Rule2026-00612

Delete, Delete, Delete

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
January 14, 2026
Effective
March 16, 2026

Issuing agencies

Federal Communications Commission

Abstract

The Direct Final Rule would repeal approximately 21 rule provisions and rule parts, totaling 2,927 words and covering approximately 7 pages in the Code of Federal Regulations, that plainly no longer serve the public interest because they have sunset by operation of law; govern an expired event; regulate an obsolete technology; are no longer used in practice by the FCC or licensees; or are otherwise duplicative, outdated, or unnecessary. The Direct Final Rule would find prior notice and comment "unnecessary" under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) before repealing these rules, but elect to provide an opportunity for input on that assessment, with the identified rules automatically being repealed absent any significant adverse comments in response to this Direct Final Rule.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1400-1404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 0, 4, 9, 11, and 90

[GN Docket No. 25-133; FCC 25-80; FR ID 326222]


Delete, Delete, Delete

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Direct Final Rule would repeal approximately 21 rule 
provisions and rule parts, totaling 2,927 words and covering 
approximately 7 pages in the Code of Federal Regulations, that plainly 
no longer serve the public interest because they have sunset by 
operation of law; govern an expired event; regulate an obsolete 
technology; are no longer used in practice by the FCC or licensees; or 
are otherwise duplicative, outdated, or unnecessary. The Direct Final 
Rule would find prior notice and comment ``unnecessary'' under the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) before repealing these rules, but 
elect to provide an opportunity for input on that assessment, with the 
identified rules automatically being repealed absent any significant 
adverse comments in response to this Direct Final Rule.

DATES: Effective March 16, 2026 without further action, unless 
significant adverse comment is received by February 3, 2026. If adverse 
comment is received, the Federal Communications Commission will publish 
a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public of the 
provisions of the rule[s] for which significant adverse comments were 
received, and elimination will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by GN Docket No. 25-133, 
electronically or on paper. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific 
information and addresses for electronic or paper filings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Wiley, Federal Communications 
Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0ba919d9583dea7999c9589b0969393de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8cc6ede1e9ffa2dbe5e0e9f5cceaefefa2ebe3fa">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, (202) 418-1678.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Direct 
Final Rule, GN Docket No. 25-133, FCC 25-80, adopted on November 20, 
2025 and released on November 24, 2025.

[[Page 1401]]

The full text of this document is available for public inspection and 
can be downloaded at <a href="https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-deletes-outdated-public-safety-rules">https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-deletes-outdated-public-safety-rules</a>. Alternative formats are available for people with 
disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) by 
sending an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#761015154346423610151558111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="62040101575256220401014c050d14">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> or calling the Commission's Consumer 
and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-
0432 (TTY).
    Comment Period and Filing Procedures. Interested parties may file 
comments on or before the dates provided in the DATES section of this 
document. Comments must be filed in GN Docket No. 25-133. Comments may 
be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System 
(ECFS). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 
63 FR 24121 (1998).
    <bullet> All filings must be addressed to the Commission's 
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
    <bullet> Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically 
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: <a href="https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/">https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/</a>.
    <bullet> Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must 
file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket 
or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers 
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or 
rulemaking number.
    <bullet> Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service 
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive, 
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
    <bullet> U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority 
mail must be addressed to 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.

Procedural Matters

    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis: This document does not 
contain new or modified information collections subject to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521. In 
addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified 
information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act 
of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
    Congressional Review Act: The Commission has determined, and the 
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget concurs, that this rule is ``non-
major'' under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The 
Commission will send a copy of this Direct Final Rule to Congress and 
the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Synopsis

I. Introduction

    This Direct Final Rule continues our efforts to modernize our 
regulatory framework by rescinding facially obsolete public safety and 
homeland security rules and requirements in parts 0, 4, 9, 10, 11, and 
90 of our rules. In this proceeding, we have undertaken a sweeping 
review eventually aimed at eliminating outdated rules, reducing 
unnecessary regulatory burdens, accelerating infrastructure deployment, 
promoting network modernization, and spurring innovation. Our objective 
is to streamline, simplify, and smartly deregulate across multiple 
fronts simultaneously to better serve the public and support 
technological progress.
    In initiating this proceeding, we generally sought to identify 
rules that are outdated, obsolete, unlawful, anticompetitive, or 
otherwise no longer in the public interest. In today's item, we 
specifically focus on the repeal of certain public safety and homeland 
security rules in various parts for which prior notice and comment are 
unnecessary, but for which we elect to provide an opportunity for input 
on that assessment. Absent any significant adverse comments in response 
to this Direct Final Rule, these rules will be repealed.

