Notice2026-00797

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Pearl Equities Fee Schedule To Adopt a New Market Quoting Program

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
January 16, 2026

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 11 (Friday, January 16, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2223-2226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00797]



[[Page 2223]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104583; File No. SR-PEARL-2025-53]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX 
Pearl Equities Fee Schedule To Adopt a New Market Quoting Program

January 13, 2026.
    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice 
is hereby given that on December 31, 2025, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX 
Pearl'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in 
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the fee schedule (the ``Fee 
Schedule'') applicable to MIAX Pearl Equities, an equities trading 
facility of the Exchange, to adopt a new Market Quoting Program 
(described below) to provide an enhanced rebate for executions of 
orders in securities priced at or above $1.00 per share during the 
Early,\3\ Regular,\4\ and Late Trading Sessions \5\ (together ``all 
trading sessions'') that add displayed liquidity to the Exchange across 
all Tapes and where the Equity Member \6\ meets certain market quality 
measures in a certain number of securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``Early Trading Session'' shall mean the time 
between 4:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. See Exchange Rule 
1901.
    \4\ The term ``Regular Trading Session'' shall mean the time 
between the completion of the Opening Process or Contingent Open as 
defined in Exchange Rule 2615 and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. See 
Exchange Rule 1901.
    \5\ The term ``Late Trading Session'' shall mean the time 
between 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. See Exchange Rule 
1901.
    \6\ The term ``Equity Member'' is a Member authorized by the 
Exchange to transact business on MIAX Pearl Equities. See Exchange 
Rule 1901.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/pearl-options/rule-filings">https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/pearl-options/rule-filings</a> and at MIAX Pearl's principal office.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 1)d) of the Fee Schedule to 
remove the heading ``Reserved.'' and replace it with ``Market Quoting 
Program''.
    Under the proposed Market Quoting Program, the Exchange will 
provide an enhanced rebate of ($0.0026) \7\ per share for executions of 
orders in securities priced at or above $1.00 per share that add 
displayed liquidity to the Exchange across all Tapes in all trading 
sessions for an Equity Member that achieves a ``Percent Time at NBBO'' 
\8\ of at least 50% in at least 750 securities that are multi-listed 
securities on the Exchange during the relevant month. The Liquidity 
Indicator Codes applicable to this rebate will be as follows: AA, EA, 
FA, AB, EB, FB, AC, EC, and FC.\9\ Equity Members who achieve and 
receive this rebate will not be eligible for the NBBO Setter Additive 
Rebate \10\ or NBBO First Joiner Additive Rebate.\11\ Equity Members 
will receive the higher rebate of either the tiered rebates set forth 
in the NBBO Setter Plus Table under the NBBO Setter Plus Program \12\ 
or the enhanced rebate provided by the proposed Market Quoting Program. 
The Exchange notes that the enhanced rebate provided under the proposed 
Market Quoting Program will not apply to executions of orders in 
securities priced below $1.00 per share across all Tapes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Rebates are indicated by parentheses. See the General Notes 
section of the Fee Schedule.
    \8\ ``Percent Time at NBBO'' means the aggregate of the 
percentage of time during regular trading hours where a Member has a 
displayed order of at least one round lot at the national best bid 
(``NBB'') or national best offer (``NBO''). For the avoidance of 
doubt, only orders that are at the NBB or NBO during the Regular 
Trading Session count towards the Percent Time at NBBO calculation. 
See Fee Schedule, Definitions.
    \9\ See Fee Schedule, Sections 1)a)-b).
    \10\ The NBBO Setter Additive Rebate is an additive rebate of 
($0.00035) per share for executions of orders in securities priced 
at or above $1.00 per share that set the NBB or NBO on MIAX Pearl 
Equities with a minimum size of a round lot. Equity Members must 
execute at least 0.015% of NBBO Set Volume as a percentage of TCV 
during the relevant month to qualify for this rebate. See Fee 
Schedule. Section 1)c). ``NBBO Set Volume'' means the ADAV in all 
securities of an Equity Member that sets the NBB or NBO on MIAX 
Pearl Equities. See id. ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume 
calculated as the volume in shares reported by all exchanges and 
reporting facilities to a consolidated transaction reporting plan 
for the month for which the fees apply. Id.
    \11\ The NBBO First Joiner Additive Rebate is an additive rebate 
of ($0.0001) per share for executions of orders in securities priced 
at or above $1.00 per share that bring MIAX Pearl Equities to the 
established NBB or NBO with a minimum size of a round lot. Equity 
Members must execute at least 0.015% of NBBO Set Volume as a 
percentage of TCV during the relevant month to qualify for this 
rebate. See Id.
    \12\ In general, the NBBO Setter Plus Program provides enhanced 
rebates for Equity Members that add displayed liquidity in 
securities priced at or above $1.00 per share in all Tapes based on 
increasing volume thresholds and increasing market quality levels. 
See Fee Schedule, Section 1)c), NBBO Setter Plus Table. The Exchange 
will continue calculating the rebates for Equity Members who qualify 
for the enhanced rebates set forth in the NBBO Setter Plus Program 
under Section 1)c) of the Fee Schedule. Equity Members will not need 
to opt in any of the rebate programs offered by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed Market Quoting Program is designed to encourage Equity 
Members, through the provision of an enhanced rebate for executions of 
orders in securities priced at or above $1.00 per share that add 
displayed liquidity to the Exchange across all Tapes in all trading 
sessions, to promote price discovery and market quality by quoting at 
the NBBO for a significant portion of each month in at least 750 multi-
listed securities across all Tapes, thereby benefitting investors by 
providing improved trading conditions for all market participants 
through narrower bid-ask spreads and increased depth of liquidity 
available at the NBBO in these securities. The Exchange notes that the 
proposed Market Quoting Program is comparable to other quoting-based 
incentives offered by other exchanges, which offer pricing incentives 
applicable to a specific set of securities based on a member's market 
quality measurement over a specified period of time.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See MEMX LLC (``MEMX'') Equities Fee Schedule, Additive 
Rebates section, available at <a href="https://info.memxtrading.com/equities-trading-resources/us-equities-fee-schedule/">https://info.memxtrading.com/equities-trading-resources/us-equities-fee-schedule/</a> (providing additive 
rebate of $0.0002 per share for a member that has an NBBO time of at 
least 50% in an average of at least 500 Tape C securities per 
trading day during the month); see also, e.g., Securities Exchange 
Act Release Nos. 102789 (April 8, 2025) 90 FR 15600 (April 14, 2025) 
(SR-MEMX-2025-09) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a 
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Equities Fee Schedule 
Concerning Additive Rebates); see also 77846 (May 17, 2016) 81 FR 
32356 (May 23, 2016) (SR-BatsBZX-2016-18) (Notice of filing and 
immediate effectiveness of a proposed rule change to Rules 15.1(a) 
and (c) in order to implement a Tape B Quoting Tier).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2224]]

