Notice2025-24054

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 5.4

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
December 31, 2025

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 247 (Wednesday, December 31, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 31, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61490-61492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-24054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104508; File No. SR-CBOE-2025-075]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Order 
Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a 
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 5.4

December 23, 2025.

I. Introduction

    On September 30, 2025, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'' or 
``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule 
change to amend Exchange Rule 5.4(a) to change the minimum increment 
for options on the Cboe Mini Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index (``MBTX'') to $0.01 
for series trading lower than $3.00 and $0.05 for series trading at 
$3.00 or higher. The proposed rule change was published for comment in 
the Federal Register on October 3, 2025.\3\ The Commission has received 
no comments regarding the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104157 (Sept. 30, 
2025), 90 FR 48071 (Oct. 3, 2025) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 3, 2025, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange 
Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to 
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, 
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the 
proposed rule change.\5\ This order institutes proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104173 (Nov. 3, 
2025), 90 FR 51424 (Nov. 17, 2025) (designating January 1, 2026, as 
the date by which the Commission shall either approve, disapprove, 
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the 
proposed rule change).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    As described more fully in the Notice,\7\ the Exchange proposes to 
amend Exchange Rule 5.4(a) to establish a minimum increment of $0.01 
for series of MBTX options trading lower than $3.00 and $0.05 for 
series of MBTX options trading at $3.00 or higher. The Exchange states 
that market demand, including from retail investors who, according to 
the Exchange, generally prefer lower trading increments, supports a 
lower trading increment for MBTX.\8\ The Exchange states that options 
overlying the components of the MBTX (and the underlying exchange-
traded funds) (``ETFs'') are actively traded.\9\ The Exchange further 
states that it expects that more granular pricing will lead to 
narrowing of the bid-ask spread for MBTX options and an increase in the 
possible number of price points available to investors for these 
series.\10\ The Exchange states that tighter spreads will increase 
order flow in MBTX options, providing additional liquidity that will 
ultimately benefit all investors.\11\ In addition, the Exchange states 
that finer increments permit more precise pricing in line with the 
theoretical value of the options.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See supra note 3.
    \8\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48071.
    \9\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48071 (citing <a href="https://cdn.cboe.com/api/global/us_indices/governance/Cboe_Bitcoin_US_ETF_Index_Methodology.pdf">https://cdn.cboe.com/api/global/us_indices/governance/Cboe_Bitcoin_US_ETF_Index_Methodology.pdf</a> (which requires each 
constituent to have monthly consolidated trading volume of at least 
500,000 shares for each month within the immediately preceding six-
month period, an average consolidated trading volume of at least 
1,000,000 shares over the immediately preceding six months, and a 
market capitalization of at least $75 million)).
    \10\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48071.
    \11\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48071.
    \12\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48071.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange states that it has analyzed its system capacity and 
represents that the Exchange and the Options Price Reporting Authority 
have the necessary systems capacity to handle any potential additional 
traffic

[[Page 61491]]

associated with this proposal.\13\ The Exchange further states that it 
does not believe any potential increased traffic will become 
unmanageable because the proposal is limited to a single class of 
options.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48071.
    \14\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48071-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange states that the proposal would permit MBTX options to 
trade at the same level of granularity as options on the iShares 
Bitcoin Trust (``IBIT''). The Exchange states that IBIT is a component 
of the MBTX and that IBIT options are the primary competitive product 
for MBTX options.\15\ The Exchange further states that IBIT options 
qualify for the Penny Interval Program under Exchange Rule 5.4(a) and 
that MBTX options should be eligible for the same pricing increments as 
IBIT options for competitive reasons.\16\ The Exchange states that 
market participants may use IBIT options to hedge MBTX options and that 
aligning the pricing increments for these products would permit 
investors to trade related products at more granular prices that may be 
more aligned with their investment objectives.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48072.
    \16\ See Notice, 90 FR at 48072. The Exchange states that as of 
September 19, 2025, IBIT options are the 13th most actively traded 
equity option (based on six-month trading volume as of September 19, 
2025). See id. at footnote 7.
    \17\ The Exchange states that, under Exchange Rule 5.4, other 
index options that trade on the Exchange are currently permitted to 
trade in smaller increments because competitive products are able to 
trade in those smaller increments. The Exchange states that the 
minimum increment for Cboe Mini SPX Index (``XSP'') options is $0.01 
because that is the minimum increment for SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 
(``SPY'') options, and the minimum increment for Dow Jonex 
Industrial Index (``DJX'') options is $0.01 for series below $3 and 
$0.05 for series $3 and above because that is the minimum increment 
for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (``DIA'') options. See 
Notice, 90 FR at footnote 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-CBOE-
2025-075 and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \18\ to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be approved or disapproved. Institution of such 
proceedings is appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy 
issues raised by the proposed rule change. Institution of proceedings 
does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with 
respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, as described below, the 
Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to provide comments 
on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\19\ the Commission is 
providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration. 
The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional 
analysis of the proposed rule change's consistency with the Act and, in 
particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ which requires, among 
other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public 
interest, and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id.
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the Commission's Rules of Practice, the ``burden to 
demonstrate that a proposed rule change is consistent with the Exchange 
Act and the rules and regulations issued thereunder . . . is on the 
self-regulatory organization that proposed the rule change.'' \21\ The 
description of a proposed rule change, its purpose and operation, its 
effect, and a legal analysis of its consistency with applicable 
requirements must all be sufficiently detailed and specific to support 
an affirmative Commission finding,\22\ and any failure of a self-
regulatory organization to provide this information may result in the 
Commission not having a sufficient basis to make an affirmative finding 
that a proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the 
applicable rules and regulations.\23\ The Commission is instituting 
proceedings to allow for additional consideration and comment on the 
issues raised herein, including as to whether the proposal is 
consistent with the Act. The Commission asks that commenters address 
the sufficiency of the Exchange's statements in support of the 
proposal, which are set forth in the Notice, in addition to any other 
comments they may wish to submit about the proposed rule change. In 
particular, the Commission asks commenters to address whether the 
proposal includes sufficient data and analysis to support a finding 
that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 201.700(b)(3).
    \22\ See id.
    \23\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written 
submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the 
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have 
with the proposal. In particular, the Commission invites the written 
views of interested persons concerning whether the proposal is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) or any other provision of the Act, and 
the rules and regulations thereunder. Although there do not appear to 
be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval that would be 
facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, the 
Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4, any request for an 
opportunity to make an oral presentation.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities 
Acts Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants the 
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either 
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate 
for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory 
organization. See Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. 
on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st 
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments regarding whether the proposed rule change should be approved 
or disapproved by January 21, 2026. Any person who wishes to file a 
rebuttal to any other person's submission must file that rebuttal by 
February 4, 2026.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a585f464f07494547474f445e596a594f49044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a282f363f77393537373f342e291a293f39743d352c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-CBOE-2025-075 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CBOE-2025-075. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's

[[Page 61492]]

internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the 
filing will be available for inspection and copying at the principal 
office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable 
information in submissions; you should submit only information that you 
wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold 
entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject 
to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number 
SR-CBOE-2025-075 and should be submitted on or before January 21, 2026. 
Rebuttal comments should be submitted by February 4, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-24054 Filed 12-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on December 31, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.