II. Discussion

    Good Cause to Forgo Notice and Comment. Under the Administrative 
Procedure Act (APA), when an agency for good cause finds that notice 
and public comment ``are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the 
public interest,'' it need not follow notice and comment procedures 
before modifying or repealing rules. Prior notice and comment are 
``unnecessary'' when ` ``the administrative rule is a routine 
determination, insignificant in nature and impact, and inconsequential 
to the industry and to the public.' ''
    We have identified approximately 21 rule provisions and rule parts, 
totaling 2,927 words and covering approximately 7 pages in the Code of 
Federal Regulations, that plainly no longer serve the public interest. 
One such rule provision, 47 CFR 9.20, has sunset by operation of law 
and ceased to be effective on September 1, 2025.
    We have also found rule provisions that no longer serve the public 
interest because they govern expired events. Section 4.17(e) sets the 
compliance deadline for the Mandatory Disaster Response Initiative as 
May 1, 2024, a date that has passed. Section 9.11(a) regulates fixed 
VoIP services prior to 2021 and non-fixed VoIP services prior to 2022, 
dates which have passed and, in any case, specifies regulations that 
have been superseded by subsection 9.11(b). Section 9.19(d)(1) sets the 
deadline for initial 911 reliability certifications as October 15, 
2014, a date which has passed. Section 10.11 establishes implementation 
timelines for Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) and the change of 
``Presidential Alert'' to ``National Alert,'' which have passed. 
Section 10.230 establishes election procedures related to an initial 
compliance deadline that has since been deleted from the rules. Section 
10.260 establishes compliance deadlines for requirements to notify 
subscribers of non-participation in WEA, which have passed. Section 
11.31(d)(2) establishes a compliance deadline for discontinuing use of 
the National Information Center EAS originator code, which has since 
passed. Section 11.34(g) establishes a compliance deadline for EAS 
equipment acceptability, which has since passed. Section 11.21(d)-(f) 
establishes one-time reporting obligations for participants in the 
Emergency Alert System (EAS) and State Emergency Communications 
Committees (SECCs) about making EAS content available in languages 
other than English, the deadlines for which have passed, and an ongoing 
requirement to report updates on these efforts, which have never been 
triggered. Section 11.31(d)(2) establishes a compliance deadline for 
discontinuing use of the National Information Center EAS originator 
code, which has since passed. Section 11.34(g) establishes a compliance 
deadline for EAS equipment acceptability, which has since passed.
    Other sections no longer serve the public interest because they 
regulate obsolete technology. Section 9.10(n) allows CMRS providers who 
offer dispatch service to meet the basic 911 requirements and Phase I 
and II requirements of section 9.10 either by complying with the 
requirements or by routing the customer's emergency calls through a 
dispatcher, but the Commission does not believe there are any CMRS 
providers who currently offer dispatch service that would be subject to 
this rule. Section 11.16 describes obsolete procedures for priority-
based processing of national, state, and local alerts that are no 
longer followed, as

