Notice2026-01988

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend IEX Rules 2.230 and 2.190 Regarding Retention of Jurisdiction and Voluntary Termination

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 2, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 21 (Monday, February 2, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4706-4711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-01988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104720; File No. SR-IEX-2026-02]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend IEX 
Rules 2.230 and 2.190 Regarding Retention of Jurisdiction and Voluntary 
Termination

January 28, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that on January 22, 2026, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or 
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 
II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,\4\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ the Exchange is filing with the 
Commission a proposed rule change to amend IEX Rule 2.230 (Retention of 
Jurisdiction) and IEX Rule 2.190 (Voluntary Termination of Rights as a 
Member). This proposed rule change is designed to update the Exchange's 
retention of disciplinary jurisdiction over a former Member \6\ and 
persons whose association with a Member has been terminated, and to 
simplify the manner in which a Member may voluntarily terminate its 
membership with the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal 
as ``non-controversial'' under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and 
provided the

[[Page 4707]]

Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) under the 
Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \6\ See IEX Rule 1.160(s). The term ``Member'' is defined as 
``any registered broker or dealer that has been admitted to 
membership in the Exchange.''
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
website at <a href="https://www.iexexchange.io/resources/regulation/rule-filings">https://www.iexexchange.io/resources/regulation/rule-filings</a> 
and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to (i) amend IEX Rule 2.230 to update the 
Exchange's retention of disciplinary jurisdiction over a former Member, 
or person whose association with a Member \9\ has been terminated, for 
conduct that occurred prior to the effective date of termination; \10\ 
and (ii) amend IEX Rule 2.190 to simplify the manner in which a Member 
may voluntarily terminate its membership with the Exchange. 
Specifically, as described below, the Exchange proposes to replace rule 
provisions requiring the Exchange to file, within two years of a 
termination, a complaint with respect to any violative conduct by a 
terminated Member or a person associated with a Member that occurred 
prior to termination, with rule text providing that the Exchange 
retains jurisdiction following a termination, provided that, within one 
year of a termination, the Exchange provides written notice that an 
inquiry has commenced regarding matters that occurred prior to the 
termination. In addition, the Exchange proposes amending the voluntary 
termination process by removing the conditions related to completion of 
investigations and examinations to avoid unnecessary delay of voluntary 
termination requests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See IEX Rule 1.160(y)(1). The term ``Member'' is used in 
this filing to refer both to Members and persons associated with a 
Member unless otherwise indicated.
    \10\ See IEX Rule 2.230.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a national securities exchange and self-regulatory organization 
(``SRO''), IEX is subject to several provisions of the Act with respect 
to rule enforcement and discipline of Members and persons associated 
with Members. Section 6(b)(1) \11\ of the Act requires the Exchange to 
enforce compliance by its members and persons associated with its 
members with applicable provisions of the Act, the rules and 
regulations thereunder and Exchange Rules. Section 6(b)(6) \12\ of the 
Act requires that IEX Rules must provide that its members and persons 
associated with its members shall be appropriately disciplined for such 
violations of applicable provisions of the Act, the rules and 
regulations thereunder and Exchange Rules (i.e., rule violations).\13\ 
Section 6(b)(7) \14\ of the Act provides that IEX Rules must provide a 
fair procedure for the disciplining of members and persons associated 
with members for rule violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
