Notice2026-01371

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to ICC's New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural Framework

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
January 26, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 16 (Monday, January 26, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3259-3262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-01371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104639; File No. SR-ICC-2026-001]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
ICC's New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural Framework

January 21, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934,\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on 
January 9, 2026, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'' or ``ICE Clear Credit'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the proposed rule 
change, security-based swap submission, or advance notice as described 
in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been primarily prepared 
by ICC. ICC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and paragraph (f)(3) of Rule 19b-4 \4\ 
thereunder, such that the proposed rule change was immediately 
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, security-
based swap submission, or aCdvance notice from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the 
Proposed Rule Change

    The principal purpose of the proposed rule change is to revise the 
New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural Framework (``NIA 
Policy''). These revisions do not require any changes to the ICC 
Clearing Rules (the ``Rules'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ICC's Rules are available on its public website: <a href="https://www.ice.com/publicdocs/clear_credit/ICE_Clear_Credit_Rules.pdf">https://www.ice.com/publicdocs/clear_credit/ICE_Clear_Credit_Rules.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, 
security-based swap submission, or advance notice and discussed any 
comments it received on the proposed rule change, security-based swap 
submission, or advance notice. The text of these statements may be 
examined at the places specified in Item IV below. ICC has prepared

[[Page 3260]]

summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most 
significant aspects of these statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

(a) Purpose
    ICC proposes revising its NIA Policy, which sets forth ICC's 
policies and procedures for the review and approval of certain new 
initiatives to be offered or implemented by ICC (``New Initiatives''). 
The NIA Policy also describes the role of the New Initiative Approval 
Committee (``NIAC''), which is the group responsible for the 
identification, review and approval of New Initiatives. ICC proposes 
revisions to the NIA Policy to update the membership of the NIAC and 
make other minor clarification or clean-up changes. ICC believes the 
proposed revisions will facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance 
and settlement of securities transactions and derivative agreements, 
contracts, and transactions for which it is responsible. ICC will not 
make the changes effective until all required regulatory actions are 
completed.\6\ The proposed rule change is described as follows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The proposed rule change is filed for immediate 
effectiveness but will not be implemented until the change is 
certified in accordance with Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
Regulation 40.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