[[Page 1402]]

reflected by the deletion of the Emergency Alert Termination (EAT) 
alert code in 2012. Section 90.20(d)(28) denotes frequencies 
unavailable for assignment in Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands to 
protect an air-to-ground radio service that no longer exists.
    We also identified rule sections that govern technology that is no 
longer used in practice by the FCC or licensees. Section 11.11(e) 
describes procedures for voluntary participation in EAS that need not 
be reflected in regulations as they do not create binding obligations 
for any entity. Section 11.21(b) describes Local Area EAS Plans without 
creating binding obligations for any entity and that, if created, would 
exist as part of the State EAS Plan, which is subject to separate 
requirements. Section 11.21(c) describes an ``FCC Mapbook'' document 
that has never been developed. Section 11.43 describes procedures to 
allow entities to voluntarily participate in EAS that need not be 
codified and that are not used in practice. Section 11.47 specifies 
that entities may contact the FCC for guidance on EAS participation, 
which does not need to be codified, and authorizes broadcast stations 
to transmit EAS alerts using subcarriers, which is not used in 
practice.
    Finally, we identified sections that are otherwise duplicative, 
outdated, or unnecessary. Section 0.181(d) references the Joint 
Telecommunications Resources Board (JTRB), which no longer exists as of 
2012. Sections 0.191(q) and 0.192 provide for creation of the Emergency 
Response Interoperability Center (ERIC), which was rendered unnecessary 
in light of the formation of First Responder Network Authority in 2012. 
Section 4.1(b) directs providers subject to the rule to use the 
definitions section of part 4 to determine whether they are subject to 
the rules, which is self-evident and unnecessary to codify. Section 
10.450(c) is unnecessary given provisions in 47 CFR 10.430. Applying 
the ``good cause'' standard discussed above, we conclude that prior 
notice and comment are unnecessary before repealing the rules 
identified in the Appendix.
    Direct Final Rule Process. In this Direct Final Rule, we follow the 
processes previously outlined by the Commission regarding direct final 
rules, which we briefly summarize here. At times when the Commission 
has found prior notice and comment unnecessary before modifying or 
repealing rules, it simply adopted the relevant rule change without any 
additional process. Although we reserve the right to proceed in that 
manner, we elect in this decision to proceed using what is known as a 
``direct final rule'' process. By proceeding through a direct final 
rule, the Commission chooses to provide expanded opportunities for 
public comment when it is not legally required to do so under the 
``good cause'' standard. Although the Commission has adopted specific 
rules codified in the Code of Federal Regulations related to notice-
and-comment rulemaking procedures under 47 CFR part. 1, subpart. C, 
there is no legal requirement that we adopt rules before employing 
processes permitted by the APA and the Communications Act. For example, 
47 U.S.C. 154(j) says that absent previously specified procedural 
obligations to the contrary, ``[t]he Commission may conduct its 
proceedings in such manner as will best conduce to the proper dispatch 
of business and to the ends of justice.'' Under a direct final rule 
process, rule changes are adopted without prior notice and comment, but 
accompanied by an opportunity for the public to file comments--and if 
we conclude that significant adverse comments have been filed, the 
relevant rule changes would not take effect until after a full notice 
and comment process.
    In particular, we will publish this item adopting direct final 
rules in the Federal Register, and allow for comment from interested 
parties within 20 days of Federal Register publication. Until 20 days 
after Federal Register publication, this shall be a ``permit-but-
disclose'' proceeding for purposes of our ex parte rules. Because this 
comment process is directed toward the discrete objective of the direct 
final rule process, and to avoid unwarranted delay in that process, we 
prohibit filings addressing the rule changes contemplated in this 
Direct Final Rule more than 20 days after Federal Register publication, 
absent further direction from the Commission published in the Federal 
Register. Up until that date, we find it in the public interest to 
continue to operate under permit-but-disclosure procedures in this 
regard, consistent with the status of the In Re: Delete, Delete, Delete 
proceeding more generally. This both accords with the purpose of the 
comment process for direct final rules, and is similar (though not 
identical) to actions the Commission has taken in other contexts to 
provide a defined end-point for public filings to enable the Commission 
to focus its attention on the submissions already before it. In the 
event that a petition for reconsideration of this action is filed, we 
will subsequently specifically address any comment process associated 
with such a petition in light of the prohibition on filings addressing 
the rule changes more than 30 days after Federal Register publication.
    The direct final rules will be effective 60 days after Federal 
Register publication. To the extent that the Commission receives 
comments on these direct final rules, we will evaluate whether they are 
significant adverse comments that warrant further procedures before 
changing the rules. In our assessment, we plan to be guided by the 
Public Engagement and Good Cause Recommendation of the Administrative 
Conference of the United States (ACUS) at 89 FR at 106409 that ``[a]n 
agency should consider any comment received during direct final 
rulemaking to be a significant adverse comment if the comment explains 
why: a. The [direct final] rule would be inappropriate, including 
challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach; or b. The 
[direct final] rule would be ineffective or unacceptable without a 
change.'' The touchstone for this analysis is whether a comment 
materially calls into question the conclusion that prior notice and 
comment is unnecessary under the APA, which is the predicate for use of 
direct final rule procedures. While we expect the formulation provided 
by ACUS to be a useful guide for conducting that analysis, our 
statutory determination of ``good cause'' to forgo notice and comment 
ultimately represents the critical issue, rather than the particular 
language used by ACUS.
    In the event that we conclude that significant adverse comments 
have been filed, the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (the 
Bureau) will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register so 
that this Direct Final Rule does not become effective until any 
appropriate additional procedures have been followed. If significant 
adverse comments are filed only with respect to a subset of the rule 
revisions addressed by this Direct Final Rule, the Bureau will withdraw 
the portions of the Direct Final Rule that were subject to significant 
adverse comments. For example, if a significant adverse comment is 
filed regarding a single rule within a direct final rule addressing 
multiple rules, we will publish a withdrawal addressing only that rule.
    In the event that no comments are filed in response to this Direct 
Final Rule, we do not anticipate publishing a confirmation of the 
effective date in the Federal Register, but simply will allow the rule 
changes to take effect as originally specified. Where comments are 
filed, but none of the comments are significant adverse comments, where 
warranted by the record the Bureau will