    \13\ IEX Rule 2.120(a) provides that ``the Exchange is required 
to discipline Members and persons associated with Members for 
violations of the provisions of IEX Rules, its Operating Agreement, 
its interpretations and policies and with the provisions of the Act 
and regulations thereunder.''
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to current Rule 2.230, the Exchange retains disciplinary 
jurisdiction over potential conduct violative of IEX Rules by a former 
Member or person formerly associated with a Member, that occurred prior 
to membership or association termination, by filing a complaint \15\ 
within two years of the membership or association termination. 
Relatedly, under current Rule 2.190, a Member's voluntary termination 
of membership will not be effective until 30 days after the terminating 
Member has: (i) provided written notice; (ii) paid in full all 
indebtedness owed to the Exchange; (iii) there is a final disposition 
of any investigation or disciplinary action against the Member; and 
(iv) any examination of the Member has been completed and all 
exceptions resolved.\16\ Accordingly, before the Exchange may 
effectuate a Member's voluntary termination of membership, it must 
ensure that all examinations and investigations concerning the 
terminated Member or associated person are completed, and, to the 
extent that any complaint results therefrom or otherwise, Rule 2.230 
requires that the complaint be filed within two years of the 
termination date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ IEX Rule 9.212(a) (Complaint Issuance--Requirements, 
Service, Amendment, Withdrawal, and Docketing) provides that a 
complaint ``shall be in writing and signed by the Department of 
Enforcement or the Department of Market Regulation . . . [and] 
specify in reasonable detail the conduct alleged to constitute the 
violative activity and the rule, regulation, or statutory provision 
the Respondent is alleged to be violating or to have violated . . . 
[and] shall be served by the Department of Enforcement or the 
Department of Market Regulation on each Party pursuant to IEX Rules 
9.131 and 9.134, and filed at the time of service with the Office of 
Hearing Officers pursuant to IEX Rules 9.135, 9.136, and 9.137.''
    \16\ IEX Rule 2.190 also authorizes the Board to declare a 
resignation effective at any earlier time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that these requirements are unnecessarily 
burdensome to both IEX and a terminating Member. Specifically, the 
requirement that investigations and examinations be completed before a 
voluntary termination may take effect can result in significant delay 
in effectuating a membership termination, even though some of the 
investigations and examinations will not ultimately result in a 
conclusion that the Member violated applicable IEX Rules.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The examinations that FINRA conducts on behalf of IEX are 
typically routine ``cycle'' examinations that are not prompted by 
potential violative activity by the firm but may nevertheless take 
several months to complete. In such circumstances, examinations can 
delay termination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described more fully below, the proposed rule change provides 
for IEX's appropriate ongoing disciplinary jurisdiction over former 
Members and persons formerly associated with Members by requiring that 
the Exchange give written notice, within one year of the termination 
date, of the commencement of any inquiry into conduct that occurred 
before the membership or associational termination. The Exchange 
believes that the one-year notice requirement to retain jurisdiction 
over a former Member or associated person is a more reasonable approach 
rather than the current approach that can delay a termination until an 
investigation of a regulatory matter has progressed such that filing a 
complaint with two years is feasible.
    In addition, the proposed rule change is designed to simplify the 
voluntary termination process to avoid unnecessary delay of voluntary 
termination requests by removing the conditions related to completion 
of investigations and examinations, while retaining the requirement to 
provide written notice to the Exchange. In addition, the Exchange 
proposes expanding the current requirement to pay all debt owed to the 
Exchange to cover all fees, assessments, charges, fines, or other 
amounts due to the Exchange, the Commission, or the