Implementation
    The proposed changes are effective beginning January 1, 2026.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule 
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \14\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \15\ in 
particular, in that the proposed changes are an equitable allocation of 
reasonable fees and other charges among the Exchange's Equity Members 
and issuers and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange also 
believes that the proposal is consistent with the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) \16\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, and to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest, and, particularly, is not 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange operates in a highly fragmented and competitive market 
in which market participants can readily direct their order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of seventeen registered equities exchanges, and 
there are a number of alternative trading systems and other off-
exchange venues, to which market participants may direct their order 
flow. For the month of November 2025, based on publicly available 
information, no single registered equities exchange had more than 
approximately 14.55% of the total market share of executed volume of 
equities trading.\17\ Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly 
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of order flow. For the month of November 
2025, the Exchange represented 0.96% of the total market share of 
executed volume of equities trading.\18\ The Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') and the courts have repeatedly expressed 
their preference for competition over regulatory intervention in 
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. 
In Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and also recognized that 
current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See the ``Market Share'' section of the Exchange's website, 
available at <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/">https://www.miaxglobal.com/</a> (last visited December 17, 
2025).
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow or discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to new or different pricing structures being 
introduced into the market. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain 
the Exchange's transaction fees and rebates, and market participants 
can readily trade on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at 
those other venues to be more favorable. The Exchange believes the 
proposal reflects a reasonable and competitive pricing structure 
designed to continue to incentivize market participants to increase 
their quoting at the NBBO (or better) on the Exchange, which will 
enhance market quality in both a broad manner and in a targeted manner 
with respect to the Markey Quoting Program, which the Exchange believes 
would promote price discovery and enhance liquidity and market quality 
on the Exchange to the benefit of all Equity Members and market 
participants.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed change to adopt the Market 
Quoting Program that would provide an enhanced rebate for executions of 
orders in securities priced at or above $1.00 per share during all 
trading sessions that add displayed liquidity to the Exchange across 
all Tapes when certain market quality measurements are met is 
reasonable because, as described above, such change is designed to 
encourage Equity Members to increase their order flow, including in the 
form of displayed, NBBO-setting orders under the required criteria, as 
applicable, to the Exchange. The Exchange believes, in turn, this will 
promote price discovery, enhance liquidity and market quality, and 
contribute to a more robust and well-balanced market ecosystem on the 
Exchange to the benefit of all Equity Members and market participants. 
In addition, the Exchange believes its proposal is reasonable and 
consistent with an equitable allocation of fees to pay a higher rebate 
than the base rebate for executions of orders in securities priced at 
or above $1.00 per share during all trading sessions that add displayed 
liquidity to the Exchange across all Tapes to Equity Members that 
qualify for the Market Quoting Program because of the additional 
commitment to market quality reflected in the associated quoting 
requirements.
    The Exchange notes that volume and quoting-based incentives have 
been widely adopted by exchanges, including the Exchange, and are 
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they are 
open to all Equity Members on an equal basis and provide additional 
benefits that are reasonably related to the value to an exchange's 
market quality associated with higher levels of market activity, such 
as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns, and the 
introduction of higher volumes of orders into the price and volume 
discovery process. Furthermore, as noted above, the proposed Market 
Quoting Program is similar in structure and purpose to pricing programs 
in place at other exchanges that are designed to enhance market 
quality.\20\ Specifically, these programs provide a higher and/or 
additive rebate for executions of a certain subset of securities that 
achieve minimum quoting standards, including minimum quoting at the 
NBBO in a large number of securities, generally, or certain designated 
securities, in particular.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the reasons discussed above, the Exchange submits that the 
proposal satisfies the requirements of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of 
the Act in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable 
dues, fees and other charges among its Equity Members and other persons 
using its facilities and is not designed to unfairly discriminate 
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. As described more 
fully below in the Exchange's statement regarding the burden on 
competition, the Exchange believes that its transaction pricing is 
subject to significant competitive forces, and that the proposed 
enhanced rebate described

