Notice2026-00484

Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Lumens VC-TR60A Camera

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
January 13, 2026

Issuing agencies

Homeland Security DepartmentU.S. Customs and Border Protection

Abstract

This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of the Lumens VC-TR60A Camera. Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded that the last substantial transformation of the Lumens VC-TR60A Camera occurs in Taiwan.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1327-1329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00484]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Lumens VC-
TR60A Camera

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of final determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the 
country of origin of the Lumens VC-TR60A Camera. Based upon the facts 
presented, CBP has concluded that the last substantial transformation 
of the Lumens VC-TR60A Camera occurs in Taiwan.

DATES: The final determination was issued on December 19, 2025. A copy 
of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as 
defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final 
determination no later than February 12, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Hedstrom, Valuation and Special 
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202) 
325-0227.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on December 19, 
2025, CBP issued a final determination concerning the country of origin 
of the Lumens VC-TR60A Camera for purposes of Title III of the Trade 
Agreements Act of 1979. This final determination, Headquarters Ruling 
Letter (HQ) H350894, was issued at the request of Lumens Digital 
Optics, Inc. under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, 
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as 
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP has 
concluded that the last substantial transformation of the Lumens VC-
TR60A Camera occurs in Taiwan.
    Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a 
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal 
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued. 
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any 
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial 
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such 
determination in the Federal Register.

Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13JA26.011

HQ H350894

December 19, 2025

OT:RR:CTF:VS H350894 ACH
CATEGORY: Origin
Gary Zheng, Lumens Digital Optics, Inc., 5F No. 20 Taiyung Street, 
Jhubei, 301 Taiwan
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of 
1979 (19 U.S.C. 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations; Country of 
Origin of Lumens Camera
Dear Mr. Zheng,

    This is in response to your July 8, 2025 request for a final 
determination concerning the country of origin of the Pan Tilt Zoom 
(``PTZ'') Lumens VC-TR60A Camera (``Camera'') pursuant to Title III of 
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (``TAA''), as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 
et seq.), and subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR 177.21, et seq.). Lumens is a party-at-
interest within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and 177.23(a) and is 
therefore entitled to request this final determination.

Facts

    The merchandise under consideration is the Lumens PTZ Camera, Model 
Number TR60A. This camera is designed for video conferencing in office 
environments. It features speaker tracking that allows the camera to 
move toward the person speaking during a discussion. The camera also 
can combine two video images in a picture-in-picture display, providing 
both a wide-angle view and a close-up shot of the meeting. 
Additionally, it has a dual lens 12 times optical zoom, wide-angle fix 
lens, Artificial Intelligence (``AI'') motion detection, and 
simultaneous output for High-Definition Multimedia Interface 
(``HDMI''), Ethernet, and Universal Serial Bus (``USB'').
    The camera production consists of nine main steps: (1) zoom lens 
module assembly and calibration; (2) PTZ camera body assembly; (3) 
panoramic lens module assembly; (4) zoom lens and panoramic lens 
optical axis alignment; (5) run in test; (6) firmware programming to 
camera; (7) system function test; (8) quality control inspection; and 
(9) final packaging and shipping. One camera takes around three hours 
to produce.
    The camera's initial source code, which includes requirements for 
the graphical user interface that provides product status information 
and the user operation interface, is developed in China and sent to 
Taiwan for burning. This software has been developed over a year and a 
half and has undergone

[[Page 1328]]

multiple updates. The ultimate consumer is unable to customize or 
remove the software.
    The printed circuit boards (``PCB''), electronic components, 
optical parts, and mechanical parts of the camera are sourced from 
global suppliers (including regions outside TAA countries). The camera 
includes seven printed circuit board assemblies (``PCBAs''): the main 
board (claimed to be the brains of the camera), driver board, power 
over Ethernet (``POE'') board, home sensor board, panoramic sensor 
board, zoom lens sensor board, and microphone board. The bare PCB and 
PCBA components (e.g., resistors, capacitors, diodes, etc.) are sourced 
through third parties in China.
    It is stated that two components fulfill the image conversion and 
capture function: the sensors and the image signal processor. The 
sensors are responsible for light conversion, and the image signal 
processor is responsible for transferring the sensor data into visible 
images through digital signal processing. These two components are 
included on the zoom lens sensor board, panoramic sensor board, and 
main board.
    In Taiwan, the main PCBA board, the panoramic sensor board, the POE 
board, the zoom lens sensor board, the driver board, and the home 
sensor board are produced through a complex surface mount technology 
(``SMT'') process, which results in fully functional PCBAs. Of all of 
the PCBA components that are used to make the various boards, around 
72% of them are used to make the main PCBA board. The SMT process 
involves solder paste printing component placement, reflow soldering, 
inspection, and testing. Additionally, a Chinese lens is joined with 
other components to create a lens module in Taiwan. The final assembly 
process operations, firmware programming, calibration, function 
testing, quality control inspection, packaging, and shipping also occur 
in Taiwan. In China, the microphone board is manufactured. No other 
manufacturing takes place in China.
    The longest production process is the zoom lens module pre-
processing, processing, and assembly which takes approximately 44% of 
the camera's production time, longer than any other steps. This process 
includes integrating the zoom lens, sensor board, and driver board, 
calibration, integration, adjustment of parts, mounting, and enclosing 
the module. This production is said to take place in Taiwan.

Issue

    What is the country of origin of the Lumens Camera for the purposes 
of U.S. Government procurement?