[[Page 4708]]

Securities Investor Protection Corporation (``SIPC'').
    The Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will 
adversely impact the Exchange's disciplinary jurisdiction over Members 
or persons associated with Members. As discussed above, the Exchange 
believes that a one-year time period to retain jurisdiction is a 
reasonable time for IEX (and FINRA on its behalf) to determine whether 
an investigation and/or examination may result in findings of potential 
rule violations by the former Member. If IEX (or FINRA) were to 
determine that regulatory action is appropriate, it would have adequate 
time to complete investigation of the matter. Further, as discussed 
below, these proposed changes are based on substantially identical 
rules of BZX, MIAX Pearl Equities, NYSE Arca, MEMX, and Nasdaq, with 
only non-substantive differences to account for different rule 
structures.
Retention of Jurisdiction
    Currently, Rule 2.230(a) provides that the Exchange retains 
disciplinary jurisdiction over a Member or a person associated with a 
Member for matters that commenced prior to the effective membership or 
associational termination, provided that any such complaint is filed 
within two years after the effective date of the membership termination 
or associational termination.\18\ Rule 2.230(b) further provides that 
the Exchange retains jurisdiction over a person whose association with 
a Member has terminated, or upon such person's failure, while subject 
to IEX's jurisdiction, to provide information requested by IEX pursuant 
to IEX Rules, provided that any such complaint is filed within two 
years after the termination of association. In addition, if a 
termination notice is amended and discloses that any such person may 
have engaged in actionable conduct, the two year time period in which 
to file a complaint will recommence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Investigations and disciplinary actions are conducted in 
accordance with Chapters 8 and 9 of the IEX Rules. Chapter 8 
contains provisions related to investigations and sanctions, that 
require, among other things, that a Member, person associated with a 
Member or any other person subject to the Exchange's jurisdiction, 
provide information or testimony or permit an inspection and copying 
of books, records, or accounts to the Exchange upon request. Chapter 
9 contains the Code of Procedure and includes proceedings for, among 
other things, disciplining a Member or person associated with a 
Member. IEX Rule 8.310 provides for the imposition of sanctions, 
after compliance with Chapter 9 Rules, on a Member or person 
associated with a Member for rule violations, as well as for any 
neglect or refusal to comply with an order, direction, or decision 
issued under IEX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.230(a) to provide that, with 
respect to Members and persons associated with Members whose membership 
or association has been terminated, the Exchange shall retain 
disciplinary jurisdiction over the former Member or associated person 
with respect to matters that occurred prior to the termination, 
provided that the Exchange provides written notice of the commencement 
of an inquiry into such matters within one year of the Exchange's 
receipt of the termination notice.
    Under the current Rule 2.230(a), the Exchange retains disciplinary 
jurisdiction over a terminated Member provided that any complaint is 
filed within two years after the effective date of the termination. In 
contrast, the proposed amendments to Rule 2.230(a) would not require 
that a disciplinary matter have progressed to the point of filing a 
complaint for the Exchange to retain jurisdiction over a terminated 
Member but instead requires the Exchange to provide notice of the 
commencement of any inquiry into such matters within a year of 
termination to retain jurisdiction over a terminated Member.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ As proposed, the notice requirement would not apply to a 
person who at any time after a termination again subjects himself or 
herself to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Exchange by once 
again becoming a Member or a person associated with a Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that a one year period in which to provide 
notice of the commencement of any inquiry is reasonable because it 
balances the Exchange's need for sufficient time to determine whether 
there are any outstanding potential disciplinary issues to investigate 
and provides the terminated Member with clarity, within one year of its 
termination, whether any potential disciplinary matters are 
outstanding.
    The Exchange believes that its retention of disciplinary 
jurisdiction pursuant to the proposed rule change will appropriately 
enable the Exchange to continue to enforce compliance by the Exchange's 
Members and persons associated with them, with the Act, the rules and 
regulations thereunder, and the Rules of the Exchange. Because this 
rule change will allow the Exchange to retain disciplinary jurisdiction 
over a terminated Member or person associated with a Member without the 
need to file a complaint as a prerequisite to retaining jurisdiction, 
the Exchange will be able to more efficiently administer its 
enforcement obligations with respect to terminated Members and persons 
associated with them.
    In addition, together with the proposed amendments to Rule 2.190 
described below, the Exchange believes the proposed amendments will 
facilitate a more efficient voluntary termination process, in which a 
Member may voluntarily terminate its membership and cease being subject 
to Member obligations notwithstanding any ongoing disciplinary actions 
or examinations, provided the Member satisfies the conditions of the 
proposed amended Rule 2.190. In addition, the Exchange believes that, 
notwithstanding differences in rule structures among the exchanges, the 
proposed rule text for the retention of jurisdiction rule, Rule 2.230, 
is substantially identical to the rule text in comparable rules of BZX, 
MEMX, MIAX Pearl Equities, and Nasdaq with only non-substantive 
differences to account for different rule structures.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See, e.g., BZX Rule 8.1(b); MEMX Rule 8.1(b); MIAX Pearl 
Rule 1000(c); Nasdaq Rule 9110(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange is proposing the following change to 
Rule 2.230. The Exchange proposes replacing the existing Rule 2.230(a) 
and (b) with a single paragraph stating that any Member or person 
associated with a Member will continue to be subject to the Exchange's 
jurisdiction with respect to matters that occurred prior to the 
termination, provided that the Exchange provides written notice of the 
commencement of any inquiry into disciplinary matters within one year 
of receiving written notice of termination. In addition, the Exchange 
proposes adding text stating that the Exchange will not be required to 
provide such notice when a person at any time after a termination 
becomes a Member or a person associated with a Member again, since by 
doing so, the Member or associated person expressly consents to the 
Exchange's jurisdiction over members to enforce compliance with the 
Exchange Act, and the Exchange's Rules.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See IEX Rule 2.120.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes removing is language in current Rule 
2.230(b) stating that the Exchange retains jurisdiction over an 
associated person who fails to provide information requested by the 
Exchange pursuant to IEX Rules. This rule text is no longer necessary 
because Rule 8.210(a) (Provisions of Information and Testimony and 
Inspection and Copying of Books) provides that an Adjudicator \22\ of 
an Exchange disciplinary proceeding or IEX staff may

