Notice2026-00185

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India and the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing Duty Orders

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
January 8, 2026

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India and the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 697-698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-533-858, C-489-817]


Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India and the Republic of 
T[uuml]rkiye: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of 
the Countervailing Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that 
revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain oil 
country tubular goods (OCTG) from India and the Republic of 
T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the 
``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.

DATES: Applicable January 8, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David De Falco, Trade Agreements 
Policy and Negotiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2178.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 10, 2014, Commerce published the Orders on OCTG from 
India and T[uuml]rkiye.\1\ On July 1, 2025, Commerce published the 
notice of initiation of the sunset reviews of the Order, pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 
CFR 351.218(c).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India and the 
Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Orders and Amended 
Affirmative Final Countervailing Duty Determination for India, 79 FR 
53688 (September 10, 2014) (India Order; and T[uuml]rkiye Order) 
(collectively, Orders).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 90 FR 28722 
(July 1, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 16, 2025, Commerce received timely and complete notices of 
intent to participate in this review from the domestic interested 
parties,\3\ within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(1)(i).\4\ U.S. Steel claims that it has interested party 
status within the meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.102(b)(29)(v) as a U.S. producer of the domestic like product; 
USOMA claims that it has interested party status within the meaning of 
771(9)(E) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(17) as a trade or business 
association in which all of its members produce the domestic like 
product in the United States.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The domestic interested parties are the U.S. OCTG 
Manufacturers Association (USOMA) and United States Steel 
Corporation (U.S. Steel).
    \4\ See USOMA's Letter, ``Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 
India: Domestic Interested Parties' Notice of Intent to 
Participate,'' dated July 16, 2025; U.S. Steel's Letter, ``Second 
Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from India: Notice of Intent to 
Participate,'' dated July 16, 2025; USOMA's Letter, ``Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Oil 
Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye: Domestic 
Interested Parties' Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated July 
16, 2025; and U.S. Steel's Letter, ``Second Five-Year (``Sunset'') 
Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Oil Country 
Tubular Goods from Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated 
July 16, 2025.
    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 31, 2025, Commerce received an adequate substantive 
response from the domestic interested parties, within the 30-day 
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\6\ Commerce did not 
receive a substantive response from the Government of India, the 
Government of T[uuml]rkiye, nor a respondent interested party to this 
proceeding. On August 22, 2025, Commerce notified the U.S. 
International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an 
adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.\7\ As 
a result,

[[Page 698]]

Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders, 
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Oil-Country 
Tubular Goods from India: Substantive Response of the Domestic 
Industry to Commerce's Notice of Initiation of Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Reviews,'' dated July 31, 2025; and Domestic Interested 
Parties' Letter, ``Oil-Country Tubular Goods from T[uuml]rkiye: 
Substantive Response of the Domestic Industry to Commerce's Notice 
of Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews,'' dated July 31, 
2025.
    \7\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Review Initiated on July 1, 
2025,'' dated August 22, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, 
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative 
proceedings by 47 days.\8\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents 
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an 
additional 21 days.\9\ Accordingly, the deadline for these final 
results is now January 5, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
    \9\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated 
November 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The product covered by these Orders is OCTG from India and 
T[uuml]rkiye. For the full description of the scope of the Orders, see 
the Issues and Decisions Memorandum.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Memorandum, ``Issue and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing 
Duty Orders on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India and the 
Republic of T[uuml]rkiye,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby 
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews, 
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization 
and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Orders 
were to be revoked, is contained in the accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\11\ A list of the topics discussed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via ACCESS, which is available to registered users at 
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, complete versions of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Sunset Reviews

    Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce 
determines that revocation of the India Order would be likely to lead 
to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the 
following net countervailable subsidy rates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Net countervailable
                   Producers                      subsidy rate (percent
                                                       ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jindal SAW Ltd.................................                    27.77
GVN Fuels Limited/Maharashtra Seamless Limited/                    13.87
 Jindal Pipes Limited..........................
All Others.....................................                    20.82
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce 
determines that revocation of the T[uuml]rkiye Order would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the 
following net countervailable subsidy rates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Net countervailable
                   Producers                      subsidy rate  (percent
                                                       ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.,                     2.87
 and cross-owned affiliates Borusan Istikbal
 Ticaret, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Yatirim
 Holding A.S., Borusan Holding A.S.............
All Others.....................................                     2.87
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO 
materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance 
with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.221(c)(5)(ii).

    Dated: January 5, 2026.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable 
Subsidy
    2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail
    3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2026-00185 Filed 1-7-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on January 8, 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.