Rule2026-00281

Air Plan Approval; New York; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
January 9, 2026
Effective
February 9, 2026

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to the State of New York's State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) related to a source-specific SIP (SSSIP) revision for Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, 513 Technology Boulevard, Rochester, New York (the Facility). The EPA finds that the control options in this SSSIP revision implement Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) with respect to volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the relevant Facility source, which are identified as one solvent-based film coating machine. This SSSIP revision implements VOC RACT for the relevant Facility source in accordance with the requirements for implementation of the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS. This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA proposed to approve this rule on July 24, 2025, and received one comment which was not germane.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 6 (Friday, January 9, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 907-909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2024-0494; FRL-12517-02-R2]


Air Plan Approval; New York; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a 
revision to the State of New York's State Implementation Plan (SIP) for 
the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) related to a 
source-specific SIP (SSSIP) revision for Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, 
513 Technology Boulevard, Rochester, New York (the Facility). The EPA 
finds that the control options in this SSSIP revision implement 
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) with respect to volatile 
organic compound (VOC) emissions from the relevant Facility source, 
which are identified as one solvent-based film coating machine. This 
SSSIP revision implements VOC RACT for the relevant Facility source in 
accordance with the requirements for implementation of the 2008 and 
2015 ozone NAAQS. This action is being taken in accordance with the 
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA proposed to approve 
this rule on July 24, 2025, and received one comment which was not 
germane.

DATES: This final rule is effective on February 9, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R02-
OAR-2024-0494, at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> (our preferred method), 
or the other submission methods identified in the link below. Once 
submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. EPA 
may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit to 
EPA's docket at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), Proprietary 
Business Information (PBI), or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must 
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered 
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you 
wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment 
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, 
cloud, or other file sharing system). Please visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a> for additional submission methods; the 
full EPA public comment policy; information about CBI, PBI, or 
multimedia submissions; and general guidance on making effective 
comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Longo, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 
10007-1866, at telephone number: (212) 637-3565, email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d4142434a4203414443494c6d485d4c034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e68a89888189c88a8f888287a6839687c8818990">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. What is the background for this action?
II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed 
action?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

    On July 24, 2025 (90 FR 34781), the EPA published a notice of 
proposed rulemaking that proposed to approve a State Implementation 
Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New York on April 7, 2023 
for purposes of establishing RACT emission limit for Ortho Clinical 
Diagnostics. The proposed SIP revision establishes the lowest VOC 
emission limit with the application of control technology that is 
reasonably available given technological and economic feasibility 
considerations for the Facility's coating machine, 72 Machine. 72 
Machine is part of a surface coating line to produce testing slides. 
The coating process falls under New York Code of Rules and Regulations 
subpart 228-1, ``Surface Coating Processes.''
    The State's April 7, 2023 SIP submittal consists of a RACT 
demonstration that includes technical analysis and cost assessment for 
seven applicable control technologies. The Facility's RACT 
demonstration shows that controlling the overspray is the only VOC 
control technology that is technologically and economically feasible 
for 72 Machine, and that controlling the overspray ensures the VOC 
emissions will not exceed 21,600 pounds per year on a 12-month rolling 
total basis.\1\ Under 6 NYCRR subpart 228-1.5(e), NYSDEC may allow 
surface coating processes to operate with a lesser degree of control, 
as established in the applicable presumptive RACT requirements, 
provided that a process specific RACT demonstration satisfies NYSDEC's 
regulations, and it addresses technical and economic feasibility of 
utilizing compliant coatings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The respective VOC emission limit is contained in the 
Facility's air permit, State Facility Permit, 8-2628-00503/02001, 
under Condition 13, issued by the State on October 31, 2022, and 
expires on October 30, 2032. The Condition 13 is being incorporated 
into the SIP and includes monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The July 24, 2025 proposed action outlines the EPA's review of the 
Facility's RACT determination showing three control technologies for 72 
Machine that are technically feasible but are not cost effective, which 
are: (1) Thermal oxidation; (2) catalytic oxidation; and (3) ducting 
the VOC exhaust from 72 Machine to the Facility's other coating 
machine.\2\ The EPA reviewed vendor quotes and cost analyses submitted 
by the Facility and compared similar sources in the United States. The 
EPA confirms that no cost-effective VOC control technologies have 
become available that could be implemented on 72 Machine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The supporting documentation in the July 24, 2025 proposed 
action also noted four additional control measures that were 
analyzed and found to be not technically feasible to install and 
operate, therefore, no cost assessment was required. Those 
additional measures were: (1) liquid absorption; (2) carbon 
adsorption; (3) condenser; and (4) biofiltration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The specific details of New York's SIP submittals and the rationale 
for the EPA's approval action are explained in the EPA's proposed 
rulemaking and are not restated in this final action. For this detailed 
information, the reader is referred to the EPA's July 24, 2025, 
proposed rulemaking (90 FR 34781).

II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed 
action?

    In response to the EPA's July 24, 2025 proposed rulemaking on New 
York SIP revision submittal, the EPA received

[[Page 908]]

one comment during the 30-day public comment period. After reviewing 
the comment, the EPA has determined that the comment is outside the 
scope of our proposed action or fails to identify any material issue 
necessitating a response. The comment does not raise issues germane to 
the EPA's proposed action. Therefore, we are finalizing our action as 
proposed. The specific comment may be viewed under Docket ID Number 
EPA-R02-OAR-2024-0494 on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> website.

III. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is approving the revision to the NYSDEC Ortho Clinical 
Diagnostics SSSIP revision submitted on April 7, 2023, for purposes of 
satisfying RACT for the NYSDEC-approved VOC emission limit for 72 
Machine.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is finalizing the regulatory text that 
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing incorporate by reference revisions to 
Ortho Clinical Diagnostics State Facility Permit, 8-2628-00503/02001, 
condition 13, described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 as 
discussed in section I. of this preamble. These documents are available 
in the docket of this rulemaking through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. 
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion 
in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by reference 
by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under 
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final 
rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference 
in the next update to the SIP compilation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, 
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under 
Executive Order 12866;
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program;
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has 
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose 
substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    This rule is exempt from the Congressional Review Act because it is 
a rule of applicability.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by March 10, 2026. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compound.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Michael Martucci,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 
52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart HH--New York

0
2. In Sec.  52.1670, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by adding 
the entry ``Ortho Clinical Diagnostics'' at the end of the table to 
read as follows:


Sec.  52.1670  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *


                                EPA-Approved New York Source-Specific Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        State effective
         Name of source             Identifier No.           date          EPA approval date       Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Ortho Clinical Diagnostics......  8-2628-00503/02001  10/31/2022........  1/9/2026..........  RACT emission
                                                                                               limit for
                                                                                               condition 13.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 909]]

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2026-00281 Filed 1-8-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on January 9, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.