[[Page 4709]]

require an associated person subject to IEX's jurisdiction to provide 
information or testify with respect to any matter involved in a 
disciplinary proceeding. Since under the proposed rule change the 
Exchange will retain jurisdiction over a person whose association was 
terminated, provided the Exchange gives the requisite notice specified 
in amended Rule 2.230, it is no longer necessary to include the current 
Rule 2.230(b) rule text referenced above because Rule 8.210(a) allows 
the Exchange to obtain information from the person.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See IEX Rule 9.120(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Voluntary Membership Termination
    Rule 2.190 governs a Member's right to voluntarily terminate its 
IEX membership. Currently, the rule provides that a Member's voluntary 
termination of its membership rights shall not take effect until 30 
days after certain specified conditions have been satisfied, including: 
(i) receipt of such written resignation; (ii) all indebtedness due the 
Exchange shall have been paid in full; (iii) any Exchange investigation 
or disciplinary action brought against the Member has reached a final 
disposition; and (iv) any examination of such Member is completed and 
all exceptions noted have been reasonably resolved. The Rule further 
provides that the Board may declare a resignation effective at any 
time.
    The Exchange has observed that the current requirements of Rule 
2.190--that investigations and examinations be completed, and all 
exceptions resolved--before a voluntary termination will take effect 
have resulted in significant delay in effectuating a membership 
termination pending completion of such matters, some of which have 
resolved without a finding of any violations. Similarly, the two year 
time limit in which to file a complaint with respect to any potentially 
violative conduct may be unduly restrictive for the Exchange (and FINRA 
on its behalf) in the case of a complex matter. And as a practical 
matter, if filing a complaint is warranted, all exceptions with respect 
to the investigation or examination in question will not be resolved 
which means that termination cannot occur until the exceptions have 
been addressed through a disciplinary matter.
    The Exchange believes that Rule 2.190, as amended, will facilitate 
a more efficient voluntary termination process, in which a Member may 
voluntarily terminate its Member status and cease being subject to 
Member obligations notwithstanding any ongoing disciplinary proceedings 
or examinations, given that the Exchange, through amended Rule 2.230 
will be able to retain disciplinary jurisdiction over the Member 
following such voluntary termination if warranted. The proposed 
amendments will streamline the voluntary termination process by 
removing conditions that have the potential to unnecessarily prolong 
unwanted obligations of membership, including, for example, filing 
annual reports with the Exchange through FINRA \23\ and maintaining 
certain books and records.\24\ As discussed below, IEX does not believe 
it is necessary to delay a membership termination until any pending 
investigations, disciplinary proceedings, or examinations have reached 
a final disposition or are completed and all exceptions noted have been 
reasonably resolved because IEX will have one year to retain 
jurisdiction over a terminated member or associated person. IEX 
believes this is an adequate time frame to determine whether 
potentially violative conduct may have occurred prior to termination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 17 CFR 240.17a-5.
    \24\ See IEX Rule 4.511.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 2.190 to remove 
the conditions set forth in Rule 2.190(iii) (the requirement that any 
Exchange investigation or disciplinary action brought against the 
Member has reached a final disposition) and (iv) (the requirement that 
any examination by the Exchange of such Member is completed and all 
exceptions noted have been reasonably resolved). As proposed, amended 
Rule 2.190 would require that a Member's voluntary termination would 
not be effective until a Member has provided written notice of 
resignation to the Exchange (current Rule 2.190(i)), completed any 
outstanding filings required under the Rules, and paid any outstanding 
fees, assessments, charges, fines, or other amounts due to the 
Exchange, the Commission, or SIPC. The proposed change would expand 
current Rule 2.190(ii), which requires all indebtedness due the 
Exchange be paid in full, to also cover all outstanding fees, 
assessments, charges, fines, or other amounts due to the Exchange, the 
Commission or SIPC to ensure that a Member has complied with these 
important financial obligations before a termination may take effect.
    The Exchange also proposes to remove the rule text in Rule 2.190 
providing that a voluntary termination will not take effect until 30 
days after the Member has satisfied the stated conditions. The Exchange 
believes this 30 day waiting period is unnecessary because the Exchange 
will be able to promptly verify whether the terminating Member has 
satisfied the criteria to terminate.
    In addition, as proposed, amended Rule 2.190 will require, as a 
condition of voluntary termination, that the Member make any 
outstanding filings required under the Exchange's Rules. The Exchange 
believes this amendment is appropriate because, to the extent a Member 
voluntarily terminating its membership is delinquent in any filings 
required by IEX Rules or FINRA rules incorporated by reference, this 
condition will ensure that the Member comes into compliance on required 
filings before the termination takes effect.\25\ This provision is 
substantially identical to the voluntary termination rules at BZX, MIAX 
Pearl Equities, and NYSE Arca.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See e.g., IEX Rule 4.120 (Regulatory Notification and 
Business Curtailment), based on FINRA Rule 4120, which requires 
members to file certain regulatory reports concerning financial and 
operating conditions.
    \26\ See, e.g., BZX Rule 2.8; MIAX Pearl Equities Rule 206; and 
NYSE Arca Rule 2.22(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to delete current Rule 2.190(ii), which 
requires the resigning Member to pay in full all indebtedness due to 
the Exchange. As proposed, amended Rule 2.190 will require a resigning 
Member to pay any outstanding fees, assessments, charges, fines, or 
other amounts due to the Exchange, the Commission, or SIPC. The 
proposed amendment is more expansive than the existing language in Rule 
2.190. The Exchange believes the proposed amendment is appropriate 
because it furthers the protection of investors by ensuring that a 
resigning Member has complied with these important financial 
obligations before their termination takes effect. This provision is 
substantially identical to the voluntary termination rules of BZX, MIAX 
Pearl Equities, and NYSE Arca.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to remove the proviso at the end of Rule 
2.190 that the Board may declare a Member's resignation effective at 
any earlier time. In light of the proposed amendments, the Exchange 
does not expect there will be extended delays in the effectiveness of a 
membership termination and accordingly there is no compelling reason 
for the conditions in the proposed rule amendments to be subject to 
override by the Board. Furthermore, the other exchanges with similar 
rules do not include such a provision.\28\ Therefore, the Exchange 
proposes removing this rule text from the amended rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Id.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 4710]]

