will notify Members via Regulatory 
Circular of the applicable On-Exchange ORF rate at least 30 calendar 
days prior to the effective date of the change. The Exchange believes a 
fee to recover a material portion of costs for regulatory programs 
associated with monitoring activities is reasonable; however, the 
Exchange would consider alternative approaches for assessment and 
collection of the fee in order to achieve consistency across the 
industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange estimates it will take approximately three 
months to implement the system changes associated with On-Exchange 
ORF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue 
collected from On-Exchange ORF to ensure that it, in combination with 
its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's 
total regulatory costs. Further, the Exchange expects to continue its 
current practice that revenue generated from On-Exchange ORF not exceed 
75% of total annual regulatory costs. And as is the Exchange's practice 
today, revenue generated by On-Exchange ORF will not be used for non-
regulatory purposes.
    The Exchange will continue to monitor its regulatory costs and 
revenues at a minimum on a semi-annual basis. If the Exchange 
determines regulatory revenues exceed or are insufficient to cover a 
material portion of its regulatory costs in a given year, the Exchange 
will adjust the On-Exchange ORF by submitting a fee change filing to 
the Commission. The Exchange will notify Members of adjustments to the 
On-Exchange ORF via an Exchange Notice in advance of any change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule 
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \12\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \13\ in 
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons 
using its facilities. The Exchange also believes the proposal furthers 
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \14\ in that it is 
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the 
public interest and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination 
between customers, issuers, brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change to assess and 
collect an On-Exchange ORF is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory for various reasons. First, On-Exchange ORF is 
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory in that it is 
charged to all Exchange transactions that clear in the Customer range 
at the OCC. Similar to ORF today, the Exchange believes On-Exchange ORF 
ensures fairness by assessing a specific fee to those Members that 
require more Exchange regulatory services based on the amount of 
customer options business they conduct. Over recent years, options 
trading volume has increased with a growing percentage of the volume 
applicable to customer transactions. Customers trading on the Exchange 
(through a Member) benefit from the protections of a robust regulatory 
program including the maintenance of fair and orderly markets and 
protections against fraud and other manipulation. The Exchange believes 
it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to assess a regulatory 
fee to transactions that clear in the Customer range to cover 
regulatory costs, but not to transactions clearing in the Firm or 
Market Maker range because Clearing Members and Market Makers (who 
clear in the Firm and Market Maker range), as those market participants 
are generally subject to other Exchange fees, fines and obligations. 
For example, Clearing Members and Market Makers \15\ are required to 
pay Exchange application fees, permit fees and connectivity fees, 
amongst others. In addition, all fines issued by the Exchange for 
regulatory infractions are assessed only to Members and would be 
applied to regulatory revenues. As with today's ORF, the Exchange 
expects that Members from whom On-Exchange ORF is collected will pass 
through the fee to their customers (as the Exchange understands occurs 
today). In addition, Market Makers in particular are subject to various 
quoting and other obligations to ensure that they provide stable and 
liquid markets, which benefit all market participants including 
customers. Excluding Market Maker transactions from On-Exchange 
Exchange ORF will allow Market Makers to better manage their costs more 
effectively thus enabling them to better allocate resources toward 
technology, risk

[[Page 4988]]