Law and Analysis

    CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final 
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a 
designated country or instrumentality for the purpose of granting 
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or 
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant 
to subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21-177.31, which implements Title 
III of the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-2518).
    CBP's authority to issue advisory rulings and final determinations 
stems from 19 U.S.C. 2515(b)(1), which states:

    For the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary of the 
Treasury shall provide for the prompt issuance of advisory rulings 
and final determinations on whether, under section 2518(4)(B) of 
this title, an article is or would be a product of a foreign country 
or instrumentality designated pursuant to section 2511(b) of this 
title.

    Emphasis added.
    The Secretary of the Treasury's authority mentioned above, along 
with other customs revenue functions, are delegated to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security via Treasury Department Order (``TO'') 100-20 
``Delegation of Customs revenue functions to Homeland Security,'' dated 
October 30, 2024, and are subject to further delegations to CBP (see 
also 19 CFR part 177, subpart B).
    The rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states:

    An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if 
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country 
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists 
in whole or in part of materials from another country or 
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new 
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use 
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so 
transformed.

    See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
    In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes 
of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B 
of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulation 
(``FAR''). See 19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the 
FAR restricts the U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made 
or designated country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. 
See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1).
    The FAR, 48 CFR 25.003, defines ``U.S.-made end product'' as:

. . . an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the 
United States or that is substantially transformed in the United 
States into a new and different article of commerce with a name, 
character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from 
which it was transformed.

    To determine whether a substantial transformation occurs when 
components of various origins are assembled into completed products, 
CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes such 
determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the 
item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a 
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name, 
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases. 
Additionally, factors such as the resources expended on product design 
and development, the extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and 
testing procedures, and worker skill required during the actual 
manufacturing process will be considered when determining whether a 
substantial transformation has occurred. No one factor is 
determinative. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HQ'') H311606, 
dated June 16, 2021; and HQ H302801, dated October 3, 2019.
    Energizer Battery, Inc. v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (Ct. 
Int'l Trade 2016), involved manufacture of a flashlight in which all 
the components of the flashlight were of Chinese origin, except for a 
white LED and a hydrogen getter. The components were imported into the 
United States and assembled into the finished Generation II flashlight. 
The Energizer Battery court applied the ``name, character and use'' 
test to determine whether a substantial transformation had occurred and 
noted, citing Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 542 F. Supp. 1026, 1031 
(Ct. Int'l Trade 1982), that when ``the post-importation processing 
consists of assembly, courts have been reluctant to find a change in 
character, particularly when the imported articles do not undergo a 
physical change.'' Energizer Battery at 1318. In addition, the court 
noted that ``when the end-use was pre-determined at the time of 
importation, courts have generally not found a change in use.'' 
Energizer Battery at 1319, citing as an example, National Hand Tool 
Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308, 312 (1992), aff'd, 989 F.2d 1201 
(Fed. Cir. 1993). Further, courts have considered the nature of the 
assembly, i.e., whether it is a simple or complex assembly, such that 
individual parts lose their separate identities and become integral 
parts of a new article. Energizer Battery, 190 F. Supp. 3d 1308.

[[Page 1329]]

    Regarding electronic equipment, CBP has found that circuit boards 
undergo a substantial transformation into PCBAs when various components 
are assembled onto the board via SMT. See C.S.D. 85-25, 19 Cust. Bull. 
844 (1985) (determining that the assembly of the PCBA involved a very 
large number of components and a significant number of different 
operations, required a relatively significant period of time as well as 
skill, attention to detail, and quality control, and resulted in 
significant economic benefit to the beneficiary developing country from 
the standpoint of both value added to the PCBA and the overall 
employment generated thereby). Additionally, CBP has found that the 
mere attachment of wires to a PCBA and installation into a case, along 
with minor tuning processes, does not result in a substantial 
transformation. See HQ 561232, dated April 20, 2004.
    In rulings concerning the country of origin of origin of a device 
containing multiple PCBAs, CBP has examined the function of the PCBAs 
contained in the device to determine the origin of the device. See HQ 
H311606, dated June 16, 2021. In New York Ruling Letter (``NY'') 
N348165, dated May 12, 2025, CBP found the country of origin of a 
camera to be the country in which the PCBA became fully functional. In 
multiple rulings, CBP determined that the PCBAs contributed to the main 
functionality of a finished camera. In NY N339727, dated May 21, 2024, 
CBP stated that the PCBAs contributed to the main functionality of 
security cameras and that there was no substantial transformation after 
the PCBAs were constructed. In NY N330296, dated February 8, 2023, and 
NY N328151, dated October 6, 2022, CBP stated that the PCBAs for a 
surveillance camera contributed to the main functionality of the 
camera.
    Here, the zoom sensor board, panoramic sensor board, and main board 
are essential to the character of the finished camera as they are 
responsible for capturing and converting images. These boards enable 
the camera to function as intended. These boards are produced in 
Taiwan. Additionally, the zoom lens assembly, which is the longest and 
most complex assembly process, takes place in Taiwan. Therefore, the 
Lumens PTZ Camera is a product of Taiwan for purposes of U.S. 
Government procurement.

Holding

    Based on the information provided, for purposes of U.S. Government 
procurement, the Lumens PTZ Camera is a product of Taiwan.
    Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal 
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other 
than the party which requested this final determination may request, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue 
a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register 
Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final 
determination before the U.S. Court of International Trade.

    Sincerely,

Alice A. Kipel,

Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.

[FR Doc. 2026-00484 Filed 1-12-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on January 13, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.