    Finally, the Exchange proposes amending the first sentence of Rule 
2.190 to remove the terms ``only'' and ``addressed'' because they are 
unnecessarily duplicative and replacing the second sentence with ``(a) 
made any outstanding filings required under the Rules; and (b) paid any 
outstanding fees, assessments, charges, fines, or other amounts due to 
the Exchange, the Commission or the Securities Investor Protection 
Corporation.''
2. Statutory Basis
    IEX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\29\ in general and further the 
objectives of Section 6(b)(1) \30\ of the Act in that is is designed to 
enable the Exchange to carry out the purposes of the Act and to comply 
with the provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, 
and the rules of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a general matter, IEX believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Act because it will make the voluntary termination 
process more efficient for Members and the Exchange because it will 
enable the Exchange to retain disciplinary jurisdiction over a 
terminated Member or person associated with a Member without the need 
to file a complaint as a prerequisite to retaining such jurisdiction, 
and thereby enable the Exchange to more efficiently administer its 
enforcement obligations with respect to terminated Members and persons 
associated with them. Members will not be forced to incur unwanted 
membership obligations during the pendency of any ongoing investigation 
or examination (which in many cases do not identify any violative 
conduct), and thereby foster cooperation and coordination between the 
Exchange and its Members and persons associated with them, and will 
apply uniformly to all Members wishing to voluntarily terminate their 
membership.
    Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed changes to Rules 
2.230 and 2.190 are consistent with Section 6(b)(1) \31\ of the Act 
because they would allow the Exchange to retain disciplinary 
jurisdiction over a terminated Member within an appropriate time period 
following termination, while not unduly prolonging the termination 
process and subjecting the Member to unwanted membership obligations. 
The Exchange believes these proposed rule changes will continue to 
support the Exchange's ability to carry out its regulatory obligations 
under the Act in the context of a voluntary termination by a Member, or 
the termination of a person's association with a Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed change to Rule 2.230 enabling 
the Exchange to retain disciplinary jurisdiction over terminated 
Members and persons associated with Members is also consistent with the 
above-referenced requirements. As discussed in the Purpose section, as 
proposed, the Exchange will have an appropriate time period in which to 
retain jurisdiction over terminated Members and persons associated with 
a Member and thereby address any potentially violative conduct without 
the needing to delay termination until a full investigation is 
completed.
    The Exchange believes the proposed change to Rule 2.190 requiring a 
Member seeking to terminate to provide the Exchange with written 
notice, make any outstanding filings and pay any outstanding fees owed 
to the Exchange, the Commission, or SIPC before a termination will be 
deemed effective are consistent with the Act's requirements that an 
exchange's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, 
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system, and protect investors and the 
public interest. As discussed in the Purpose section, IEX believes that 
this requirement furthers the protection of investors and the public 
interest by ensuring that a resigning Member has complied with these 
important financial obligations before their termination takes effect.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change regarding 
retention of jurisdiction is consistent with Section 6(b)(6) \32\ of 
the Act in that it is designed to provide authority to the Exchange to 
appropriately enable it to discipline former Members and persons 
associated with its Members for any rule violations that occurred 
during membership or association with a Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(7) \33\ of the Act because it would 
support a fair procedure for the disciplining of Members and persons 
associated with Members for rule violations. Specifically, as proposed 
the Exchange will be able to retain jurisdiction over terminated 
Members and persons associated within a reasonable period of time for 
rule violations that may have occurred while the firm was a Member or 
while an individual was associated with a Member. The Exchange believes 
that one year is reasonable in that it provides adequate time for 
FINRA, on the Exchange's behalf, to determine whether an inquiry into a 
potential disciplinary matter is warranted.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
    \34\ IEX and FINRA are parties to a regulatory services 
agreement pursuant to which FINRA has agreed to perform certain 
regulatory functions on behalf of IEX. See IEX Rules 8.100; 9.001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
just, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory. Under the proposed 
changes to Rule 2.190, the obligations imposed on Members wishing to 
voluntarily terminate--that they make any outstanding filings and pay 
any outstanding fees owed to the Exchange, the Commission, or SIPC--
merely impose existing obligations and are the same regardless of the 
circumstances surrounding a Member's voluntary termination.
    Similarly, the proposed change to Rule 2.230 will enable the 
Exchange to continue to enforce compliance by the Exchange's Members 
and persons associated with them whose membership or association has 
been terminated, with the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, 
and the rules of the Exchange. Because this rule change will allow the 
Exchange to retain disciplinary jurisdiction over a terminated Member 
or person associated with a Member without the need to file a complaint 
as a prerequisite to retaining such jurisdiction, the Exchange will be 
able to more efficiently administer its enforcement obligations with 
respect to terminated Members and persons associated with them. At the 
same time, since the Exchange will be required to notify a terminated 
Member or person associated with Members of the commencement of any 
inquiry within one year of the termination date, terminated Members and 
persons associated with a Member will gain clarity sooner regarding any 
potential disciplinary proceedings they may face concerning conduct 
that occurred before the termination date. Furthermore, the Exchange's 
retention of disciplinary jurisdiction over terminated Members and 
associated persons following termination under the proposed change 
would apply equally to all Members and associated persons, without 
regard to the circumstances of the termination or the amount of trading 
a Member did on the Exchange.
    The Exchange notes, as discussed in the Purpose section, that the 
proposed rule change is substantially identical to

