Rule2026-00332

Privacy Act Exemption; Correction

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
January 12, 2026
Effective
January 12, 2026

Issuing agencies

National Credit Union Administration

Abstract

In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Board is issuing this interim final rule to make a correction to the numbering of one system of records and to exempt one system of records from certain requirements of the Act. NCUA has previously published System of Records Notices (SORN) for these systems. The Board has found good cause to issue the interim final rule without advance notice-and-comment procedures and with an immediate effective date.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 7 (Monday, January 12, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1072-1076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00332]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 792

RIN 3133-AG06


Privacy Act Exemption; Correction

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the National 
Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Board is issuing this interim final 
rule to make a correction to the numbering of one system of records and 
to exempt one system of records from certain requirements of the Act. 
NCUA has previously published System of Records Notices (SORN) for 
these systems. The Board has found good cause to issue the interim 
final rule without advance notice-and-comment procedures and with an 
immediate effective date.

DATES: This rule is effective on January 12, 2026. Comments must be 
received on or before February 11, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in one of the following ways. 
(Please send comments by one method only):
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. 
The docket number for this proposed rule is NCUA-2026-XXXX. Follow the 
``Submit a comment'' instructions. If you are reading this document on 
<a href="http://federalregister.gov">federalregister.gov</a>, you may use the green ``SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT'' 
button beneath this rulemaking's title to submit a comment to the 
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> docket. A plain language summary of the proposed rule 
is also available on the docket website.
    <bullet> Mail: Address to Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of 
the Board, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mailing address. Mailed and 
hand-delivered comments must be received by the close of the comment 
period.
    Public Inspection: Please follow the search instructions on <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> to view the public comments. Do not include any 
personally identifiable information (such as name, address, or other 
contact information) or confidential business information that you do 
not want publicly disclosed. All comments are public records; they are 
publicly displayed exactly as received, and will not be deleted, 
modified, or redacted. Comments may be submitted anonymously. If you 
are unable to access public comments on the internet, you may contact 
the NCUA for alternative access by calling (703) 518-6540 or emailing 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98d7dfdbd5f9f1f4d8f6fbedf9b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8dc2cacec0ece4e1cde3eef8eca3eae2fb">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Harris, Senior Agency 
Official for Privacy, National Credit Union Administration, or Jennifer 
Harrison, Senior Counsel, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-
3428 or by phone at (703) 518-6540.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Privacy Act of 1974 places requirements on federal agencies 
regarding the collection, maintenance, distribution, and security of an 
individual's personal information that is contained in an agency's 
systems of records. Pursuant to the Privacy Act, NCUA publishes a 
Systems of Records Notice (SORN) that informs the public of each system 
of records the agency maintains, describes the nature and routine use 
of records in the system, identifies the system manager responsible for 
the system including contact information, and provides procedures 
whereby individuals may determine whether a system contains a record 
pertaining to them, gain access to

[[Page 1073]]

records pertaining to them, or seek to amend or correct information in 
a record about them. NCUA Systems of Records Notices are published in 
the Federal Register and are available at <a href="https://www.ncua.gov/privacy">https://www.ncua.gov/privacy</a>.
    The Privacy Act also requires each federal agency to publish rules 
describing its Privacy Act procedures and any system of records it 
exempts from provisions of the Act, including the reasons for the 
exemption. NCUA publishes its rules at part 792, subpart E; the rules 
provide individuals with detailed information regarding the exercise of 
their rights under the Privacy Act, identify and describe the NCUA 
systems of records that are exempt from provisions of the Privacy Act, 
and provide standards for NCUA employees regarding collecting, using, 
maintaining, or disseminating records.

II. Proposed Changes

    The Board is revising its Privacy Act regulations at 12 CFR part 
792 to correct the number associated with a system of records, NCUA-11 
(previously numbered as NCUA-20). The Board has previously promulgated 
exemptions to the Privacy Act for this system of records in accordance 
with subsections (k)(2) and (j)(2). The Board is also revising its 
Privacy Act regulations at 12 CFR part 792 to exempt one system of 
records, NCUA-28, from certain requirements of the Privacy Act in 
accordance with subsection (k)(2) of the Privacy Act. The interim final 
rule amends 12 CFR 792.66, the provision on exemptions.