NIA Policy Overview
    The NIA Policy sets forth ICC's policies and procedures for the 
review and approval of New Initiatives, including the role of the NIAC. 
Projects meeting certain criteria are considered New Initiatives and 
require NIAC approval prior to launch. These include projects involving 
(1) new and material modifications to the risk and/or pricing 
methodology; (2) potential significant changes to the processing 
system, Rules, and/or clearing operating procedures; (3) new and 
material modifications to existing and significant capabilities 
provided by ICC to operate the clearing house or enable its Clearing 
Participants (``Participants'') or their clients to clear trades and 
manage and price their cleared portfolios; or (4) certain material 
model changes under ICC's Model Validation Framework.\7\ The NIAC is 
responsible for the identification, review and approval of New 
Initiatives and is composed of the President, Chief Risk Officer 
(``CRO''), Head of Corporate Development, General Counsel, Chief 
Compliance Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Regional CRO--North 
American Clearinghouses, Manager of Systems Operations, Head of Quality 
Systems, and Vice President of Technology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95214 (July 7, 
2022), 87 FR 41776 (July 13, 2022) (File No. SR-ICC-2022-006) 
(containing additional information on ICC's Model Validation 
Framework and model change materiality).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The intention of the NIA Policy is to notify all relevant 
departments of the introduction of the New Initiative, facilitate 
information sharing between departments, ensure prior to the launch of 
a New Initiative that all required governance and regulatory filings 
have been completed and New Initiative risks are considered, and 
establish requirements for the pre-launch verification and testing of 
the New Initiative. To achieve this, the NIA Policy defines key terms, 
roles and responsibilities, outlines a procedural framework with 
activity steps, and includes policy administration details, along with 
various templates used by the NIAC.
Membership Updates
    ICC proposes to update the membership of the NIAC to align with 
current roles and responsibilities. The proposed amendments add a new 
member to the NIAC, the Director, Treasury, North America Clearing 
Houses (``Treasury Director''), to capture any treasury-related 
considerations during the identification, review and approval of New 
Initiatives by the NIAC. This individual is responsible for treasury 
functions at ICC and adding this role to the NIAC would help ensure 
such considerations are appropriately represented at the NIAC. The 
proposed updates remove the Head of Corporate Development, as this 
individual now serves as the Chief Operating Officer, a role which is 
already represented on the NIAC. In addition, ICC proposes updating 
member titles to reflect current designations: Regional CRO--North 
American Clearinghouses would be Senior Director, Enterprise Risk; 
Manager of Systems Operations would be Director, Systems Operations; 
Head of Quality Systems would be Director, Quality Assurance; and Vice 
President of Technology would be Head of Technology. ICC also proposes 
to update the NIAC Secretary from Technology Project Manager or NIAC 
chair designee to the NIAC chair designee, such that the role is not 
tied to a position title that may change over time.
    ICC proposes to make updates throughout the NIA Policy to effect 
these changes. Specifically, ICC proposes to update the membership 
composition, as described above, in the list of key definitions in 
Section II; list of Functional Area Heads \8\ in Section IV; and list 
of NIAC members in Attachments C, D and F to the NIA Policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Functional Areas are defined in Section II of the NIA Policy 
as any or all of Risk, Pricing, Compliance, Legal, Operations, 
Finance, Treasury, Accounting, and Information Technology (``IT'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Clarifications or Clean-Up Changes
    ICC proposes additional clarifications or clean-up changes 
throughout the NIA Policy, including incorporating recent governance 
updates, and updating categories and rating guidelines in an internal 
risk assessment template. ICC proposes amendments to reflect recent 
governance updates in Section IV and Attachment A to the NIA Policy. 
Specifically, ICC proposes to reference the recently established Board 
Risk Committee when identifying stakeholders whose recommendation or 
approval may be required.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ ICC previously filed a proposed rule change to establish the 
Board Risk Committee. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 103161 
(May 30, 2025), 90 FR 23970 (June 5, 2025) (File No. SR-ICC-2025-
006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ICC also proposes to update Attachment B to the NIA Policy, which 
contains a risk assessment template reviewed by the NIAC. This template 
describes key risks identified by the Functional Area department heads, 
mitigation plans, and residual impact ratings and comments. Currently, 
for each potential risk, ratings are provided for the following 
categories: Risk Management, Operations, Legal/Governance, Compliance, 
Technology, and Reputation. To reflect the addition of the Director of 
Treasury to the NIAC, ICC proposes a separate category for Treasury in 
the risk assessment template. ICC further proposes to clarify that 
Operations refers to ``Business'' Operations to better define the scope 
and to establish Systems Operations as a distinct category, separate 
from Technology, to promote more specific comments pertaining to 
Systems Operations. In general, such changes would improve clarity in 
the NIA Policy and promote ICC's ability to properly identify and 
address key risks by including additional specificity in the risk 
assessment.
    ICC proposes related revisions to the rating guidelines to ensure 
consistency with the changes described above. ICC proposes updating 
``Operations'' to ``Business Operations'' without changing the existing 
rating guidelines. ICC proposes adding rating guidelines for the new 
categories of Systems

[[Page 3261]]