management, and capacity to ensure continued liquidity provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Market Maker means a Member registered with the Exchange 
for the purpose of making markets in options contracts traded on the 
Exchange and that is vested with the rights and responsibilities 
specified in Chapter 22 of the Exchange Rules. See Exchange Rule 
16.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the overall increase in Customer-range volume 
generally, regulating customer trading activity is more labor intensive 
and requires greater expenditure of human and technical resources than 
regulating non-customer trading activity, which tends to be more 
automated and less labor-intensive. For example, there are costs 
associated with main office and branch office examinations (e.g., staff 
and travel expenses), as well as investigations into customer 
complaints and terminations of registered persons. As a result, the 
costs associated with administering the customer component of the 
Exchange's overall regulatory program are materially higher than the 
costs associated with administering the non-customer component (e.g., 
Clearing Member proprietary transactions) of its regulatory 
program.\16\ While the Exchange notes that it has broad regulatory 
responsibilities with respect to its Members' activities, irrespective 
of where their transactions take place, the Exchange believes it is 
reasonable to assess the proposed fee to only those transactions 
occurring on the Exchange. The proposed change more narrowly tailors 
the fee to products and transactions with a direct connection to the 
Exchange. With this proposal, transactions that would clear in the 
Customer range occurring on other exchanges would no longer be subject 
to an ORF assessed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ If the Exchange changes its method of funding regulation or 
if circumstances otherwise change in the future, the Exchange may 
decide to modify On-Exchange ORF or assess a separate regulatory fee 
on Member proprietary transactions if the Exchange deems advisable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes it is equitable and not unduly discriminatory 
to modify the method of collecting the fee such that On-Exchange ORF 
will not consider CMTAs reported directly to OCC as is done in today's 
method of ORF. CMTA transfers are considered today under the current 
collection methodology for ORF as a convenience to industry members in 
administering a pass through of the fee to their customers. Limiting 
the On-Exchange ORF to transactions on the Exchange poses a limitation 
in the use of CMTA for this purpose. The Exchange understands that a 
CMTA may be added at order entry, via post-trade edit on the Exchange, 
or post-trade at OCC. CMTA transfers that occur at OCC do not 
necessarily contain reliable information regarding the Exchange on 
which the original transaction occurred.\17\ Without specific 
information as to where the original transaction occurred, the Exchange 
would not be able to accurately account for CMTA transfers that occur 
at OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Under the current methodology for assessing ORF, the 
Exchange on which the transaction occurred is irrelevant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange further believes that the proposed change to the 
method for assessment and collection of the fee is reasonable because 
it would help ensure that revenue collected from the On-Exchange ORF, 
in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, would help offset, 
but not exceed, the Exchange's total regulatory costs.
    As discussed, On-Exchange ORF is similarly designed to the current 
ORF, in that revenues generated from the fee would be less than or 
equal to 75% of the Exchange's regulatory costs, which is consistent 
with the practice across the options industry today and the view of the 
Commission that regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not 
to support the Exchange's business side.
    As noted above, the Exchange will also continue to monitor on at 
least a semi-annual basis the amount of revenue collected from the On-
Exchange ORF, even as amended, to ensure that it, in combination with 
its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's 
total regulatory costs. If the Exchange determines regulatory revenues 
would exceed its regulatory costs in a given year, the Exchange will 
reduce the On-Exchange ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the 
Commission.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal will not 
create an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on 
competition because On-Exchange ORF applies to all customer activity on 
the Exchange, thereby raising regulatory revenue to offset regulatory 
expenses. It also supplements the regulatory revenue derived from non-
customer activity. The Exchange notes, however, the proposed change is 
not designed to address any competitive issues. Indeed, this proposal 
does not create an unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market burden on 
competition because it is a regulatory fee that supports regulation in 
furtherance of the Act. The Exchange is obligated to ensure that the 
amount of regulatory revenue collected from the On-Exchange ORF, in 
combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed 
regulatory costs. In addition, the Exchange will not implement the On-
Exchange ORF until all other options exchanges are prepared to adopt a 
similar model to avoid overlapping ORFs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \18\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \19\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f7f0e9e0a8e6eae8e8e0ebf1f6c5f6e0e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5c7c0d9d098d6dad8d8d0dbc1c6f5c6d0d69bd2dac3">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-MEMX-2026-02 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2026-02. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your

[[Page 4989]]

comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission 
will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do 
not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you 
should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication 
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. 
All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2026-02 and should 
be submitted on or before February 24, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-02121 Filed 2-2-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 3, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.