[[Page 2225]]

herein is appropriate to address such forces.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impose 
any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance 
of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the proposal 
is intended to enhance market quality on the Exchange in a large number 
of securities and to incentivize market participants to direct 
additional order flow to the Exchange, thereby enhancing liquidity and 
market quality on the Exchange to the benefit of all Equity Members and 
market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes the proposal 
would enhance its competitiveness as a market that attracts actionable 
orders, thereby making it a more desirable destination venue for its 
customers. For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering 
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of 
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.'' \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See supra note 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intramarket Competition
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposal will impose any 
burden on intra-market competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As discussed above, the 
Exchange believes that the proposal would incentivize Equity Members to 
promote price discovery and market quality by quoting at the NBBO for a 
significant portion of each month in a large number of securities 
across all Tapes, thereby contributing to a deeper and more liquid 
market to the benefit of all market participants and enhancing the 
attractiveness of the Exchange as a trading venue. The Exchange, in 
turn, believes this will continue to encourage market participants to 
direct additional order flow to the Exchange. The opportunity to 
qualify for the Market Quoting Program and thus receive the 
corresponding enhanced rebate for executions of orders in securities 
priced at or above $1.00 per share during all trading sessions that add 
displayed liquidity to the Exchange across all Tapes would be available 
to all Equity Members that meet the associated criteria for the Market 
Quoting Program in any month. As such, the Exchange believes the 
proposed change would not impose any burden on intramarket competition 
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act.
Intermarket Competition
    The Exchange believes its proposal will benefit competition as the 
Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. Equity Members have 
numerous alternative venues they may participate on and direct their 
order flow to, including seventeen other equities exchanges and 
numerous alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues. As 
noted above, no single registered equities exchange currently has more 
than approximately 14.55% of the total market share of executed 
equities volume. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly 
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of order flow. Moreover, the Exchange 
believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from 
month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order 
flow in response to new or different pricing structures being 
introduced to the market. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the 
Exchange's transaction fees and rebates generally, including with 
respect to executions of all orders in securities priced at or above 
$1.00 per share during all trading sessions that add displayed or non-
displayed liquidity to the Exchange across all Tapes. Market 
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchanges 
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. As described above, the proposed change is a 
competitive proposal through which the Exchange is seeking to encourage 
additional order flow and quoting activity on the Exchange and to 
promote market quality through pricing incentives that are comparable 
to incentives in place at other exchanges.\22\ Accordingly, the 
Exchange believes the proposal would not burden, but rather promote 
intermarket competition by enabling it to better compete with other 
exchanges that offer similar incentives to market participants that 
enhance market quality and/or achieve certain quoting requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, 
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \23\ The fact 
that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the 
courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. 
circuit stated: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is 
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market 
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that 
act as their routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to 
route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its 
market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange possess a 
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from 
broker dealers' . . . .'' \24\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not 
believe that this proposal would impose any burden on competition that 
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
    \24\ See NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\25\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \26\ thereunder. 
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, 
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such 
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether 
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2226]]

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f785829b92da94989a9a92998384b7849294d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="285a5d444d054b4745454d465c5b685b4d4b064f475e">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-PEARL-2025-53 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2025-53. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2025-53 and should be submitted on 
or before February 6, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-00797 Filed 1-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on January 16, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.