[[Page 1403]]

issue a Public Notice that will briefly explain why any comments filed 
were not determined to be significant adverse comments. Although the 
Public Notice is a document in a non-notice and comment rulemaking 
proceeding, nothing in that document is required to be published in the 
Federal Register by the APA given that the Public Notice is not itself 
adopting new or modified rules. As a result, the Bureau also need not 
publish the Public Notice in the Federal Register to establish the date 
of ``public notice'' for the Public Notice under Sec.  1.4(b)(1) of the 
rules--which is limited to documents in rulemaking proceedings 
``required by the Administrative Procedure Act to be published in the 
Federal Register''--and instead the date of the Public Notice will be 
the release date per Sec.  1.4(b)(4).

III. Ordering Clauses

    Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 
and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 
154(i), (j), 303(r), this Direct Final Rule is adopted. Except as 
specified in the Direct Final Rule process summarized above, this 
Direct Final Rule shall be effective upon Federal Register publication 
of the rule changes set forth in the Appendix, which also shall serve 
as the date of public notice of that action.
    It is further ordered that the amendments of the Commission's rules 
as set forth in the Appendix shall be effective 60 days after Federal 
Register publication. In the event that significant adverse comments 
are filed, the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau shall publish 
a timely document in the Federal Register withdrawing the rule so that 
the rule change does not become effective until any additional 
procedures have been followed. In the event that significant adverse 
comments are filed with respect to only a subset of the rule revisions, 
we direct the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau to publish a 
timely document in the Federal Register withdrawing only such rule so 
that the rule change does not become effective until any additional 
procedures have been followed.
    It is further ordered that the Office of the Managing Director, 
Performance Program Management, shall send a copy of this Direct Final 
Rule in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government 
Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 5 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects

47 CFR Part 0

    Organization and functions (Government agencies).

47 CFR Part 4

    Communications common carriers, Communications equipment, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

47 CFR Part 9

    Communications, Communications common carriers, Communications 
equipment, Telephone, Telecommunications, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

47 CFR Part 10

    Communications, Communications common carriers, Communications 
equipment, Electronic products, Radio, Telecommunications.

47 CFR Part 11

    Radio, Television.

47 CFR Part 90

    Radio

Federal Communications Commission
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.