A. NCUA-11

    The NCUA SORN entitled ``Office of Inspector General (OIG) 
Investigative Records'' and currently numbered as NCUA-11, was 
originally published at 53 FR 37372 (Sept. 26, 1988) as ``Investigation 
Files'' and numbered as NCUA-20. A modified SORN was published at 60 FR 
18149 (Apr. 10, 1995), renaming the system ``Office of Inspector 
General Investigative Records'' and listing exemptions from certain 
provisions of the Privacy Act. Those exemptions were promulgated at 60 
FR 31912 (June 19, 1995). The system was renumbered to NCUA-11 at 65 FR 
3486 (Feb. 20, 2000). The corresponding reference to the SORN in Sec.  
792.66(b)(3) was not updated at that time. Subsequent modifications to 
the SORN were published at 71 FR 77807 (Dec. 27, 2006),75 FR 41539 
(July 16, 2010), and 88 FR 43152 (July 6, 2023), however the 
corresponding reference to the SORN was still not updated. The NCUA is 
now updating the SORN number in Sec.  792.66(b)(3) as a technical 
correction.

B. NCUA-28

    The Board is also adopting exemptions under subsection (k)(2) for 
NCUA-28, Anti-Harassment Case Tracking and Records. NCUA has previously 
published a SORN for this system in the Federal Register at 88 FR 37584 
(June 8, 2023). NCUA-28 contains information collected by the NCUA to 
assist the NCUA with conducting internal investigations into 
allegations of harassment brought by current NCUA employees and NCUA 
contractors and taking appropriate action(s) to address such 
allegations.
    Subsection (k)(2) of the Privacy Act authorizes the head of an 
agency to exempt a system of records from the applicable subsections if 
investigatory records are compiled for law enforcement purposes; 
provided, however if an individual is denied any right, privilege, or 
benefit that he or she would otherwise be entitled by Federal law, or 
for which he or she would otherwise be eligible, as a result of the 
maintenance of such material, such material shall be provided to such 
individual, except to the extent that the disclosure of such material 
would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the 
Government under an express promise that the identity of the source 
would be held in confidence. Because of the investigatory nature of 
information that is maintained in this system of records, this rule 
would add NCUA's Anti-Harassment Case Tracking and Records System to 
the list of NCUA systems that are exempt from specific provisions of 
the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
    Specifically, the Board is exempting this system of records under 5 
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) from the following provisions of the Privacy Act of 
1974:
    <bullet> Subsection (c)(3) relating to access to the accounting of 
disclosures;
    <bullet> Subsection (d) relating to access to the records;
    <bullet> Subsection (e)(1) relating to the type of information 
maintained in the records;
    <bullet> Subsections (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I) relating to publishing 
in the annual system notice information as to agency procedures for 
access and correction and information as to the categories of sources 
of records; and
    <bullet> Subsection (f) relating to developing agency rules for 
gaining access and making corrections.
    The determination to exempt these records was made because it is 
necessary for NCUA to continue to investigate alleged violations of 
law, regulation, and NCUA policy and also to determine continued 
suitability for Federal employment. In accordance with Federal anti-
discrimination laws, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) 
requires that all Federal agencies have an anti-harassment policy and 
program. NCUA's specific policy prohibits harassment by all employees, 
provides an avenue for individuals to report allegations of harassment, 
and a process by which NCUA factfinders conduct inquiries and 
investigations. Furthermore, NCUA's policy prohibits retaliation 
against individuals for raising allegations of harassment or 
participating in the process. For NCUA to promptly address and resolve 
potential violations of law, regulation, or NCUA policy, individuals 
who are participating in this process must be assured that their 
statements will be kept confidential consistent with law. Without this 
exemption, the NCUA's ability to address allegations of harassment 
would be hindered by witnesses' and/or victims' lack of willingness to 
come forward, fearful that their statements or identities may be 
revealed. Other agencies, including the EEOC, have exempted similar 
records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
    The Board is promulgating these exemptions on the following bases:
    5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3)--The release of the disclosure accounting to 
the individual who is the subject of the investigation would present a 
serious impediment to NCUA's ability to conduct inquiries or 
investigations into potential violations of law or policy.
    5 U.S.C. 552a(d)--Access to records contained in this system would 
inform the subject of an actual or potential investigation, of the 
existence of that investigation, of the nature and scope of the 
investigation, of the information and evidence obtained as to their 
activities, and of the identity of witnesses. Such access would impede 
an investigator's ability to freely investigate such cases, including 
concerns that some witnesses have been promised confidentiality and 
would not want their statements provided to the subject of the 
investigation. Amendment of the records would interfere with the 
ongoing fact-finding process. Furthermore, subject individuals of the 
files in this system have access to relevant information as part of the 
investigatory process and are given the opportunity to explain or 
contradict such information and to submit any responsive evidence of 
their own.
    5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1)--Under the provision of (e)(1), the agency must 
only maintain such information that is relevant and necessary. It is 
difficult to