Operations \10\ and Treasury \11\ noted above. ICC further proposes 
adding guidelines for the existing category of Reputation to ensure 
that such category noted in the risk assessment has documented rating 
guidelines.\12\ Such changes would promote clarity when determining 
low, medium, and high ratings. ICC also proposes a non-substantive 
clean-up change to the Table of Contents to remove the titles of 
attachments, which are unnecessary in ICC's view. Such change would not 
alter the names of the attachments within the NIA Policy text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Guidelines would include the following: low rating for 
potential infrequent, minor system performance degradation; medium 
rating for potential frequent, minor outages or infrequent, 
significant outages; and high rating for potential frequent, 
significant outages or system failures.
    \11\ Guidelines would include the following: low rating for 
minor impact on funds management or movement; medium rating for 
delays or disruptions in funds management or movement possible; and 
high rating for significant delays or disruptions in funds 
management or movement likely.
    \12\ Guidelines would include the following: low rating for 
immaterial impact on regulatory or public perception; medium rating 
for possible decline in stakeholder trust and heightened regulatory 
or public scrutiny; and high rating for likely and significant 
decline in stakeholder trust and adverse regulatory or public 
perception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Statutory Basis
    ICC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 17A of the Act \13\ and the regulations 
thereunder applicable to it, including the applicable standards under 
Rule 17Ad-22.\14\ In particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \15\ 
requires that the rule change be designed to promote the prompt and 
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and 
derivative agreements, contracts and transactions cleared by ICC, to 
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds in the custody or 
control of ICC or for which it is responsible, and to protect investors 
and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, the proposed revisions to the NIA Policy update 
the membership of the NIAC and make other minor clarification or clean-
up changes. Such changes promote clarity in the NIA Policy and ICC's 
ability to properly identify and address key risks, including by adding 
a new member to the NIAC to capture any treasury-related considerations 
and including additional specificity and clarity in the risk assessment 
and related rating guidelines. Such sound policies, practices, and 
procedures are an important component of ICC's ability to comply with 
the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \16\ because disruptions to 
operations resulting from a new offering or implementation can impair 
the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities 
transactions, derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions; 
safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or 
control of ICC or for which it is responsible; and protection of 
investors and the public interest. Accordingly, ICC believes that the 
proposed rule change is consistent with the prompt and accurate 
clearance and settlement of securities transactions, derivatives 
agreements, contracts, and transactions, the safeguarding of securities 
and funds in the custody or control of ICC or for which it is 
responsible, and the protection of investors and the public interest, 
within the meaning of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the proposed rule change is consistent with the relevant 
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22.\18\ Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v) \19\ 
requires ICC to establish, implement, maintain and enforce written 
policies and procedures reasonably designed to, in relevant part, 
provide for governance arrangements that are clear and transparent and 
specify clear and direct lines of responsibility. The proposed 
amendments add the Head of Treasury to the NIAC to capture any 
treasury-related considerations during the identification, review and 
approval of New Initiatives, update member titles to reflect current 
designations, and incorporate reference to the Board Risk Committee. 
The NIA Policy will continue to clearly assign and document 
responsibility and accountability for the identification, review, and 
approval of New Initiatives by the NIAC. These governance arrangements 
continue to be clear and transparent, such that information relating to 
the assignment of responsibilities and the requisite involvement of 
department heads and the NIAC is clearly documented. In ICC's view, the 
proposed changes are therefore consistent with the requirements of Rule 
17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v).\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
    \19\ 17 CFR 270.17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v).
    \20\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17Ad-22(e)(17)(i) \21\ requires ICC to establish, implement, 
maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably 
designed to, in relevant part, manage its operational risks by 
identifying the plausible sources of operational risk, both internal 
and external, and mitigating their impact through the use of 
appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls. The proposed 
rule change provides additional clarity in the NIA Policy regarding the 
risk assessment template and related rating guidelines utilized by the 
NIAC. Such changes will enhance the review of New Initiatives, 
including by updating the risk assessment template and providing 
additional clarity with respect to rating guidelines, which serves to 
reduce the likelihood of a disruption in operations from a New 
Initiative. Moreover, the documentation of ICC's New Initiatives 
process will continue to improve ICC's ability to identify sources of 
operational risk and minimize them through the development of 
appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls, consistent 
with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(17)(i).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(17)(i).
    \22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    ICC does not believe the proposed rule change would have any 
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The proposed changes 
update NIAC membership and make clarification or clean-ups to the NIA 
Policy. These changes relate to the governance and structure of an 
internal ICC committee and do not impact ICC's operational rules or 
Participant-facing processes. Moreover, ICC does not believe these 
amendments would affect the costs of clearing or the ability of market 
participants to access clearing. Therefore, ICC does not believe the 
proposed rule change imposes any burden on competition that is 
inappropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been 
solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written 
comments received by ICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \23\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \24\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if

[[Page 3262]]

it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking">https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking</a>); 
or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5d7d0c9c088c6cac8c8c0cbd1d6e5d6c0c68bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e89a9d848dc58b8785858d869c9ba89b8d8bc68f879e">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-ICC-2026-001 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-ICC-2026-001. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method of submission. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking">https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking</a>). Copies of 
such filings will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of ICE Clear Credit and on ICE Clear Credit's website 
at <a href="https://www.ice.com/clear-credit/regulation">https://www.ice.com/clear-credit/regulation</a>.
    Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; 
you should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication 
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
    All submissions should refer to file number SR-ICC-2026-001 and 
should be submitted on or before February 17, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-01371 Filed 1-23-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on January 26, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.