Final Rules

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission amends parts 0, 4, 9, 11, and 90 of Title 47 
of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 0--COMMISSION ORGANIZATION

0
1. The authority citation for part 0 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 225, 409, and 
1754, unless otherwise noted.


Sec.  0.181  [Amended]

0
2. Section 0.181 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (d).


Sec.  0.191   [Amended]

0
3. Section 0.191 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (q).


Sec.  0.192   [Removed and Reserved]

0
4. Remove and reserve Sec.  0.192.

PART 4--DISRUPTIONS TO COMMUNICATIONS

0
5. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  47 U.S.C. 34-39, 151, 154, 155, 157, 201, 251, 307, 
316, 615a-1, 1302(a), and 1302(b); 5 U.S.C. 301, and Executive Order 
no. 10530.


Sec.  4.1   [Amended]

0
6. Section 4.1 is amended by removing paragraph (b) and redesignating 
paragraph (c) as paragraph (b).


Sec.  4.17  [Amended]

0
7. Section 4.17 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (e).

PART 9--911 REQUIREMENTS

0
8. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151-154, 152(a), 155(c), 157, 160, 201, 
202, 208, 210, 214, 218, 219, 222, 225, 251(e), 255, 301, 302, 303, 
307, 308, 309, 310, 316, 319, 332, 403, 405, 605, 610, 615, 615 
note, 615a, 615b, 615c, 615a-1, 616, 620, 621, 623, 623 note, 721, 
and 1471, and Section 902 of Title IX, Division FF, Pub. L. 116-260, 
134 Stat. 1182, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart C--Commercial Mobile Radio Service


Sec.  9.10  [Amended]

0
9. Section 9.10 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (n).

Subpart D--Interconnected Voice Over internet Protocol Services


Sec.  9.11   [Amended]

0
10. Section 9.11 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (a).

Subpart H--Resiliency, Redundancy, and Reliability of 911 
Communications

0
11. Section 9.19 is amended by revising paragraph (c) introductory text 
and removing and reserving paragraph (d)(1).


Sec.  9.19  Reliability of covered 911 service providers.

* * * * *
    (c) On October 15 of each year, a certifying official of every 
covered 911 service provider shall submit a certification to the 
Commission as follows.
* * * * *


Sec.  9.20   [Removed and Reserved]

0
12. Remove and reserve Sec.  9.20.

PART 10--WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS

0
13. The authority citation for part 10 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 154(n), 201, 301, 
303(b), 303(e), 303(g), 303(j), 303(r), 307, 309, 316, 403, 544(g), 
606, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, and 1206.

[[Page 1404]]

Subpart A--General Information


Sec.  10.11   [Removed and Reserved]

0
14. Remove and reserve Sec.  10.11.

Subpart B--Election To Participate in Wireless Emergency Alerts 
System


Sec.  10.230   [Removed and Reserved]

0
15. Remove and reserve Sec.  10.230.


Sec.  10.260  [Removed and Reserved]

0
16. Remove and reserve Sec.  10.260.

Subpart D--Alert Message Requirements


Sec.  10.450  [Amended]

0
17. Section 10.450 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (c).

PART 11--EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM (EAS)

0
18. The authority citation for part 11 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154 (i) and (n), 303(r), 544(g), 606, 
1201, and 1206.

Subpart A--General


Sec.  11.11   [Amended]

0
19. Section 11.11 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (e).


Sec.  11.16  [Removed and Reserved]

0
20. Revise and republish Sec.  11.21 to read as follows:


Sec.  11.21  State EAS Plans

    (a) EAS plans contain guidelines which must be followed by EAS 
Participants' personnel, emergency officials, and National Weather 
Service (NWS) personnel to activate the EAS. The plans include the EAS 
header codes and messages that will be transmitted by key EAS sources 
(NP, LP, SP and SR). State and local plans contain unique methods of 
EAS message distribution such as the use of the Radio Broadcast Data 
System (RBDS). The plans also include information on actions taken by 
EAS Participants, in coordination with state and local governments, to 
ensure timely access to EAS alert content by non-English speaking 
populations. The plans must be reviewed and approved by the Chief, 
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (Bureau), prior to 
implementation to ensure that they are consistent with national plans, 
FCC regulations, and EAS operation. The plans are administered by State 
Emergency Communications Committees (SECC). The Commission encourages 
the chief executive of each State to establish an SECC if their State 
does not have an SECC, and if the State has an SECC, to review the 
composition and governance of the SECC. The Bureau will review and 
approve plans, including annual updated plans, within 60 days of 
receipt, provided that no defects are found requiring the plan to be 
returned to the SECC for correction and resubmission. If a plan 
submitted for approval is found defective, the SECC will be notified of 
the required corrections, and the corrected plan may be resubmitted for 
approval, thus starting the 60-day review and approval period anew. The 
approval dates of State EAS Plans will be listed on the Commission's 
website.
    (b) State EAS Plans contain guidelines that must be followed by EAS 
Participants' personnel, emergency officials, and National Weather 
Service (NWS) personnel to activate the EAS. The Plans include 
information on actions taken by EAS Participants, in coordination with 
state and local governments, to ensure timely access to EAS alert 
content by non-English speaking populations. State EAS Plans must be 
updated on an annual basis. State EAS Plans must include the following 
elements:
    (1) A list of the EAS header codes and messages that will be 
transmitted by key EAS sources (NP, LP, SP, and SR);
    (2) Procedures for state emergency management officials, the 
National Weather Service, and EAS Participant personnel to transmit 
emergency information to the public during an emergency via the EAS, 
including the extent to which the state's dissemination strategy for 
state and local emergency alerts differs from its strategy for the 
National Emergency Message;
    (3) Procedures for state and local activations of the EAS, 
including a list of all authorized entities participating in the State 
or Local Area EAS;
    (4) A monitoring assignment matrix, in computer readable form, 
clearly showing monitoring assignments and the specific primary and 
backup path for the National Emergency Message (EAN) from the NPWS to 
all key EAS sources (using the uniform designations specified in Sec.  
11.18) and to each station in the plan, organized by operational areas 
within the state. If a state's emergency alert system is capable of 
initiating EAS messages formatted in the Common Alerting Protocol 
(CAP), its EAS State Plan must include specific and detailed 
information describing how such messages will be aggregated and 
distributed to EAS Participants within the state, including the 
monitoring requirements associated with distributing such messages; 
State EAS Plans must indicate whether any of the EAS monitoring sources 
in the monitoring assignment matrix are primary stations adopting 
program originating boosters and, if so, whether the boosters will 
simulcast the primary station or remain off-air during periods when 
they are not originating programming;
    (5) State procedures for conducting special EAS tests and Required 
Monthly Tests (RMTs);
    (6) A list of satellite-based communications resources that are 
used as alternate monitoring assignments and present a reliable source 
of EAS messages; and
    (7) The SECC governance structure utilized by the state in order to 
organize state and local resources to ensure the efficient and 
effective delivery of a National Emergency Message, including the 
duties of the SECC, the membership selection process utilized by the 
SECC, and the administrative structure of the SECC.
    (8) Certification by the SECC Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson that 
the SECC met (in person, via teleconference, or via other methods of 
conducting virtual meetings) at least once in the twelve months prior 
to submitting the annual updated plan to review and update the plan.

Subpart B--Equipment Requirements


Sec.  11.31   [Amended]

0
22. Section 11.31 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph 
(d)(2).


Sec.  11.34   [Amended]

0
23. Section 11.34 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (g).

Subpart C--Organization


Sec.  11.43  [Removed and Reserved]

0
24. Remove and reserve Sec.  11.43.


Sec.  11.47  [Removed and Reserved]

0
25. Remove and reserve Sec.  11.47.

PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES

0
26. The authority citation for part 24 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 303(g), 303(r), 332(c)(7), 
1401-1473

Subpart B--Public Safety Radio Pool


Sec.  90.20  [Amended]

0
27. Section 90.20 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph 
(d)(28).

[FR Doc. 2026-00612 Filed 1-13-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on January 14, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.