Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India and the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing Duty Orders
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India and the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 697-698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00185]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-858, C-489-817]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India and the Republic of
T[uuml]rkiye: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of
the Countervailing Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain oil
country tubular goods (OCTG) from India and the Republic of
T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the
``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable January 8, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David De Falco, Trade Agreements
Policy and Negotiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2178.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 10, 2014, Commerce published the Orders on OCTG from
India and T[uuml]rkiye.\1\ On July 1, 2025, Commerce published the
notice of initiation of the sunset reviews of the Order, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19
CFR 351.218(c).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India and the
Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Orders and Amended
Affirmative Final Countervailing Duty Determination for India, 79 FR
53688 (September 10, 2014) (India Order; and T[uuml]rkiye Order)
(collectively, Orders).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 90 FR 28722
(July 1, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 16, 2025, Commerce received timely and complete notices of
intent to participate in this review from the domestic interested
parties,\3\ within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).\4\ U.S. Steel claims that it has interested party
status within the meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.102(b)(29)(v) as a U.S. producer of the domestic like product;
USOMA claims that it has interested party status within the meaning of
771(9)(E) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(17) as a trade or business
association in which all of its members produce the domestic like
product in the United States.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The domestic interested parties are the U.S. OCTG
Manufacturers Association (USOMA) and United States Steel
Corporation (U.S. Steel).
\4\ See USOMA's Letter, ``Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
India: Domestic Interested Parties' Notice of Intent to
Participate,'' dated July 16, 2025; U.S. Steel's Letter, ``Second
Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from India: Notice of Intent to
Participate,'' dated July 16, 2025; USOMA's Letter, ``Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Oil
Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye: Domestic
Interested Parties' Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated July
16, 2025; and U.S. Steel's Letter, ``Second Five-Year (``Sunset'')
Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Oil Country
Tubular Goods from Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated
July 16, 2025.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 31, 2025, Commerce received an adequate substantive
response from the domestic interested parties, within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\6\ Commerce did not
receive a substantive response from the Government of India, the
Government of T[uuml]rkiye, nor a respondent interested party to this
proceeding. On August 22, 2025, Commerce notified the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an
adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.\7\ As
a result,
[[Page 698]]
Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Oil-Country
Tubular Goods from India: Substantive Response of the Domestic
Industry to Commerce's Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Reviews,'' dated July 31, 2025; and Domestic Interested
Parties' Letter, ``Oil-Country Tubular Goods from T[uuml]rkiye:
Substantive Response of the Domestic Industry to Commerce's Notice
of Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews,'' dated July 31,
2025.
\7\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Review Initiated on July 1,
2025,'' dated August 22, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown,
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative
proceedings by 47 days.\8\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24,
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an
additional 21 days.\9\ Accordingly, the deadline for these final
results is now January 5, 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated
November 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The product covered by these Orders is OCTG from India and
T[uuml]rkiye. For the full description of the scope of the Orders, see
the Issues and Decisions Memorandum.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Issue and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing
Duty Orders on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India and the
Republic of T[uuml]rkiye,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews,
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization
and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Orders
were to be revoked, is contained in the accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\11\ A list of the topics discussed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via ACCESS, which is available to registered users at
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, complete versions of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the India Order would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the
following net countervailable subsidy rates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net countervailable
Producers subsidy rate (percent
ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jindal SAW Ltd................................. 27.77
GVN Fuels Limited/Maharashtra Seamless Limited/ 13.87
Jindal Pipes Limited..........................
All Others..................................... 20.82
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the T[uuml]rkiye Order would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the
following net countervailable subsidy rates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net countervailable
Producers subsidy rate (percent
ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., 2.87
and cross-owned affiliates Borusan Istikbal
Ticaret, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Yatirim
Holding A.S., Borusan Holding A.S.............
All Others..................................... 2.87
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: January 5, 2026.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable
Subsidy
2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail
3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2026-00185 Filed 1-7-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.