[[Page 1074]]

know during the course of an investigation what is relevant and 
necessary. In this context, facts or evidence may not seem relevant at 
first, but later in the investigation, their relevance is borne out.
    5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H)--These subsections are inapplicable 
to the extent that this system is exempt from the access provisions of 
subsection (d) and the rules provisions of subsection (f).
    5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I)--The categories of sources of the records in 
this system has been published in the Federal Register under the 
requirements of the Privacy Act. In the event, however, that this 
subsection should be interpreted to require more detail as to the 
identity of sources of the records in this system, exemption from this 
provision is necessary as the application of this provision could 
disclose investigative techniques and procedures and cause sources to 
refrain from giving such information because of fear of reprisal, or 
fear of breach of promises of anonymity and confidentiality. This would 
compromise the ability to conduct investigations, and to make fair and 
objective decisions on questions of suitability for Federal employment 
and related issues.
    5 U.S.C. 552a(f)--Procedures for notice to an individual pursuant 
to subsection (f)(1) as to existence of records pertaining to the 
individual dealing with an actual or potential criminal, civil, or 
regulatory investigation or prosecution must be exempted because such 
notice to an individual would be detrimental to the successful conduct 
and/or completion of an investigation or case, pending or future. In 
addition, mere notice of the fact of an investigation could inform the 
subject or others that their activities are under investigation or may 
become the subject of an investigation and could enable the subjects to 
avoid detection, to influence witnesses improperly, to destroy 
evidence, or to fabricate testimony. Since an exemption is being 
claimed for subsection (d) of the Act, the rules required pursuant to 
subsections (f)(2) through (5) are inapplicable to this system of 
records to the extent that this system of records is exempted from 
subsection (d).
    For these reasons, the listed exemptions are both necessary and 
appropriate.

III. Interim Final Rule

    The Board is publishing these changes in an interim final rule for 
the following reasons:
    A. The correction of NCUA-20 to NCUA-11 is a non-substantive 
correction. The change merely corrects the system number to match the 
current number of the corresponding SORN, which is an administrative 
change. No opposition to the changes and no significant adverse 
comments are expected. Therefore, the Board finds that prior notice and 
comment are unnecessary.
    B. The promulgation of exemptions for NCUA-28 concerns ``agency 
organization, procedure, and practice'' and is limited to ``agency 
organization, management, or personnel matters.'' The exemption from 
provisions of the Privacy Act by the interim final rule affects only 
current NCUA employees and contractors, as described previously. No 
opposition to the changes and no significant adverse comments are 
expected. Accordingly, this rule is exempt from notice-and-public 
comment requirements under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
    C. NCUA employees and contractors have had notice of the exemptions 
for NCUA-28 since Federal Register publication of the SORN on June 8, 
2023. At the time of publication, no comments regarding the proposed 
exemptions were received. Therefore, even if this portion of the rule 
were not exempt from notice-and-comment requirements, the Board would 
find prior notice and comment unnecessary for this reason.
    Accordingly, the Board finds good cause exists for making the 
amendments set forth in this interim final rule effective less than 30 
days after publication.