[[Page 4711]]

rules of several other exchanges regarding voluntary terminations and 
the retention of jurisdiction over terminated Members. Accordingly, the 
Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change raises any new 
or novel issues not already considered by the Commission.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The 
proposed rule change is not designed to address any competitive issues 
but rather to provide for a simplified voluntary termination process, 
and appropriate retention of jurisdiction of former Members and persons 
associated with a Member.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has designated this rule filing as non-controversial 
under Section 19(b)(3)(A) \35\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \36\ 
thereunder. Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \36\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that this proposal qualifies for non-
controversial filing because the proposed rule change is designed to 
update the Exchange's retention of jurisdiction over former Members and 
persons formerly associated with a Member, provided that the Exchange 
gives notice of the commencement of any inquiry within one year of the 
effective termination date, and to simplify the manner in which a 
Member may voluntarily terminate membership. The proposed rule change 
will not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest because it will continue to provide a fair and appropriate 
process for the Exchange to retain jurisdiction over former Members and 
associated persons and address any potentially violative conduct. The 
Exchange also believes that this filing is non-controversial because it 
raises no new or novel issues not already considered by the Commission, 
as discussed in the Purpose and Statutory Basis sections. Accordingly, 
the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is eligible for 
immediate effectiveness.
    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \37\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#156760797038767a7878707b6166556670763b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d7f786168206e6260606863797e4d7e686e236a627b">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-IEX-2026-02 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-IEX-2026-02. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-IEX-2026-02 and should be submitted on 
or before February 23, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-01988 Filed 1-30-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 2, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.