IV. Regulatory Procedures

A. Administrative Procedure Act

    The Board is issuing this interim final rule without prior notice 
and the opportunity for public comment and the 30-day delayed effective 
date ordinarily prescribed by the Administrative Procedure Act 
(APA).\1\ Pursuant to the APA, general notice and the opportunity for 
public comment are not required with respect to a rulemaking when an 
``agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief 
statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and 
public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to 
the public interest.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 5 U.S.C. 553.
    \2\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board believes that the public interest is best served by 
implementing the interim final rule as soon as possible. As discussed 
in the previous section of this preamble, one of the corrections is 
non-substantive, while the other concerns internal agency organization, 
management, or personnel matters, and is thus exempt from notice and 
comment requirements. For the reasons noted previously, the Board finds 
that there is good cause consistent with the public interest to issue 
the rule without advance notice and comment.\3\ Independently, the 
change to NCUA-28 is also exempt from the APA's notice-and-comment 
requirements as a rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B); 553(d)(3). For the same reasons, the 
Board is not providing the usual 60-day comment period before 
finalizing this rule. See NCUA Interpretive Ruling and Policy 
Statement (IRPS) 87-2, as amended by IRPS 03-2 and IRPS 15-1. 80 FR 
57512 (Sept. 24, 2015), available at <a href="https://www.ncua.gov/files/publications/irps/IRPS1987-2.pdf">https://www.ncua.gov/files/publications/irps/IRPS1987-2.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the Board believes that there is good cause to issue the rule 
without advance notice and comment and with an immediate effective 
date, it is interested in the views of the public and requests comment 
on the interim final rule.

B. Congressional Review Act

    For purposes of the Congressional Review Act, the OMB makes a 
determination as to whether a final rule constitutes a ``major'' rule. 
If a rule is deemed a ``major rule'' by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), the Congressional Review Act generally provides that the 
rule may not take effect until at least 60 days following its 
publication.
    The Congressional Review Act defines a ``major rule'' as any rule 
that the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs of the OMB finds has resulted in or is likely to result in (A) 
an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; (B) a major 
increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, 
Federal, State, or local government agencies or geographic regions, or 
(C) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, 
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based 
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and 
export markets.
    For the same reasons set forth above, the Board is adopting the 
interim final rule without the delayed effective date generally 
prescribed under the Congressional Review Act. The delayed effective 
date required by the Congressional Review Act does not apply to any 
rule for which an agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the 
finding and a brief statement of

[[Page 1075]]

reasons therefor in the rule issued) that notice and public procedure 
thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest. As discussed above, the Board has concluded there is good 
cause to issue the interim final rule without notice-and-comment 
procedures.
    As required by the Congressional Review Act, the Board will submit 
the interim final rule and other appropriate reports to Congress and 
the Government Accountability Office for review. The Board believes the 
rule is not major.

C. Regulatory Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)

    Pursuant to Executive Order 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and 
Review''), a determination must be made whether a regulatory action is 
significant and therefore subject to review by the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the Executive 
Order. OMB has determined that this proposed rule is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of 
Executive Order 12866.
    Executive Order 13563 (``Improving Regulations and Regulatory 
Review'') directs executive agencies to analyze regulations that are 
``outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and 
to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what 
has been learned.'' Executive Order 13563 also directs that, where 
relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives, and to 
the extent permitted by law, agencies are to identify and consider 
regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and 
freedom of choice for the public. This interim final rule does not 
govern the operations of regulated parties. It updates two of the 
agency's Privacy Act systems and exemptions. This proposed rule is 
consistent with Executive Order 13563.

D. Regulatory Costs (Executive Order 14192)

    Executive Order 14192 (``Unleashing Prosperity Through 
Deregulation'') was issued on January 31, 2025. Section 3(c) of 
Executive Order 14192 requires that any new incremental costs 
associated with new regulations shall, to the extent permitted by law, 
be offset by the elimination of existing costs associated with at least 
10 prior regulations. This interim final rule is not expected to be an 
Executive Order 14192 regulatory action because it imposes no costs on 
regulated parties.

E. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) generally provides that 
an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and not withstanding any other 
provision of law, a person is not required to respond to a collection 
of information, unless it displays a currently valid Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
    The PRA applies to rulemakings in which an agency creates new or 
amends existing information collection requirements. For purposes of 
the PRA, an information-collection requirement may take the form of a 
reporting, recordkeeping, or a third-party disclosure requirement. The 
NCUA has determined that the changes in the interim final rule do not 
create a new information collection or revise an existing information 
collection as defined by the PRA.

F. Executive Order 13132

    Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism'') encourages certain agencies 
to consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. 
The NCUA, an independent regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 
3502(5), voluntarily complies with the executive order to adhere to 
fundamental federalism principles.
    This interim final rule does not have substantial direct effects on 
the states, on the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. The rule is administrative and largely 
governs internal agency procedures. The NCUA has therefore determined 
that this rule does not constitute a policy that has federalism 
implications for purposes of the executive order.

G. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families

    The NCUA has determined that this rule will not affect family well-
being within the meaning of Sec.  654 of the Treasury and General 
Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681 
(1998).

H. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires that when 
an agency issues a proposed rule or a final rule pursuant to the APA or 
another law, the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis 
that meets the requirements of the RFA and publish such analysis in the 
Federal Register. Specifically, the RFA normally requires agencies to 
describe the impact of a rulemaking on small entities by providing a 
regulatory impact analysis. For purposes of the RFA, the Board 
considers credit unions with assets less than $100 million to be small 
entities. This rule does not impose any requirements on federally-
insured credit unions or other small entities.
    As discussed previously, consistent with the APA, the Board has 
determined for good cause that general notice and opportunity for 
public comment is unnecessary, and therefore the Board is not issuing a 
notice of proposed rulemaking. Rules that are exempt from notice and 
comment procedures are also exempt from the RFA requirements, including 
conducting a regulatory flexibility analysis, when among other things 
the agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure are 
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. 
Accordingly, the Board has concluded that the RFA's requirements 
relating to initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis do not 
apply.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 792

    Administrative practice and procedure, Credit unions, Freedom of 
information, Information, Privacy, Records, Systems of records.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on December 
17, 2025.
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the NCUA Board is amending 
12 CFR part 792 as set forth below:

PART 792--REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 
ACT AND PRIVACY ACT, AND BY SUBPOENA; SECURITY PROCEDURES FOR 
CLASSIFIED INFORMATION

0
1. The authority citation for part 792 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b; 12 U.S.C. 1752a(d), 
1766, 1789, 1795f; E.O. 12600, 52 FR 23781, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., 
p.235; E.O. 13526, 75 FR 707, 2009 Comp. p.298.


0
2. Amend Sec.  792.66 by:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(3), removing the text ``NCUA-20'' and adding in its 
place the text ``NCUA-11''; and
0
b. Adding paragraph (b)(5).
    The addition reads as follows:


Sec.  792.66   Exemptions.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (5) System NCUA-28, entitled ``Anti-Harassment Case Tracking and 
Records'' consists of investigatory materials compiled for law 
enforcement purposes.

[[Page 1076]]

Records in the Anti-Harassment Case Tracking and Records system are 
used in connection with the execution of NCUA's responsibilities 
relating to conducting internal investigations into allegations of 
harassment. Because the system covers investigatory materials compiled 
for law enforcement purposes, it is eligible for exemption under 
subsection (k)(2) of the Privacy Act. The Anti-Harassment Case Tracking 
and Records system is exempt from subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), 
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f) of the Privacy Act. However, 
if an individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit to which he 
would otherwise be entitled by Federal law, or for which he otherwise 
would be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such records, the 
records or information will be made available to him, provided the 
identity of a confidential source is not disclosed. NCUA need not make 
an accounting of previous disclosures of a record in this system of 
records available to its subject, and NCUA need not grant access to any 
records in this system of records by their subject. Further, whenever 
individuals request records about themselves and maintained in this 
system of records, the NCUA will advise the individuals only that no 
records available to them pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 have been 
identified. However, if review of the record reveals that the 
information contained therein has been used or is being used to deny 
the individuals any right, privilege or benefit for which they are 
eligible or to which they would otherwise be entitled under Federal 
law, the individuals will be advised of the existence of the 
information and will be provided the information, except to the extent 
disclosure would identify a confidential source. Where possible, 
information that would identify a confidential source will be extracted 
or summarized in a manner which protects the source and the summary or 
extract will be provided to the requesting individual.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2026-00332 Filed 1-9-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on January 12, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.